306
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief report

Psychometric validity of the implicit theories of intelligence scale among Filipino university students: growth mindset is linked to higher self-reported academic achievement via academic engagement

ORCID Icon
Pages 118-124 | Received 13 Mar 2023, Accepted 16 Sep 2023, Published online: 04 Oct 2023

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2019). Amos (Version 26.0) [Computer program]. IBM SPSS.
  • Bernardo, A. B. I. (2020). Socioeconomic status moderates the relationship between growth mindset and learning in mathematics and science: Evidence from PISA 2018 Philippine data. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 9(2), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2020.1832635
  • Buenconsejo, J. U., & Datu, J. A. D. (2020). Growth and fixed mindsets about talent matter for career development self-efficacy in selected Filipino adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105470
  • Cook, D. A., Castillo, R. M., Gas, B., & Artino, A. R. (2017). Measuring achievement goal motivation, mindsets and cognitive load: Validation of three instruments’ scores. Medical Education, 51(10), 1061–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/MEDU.13405
  • Costa, A., & Faria, L. (2018). Implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(JUN), 829. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00829
  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315783048
  • Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
  • Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995a). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 4(4), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_12
  • Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995b). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI0604_1
  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
  • Escribano, C., & Díaz-Morales, J. F. (2014). Are self-reported grades a good estimate of academic achievement? [¿Son las notas auto-informadas una buena estimación del rendimiento académico?]. Estudios de Psicología, 35(1), 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2014.893650
  • Haimovitz, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). What predicts children’s fixed and growth intelligence mind-sets? Not their parents’ views of intelligence but their parents’ views of failure. Psychological Science, 27(6), 859–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616639727
  • Haimovitz, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2017). The origins of children’s growth and fixed mindsets: New research and a new proposal. Child Development, 88(6), 1849–1859. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12955
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • King, R. B. (2012). How you think about your intelligence influences how adjusted you are: Implicit theories and adjustment outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(5), 705–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2012.05.031
  • King, R. B. (2016). A fixed mindset leads to negative affect: The relations between implicit theories of intelligence and subjective well-being. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/A000290
  • King, R. B., McInerney, D. M., & Watkins, D. A. (2012). How you think about your intelligence determines how you feel in school: The role of theories of intelligence on academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 814–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2012.04.005
  • King, R. B., & Trinidad, J. E. (2021). Growth mindset predicts achievement only among rich students: Examining the interplay between mindset and socioeconomic status. Social Psychology of Education, 24(3), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09616-z
  • Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.2224/SBP.7054
  • Martin, A. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 413–440. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X118036
  • Martin, A. J., Nejad, H. G., Colmar, S., Arief, G., & Liem, D. (2013). Adaptability: How students’ responses to uncertainty and novelty predict their academic and non-academic outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 728–746. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032794
  • Montano, R. L. T. (2023). Believing that failure is essential: Failure-is-enhancing mindset mediates the relationship of perfectionism and academic engagement. Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 40(2), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2023.2210760
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Martínez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003
  • Tang, H., Datu, J. A. D., Liu, Z., Shen, J., & Xing, Q. (2022). The engaged lives of encouraged students: Academic encouragement, grit and academic engagement in Chinese first year undergraduate students. Current Psychology, 42(23), 19526–19536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03057-3
  • Tao, V. Y. K., Li, Y., & Wu, A. M. S. (2021). Do not despise failures: Students’ failure mindset, perception of parents’ failure mindset, and implicit theory of intelligence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2021, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10212-020-00524-Y
  • Troche, S. J., & Alexandra, K. (2020). The factorial structure and construct validity of a German translation of Dweck’s Implicit theories of intelligence scale under consideration of the wording effect. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 62(3), 386–403.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.