“A modern research profession’: government social research, evidence-based policymaking and blind spots in contemporary governance research

References

• Adams, T. L. (2015). Sociology of professions: International divergences and research directions. Work, Employment and Society, 29(1), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017014523467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backman, C. (1987). Policy research at the congress: A case study of a research unit at the U.S. Senate. The American Sociologist, 18(4), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692365
   Google Scholar
• Behavioural Insights Team. (2022). About Us [Online]. https://www.bi.team/about-us-2/ (Accessed 6 October 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Boaz, A., Grayson, L., Levitt, R., & Solesbury, W. (2008). Does evidence-based policy work? Learning from the UK experience. Evidence & Policy, 4(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426408784614680
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, M. (1987). Social science research and government: Comparative essays on Britain and the United States. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, J., & Duncan, S. (2008). Reflections and observations: An interview with the UK’s first chief government social researcher. Critical Social Policy, 28(3), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018308091270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, P. (2022). DWP blocks data for study of whether benefit sanctions linked to suicide. The Guardian. 2 March. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/mar/02/dwp-blocks-data-for-study-of-whether-benefit-sanctions-linked-to-suicide (Accessed 29 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. (2021). A modern civil service: Guidance. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-modern-civil-service (Accessed 29 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. (2022a). Government functions: Guidance. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-functions/government-functions (Accessed 29 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. (2022b). Evaluation task force. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/evaluation-task-force (Accessed 29 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. (2022c). Guidance and resources for evaluating policy in government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-and-resources-for-evaluating-policy-in-government (Accessed 29 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office Policy Lab. (2022). Blog. https://openpolicy.blog.gov.uk (Accessed 6 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. (2016). The politics of evidence-based policy making. Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. (2022). The myth of ‘evidence-based policymaking’ in a decentred state. Public Policy and Administration, 37(1), 46–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076720905016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N., & Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence-based policy: A practical guide to doing it better. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Civil Service. (2014). Civil service reform plan progress report. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/civil-service-reform-plan-progress-report (Accessed 29 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, S., Vanderhoven, D., Durose, C., Matthews, P., Richardson, L., & Rutherford, R. (2017). Translation across borders: Connecting the academic and policy communities. In K. Facer, & K. Pahl (Eds.), Valuing interdisciplinary collaborative research: Beyond impact (pp. 173–190). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. (2018). Nervous states: How feeling took over the world. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• European Society of Criminology. (2019). Mike Hough. Interviewed by Ben Bradford. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DLTlrqt_OA (Accessed 1 October 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Fulton Report. (1968). The civil service. Vol. 1. Report of the committee 1966-68. Cmnd. 3638.
   Google Scholar
• Government Analysis Function. (2022a). Government social research. https://analysisfunction.civilservice.gov.uk/government-social-research/ (Accessed 29 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Government Analysis Function. (2022b). Frequently asked questions. https://analysisfunction.civilservice.gov.uk/about-us/frequently-asked-questions/ (Accessed 29 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Government Analysis Function. (2022c). Analysis function strategy for 2022 to 2025. https://analysisfunction.civilservice.gov.uk/about-us/analysis-function-strategy/ (Accessed 29 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Government Social Research. (2021a). Government social research diversity & inclusion strategy 2021-2025: Growing and embedding a diverse and inclusive GSR culture. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/957190/GSR_D_I_Strategy_2021-2025_Growing___embedding_a_diverse___inclusive_GSR_culture.pdf (Accessed 29 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Government Social Research. (2021b). Government social research diversity & inclusion strategy 2021-2025: Growing and embedding a diverse and inclusive GSR culture. Year 1 delivery plan. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/957191/GSR_D_I_Strategy_2021-2025_Year_1_Delivery_Plan.pdf (Accessed 29 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Government Social Research. (2021c). Government social research strategy 2021-2025: Social research in and for government. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/957187/GSR_Strategy_2021-2025_Social_Research_In_and_For_Government.pdf (Accessed 29 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2012). The civil service reform plan. June 2012.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2018). Government social research code. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-goverment-social-research-code-people-and-products (Accessed 5 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2021). Declaration on government reform. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/993902/FINAL_Declaration_on_Government_Reform.pdf (Accessed 29 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2022a). Social Research Service Research Scheme applicants. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/social-research-scheme-2021 (Accessed 5 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2022b). Technical Framework https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-government-social-research-competency-framework (Accessed 5 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2022d). Government Functional Standard: GovS 010: Analysis. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1011798/CO_Govt_Functional_Std_GovS010_Analysis_v2_Final_WEB.pdf (Accessed 30 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Government. (2018). How government can work with academia. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/IfG_government_academia_June_2018_vb.pdf (Accessed 31 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Kattirtzi, M. (2017). “Challenge and be challenged”: A history of social research capacity and influence in DEFRA and DECC, 2001-2015 [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kogan, M., & Henkel, M. (1983). Government and research: The rothschild experiment in a government department. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, M. (2017). The patterns in between: “Field” as a conceptual variable. In C. E. Benzecry, M. Krause, & I. A. Reed (Eds.), Social theory now (pp. 227–250). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lury, C. (2020). Problem spaces: How and why methodology matters. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• MacClancy, J. (2017). Anthropology and public service: The UK experience. Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• MacKillop, E., & Downe, J. (2022). Knowledge brokering organisations: A new way of governing evidence. Evidence & Policy, 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16445093010411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, M. (2021). The problem of the state. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mangset, M., & Asdal, K. (2019). Bureaucratic power in note-writing: Authoritative expertise within the state. The British Journal of Sociology, 70(2), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina, J. (2023). The first British crime survey: An ethnography of criminology within government. Emerald Advances in Historical Criminology.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, R. (2000). Social science in government: The role of policy researchers. The Rockefeller Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, J. W., Posner, S., & Brutzman, B. (2021). Understanding brokers, intermediaries, and boundary spanners: A multi-sectoral review of strategies, skills, and outcomes. Evidence & Policy, Published online, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426420X16083745764324
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, K., & Faul, M. V. (2018). Networks and network analysis in evidence, policy and practice. Evidence & Policy, 14(3), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426418X15314037224597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, K., & Fraser, A. (2021). Evidence-based policy and public value management: Mutually supporting paradigms? In J. Connolly, & A. van der Zwet (Eds.), Public value management, governance and reform in britain (pp. 115–148). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, K., Hopkins, A., Boaz, A., Guillot-Wright, S., & Cairney, P. (2022). What works to promote research-policy engagement? Evidence & Policy, 18(4), 691–713. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16420918447616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, M. (2016). Libraries for the future: The role of IT utilities in the transformation of academic libraries. Palgrave Communications, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.53
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, M. (2013). The ‘social life of methods’: A critical introduction. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(4), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413486160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, D. (2019). MOJ used failed sex offender treatment ‘unlawfully’. BBC News. 16 July 2019. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48998136 (Accessed 29 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A. (2011). Telling policy stories: An ethnographic study of the use of evidence in policy-making in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 40(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279410000723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, P. (1982). Social research and government policy. Futures, 14(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(82)90067-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., & Epstein, S. (2010). A world of standards but not a standard world: Toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UKRI. (2021). Review of the PhD in the Social Sciences. https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ESRC-020322-Review-of-the-PhD-in-the-Social-Sciences.pdf (Accessed 29 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H. (1986). The many meanings of research utilization. In M. Bulmer (Ed.), Social science and social policy (pp. 31–40). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Government. (2016). Government social research publication protocol, welsh government (2016): https://www.opengovpartnership.org/members/united-kingdom/commitments/UK0085/ (Accessed 18 August 2022).
   Google Scholar