The “content” of intergroup contact: lessons from the Denton Women’s Interracial Fellowship

References

• Allport, Floyd, et al. 1953. “The Effects of Segregation and the Consequences of Desegregation: A Social Science Statement.” Journal of Negro Education 22:68–76. (Also published in the Minnesota Law Review 37:427–439).
   Google Scholar
• Allport, Gordon W. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. 25th ed. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Al Ramiah, Ananthi, and Miles Hewstone. 2013. “Intergroup Contact as a Tool for Reducing, Resolving, and Preventing Intergroup Conflict: Evidence, Limitations, and Potential.” American Psychologist 68 (7): 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnhardt, Sharon. 2009. Near and Dear? Evaluating the Impact of Neighbor Diversity on Inter-religious Attitudes. Unpublished Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Broockman, David, and Joshua Kalla. 2016. “Durably Reducing Transphobia: A Field Experiment on Door-to-Door Canvassing.” Science 352 (6282): 220–224. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd, Richard. 1991. “Interracial Cooperation in a Decade of Conflict: The Denton (Texas) Christian Women’s Inter-Racial Fellowship.” The Oral History Review 19 (1): 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/ohr/19.1.31.
   Google Scholar
• Carrell, Scott E., Mark Hoekstra, and James E. West. 2015. “The Impact of Intergroup Contact on Racial Attitudes and Revealed Preferences.” National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper w20940.
   Google Scholar
• Corno, Lucia, Eliana La Ferrara, and Justine Burns. 2022. “Interaction, Stereotypes, and Performance: Evidence from South Africa.” American Economic Review 112 (12): 3848–3875. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio, John F., Samuel L. Gaertner, and Kerry Kawakami. 2003. “Intergroup Contact: The Past, Present, and the Future” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 6 (1): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430203006001009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finseraas, Henning, and Andreas Kotsadam. 2017. “Does Personal Contact with Ethnic Minorities Affect Anti-Immigrant Sentiments? Evidence from a Field Experiment.” European Journal of Political Research 56: 703–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Donald, and Janelle Wong. 2009. “Tolerance and the Contact Hypothesis: A Field Experiment.” In The Political Psychology of Democratic Citizenship, 228–246. Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, Jasmine, Nazita Lajevardi, and John Waller. 2022. “How Contact Is Related to Awareness of Discrimination Against Women of Color.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 11 (5): 1120–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalla, Joshua, and David Broockman. 2020. “Reducing Exclusionary Attitudes through Interpersonal Conversation: Evidence from Three Field Experiments.” American Political Science Review 114 (2): 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalla, Joshua, and David Broockman. 2023. “Which Narrative Strategies Durably Reduce Prejudice? Evidence from Field and Survey Experiments Supporting the Efficacy of Perspective-Getting” American Journal of Political Science 67:185–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kensinger, Elizabeth, and Jaclyn Ford. 2020. “Remembering: An Activity of Mind and Brain” Annual Review of Psychology 71:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Barrett A., Chad Farrell, and Bruce Link. 2004. “Revisiting the Contact Hypothesis: The Case of Public Exposure to Homelessness.” American Sociological Review 69 (1): 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, Martina, Mimi Visentini, Timo Mäntylä, and Fabio Del Missier. 2017. “Choice-Supportive Misremembering: A New Taxonomy and Review.” Frontiers in Psychology 8:2062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, Matt. 2021. “Types of Contact: A Field Experiment on Collaborative and Adversarial Caste Integration.” American Economic Review 111 (6): 1807–1844. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousa, Salma. 2020. “Building Social Cohesion between Christians and Muslims through Soccer in Post-ISIS Iraq.” Science 369 (6505): 866–870. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussen, Paul H. 1950. “Some Personality and Social Factors Related to Changes in Children’s Attitudes Toward Negroes.” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 45 (3): 423. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paluck, Elizabeth Levy, Seth Green, and Donald P. Green. 2019. “The Contact Hypothesis Re-evaluated.” Behavioural Public Policy 3 (2): 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.25.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, Thomas. 1979. “Tension between the Law and Social Science: An Expert Witness’s View.” In Schools and the Courts: Desegregation, Vol. 1, 23–44. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse for Educational Management.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, Thomas, and Linda Tropp. 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (5): 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, Thomas, and Linda Tropp. 2008. “How Does Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? Meta-Analytic Tests of Three Mediators.” European Journal of Social Psychology 38:922–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, Gautam. 2019. “Familiarity Does Not Breed Contempt: Generosity, Discrimination, and Diversity in Delhi Schools” American Economic Review 109 (3): 774–809. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter, Erin. 2023. The Similar and Distinct Effects of Political and Non-Political Conversation on Affective Polarization. Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, Johnny. 2015. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scacco, Alexandra, and Shana S. Warren. 2018. “Can Social Contact Reduce Prejudice and Discrimination? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria.” American Political Science Review 112 (3): 654–677. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, Hannah L., Katherine T. McCabe, and Yalidy Matos. 2022. “Proximal Contact with Latino Immigrants and Immigration Attitudes.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 10 (4): 653–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2021.1882315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, Chagai M. 2021. “Diversity in Health Care Institutions Reduces Israeli Patients’ Prejudice Toward Arabs.” PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118 (14).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, Stephen C., Agostino Mazziotta, and Linda Tropp. 2017. “Contact and Intergroup Conflict: New Ideas for the Road Ahead.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 23 (3): 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Yang-Yang, and Jason Lyall. 2023. “Prolonged Contact Does Not Improve Locals Relations with Migrants in Wartime Settings.” American Journal of Political Science, forthcoming.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar