An assessment of the linkages between GM crop biotechnology and climate change mitigation

References

• Khush GS. Genetically modified crops: the fastest adopted crop technology in the history of modern agriculture. Agric Food Secur. 2012;1(1):1–2. doi:10.1186/2048-7010-1-14.
   Google Scholar
• Brookes GBP, Barfoot P. Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996–2018: impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions. GM Crops & Food. 2020;11(4):215–41. doi:10.1080/21645698.2020.1773198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). Biotech crops drive socio-economic development and sustainable environment in the new frontier. ISAAA Brief 55. 2020. https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/55/executivesummary/default.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Klümper W, Qaim M, Albertini E. A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e111629. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleim S, Smyth SJ. Scientific underpinnings of biotechnology regulatory frameworks. N Biotechnol. 2018;42:26–32. doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2018.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen CW, Wingender AM. National and global impacts of genetically modified crops. Am Econ Revi Insights. 2023;5(2):224–40. doi:10.1257/aeri.20220144.
   Google Scholar
• Qaim M. Agricultural biotechnology in India: impacts and controversies. Chapter 9 In: Smyth SJ, Phillips PWB Castle D. editors. Handbook on agriculture, biotechnology and development. Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd; 2014:pp. 126–37.
   Google Scholar
• Tilman D. Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: the need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1999;96(11):5995–6000. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.11.5995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Making better policies for food systems. 2021. doi:10.1787/ddfba4de-en.
   Google Scholar
• Barrows G, Sexton S, Zilberman D. The impact of agricultural biotechnology on supply and land-use. Environ Dev Econ. 2014;19(6):676–703. doi:10.1017/S1355770X14000400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahaffey H, Taheripour F, Tyner WE. Evaluating the economic and environmental impacts of a global GMO ban. J Environ Prot. 2016;7(11):1522–1546.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taheripour F, Mahaffey H, Tyner WE. Evaluation of economic, land use, and land use emission impacts of substituting non-GMO crops for GMO in the US (no. 330-2016-13790). 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Wohlhueter R, Zhang H. Genetically modified foods: a critical review of their promise and problems. Food Sci Hum Wellness. 2016;5(3):116–23. doi:10.1016/j.fshw.2016.04.002.
   Google Scholar
• Brookes G, Barfoot P. Economic impact of GM crops. GM Crops Food Biotechnol Agric Food Chain. 2014;5(1):65–75. doi:10.4161/gmcr.28098.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brookes G. Farm income and production impacts from the use of genetically modified (GM) crop technology 1996-2020. GM Crops & Food. 2022;13(1):171–95. doi:10.1080/21645698.2022.2105626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phalan B, Onial M, Balmford A, Green RE. Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared. Science. 2011;333(6047):1289–91. doi:10.1126/science.1208742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland C, Gleim S, Smyth SJ. Correlating genetically modified crops, glyphosate use and increased carbon sequestration. Sustainability. 2021;13(21):11679. doi:10.3390/su132111679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awada L, Nagy C, Phillips PW, Ali G. Contribution of land use practices to GHGs in the Canadian Prairies crop sector. PLoS One. 2021;16(12):e0260946. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern M, Noleppa S, Schwarz G. Impacts of chemical crop protection applications on related CO2 emissions and CO2 assimilation of crops. Pest Manag Sci. 2012;68(11):1458–66. doi:10.1002/ps.3328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canola Council of Canada (CCC). An agronomic and economic assessment of transgenic canola. 2001. http://www.canola-council.org/gmo_toc.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Brimner TA, Gallivan GJ, Stephenson GR. Influence of herbicide‐resistant canola on the environmental impact of weed management. Pest Manage Sci Formerly Pesti Sci. 2005;61(1):47–52. doi:10.1002/ps.967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleter GA, Bhula R, Bodnaruk K, Carazo E, Felsot AS, Harris CA, Katayama A, Kuiper HA, Racke KD, Rubin B. et al. Altered pesticide use on transgenic crops and the associated general impact from an environmental perspective. Pest Manag Sci. 2007;63(11):1107–15. doi:10.1002/ps.1448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookes G, Barfoot P. Global impact of biotech crops: environmental effects, 1996–2008. AgBioForum. 2010;13:76–94.
   Google Scholar
• Leeson JY, Thomas AG, Beckie HJ, Brenzil CA, Hall LM, Andrews T, Brown KR, Van Acker RC. Herbicide-use trends in prairie canola production systems. 2006 soils and crops workshop [CD-ROM], extension division, Saskatoon, SK, Canada: University of Saskatchewan; March 2–3, 2006. p. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth SJ, Gusta M, Belcher K, Phillips PW, Castle D. Changes in herbicide use after adoption of HR canola in Western Canada. Weed Technol. 2011;25(3):492–500. doi:10.1614/WT-D-10-00164.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry ED, Ciliberto F, Hennessy DA, Moschini G. Genetically engineered crops and pesticide use in US maize and soybeans. Sci Adv. 2016a;2(8):e1600850. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong F, Mitchell PD, Davis VM, Recker R. Impact of atrazine prohibition on the sustainability of weed management in Wisconsin maize production. Pest Manag Sci. 2017;73(2):425–34. doi:10.1002/ps.4298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qaim M. Bt cotton in India: field trial results and economic projections. World Dev. 2003;31(12):2115–27. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian A, Qaim M. The impact of bt cotton on poor households in rural India. J Dev Stud. 2010;46(2):295–311. doi:10.1080/00220380903002954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouser S, Qaim M. Impact of bt cotton on pesticide poisoning in smallholder agriculture: a panel data analysis. Ecol Econ. 2011;70(11):2105–13. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pray C, Huang J. The impact of bt cotton in China. In: Kalaitzandonakes N, editor. The economic and environmental impacts of agbiotech. Boston, MA: Springer; 2003. pp. 223–42.
   Google Scholar
• Huang J, Mi J, Lin H, Wang Z, Chen R, Hu R, Rozelle S, Pray C. A decade of bt cotton in Chinese fields: assessing the direct effects and indirect externalities of Bt cotton adoption in China. Sci China Life Sci. 2010;53(8):981–91. doi:10.1007/s11427-010-4036-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed AU, Hoddinott J, Abedin N, Hossain N. The impacts of GM foods: results from a randomized controlled trial of Bt eggplant in Bangladesh. Am J Agric Econ. 2021;103(4):1186–206. doi:10.1111/ajae.12162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macall DM, Trabanino CR, Soto AH, Smyth SJ. Genetically modified maize impacts in Honduras: production and social issues. Transgenic Res. 2020;29(5):575–86. doi:10.1007/s11248-020-00221-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookes G, Taheripour F, Tyner WE. The contribution of glyphosate to agriculture and potential impact of restrictions on use at the global level. GM Crops & Food. 2017;8(4):216–28. doi:10.1080/21645698.2017.1390637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh MJ, Harrington RB, Powles SB. Harrington seed destructor: a new nonchemical weed control tool for global grain crops. Crop Sci. 2012;52(3):1343–47. doi:10.2135/cropsci2011.11.0608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistic Canada. Table 32-10-0359-01, estimated areas, yield, production, average farm price and total farm value of principal field crops, in metric and imperial units. Ottawa, Canada: Queen’s Printer; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth SJ, Awada L). Assessment of Saskatchewan agricultural greenhouse gas emissions: sources, sinks and measures. Report submitted to the Global Institute for Food Security. 2018
   Google Scholar
• Grant B, Smith WN, Desjardins R, Lemke R, Li C. Estimated N2O and CO2 emissions as influenced by agricultural practices in Canada. Clim Change. 2004;65(3):315–32. doi:10.1023/B:CLIM.0000038226.60317.35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha BM, Desjardins RL, McConkey BG, Worth DE, Dyer JA, Cerkowniak DD. Change in carbon footprint of canola production in the Canadian prairies from 1986 to 2006. Renewable Energy. 2014;63:634–41. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.10.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWilliam S, Sanscartier D, Lemke R, Wismer M, Baron V. Environmental benefits of canola production in 2010 compared to 1990: a life cycle perspective. Agric Syst. 2016;145:106–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biden S, Smyth SJ, Hudson D. The economic and environmental cost of delayed GM crop adoption: the case of Australia’s GM canola moratorium. GM Crops & Food. 2018;9(1):13–20. doi:10.1080/21645698.2018.1429876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovak E, Blaustein-Rejto D, Qaim M. Genetically modified crops support climate change mitigation. Trends in Plant Science. 2022;27(7):627–629. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2022.01.004.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson D, Richards R. Evaluation of the agronomic, environmental, economic, and coexistence impacts following the introduction of GM canola to Australia (2008-2010). AgBioforum. 2014;17:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Environmental impacts of genetically engineered crops at the farm level. In: The impact of genetically engineered crops on farm sustainability in the United States. National Academies Press; 2010. p. 59–134.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Cornejo J. First decade of genetically engineered crops in the United States. Darby, PA: DIANE Publishing; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Givens WA, Shaw DR, Kruger GR, Johnson WG, Weller SC, Young BG, Wilson RG, Owen MDK, Jordan D. Survey of tillage trends following the adoption of glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol. 2009;23(1):150–55. doi:10.1614/WT-08-038.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington J, Byrne PF, Frank B, Nissen SJ, Westra P, Ellsworth PC, Henry WB. Perceived consequences of herbicide-tolerant and insect-resistant crops on integrated pest management strategies in the Western United States: results of an online survey. AgBioforum. 2009;12:412–21.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Cornejo J, Hallahan C, Nehring RF, Wechsler S, Grube A. Conservation tillage, herbicide use, and genetically engineered crops in the United States: the case of soybeans. AgBioforum. 2013;15:231–41.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Cornejo J, Klotz-Ingram C, Jans S. Farm-level effects of adopting herbicide-tolerant soybeans in the USA. J Agric Appl Econ. 2002;34(1):149–63. doi:10.1017/S1074070800002200.
   Google Scholar
• Perry ED, Moschini G, Hennessy DA. Testing for complementarity: glyphosate tolerant soybeans and conservation tillage. Am J Agric Econ. 2016b;98(3):765–84. doi:10.1093/ajae/aaw001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molberg ES, McCurdy EV, Wenhardt A, Dew DA, Dryden RD. Minimum tillage requirements for summerfallow in western Canada. Can J Soil Sci. 1967;47(3):211–16. doi:10.4141/cjss67-033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlyle WJ. The decline of summerfallow on the Canadian Prairies. Can Geographer. 1997;41(3):267–80. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0064.1997.tb01313.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehm M, Junkins B, Desjardins R, Kulshreshtha S, Lindwall W. Sink potential of Canadian agricultural soils. Clim Change. 2004;65(3):297–314. doi:10.1023/B:CLIM.0000038205.09327.51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikha MM, Benjamin JG, Vigil MF, Nielson DC. Cropping intensity impacts on soil aggregation and carbon sequestration in the central great plains. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2010;74(5):1712–19. doi:10.2136/sssaj2009.0335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogle SM, Breidt FJ, Paustian K. Agricultural management impacts on soil organic carbon storage under moist and dry climatic conditions of temperate and tropical regions. Biogeochemistry. 2005;72(1):87–121. doi:10.1007/s10533-004-0360-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperow M. Estimating carbon sequestration potential on US agricultural topsoils. Soil Tillage Res. 2016;155:390–400. doi:10.1016/j.still.2015.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig ST, Schipanski ME. Landscape-scale cropping changes in the high plains: economic and environmental implications. Environ Res Lett. 2019;14(12):124088. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab5e8b.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell CA, Zentner RP, Gameda S, Blomert B, Wall DD. Production of annual crops on the Canadian prairies: trends during 1976–1998. Can J Soil Sci. 2002;82(1):45–57. doi:10.4141/S01-046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall SJ, Russell AE, Moore AR. Do corn-soybean rotations enhance decomposition of soil organic matter? Plant Soil. 2019;444(1):427–42. doi:10.1007/s11104-019-04292-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan YT, Campbell CA, Janzen HH, Lemke RL, Basnyat P, McDonald CL. Carbon input to soil from oilseed and pulse crops on the Canadian prairies. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2009;132(3–4):290–97. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker MM, Govers G, Jones RA, Rounsevell MD. The effect of soil erosion on Europe’s crop yields. Ecosystems. 2007;10(7):1209–19. doi:10.1007/s10021-007-9090-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarecki MK, Lal R. Crop management for soil carbon sequestration. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2003;22(6):471–502. doi:10.1080/713608318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer TJ, Hatfield JL, Prueger JH. Corn residue age and placement effects on evaporation and soil thermal regime. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1996;60(5):1558–64. doi:10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000050039x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter JE. Impact of GM crops on biodiversity. GM Crops. 2011;2(1):7–23. doi:10.4161/gmcr.2.1.15086.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McConkey B, Luce MS, Grant B, Smith W, Padbury G, Brandt K, Cerkowniak D. Saskatchewan soil conservation association prairie soil carbon balance project: monitoring SOC change across saskatchewan farms from 1996 to 2018. Change In SOC At Field Level Compon. February 2020. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5fc882025388527f26b77665/t/5ff2b6fa0db4f45ccbebd302/1609742076069/2020-0223+PSCB+Report+2020+Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Olson KR, Al-Kaisi M, Lal R, Morton LW. Soil ecosystem services and intensified cropping systems. J Soil Water Conserv. 2017;72(3):64A–9A. doi:10.2489/jswc.72.3.64A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science. 2004;304(5677):1623–27. doi:10.1126/science.1097396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powlson DS, Whitmore AP, Goulding KW. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: a critical re‐examination to identify the true and the false. Eur J Soil Sci. 2011;62(1):42–55. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01342.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell CA, Zentner RP, Selles F, Liang BC, Blomert B. Evaluation of a simple model to describe carbon accumulation in a brown chernozem under varying fallow frequency. Can J Soil Sci. 2001;81(4):383–94. doi:10.4141/S00-082.
   Google Scholar
• West TO, Post WM. Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation: a global data analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2002;66(6):1930–46. doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemo, Klumpp K, Coleman K, Dondini M, Goulding K, Hastings A, Jones M, Leifeld J, Osborne B, Saunders M, Scott T. Soil organic carbon (SOC) equilibrium and model initialisation methods: an application to the Rothamsted carbon (RothC) model. Environ Model Assess. 2017;22(3):215–29. doi:10.1007/s10666-016-9536-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wutzler T, Reichstein M. Soils apart from equilibrium–consequences for soil carbon balance modelling. Biogeosciences. 2007;4(1):125–36. doi:10.5194/bg-4-125-2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath AJ, Rattan LAL. Effects of tillage practices and land use management on soil aggregates and soil organic carbon in the north Appalachian region, USA. Pedosphere. 2017;27(1):172–76. doi:10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60301-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paustian K. Modelling soil organic matter dynamics - global challenges. In: Rees RM, Ball BC, Campbell CD Watson CA. editors Sustainable management of soil organic matter. Oxon, UK: CABI Press; 2000. p. 45–53.
   Google Scholar
• McConkey BG, Liang BC, Campbell CA, Curtin D, Moulin A, Brandt SA, Lafond GP. Crop rotation and tillage impact on carbon sequestration in Canadian prairie soils. Soil Tillage Res. 2003;74(1):81–90. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00121-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebig MA, Morgan JA, Reeder JD, Ellert BH, Gollany HT, Schuman GE. Greenhouse gas contributions and mitigation potential of agricultural practices in northwestern USA and western Canada. Soil Tillage Res. 2005;83(1):25–52. doi:10.1016/j.still.2005.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz I, Mahmood T, Islam KR. Effect of long term no-till and conventional tillage practices on soil quality. Soil Tillage Res. 2013;131:28–35. doi:10.1016/j.still.2013.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angers DA, Eriksen-Hamel NS. Full‐inversion tillage and organic carbon distribution in soil profiles: a meta‐analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2008;72(5):1370–74. doi:10.2136/sssaj2007.0342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R. No‐tillage and soil‐profile carbon sequestration: An on‐farm assessment. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2008;72(3):693–701. doi:10.2136/sssaj2007.0233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VandenBygaart AJ, Bremer E, McConkey BG, Ellert BH, Janzen HH, Angers DA, Carter MR, Drury CF, Lafond GP, McKenzie RH. Impact of sampling depth on differences in soil carbon stocks in long‐term agroecosystem experiments. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2011;75(1):226–34. doi:10.2136/sssaj2010.0099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanni S, Rajsic P, Wagner-Riddle C, Weersink A. 2018). A review of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of on-farm BMPs for mitigating soil-related GHG emissions. Working Paper Series–WP 18-05. Institute for the Advanced Study of Food and Agricultural Policy. Department of Food, Agriculture, and Resource Economics. University of Guelph. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/276270/files/SynthesisofGH.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Clay DE, Clay SA. Impact of herbicide tolerant crops on soil health and sustainable agriculture crop production. In: Songstad D, Hatfield J, and Tomes D. editors. Convergence of food security, energy security and sustainable agriculture. Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry. Vol. 67. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer; 2014. p. 211–236.
   Google Scholar
• Fiodor A, Singh S, Pranaw K. The contrivance of plant growth promoting microbes to mitigate climate change impact in agriculture. Microorganisms. 2021;9(9):1841. doi:10.3390/microorganisms9091841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe J. 2019). Reducing crime: a companion for police leaders. http://reducingcrime.com.
   Google Scholar
• Entine J, Felipe MSS, Groenewald J-H, Kershen DL, Lema M, McHughen A, Nepomuceno AL, Ohsawa R, Ordonio RL, Parrott WA. et al. Regulatory approaches for genome edited agricultural plants in select countries and jurisdictions around the world. Transgenic Res. 2021;3(4):551–84. doi:10.1007/s11248-021-00257-8.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth SJ. Contributions of genome editing technologies towards improved nutrition, environmental sustainability and poverty reduction. Front Genome Ed. 2022;4:1–9. doi:10.3389/fgeed.2022.863193.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth SJ, Lassoued R. Agriculture R&D implications of the CJEU’s gene-editing mutagenesis ruling. Trends Biotechnol. 2018;37(4):337–40. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth SJ, McDonald J, Falck-Zepeda J. Investment, regulation, and uncertainty: managing new plant breeding techniques. GM Crops & Food. 2014;5(1):1–14. doi:10.4161/gmcr.27465.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wesseler J. The EU’s farm-to-fork strategy: an assessment from the perspective of agricultural economics. Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2022;44(4):1826–43. doi:10.1002/aepp.13239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization. The 10 elements of agroecology: guiding the transition to sustainable food and agricultural systems. 2020. https://www.fao.org/3/i9037en/i9037en.pdf.
   Google Scholar