The Development and Content Validity of the Assessment of Written Expression Adaptivity for Assistive Technology

References

• Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (2002). Introduction to measurement theory. Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• American Occupational Therapy Association. (2016). Assistive technology and occupational performance. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(Supplement_2), 7012410030p1–7012410030p9. doi:10.5014/ajot.2016.706S02
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
   Google Scholar
• Batorowicz, B., Missiuna, C. A., & Pollock, N. A. (2012). Technology supporting written productivity in children with learning disabilities: A critical review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(4), 211–224. doi:10.2182/cjot.2012.79.4.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Vaughan Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R. D., Begay, K., Coleman, K. B. … Graham, S. (2002). Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 291–304. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P., Tate, T. P., & Warschauer, M. (2019). Technology as a lever for adolescent writing. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(2), 194–201. doi:10.1177/2372732219836440
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A. M., Polgar, J. M., & Encarnação, P. (2020). Principles of assistive technology: Introducing the Human Activity Assistive Technology model. In Assistive Technologies: Principles Et practice (5th ed., pp.1–15). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5(4), 194–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0897-1897(05)80008-4
   Google Scholar
• DeCoste, D. C. (2014). DeCoste writing protocol. Don Johnston.
   Google Scholar
• Desmond, D., Layton, N., Bentley, J., Boot, F. H., Borg, J., Dhungana, B. M. … Scherer, M. J. (2018). Assistive technology and people: A position paper from the first global research, innovation and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(5), 437–444. doi:10.1080/17483107.2018.1471169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, W., Brown, C., & McGuigan, A. (1994). The ecology of human performance: A framework for considering the effect of context. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48(7), 595–607. doi:10.5014/ajot.48.7.595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frolek Clark, G. (2016). The occupations of literacy: Occupational therapy’s role. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 9(1), 27–37. doi:10.1080/19411243.2016.1152835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George-Paschal, L., & Grajo, L. C. (2019). Adaptation as a measure of occupational participation. In L. C. Grajo & A. K. Boisselle (Eds.), Adaptation through occupation: Multidimensional perspectives (pp. 19–31). SLACK Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grajo, L. C. (2017). Occupational adaptation. In J. Hinojosa, P. Kramer & C. Royeen (Eds.), Perspectives on human occupation; Theories underlying practice (2nd ed., pp. 287–311). F. A. Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Grajo, L. C. (2019). Occupational adaptation as a normative and intervention process. In L. C. Grajo & A. K. Boisselle (Eds.), Adaptation through occupation; Multidimensional perspectives (pp. 83–104). SLACK Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Grajo, L., Candler, C., & Bowyer, P. (2019). The inventory of reading occupations – pediatric version. Retrieved from https://www.ot.wustl.edu/about/resources/ot-for-literacy-1687
   Google Scholar
• Grajo, L. C., Candler, C., Bowyer, P., Schultz, S., Thomson, J., & Fong, K. (2016). Determining the internal validity of the Inventory of Reading Occupations: An assessment tool of children’s reading participation. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(3), 7003220010p1–7003220010p9. doi:http://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2016.017582
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grajo, L. C., Candler, C., & Sarafian, A. (2020). Interventions within the scope of occupational therapy to improve children’s academic participation: A systematic review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(2), 7402180030p1–7402180030p32. doi:10.5014/ajot.2020.039016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2001). Implementing occupation-based assessment. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(4), 463–469. doi:10.5014/ajot.55.4.463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, J., Kafkes, A., & Kielhofner, G. (2005). Psychometric characteristics of the Child Occupational Self Assessment (COSA), Part one: An initial examination of psychometric properties. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 12(3), 118–127. doi:10.1080/11038120510031752
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kielhofner, G., & Burke, J. (1980). A model of human occupation, Part 1. Conceptual framework and content. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34(9), 572–581. doi:10.5014/ajot.34.9.572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, M. (2002). Participation in the occupations of everyday life. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(6), 640–649. doi:10.5014/ajot.56.6.640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, M. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–386. doi:10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MetaMetrics Inc. (n.d.). The Lexile framework for reading. Retrieved from https://lexile.com/
   Google Scholar
• Molitor, S. J., Langberg, J. M., Bourchtein, E., Eddy, L. D., Dvorsky, M. R., & Evans, S. W. (2016). Writing abilities longitudinally predict academic outcomes of adolescents with ADHD. School Psychology Quarterly, 31(3), 393–404. doi:10.1037/spq0000143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012–470). Washington, D.C.: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://app.snapandread.com/workspace#action=open_url&source=https%3A%2F%2Fnces.ed.gov%2Fnationsreportcard%2Fpdf%2Fmain2011%2F2012470.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Poch, A. L., & Lembke, E. S. (2017). A not-so-simple view of adolescent writing. International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 3(2), 27–44. doi:10.28987/ijrld.3.2.27
   Google Scholar
• Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467. doi:10.1002/nur.20199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, M., Jutai, J., Fuhrer, M., Demers, L., & Deruyter, F. (2007). A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2(1), 1–8. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483100600845414
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schkade, J. K., & Schultz, S. (1992). Occupational adaptation: Toward a holistic approach for contemporary practice, Part 1. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46(9), 829–837. doi:10.5014/ajot.46.9.829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. O. (2004). IMPACT2 model. Rehabilitation Research Design & Disability (R₂D₂) Center. Retrieved from https://uwm.edu/r2d2/methods/impact2-model/‘
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A. (1998). Reflections on doing, being and becoming. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(5), 248–256. doi:10.1177/000841749806500501
   Google Scholar
• Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518. doi:10.1177/0193945903252998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabala, J. (1995, March 2-4). The SETT Framework: Critical areas to consider when making informed assistive technology decisions [ Paper presentation]. Florida Assistive Technology Impact Conference and Technology and Media Division of Council for Exceptional Children, Orlando, {FL,} United States.
   Google Scholar