Sexism, risk perception, and beliefs about sexual consent

References

• Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G.(2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84(1), 111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelone, D. J., Mitchell, D., & Lucente, L. (2012). Predicting perceptions of date rape: An examination of perpetrator motivation, relationship length, and gender role beliefs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(13), 2582–2602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512436385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 339–363. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, A. A., & Ronis, S. T. (2022). A qualitative examination of withdrawing sexual consent, sexual compliance, and young women’s role as sexual gatekeepers. International Journal of Sexual Health, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2022.2089312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M. A., Herold, E., & Maitland, S. B. (2004). Sexual consent behaviors in same-sex relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037428.41757.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, E., Fletcher, P. R., & Roth, M. (1993). Transforming a rape culture. Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byers, E. S. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 8, 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v08n01_02
   Google Scholar
• Byers, E. S., & Wilson, P. (1985). Accuracy of women’s expectations regarding men’s responses to refusals of sexual advances in dating situations. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 8, 376–387.
   Google Scholar
• Canan, S. N., Jozkowski, K. N., & Crawford, B. L. (2016). Sexual assault supportive attitudes: Rape myth acceptance and token resistance in Greek and non-Greek college students from two university samples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516636064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapleau, K. M., Oswald, D. L., & Russell, B. L. (2007). How ambivalent sexism toward women and men support rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 57, 131–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. (1985). An empirical assessment of some feminist hypotheses about rape. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 8, 414–422. http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/comm/malamuth/pdf/85ijws8_414
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, E. J., & Overall, N. C. (2019). Women experience more serious relationship problems when male partners endorse hostile sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(5), 1022–1041. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, J. N., & Burnett, S. (2017). Affirmative consent: What do college student leaders think about “yes means yes” as the standard for sexual behavior? American Journal of Sexuality Education, 12, 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2017.1328322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Toukhy, S. (2015). Parsing susceptibility and severity dimensions of health risk perceptions. Journal of Health Communication, 20(5), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.989342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmers-Sommer, T. M., Farrell, J., Gentry, A., Stevens, S., Eckstein, J., Battocletti, J., & Gardener, C. (2010). First date sexual expectations: The effects of who asked, who paid, date location, and gender. Communication Studies, 61(3), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510971003752676
   Google Scholar
• Fantasia, H. C. (2011). Really not even a decision any more: Late adolescent narratives of implied sexual consent. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 7, 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-3938.2011.01108.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferber, R. (1977). Research by convenience. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), 57–58. https://doi.org/10.1086/208679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foubert, J. D., Garner, D. N., & Thaxter, P. J. (2006). An exploration of fraternity culture: Implications for programs to address alcohol-related sexual assault. College Student Journal, 40, 361–373.
   Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., & López, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79(5), 763–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, G., Boyer, R., Duval, B., Fortin, C., & Nadeau, D. (1992). Understanding physicians’ decision to perform a clinical examination on an HIV seropositive patient. Medical Care, 30, 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199203000-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodall, C. E., & Appiah, O. (2008). Adolescents’ perceptions of Canadian cigarette package warning labels: Investigating the effects of message framing. Health Communication, 23, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230801967825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. A., & Canterberry, M. (2011). Sexism and assertive courtship strategies. Sex Roles, 65, 840–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0045-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, H., de Bruijn, G. J., & van den Putte, B. (2012). Talking about alcohol consumption: Health campaigns, conversational valence, and binge drinking intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 843–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02080.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, S. E., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1999). “By the semi-mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J., Seib, E., Pleva, M., Smythe, J., Gosling, M. R., & Cole, T. (2020). Consent, wantedness, and pleasure: Three dimensions affecting the perceived stress of and judgements of rape in sexual encounters. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 26(1), 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmström, C., Plantin, L., & Elmerstig, E. (2020). Complexities of sexual consent: Young people’s reasoning in a Swedish context. Psychology and Sexuality, 11(4), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2020.1769163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, T. (2007). Perceptions of sexual consent: The impact of relationship history and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701586706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, T., & Brousseau, M. M. (2010). The sexual consent scale— revised: Development, reliability, and preliminary validity. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903151358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The health belief model: A decade later. Health Education Quarterly, 11, 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818401100101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N. (2011). Measuring internal and external conceptualizations of sexual consent: A mixed-methods exploration of sexual consent [ Doctoral Dissertation]. Indiana University. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/docview/884637353?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses
   Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Manning, J., & Hunt, M. (2018). Sexual consent in and out of the bedroom: Disjunctive views of heterosexual college students. Women’s Studies in Communication, 41(2), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2018.1470121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Marcantonio, T. L., & Hunt, M. E. (2017). College students’ sexual consent communication and perceptions of sexual double standards: A qualitative investigation. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 49(4), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Peterson, Z. D., Sanders, S. A., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014). Gender differences in heterosexual college students’ conceptualizations and indicators of sexual consent: Implications for contemporary sexual assault prevention education. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 904–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.792326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., & Willis, M. (2020). People perceive transitioning from a public to a private setting as an indicator of sexual consent. Psychology and Sexuality. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2020.1769162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, V., Imhoff, R., Reininger, K. M., & Briken, P. (2019). Perceptions of sexual script deviation in women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 631–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcantonio, T. L., Willis, M., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2020). Women’s sexual consent communication and feelings: Potential implications for sexual satisfaction. Current Sexual Health Reports, 12, 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-020-00267-3
   Google Scholar
• Marg, L. Z. (2020). College men’s conceptualization of sexual consent at a large, racially/ethnically diverse Southern California University. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 15(3), 371–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2020.1737291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masser, B., & Abrams, D. (1999). Contemporary sexism: The relationships among hostility, benevolence, and neosexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(3), 503–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, J. L., Roemer, L., & Orsillo, S. M. (2022). Gender and sexual minority status as predictors of sexual consent attitudes among cisgender young adults. Psychology and Sexuality, 13(5), 1288–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2021.2018354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., Humphreys, T. P., Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2016). The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1146651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poerwandari, E. K., Utami, C. P., & Primasari, I. (2021). Ambivalent sexism and sexual objectification of women as predictors of rape myth acceptance among male college students in Greater Jakarta. Current Psychology, 40(12), 5909–5918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00500-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RAINN. (2020). How does your state define consent?. Retrieved from. https://www.rainn.org/news/how-does-your-state-define-consent
   Google Scholar
• Reed, L. A., Ward, L. M., Tolman, R. M., Lippman, J. R., & Seabrook, R. C. (2021). The association between stereotypical gender and dating beliefs and digital dating abuse perpetration in adolescent dating relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9–10), NP5561–NP5585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518801933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, A. E., & Aiken, L. S. (2011). Integration of five health behaviour models: Common strengths and unique contributions to understanding condom use. Psychology & Health, 26(11), 1499–1520. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.572259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righi, M. K., Bogen, K. W., Kuo, C., & Orchowski, L. M. (2019). A qualitative analysis of beliefs about sexual consent among high school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519842855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollero, C., Moyano, N., & Roccato, M. (2023). The role of sexual consent and past non-consensual sexual experiences on rape supportive attitudes in a heterosexual community sample. Sexuality & Culture, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-023-10066-2
   Google Scholar
• Seabrook, R. C., Ward, L. M., Reed, L., Manago, A., Giaccardi, S., & Lippman, J. R. (2016). Our scripted sexuality: The development and validation of a measure of the heterosexual script and its relation to television consumption. Emerging Adulthood, 4(5), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815623686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States. (2021). Advancing sex education. Retrieved from https://siecus.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/CSE-Federal-Factsheet-Sept-2021-Update-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shi, J., & Kim, H. K. (2020). Integrating risk perception attitude framework and the theory of planned behavior to predict mental health promotion behaviors among young adults. Health Communication, 35(5), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1573298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, X., & Zheng, Y. (2022). Hostile and benevolent sexism and attitudes toward establishing consent among Chinese men: The detrimental role of Token Resistance Beliefs and binge drinking. Sex Roles, 87(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01298-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viki, G. T., & Abrams, D. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vladutiu, C. J., Martin, S. L., & Macy, R. J. (2011). College-or university-based sexual assault prevention programs: A review of program outcomes, characteristics, and recommendations. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 12(2), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838010390708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. A., Miller, K. S., & Forehand, R. (2008). Perceived peer norms and sexual intentions among African American preadolescents. AIDS Education and Prevention, 20, 360–369. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2008.20.4.360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, L. M. (2002). Does television exposure affect emerging adults’ attitudes and assumptions about sexual relationships? Correlational and experimental confirmation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014068031532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13, 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480705278729
   Google Scholar
• Willis, M., Canan, S. N., Jozkowski, K. N., & Bridges, A. J. (2020). Sexual consent communication in best-selling pornography films: A content analysis. Journal of Sex Research, 57(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1655522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, M., Hunt, M., Wodika, A., Rhodes, D. L., Goodman, J., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2019). Explicit verbal sexual consent communication: Effects of gender, relationship status, and type of sexual behavior. International Journal of Sexual Health, 31, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2019.1565793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, M., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2018). Barriers to the success of affirmative consent initiatives: An application of the social ecological model. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 13(3), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2018.1443300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, M., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2019). Sexual precedent’s effect on sexual consent communication. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 1723–1734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1348-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, M., Jozkowski, K. N., Bridges, A. J., Veilleux, J. C., & Davis, R. E. (2021). Assessing the within-person variability of internal and external sexual consent. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(9), 1173–1183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.1913567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, M., Jozkowski, K. N., & Read, J. (2019). Sexual consent in K– 12 sex education: An analysis of current health education standards in the United States. Sex Education, 19, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2018.1510769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P. J. (2011). Mass media effects on youth sexual behavior: Assessing the claim for causality. Communication Yearbook, 35, 343–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2011.1167912
   Google Scholar
• Yamawaki, N. (2007). Rape perception and the function of ambivalent sexism and gender-role traditionality. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(4), 406–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506297210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar