Effects of reactive and non-reactive tackifying agents on mechanical neat resin and composite performance for preforming processes and Liquid Resin Infusion (LRI) techniques

References

• Szcesny M, Heieck F, Carosella S, et al. The advanced ply placement process – an innovative direct 3D placement technology for plies and tapes. Adv Manuf Polym Compos Sci. 2017;3(1):2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Aziz AR, Ali MA, Zeng X, et al. Transverse permeability of dry fiber preforms manufactured by automated fiber placement. Compos Sci Technol. 2017;152:57–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinhardt T, Harismendy I, Heieck F. LOWFLIP – tailored Snap-Cure prepregs for novel composite production processes. Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Composite Materials 2016, Munich, Germany, June 26–30th, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen MH, Vijayachandran AA, Davidson P, et al. Effect of automated fiber placement (AFP) manufacturing signature on mechanical performance of composite structures. Compos Struct. 2019;228:111335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A roadmap to automated composites. [cited 2022 Jan 25]. https://www.cgtech.com/images/pdf/Roadmap-to-Automated-Composites.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Björnsson A. Enabling automation of composite manufacturing through the use of off-the-shelf solutions [PhD thesis]. Linköping (Sweden): Linköping University, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Composites World. [cited 2022 Jan 25]. https://www.compositesworld.com/articles/dry-fiber-placement-surpassing-limits
   Google Scholar
• Cherif C. Textile werkstoffe für den leichtbau. Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Schnabel A, Grundmann T, Kruse FF, et al. Automatisiertes textiles preforming. Lightweight Des. 2009;2(3):44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kyosev Y. Braiding technology for textiles. Waltham (MA): Woodhead Publishing; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Schmucker WJ. TFP-RTM-Bindertechnologie in hochbelasteten kohlefaserbauteilen. Lightweight Des. 2010;3(1):38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Carosella S. Analyse und verbesserung des faserablegeverfahrens tailored fibre placement zur kostenoptimierten preformherstellung. Verl. Dr. Hut, München, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Klingele J, Greb C, Linke M, et al. Auftrag und aktivierung von bindern. Lightweight Des. 2011;4(6):54–61.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández Eguibar D. Selective stitching on composite skin-stiffener bonding for improved damage tolerant structures. Verl. Dr. Hut, München, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lukaszewicz DH-J, Ward C, Potter KD. The engineering aspects of automated prepreg layup: history, present and future. Compos B Eng. 2012;43(3):997–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenker T. T-AFP – Thermoplastic automated fiber placement for the manufacturing of structures. Luftfahrttechnisches Handbuch, 2021, Under Review.
   Google Scholar
• Veldenz L, Francesco MD, Astwood S, et al. Characteristics and processability of bindered dry fibre material for automated fibre placement, Munich. Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Composite Materials 2016, Munich, Germany, June 26–30, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Schledjewski R, Yadav N. Safe and efficient heating – how to identify the best performing heating method for thermoplastic tape placement. Proceedings of the SAMPE Europe Conference 2019, Nantes, France, September 17–19, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Veldenz L, Francesco MD, Giddings P, et al. Material selection for automated dry fiber placement using the analytical hierarchy process. Adv Manuf Polym Compos Sci. 2018;4(4):83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft K, Lessard L, Pasini D, et al. Experimental study of the effect of automated fiber placement induced defects on performance of composite laminates. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2011;42(5):484–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisin B, Carosella S, Middendorf P. Dry fibre placement: the influence of process parameters on mechanical laminate properties and infusion behaviour. Polymers. 2021;13(21):3853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helber F, Schrick B, Carosella S, et al. Tailored preform production with customizable UD materials for hybrid material design. Proceedings of the SAMPE Europe Conference 2017, Stuttgart, Germany, November 14–16, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Helber F, Szcesny M, Carosella S, et al. Tack and binder solubility investigations on reactive and Non-Reactive binder systems. Proceedings of the SAMPE Europe Conference 2019, Nantes, France, September 17–19, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ringwald H. Entwicklung und charakterisierung von binderaktivierungsverfahren zur herstellung von carbonfaserverstärkten kunststoffen [PhD thesis]. Stuttgart (Germany): München, University of Stuttgart, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Shih C-H, Lee LJ. Tackification of textile fiber preforms in resin transfer molding. J Compos Mater. 2001;35(21):1954–1981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickert M, Berg DC, Ziegmann G. Influence of binder activation and fabric design on the peremeability of non-crimp carbon fabrics. Proceedings of Eleventh Internatinal Conference on Flow Processing in Composite Materials – FPCM11 – Auckland, July 9–12, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rimmel O, Becker D, Mitschang P. Maximizing the out-of-plane-permeability of preforms manufactured by dry fiber placement. Adv Manuf Polym Compos Sci. 2016;2(3–4):93–102.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt S, Mahrholz T, Kühn A, et al. Powder binders used for the manufacturing of wind turbine rotor blades. Part 1. Characterization of resin-binder interaction and preform properties. Polym Compos. 2018;39(3):708–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody JC, Gillespie JW. Reactive and non-reactive binders in glass/vinyl ester composites. Polym Compos. 2005;26(3):377–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geßler A. Textile integrationstechniken zur herstellung vorkonfektionierter verstärkungsstrukturen für FVK INTEX. Zusammenfassender Schlussbericht, München, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Beier U. High-performance fibre-reinforced composites prepared by a novel preform manufacturing routine [PhD thesis]. Univ. Lehrstuhl für Polymere Werkstoffe, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Tanoğlu M, Seyhan A. Compressive mechanical behaviour of E-glass/polyester composite laminates tailored with a thermoplastic preforming binder. Mater Sci Eng: A. 2003;363(1-2):335–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz J, Kühne E, Wielage B. Einsatz der preformtechniken zur produktivitätssteigerung bei der verarbeitung von faserverbundkunststoffen. Proceedings of the 17. Symposium Verbundwerkstoffe und Werkstoffverbunde, 2009, Bayreuth, Germany, April 1–3, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Girdauskaite L, Krzywinski S, Rödel H, et al. Local structure fixation in the composite manufacturing chain. Appl Compos Mater. 2010;17(6):597–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillermeier RW, Seferis JC. Interlayer toughening of resin transfer molding composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2001;32(5):721–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanoğlu M, Seyhan AT. Investigating the effects of a polyester preforming binder on the mechanical and ballistic performance of E-glass fiber reinforced polyester composites. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2003;23(1):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulat M, Heieck F. Binder application methods for textile preforming processes. LTH Faserverbund-Leichtbau, 2014, FL 21 200–02.
   Google Scholar
• HEXCEL Fibers SASU, Roussillon, France. Product Data Sheet HexForce G0827 BB1040, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• HEXION Stuttgart GmbH, Esslingen, Germany, Technical Data Sheet EPIKOTETM Resin 05311, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• HEXION Stuttgart GmbH, Esslingen, Germany, Technical Data Sheet EPIKOTETM Resin 05390, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Huntsman Advanced Materials (Switzerland) GmbH, Basel, Switzerland, Technical Data Sheet Araldite® LT 3366, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hänsel Verbundtechnik GmbH, Iserlohn, Germany, Technical Datasheet PA 1541, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• SAERTEX GmbH & Co. KG, Saerbeck, Germany, Safety Data Sheet SAERfix® EP, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• HEXION Stuttgart GmbH, Esslingen, Germany, Technical Data Sheet EPIKOTETM Resin MGS PR 685, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bühnen GmbH & Co. KG, Bremen, Germany, Operating Manuel HB 700K Spray, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• AIRTECH EUROPE Sarl, Differdange, Luxembourg, Safety Data Sheer AIRTAC 2E, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• HEXION Stuttgart GmbH, Esslingen am Neckar, Germany. Technical Information EPIKOTE Resin, MGS RIMR135, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• SIKA Deutschland GmbH, Bad Urach, Germany, Product Data Sheet Biresin, CR120, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Resoltech Advanced Technology Resins, Rousset, France, Safety Data Sheet 1500, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Memmert GmbH, Schwabach, Germany, Product Specification UF260plus, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• KERN & Sohn GmbH, Balingen, Germany, Operating Manual TGD, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• KURABO Advanced Technology Division, Osaka, Japan, MAZERUSTAR Catalogue, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• DIN EN ISO 527-2, Plastics – Determination of tensile properties – Part 2: test conditions for moulding and extrusion plastics. ISO 527-2: 2012.
   Google Scholar
• R&G Faserverbundwerkstoffe GmbH, Waldenbuch, Germany, Safety Data Sheet Siliconkautschuk. KDSV-25, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• DIN EN ISO 14130, Fibre reinforced plastic composites – Determination of apparent interlaminar shear strength by short beam-method. ISO 14130, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• DIN EN ISO 175 ; Plastics – Methods of test for the determination of the effects of immersion in liquid chemicals. ISO 175, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• DIN EN 2564, Aerospace series – Carbon fibre laminates – Determination of the fibre, resin and void contents. German and English version, EN 2564, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Struers GmbH, Willich, Germany, Betriebshandbuch Tegramin-25/-30 (Nr.16037025); revision C, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• EMAG Technologies, Mörfelden-Walldorf. Germany, Operating Instructions EMMI20 HC, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt S, Mahrholz T, Kühn A, et al. Powder binders used for the manufacturing of wind turbine rotor blades. Part 2. Investigation of binder effects on the mechanical performance of glass fiber reinforced polymers. J Compos Mater. 2019;53(16):2261–2270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanoglu M, Robert S, Heider D, et al. Effects of thermoplastic preforming binder on the properties of S2-glass fabric reinforced epoxy composites. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2001;21(3):187–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning K. Wirtschaftliche Herstellung von Faserverbundbauteilen mit Hilfe automatisiert hergestellter textiler Preforms [PhD thesis]. RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany, 2008.
   Google Scholar