Publication Cover
Marine and Coastal Fisheries
Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science
Volume 9, 2017 - Issue 1
4,239
Views
50
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLE

Red Snapper Distribution on Natural Habitats and Artificial Structures in the Northern Gulf of Mexico

, ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 50-67 | Received 08 Jan 2016, Accepted 28 Oct 2016, Published online: 15 Feb 2017

REFERENCES

  • Ajemian, M. J., J. J. Wetz, B. Shipley-Lozano, J. D. Shively, and G. W. Stunz. 2015. An analysis of artificial reef fish community structure along the northwestern Gulf of Mexico shelf: potential impacts of “Rigs-to-Reefs” programs. PLOS (Public Library of Science) ONE [online serial] 10(5):e0126354.
  • Allman, R., B. Barnett, H. Trowbridge, L. Goetz, and N. Evou. 2012. Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) otolith ageing summary for collection years 2009–2011. Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review, SEDAR31-DW05, North Charleston, South Carolina.
  • Allman, R. J., and G. R. Fitzhugh. 2007. Temporal age progressions and relative year-class strength of Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper. Pages 311–328 in W. F. Patterson III, J. H. Cowan Jr., G. R. Fitzhugh, and D. L. Nieland, editors. Red Snapper ecology and fisheries in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 60, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Ault, J. S., S. G. Smith, J. A. Bohnsack, J. Luo, D. E. Harper, and D. B. McClellan. 2006. Building sustainable fisheries in Florida’s coral reef ecosystem: positive signs in the Dry Tortugas. Bulletin of Marine Science 78:633–654.
  • Bacheler, N. M., D. J. Berrane, W. A. Mitchell, C. M. Schobernd, Z. H. Schobernd, B. Z. Teer, and J. C. Ballenger. 2014. Environmental conditions and habitat characteristics influence trap and video detection probabilities for reef fish species. Marine Ecology Progress Series 517:1–14.
  • Buczkowski, B. J., J. A. Reid, C. J. Jenkins, J. M. Reid, S. J. Williams, and J. G. Flocks. 2006. usSEABED: Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean (Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands) offshore surficial sediment data release. U.S. Geological Survey, Data Series 146, version 1.0, Reston, Virginia. Available: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/2006/146/. ( February 2014).
  • Cadrin, S. X., and D. H. Secor. 2009. Accounting for spatial population structure in stock assessment: past, present and future. Pages 405–425 in R. J. Beamish and B. J. Rothschild, editors. The future of fishery science in North America. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Campbell, M. D., A. G. Pollack, W. B. Driggers, and E. R. Hoffmayer. 2014. Estimation of hook selectivity of Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) and Vermilion Snapper (Rhomboplites aurorubens) from fishery independent surveys of natural reefs of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science [online serial] 6:260–273.
  • Campbell, M. D., A. G. Pollack, T. A. Henwood, J. M. Provaznik, and M. Cook. 2012. Summary report of the Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) catch during the 2001 Congressional Supplemental Sampling Program. Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review, SEDAR31-DW17, North Charleston, South Carolina.
  • Campbell, M. D., K. A. Rose, K. Boswell, and J. H. Cowan Jr. 2011. Individual-based modeling of fish population dynamics of an artificial reef community: effects of habitat quantity and spatial arrangement. Ecological Modelling 222:3895–3909.
  • Cass-Calay, S. L., C. E. Porch, D. R. Goethel, M. W. Smith, V. Matter, and K. J. McCarthy. 2015. Stock assessment of Red Snapper in the Gulf of Mexico 1872–2013, with provisional 2014 landings. Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review, Red Snapper 2014 Update Assessment Report, North Charleston, South Carolina.
  • Cassel, C. M., C. E. Sarndal, and J. H. Wretman. 1977. Foundations of inference in survey sampling. Wiley, New York.
  • Claisse, J. T., D. J. Pondella II, M. Love, L. A. Zahn, C. M. Williams, J. P. Williams, and A. S. Bull. 2014. Oil platforms off California are among the most productive marine fish habitats globally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 111:15462–15467.
  • Cowan, J. H. Jr., C. B. Grimes, W. F. Patterson, C. J. Walters, A. C. Jones, W. J. Lindberg, D. J. Sheehy, W. E. Pine, J. E. Powers, M. D. Campbell, K. C. Lindeman, S. L. Diamond, R. Hilborn, H. T. Gibson, and K. A. Rose. 2010. Red Snapper management in the Gulf of Mexico: science- or faith-based? Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 21:187–204.
  • Cowen, R. K., G. Gawarkiewicz, J. Pineda, S. R. Thorrold, and F. E. Werner. 2007. Population connectivity in marine systems: an overview. Oceanography 20:14–21.
  • Cowen, R. K., C. B. Paris, and A. Srinivasan. 2006. Scaling of connectivity in marine populations. Science 307:522–527.
  • Drass, D. M., K. L. Bootes, G. J. Holt, J. Lyczkowski-Shultz, C. M. Riley, B. H. Comyns, and R. P. Phelps. 2000. Larval development of Red Snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, and comparisons with co-occurring snapper species. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 98:507–527.
  • Drexler, M., and C. H. Ainsworth. 2013. Generalized additive models used to predict species abundance in the Gulf of Mexico: an ecosystem modeling tool. PLOS (Public Library of Science) ONE [online serial] 8(5):e64458.
  • Driggers, W. B., E. R. Hoffmayer, and M. D. Campbell. 2012. Feeding chronology of seven species of carcharhinid sharks in the western North Atlantic Ocean as inferred from longline capture data. Marine Ecology Progress Series 465:185–192.
  • Farmer, N., and M. Karnauskas. 2013. Spatial distribution and conservation of Speckled Hind and Warsaw Grouper in the Atlantic Ocean off the southeastern U.S. PLOS (Public Library of Science) ONE [online serial] 8(11):e78682.
  • Gaines, S. D., C. White, M. H. Carr, and S. R. Palumbi. 2010. Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107:18286–18293.
  • Gallaway, B. J., S. T. Szedlmayer, and W. J. Gazey. 2009. A life history review for Red Snapper in the Gulf of Mexico, with an evaluation of the importance of offshore petroleum platforms and other artificial reefs. Reviews in Fisheries Science 17:48–67.
  • Gazey, W. J., B. J. Gallaway, J. G. Cole, and D. A. Fournier. 2008. Age composition, growth, and density-dependent mortality in juvenile Red Snapper estimated from observer data from the Gulf of Mexico penaeid shrimp fishery. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28:1828–1842.
  • Gitschlag, G. R., M. J. Schirripa, and J. E. Powers. 2003. Impacts of Red Snapper mortality associated with the explosive removal of oil and gas structures on stock assessments of Red Snapper in the Gulf of Mexico. Pages 83–94 in D. R. Stanley and A. Scarborough-Bull, editors. Fisheries, reefs, and offshore development. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 36, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Gledhill, C. T., J. Lyczkowski-Shulz, K. Rademacher, E. Kargard, G. Crist, and M. A. Grace. 1996. Evaluation of video and acoustic index methods for assessing reef-fish populations. ICES Journal of Marine Science 53:483–485.
  • Glenn, H. 2014. Does reproductive potential of Red Snapper in the northern Gulf of Mexico differ among natural and artificial habitats? Master’s thesis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
  • Gregalis, K. C., L. S. Schlenker, J. M. Drymon, J. F. Mareska, and S. P. Powers. 2012. Evaluating the performance of vertical longlines to survey reef fish populations in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 141:1453–1464.
  • Gutherz, E. J., and G. J. Pellegrin. 1988. Estimate of the catch of Red Snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, by shrimp trawlers in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Marine Fisheries Review 50:17–25.
  • Hamilton, S. L., J. E. Caselle, D. P. Malone, and M. H. Carr. 2010. Incorporating biogeography into evaluations of the Channel Islands marine reserve network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107:18272–18277.
  • Kleisner, K. M., J. F. Walter, S. L. Diamond, and D. J. Die. 2010. Modeling the spatial autocorrelation of pelagic fish abundance. Marine Ecology Progress Series 411:203–213.
  • Lauretta, M. V., J. F. Walter, and M. C. Christman. 2015. Some considerations for CPUE standardization; variance estimation and distributional considerations. International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, SCRS/2015/029, Madrid.
  • Lecours, V., R. Devillers, D. C. Schneider, V. L. Lucieer, C. J. Brown, and E. N. Edinger. 2015. Spatial scale and geographic context in benthic habitat mapping: review and future directions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 535:259–284.
  • Martin, C., and C. Lowe. 2010. Assemblage structure of fish at offshore petroleum platforms on the San Pedro shelf of southern California. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science [online serial] 2:180–194.
  • Mitchell, K. M., T. Henwood, G. R. Fitzhugh, and R. J. Allman. 2004. Distribution, abundance, and age structure of Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) caught on research longlines in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Gulf of Mexico Science 22:164–172.
  • Moser, J. G. Jr., A. G. Pollack, G. W. Ingram Jr., C. T. Gledhill, T. A. Henwood, and W. B. Driggers III. 2012. Developing a survey methodology for sampling Red Snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, at oil and gas platforms in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review, SEDAR31-DW26, North Charleston, South Carolina.
  • Mueller, M. 2012. Artificial structure and hard-bottom spatial coverage in the Gulf of Mexico. Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review, SEDAR31-DW29, North Charleston, South Carolina.
  • Porch, C. E., G. R. Fitzhugh, E. T. Lang, H. M. Lyon, and B. C. Linton. 2015. Estimating the dependence of spawning frequency on size and age in Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science [online serial] 7:233–245.
  • Reich, D. A., and J. T. DeAlteris. 2009. A simulation study of the effects of spatially complex population structure for Gulf of Maine Atlantic Cod. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 29:116–126.
  • Reynolds, E. M. 2015. Fish biomass and community structure around standing and toppled oil and gas platforms in the northern Gulf of Mexico using hydroacoustic and video surveys. Master’s thesis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
  • Saul, S. E., J. F. Walter III, D. J. Die, D. F. Naar, and B. T. Donahue. 2013. Modeling the spatial distribution of commercially important reef fishes on the west Florida shelf. Fisheries Research 143:12–20.
  • Schwartzkopf, B. 2014. Assessment of habitat quality for Red Snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico: natural vs. artificial reefs. Master’s thesis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
  • SEDAR (Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review). 2005. Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper stock assessment report (SEDAR 7). SEDAR, North Charleston, South Carolina.
  • SEDAR (Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review). 2013. Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper stock assessment report (SEDAR 31). SEDAR, North Charleston, South Carolina.
  • Shipp, R. L., and S. A. Bortone. 2009. A prospective of the importance of artificial habitat on the management of Red Snapper in the Gulf of Mexico. Reviews in Fisheries Science 17:41–47.
  • Simonsen, K. A., J. H. Cowan Jr., and K. M. Boswell. 2014. Habitat differences in the feeding ecology of Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus, Poey 1860): a comparison between artificial and natural reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Environmental Biology of Fishes 98:811–824.
  • Stephenson, R. L., G. D. Melvin, and M. J. Power. 2009. Population integrity and connectivity in northwest Atlantic Herring: a review of assumptions and evidence. ICES Journal of Marine Science 66:1733–1739.
  • Syc, T. S., and S. T. Szedlmayer. 2012. A comparison of size and age of Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) with the age of artificial reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 110:458–469.