A Dynamic Perspective on Diverse Teams: Moving from the Dual-Process Model to a Dynamic Coordination-based Model of Diverse Team Performance

References

• Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A., & Perlow, L. A. (2001). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, 26, 512–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anteby, M., & Anderson, C. *(2014). The shifting landscape of LGBT organizational research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 3–25. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2014.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D. J., & Cole, P. (2002). Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 167–187). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bantel, K., & Jackson, S. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107–124. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250100709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behfar, K. J., Peterson, R. S., Mannix, E. A., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2008). The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 170–188. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K. A., Zanutto, E. L., & Thatcher, S. M. (2009). Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organization Science, 20(1), 35–50. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobo, L. D., Charles, C. Z., Krysan, M., & Simmons, A. D. (2012). The real record on racial attitudes. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Social trends in American life: Findings from the general social survey since 1972 (pp. 28–83). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen, G. V., Kang, S. K., & Peery, D. (2012). Social categorization and the perception of social groups. In S. T. Fiske & C. N. Macrae (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social cognition (pp. 318–336). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 875–893. doi: 10.2307/3069319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioural game theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chatman, J., & Flynn, F. (2001). The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 956–974. doi: 10.2307/3069440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatman, J. A. (2010). Norms in mixed sex and mixed race work groups. The Academy of Management Annals, 4, 447–484. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2010.494826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatman, J. A., Polzer, J. T., Barsade, S. G., & Neale, M. A. (1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 749–781. doi: 10.2307/2393615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N., & Sy, T. (2010). Group-level organizational citizenship behaviour: Effects of demographic faultlines and conflict in small work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(7), 1032–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cramton, C. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 346–371. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.3.346.10098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, M. A., & Weingart, L. R. (2007). Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 761–773. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.25275511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, M. A., Weingart, L. R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 571–612. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2011.590297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlin, K. B., Weingart, L. R., & Hinds, P. J. (2005). Team diversity and information use. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1107–1123. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.19573112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179–202. doi: 10.1287/orsc.3.2.179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earley, C. P., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 26–49. doi: 10.2307/1556384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., & Schein, E. H. (2012). Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ely, R., & Thomas, T. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 229–273. doi: 10.2307/2667087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46(12), 1554–1568. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A. J., & Peterson, R. S. (2015). Sinking slowly: Diversity in propensity to trust predicts downward trust spirals in small groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1012–1024. doi: 10.1037/apl0000007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. M., Bell, S. T., Dierdorff, E. C., & Belohlav, J. A. (2012). Facet personality and surface-level diversity as team mental model antecedents: Implications for implicit coordination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 825–841. doi: 10.1037/a0027851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., Gino, F., & Staats, B. (2012). Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: Transforming resources into performance. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 998–1022. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillaume, Y. R. F., Brodbeck, F. C., & Riketta, M. (2012). Surface- and deep-level dissimilarity effects on social integration and individual effectiveness related outcomes in work groups: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 80–115. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.2010.02005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. D. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307–338. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., Mohammed, S., McGrath, J. E., Florey, A. T., & Vanderstoep, S. W. (2003). Time matters in team performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psychology, 56(3), 633–669. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00753.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96–107. doi: 10.2307/256901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029–1045. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2002.9265944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, S. (2013). A different perspective: The multiple effects of deep-level diversity on group creativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 822–832. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, S., & Kou, C. Y. (2013). Collective engagement in creative tasks: The role of evaluation in the creative process in groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(3), 346–386. doi: 10.1177/0001839213498591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Staudenmayer, N. (2000). Coordination neglect: How lay theories of organizing complicate coordination in organizations. In R. I. Sutton & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organization behaviour (Vol. 22, pp. 153–193). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, B., & Roberts, J. (1998). Boundaries of the firm revisited. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 73–94. doi: 10.1257/jep.12.4.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homan, A. C., & Greer, L. L. (2013). Considering diversity: The positive effects of considerate leadership in diverse teams. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 105–125. doi: 10.1177/1368430212437798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homan, A. C., van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. (2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1189–1199. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143–156. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, G. P., & Lewis, K. (2010). Cross-understanding: Implications for group cognition and performance. Academy of Management Review, 35, 6–26. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2010.45577787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo, Y. J. (2003). Procedural justice and social regulation across group boundaries: Does subgroup identity undermine relationship-based governance? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(3), 336–348. doi: 10.1177/0146167202250222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo, Y. J., Molina, L. E., Sawahata, R., & Deang, J. M. (2005). Leadership and the management of conflicts in diverse groups: Why acknowledging vs. neglecting subgroup identity matters. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(2), 237–254. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, T. A., & Urland, G. R. (2003). Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 616–626. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on organizational and team diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801–830. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00080-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A., & Bezrukova, K. (2004). A field study of group diversity, workgroup context, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(6), 703–729. doi: 10.1002/job.257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741–764. doi: 10.2307/2667054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 599–627. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, E., Gebert, D., & Voelpel, S. C. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 581–598. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., Knight, A. P., Ziegert, J. C., Lim, B. C., & Saltz, J. L. (2011). When team members’ values differ: The moderating role of team leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114(1), 25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3), 211–236. doi: 10.1177/109442810033001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knez, M., & Camerer, C. F. (1996). Coordination, organizational boundaries, and fads in business practice. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5, 89–112. doi: 10.1093/icc/5.1.89
   Google Scholar
• Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product team's innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779–793. doi: 10.2307/3069415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyd, D. L., Wang, C. S., Phillips, K. W., & Lount, Jr., R. B. (2013). Social category diversity promotes premeeting elaboration: The role of relationship focus. Organization Science, 24, 757–772. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(2), 31–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B., Shemla, M., & Schermuly, C. C. (2011). Social category salience moderates effect of diversity faultlines on information elaboration. Small Group Research, 42, 257–282. doi: 10.1177/1046496411398396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. R., & James, L. R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review, 26, 530–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., & Harrison, D. A. (2013). The clocks that time us are not the same: A theory of temporal diversity, task characteristics, and performance in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122, 244–256. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., & Nadkarni, S. (2011). Temporal diversity and team performance: The moderating role of team temporal leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 489–508. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2011.61967991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., & Nadkarni, S. (2014). Are we all on the same temporal page? The moderating effects of temporal team cognition on the polychronicity diversity-team performance relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 404–422. doi: 10.1037/a0035640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 249–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muira, A., & Hida, M. (2004). Synergy between diversity and similarity in group idea generation. Small Group Research, 35, 240–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederveen Pieterse, A., van Knippenberg, D., & van Dierendonck, D. (2013). Cultural diversity and team performance: The role of team member goal orientation. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 782–804. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently … and why. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nishii, L. H., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader-member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1412–1426. doi: 10.1037/a0017190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okhuysen, G., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2002). Integrating knowledge in groups: How simple formal interventions enable flexibility. Organization Science, 13(4), 370–386. doi: 10.1287/orsc.13.4.370.2947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Reilly III, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 21–37. doi: 10.2307/2392984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paletz, S., Schunn, C. D., & Kim, K. H. (2011). Intragroup conflict under the microscope: Micro-conflicts in naturalistic team discussions. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 4, 314–351. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-4716.2011.00085.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1–28. doi: 10.2307/2667029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. S., & Behfar, K. J. (2003). The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92(1), 102–112. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00090-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. S., Owens, P. D., & Martorana, P. V. (1999). The group dynamics q-sort in organizational research: A new method for studying familiar problems. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 107–139. doi: 10.1177/109442819922001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 299–357.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, K. W. (2003). The effect of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 3–13. doi: 10.1177/0146167202238367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, K.W., Northcraft, G.B., & Neale, M. A. (2006). Surface-level diversity and decision-making in groups: When does deep-level similarity help. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9(4), 467–482.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, K. W., & Loyd, D. L. (2006). When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(2), 143–160. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, K. W., Mannix, E. A., Neale, M. A., & Gruenfeld, D. A. (2004). Diverse teams and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 497–510. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puranam, P., Raveendran, M., & Knudsen, T. (2012). Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 419–440. doi: 10.5465/amr.2010.0535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattan, A., & Ambady, N. (2013). Diversity ideologies and intergroup relations: An examination of colorblindness and multiculturalism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 12–21. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, R., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Antino, M., & Lau, D. (2012). Bridging team faultlines by combining task role assignment and goal structure strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 407–420. doi: 10.1037/a0025231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. (2006). What can you expect? The influence of gender diversity in dyads on work goal expectancies and subsequent work commitment. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 577–588. doi: 10.1177/1368430206067560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. (2007a). Diversity as a basis for shared organizational identity: The norm-congruity principle. British Journal of Management, 18, 17–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00523.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. (2007b). The role of expectancies in accepting task-related diversity: Do disappointment and lack of commitment stem from actual differences or violated expectations? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 842–854. doi: 10.1177/0146167207301016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, J. E., Houlette, M. A., & Yeagley, E. L. (2006). Decision performance and diversity structure: Comparing faultlines in convergent, crosscut, and racially homogeneous groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, S. J., Kim, T. Y., Lee, J. Y., & Bian, L. (2012). Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 197–212. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102–111. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, M. L., Stephan, W., & Rosenfeld, D. (1976). Egotism and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 435–441. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.33.4.435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srikanth, K., & Puranam, P. (2011). Integrating distributed work: Task design, communication and tacit coordination mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8), 849–875. doi: 10.1002/smj.908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srikanth, K., & Puranam, P. (2014). The firm as a coordination system: Evidence from software services offshoring. Organization Science, 25(4), 1253–1271. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2013.0886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M. M., & Garcia-Prieto, P. (2008). A relational demography model of workgroup identification: Testing the effects of race, race dissimilarity, racial identification, and communication behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(5), 657–680. doi: 10.1002/job.523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1979). Individuals and groups in social psychology. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18(2), 183–190. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1979.tb00324.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. (1992). Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. In M. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 651–717). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tushman, M., & Nadler, D. (1978). Information processing as an integrating concept in organization design. Academy of Management Review, 3, 613–624.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 532–547. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt, G. S., Bunderson, S., & Kuipers, B. (2010). Why turnover matters in self-managing work teams: Learning, social integration, and task flexibility. Journal of Management, 36, 1168–1191. doi: 10.1177/0149206309344117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt, G. S., Bunderson, J. S., & Oosterhof, A. (2006). Expertness diversity and interpersonal helping in teams: Why those who need the most help end up getting the least. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 877–893. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.22798169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008–1022. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D. L., & Schippers, M. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 145–180. doi: 10.2307/2393703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wageman, R. (2003). Virtual processes: Implications for coaching the virtual team. In R. S. Peterson & E. A. Mannix (Eds.), Leading and managing people in the dynamic organization (pp. 65–86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wageman, R., Fisher, C. M., & Hackman, J. R. (2009). Leading teams when the time is right: Finding the best moments to act. Organizational Dynamics, 38(3), 192–203. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2009.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wageman, R., Gardner, H., & Mortensen, M. (2012). The changing ecology of teams: New directions for teams research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3), 301–315. doi: 10.1002/job.1775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590–603. doi: 10.2307/256593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1993). Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: The role of the environment. Strategic Management Journal, 14(7), 485–504. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250140702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K., & O'Reilly, C. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wit, F. R. C., Greer, L., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360–390. doi:10.1037/a0024844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229–239. doi: 10.2307/2393957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., Maloney, M. M., Bhappu, A. D., & Salvador, R. (2008). When and how do differences matter: An exploration of perceived similarity in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 41–59. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar