Design Science method and theory in a construction and engineering context: “a phronetic tale of research”

References

• van der Aalst, W.M.P., Reijers, H.A., Weijters, A.J.M.M., van Dongen, B.F., Alves de Medeiros, A.K., Song, M. and Verbeek, H.M.W. (2007) Business process mining: an industrial application, Information Systems, 32(5), 713–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonacopoulou, E.P. (2010a) Beyond co-production: practice-relevant scholarship as a foundation for delivering impact through powerful ideas, Public Money & Management, 30(4), 219–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonacopoulou, E.P. (2010b) Making the business school more ‘critical’: reflexive critique based on phronesis as a foundation for impact, British Journal of Management, 21(s1), s6–s25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnott, D. and Pervan, G. (2010) An assessment of DSS design science using the Hevner, March, Park and Ram guidelines, in Hart, D. and Gregor, S. (eds.) Information Systems Foundations: The Role of Design Science, ANU Press, Canberra, Australia, pp. 255–84.
   Google Scholar
• Azhar, S. (2016) Chapter 13: Information Systems to Support Planning and Decision-Making in Construction Organizations Using Action Research Methodology, Research Methodology in the Built Environment: A Selection of Case Studies, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R., Kaul, M. and Storey, V.C. (2015) Genres of inquiry in design-science research: justification and evaluation of knowledge production, MIS Quarterly, 39(3), 541–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R. and Myers, M.D. (2015) Design ethnography in information systems, Information Systems Journal, 25(1), 23–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R. and Wood-Harper, A. (1996) A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research, Journal of Information Technology, 11(3), 235–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensimon, E.M. (2007) The underestimated significance of practitioner knowledge in the scholarship on student success, The Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 441–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besancenot, D. and Vranceanu, R. (2015) Fear of novelty: a model of scientific discovery with strategic uncertainty, Economic Inquiry, 53(2), 1132–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bichler, M. (2014) Reflections on the state of design science research, Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(2), 71–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briand, L., Falessi, D., Nejati, S., Sabetzadeh, M. and Yue, T. (2012) Research-based innovation: a tale of three projects in model-driven engineering, paper presented to International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2008) Design thinking, Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2009) The making of a design thinker, Metropolis, October, 60–2.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking, Design Issues, 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, P.W. (2013) Queer eye on a ‘straight’life: deconstructing masculinities in construction, Construction Management and Economics, 31(8), 816–31.
   Google Scholar
• Colucci-Gray, L., Das, S., Gray, D., Robson, D. and Spratt, J. (2013) Evidence-based practice and teacher action-research: a reflection on the nature and direction of ‘change’, British Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 126–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connaughton, J. and Weller, S. (2013) Improving collaboration in construction: an opportunity for action research, paper presented to Proceedings 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Conner, K.R. (1991) A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: do we have a new theory of the firm?, Journal of Management, 17(1), 121–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, K.R. and Prahalad, C.K. (1996) A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism, Organization Science, 7(5), 477–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2011) Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work, Berg, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Dainty, A. (2008) Methodological pluralism in construction management research, Advanced Research Methods in the Built Environment, 1, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dave, B. and Koskela, L. (2009) Collaborative knowledge management – a construction case study, Automation in Construction, 18(7), 894–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. (2011) The core of ‘design thinking’and its application, Design Studies, 32(6), 521–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dym, C.L., Agogino, A.M., Eris, O., Frey, D.D. and Leifer, L.J. (2005) Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning, Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman, C., Lee, J-M., Jeong, Y-S. and Lee, J-K. (2009) Automatic rule-based checking of building designs, Automation in Construction, 18(8), 1011–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, D. and Haugan, M. (1997) Modelling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment, Journal of Documentation, 53(4), 384–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R.B. (2004) Applying knowledge to reverse engineering problems, Computer-Aided Design, 36(6), 501–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) Making organization research matter: power, values, and phronesis, in The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, 2nd edn, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, pp. 370–87.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T. and Schram, S. (2012) Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis, Cambridge University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A.W. (2012) Reflective healthcare practice, in Phronesis As Professional Knowledge, Springer, Rotterdam, pp. 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Fulford, R. and Standing, C. (2014) Construction industry productivity and the potential for collaborative practice, International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 315–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R.M. (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue); ABI/INFORM Global, 109–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, S. and Hevner, A.R. (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact, MIS Quarterly & The Society for Information Management, 02767783, Essay, <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=iih&AN=87369151&site=ehost-live>.
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, S. and Hevner, A.R. (2015) The front end of Innovation: perspectives on creativity, knowledge and design, in New Horizons in Design Science: Broadening the Research Agenda, Springer, New York, pp. 249–63.
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, S. and Jones, D. (2007) The anatomy of a design theory, Journal of the AIS, 8(5), 312–35.
   Google Scholar
• Heusinger, J.M. (2014) On the ‘impossibility’of critical and emancipatory design science research, in Enterprise Information Systems, Springer, pp. 331–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, A.R. and Chatterjee, S. (2010) Design research in information systems, in Sharda, R. and Voß, S. (eds.) Design Research in Information Systems, Springer, New York, vol. 22, pp. 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J. and Ram, S. (2004) Design science in information systems research, MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbert, K. (2013) Finding wisdom in practice: the genesis of the salty chip, a Canadian multiliteracies collaborative, Language and Literacy, 15(1), 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelseth, E. and Nisbet, N. (2011), ‘Capturing normative constraints by use of the semantic mark-up (RASE) methodology’, paper presented to Proceedings of CIB W78-W102 Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, M.R. and Chileshe, N. (2013) Global virtual engineering teams (GVETs): a fertile ground for research in Australian construction projects context, International Journal of Project Management, 31(8), 1101–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanjanabootra, S. (2011) Improving strategic business performance with knowledge management: a case study of a refrigeration company, doctoral dissertation thesis, RMIT University.
   Google Scholar
• Kanjanabootra, S. and Corbitt, B. (2016) Reproducing knowledge in construction expertise: a reflexive theory, critical approach. Construction Management and Economics, 34(7–8), 561–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keynes, J.M. (1937) The general theory of employment, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51(2), 209–23.
   Google Scholar
• Khemlani, L. (2005) CORENET e-PlanCheck: Singapore’s Automated Code Checking System. AECbytes “Building the Future”. Available at http://aecbytes.com/buildingthefuture/2005/CORENETePlanCheck.html (accessed 15 November 15 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, S., Kenny, A. and McKinstry, C. (2014) From experience to action in recovery-oriented mental health practice: a first person inquiry, Action Research, 12(4), 357–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L. (2011) Rethinking design thinking: Part I, Design and Culture, 3(3), 285–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, E.A. and Pitman, A. (2012) Phronesis as Professional Knowledge: Practical Wisdom in the Professions, vol. 1, Springer Science & Business Media, Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Liebeskind, J. (1996) Knowledge, strategy and the theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter special issue), 441–52.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, M.L., Majchrzak, A. and Gasser, L. (2002) A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes, MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 179–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslach, C., Leiter, M.P. and Jackson, S.E. (2012) Making a significant difference with burnout interventions: researcher and practitioner collaboration, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 296–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, J., Marshall, P. and Heath, G. (2010) An exploration of the concept of design in information systems, in Hart, D. and Gregor, S. (eds.) Information Systems Foundations: The Role of Design Science, ANU Press, Canberra, Australia, pp. 91–120.
   Google Scholar
• Mobjörk, M. (2010) Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: a refined classification of transdisciplinary research, Futures, 42(8), 866–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, M.D. and Venable, J.R. (2014) A set of ethical principles for design science research in information systems, Information & Management, 51(6), 801–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D.A. and Verganti, R. (2014) Incremental and radical innovation: design research vs. technology and meaning change, Design Issues, 30(1), 78–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omari, A. and Roy, G. (1993) A representational scheme for design code information in an expert systems approach to building design, Computing Systems in Engineering, 4(2–3), 253–69.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, A., Storbacka, K. and Frow, P. (2008) Managing the co-creation of value, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M.E. (1991) Towards a dynamic theory of strategy, Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 95–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porwal, A. and Hewage, K.N. (2013) Building information modeling (BIM) partnering framework for public construction projects, Automation in Construction, 31, 204–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razzouk, R. and Shute, V. (2012) What is design thinking and why is it important?, Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richey, R.C. and Klein, J.D. (2014) Design and Development Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, P 1987, Design Thinking, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, R. and Pikas, E. (2013) Building information modeling education for construction engineering and management. I: industry requirements, state of the art, and gap analysis, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(11), 04013016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. and Stappers, P.J. (2008) Co-creation and the new landscapes of design, CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, S.-Y. (2016) Challenges associated with implementing BIM-enabled code-checking systems within the design process, The University of Newcastle, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Shugan, S.M. (2004) Editorial: consulting, research, and consulting research, Marketing Science, 23(2), 173–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. (1988) The science of design: creating the Artificial, Design Issues, 4(1–2), 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• So, H-J., Seah, L.H. and Toh-Heng, H.L. (2010) Designing collaborative knowledge building environments accessible to all learners: impacts and design challenges, Computers & Education, 54(2), 479–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohaib, O. and Khan, K. (2010) Integrating usability engineering and agile software development: a literature review, paper presented to Computer design and applications (ICCDA), 2010 International Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Spohrer, J. and Maglio, P.P. (2008) The emergence of service science: toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value, Production and Operations Management, 17(3), 238–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svihla, V. (2010) Collaboration as a dimension of design innovation, CoDesign, 6(4), 245–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szebeko, D. and Tan, L. (2010) Co-designing for society, Australasian Medical Journal AMJ, 3(9), 580–90. doi 10.4066/AMJ.2010.378.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. and White, S. (2000) Practising Reflexivity in Health and Welfare, Buckingham, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, S.L., Maglio, P.P. and Akaka, M.A. (2008) On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective, European Management Journal, 26(3), 145–52.
   Google Scholar
• Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J. and Baskerville, R. (2014) FEDS: a framework for evaluation in design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 77–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voordijk, H. (2009) Construction management and economics: the epistemology of a multidisciplinary design science, Construction Management and Economics, 27(8), 713–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, F.L. (2005) Frank Lloyd Wright: An Autobiography. Pomegranate, Petaluma, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Weijters, A.J.M.M. and van der Aalst, W.M.P. (2003) Rediscovering workflow models from event-based data using little thumb, Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 10(November 2/2003), 151–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984) A resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, X., Shen, Q., Fan, H., Li, H. and Fan, S. (2012) IT supported collaborative work in A/E/C projects: a ten-year review, Automation in Construction, 21, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zack, M. (1999) Developing a knowledge strategy, California Management Review, 41(3), 125–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar