Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Greek version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET)

References

• Laible C, Stein DA, Kiridly DN. Meniscal repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21(4):204–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majewski M, Susanne H, Klaus S. Epidemiology of athletic knee injuries: a 10-year study. Knee. 2006;13(3):184–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocker BD, Nyland JA, Caborn DN, Sternes R, et al. Results of the Kentucky high school football knee injury survey. J Ky Med Assoc. 1997;95(11):458–464.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noble J. Clinical features of the degenerate meniscus with the results of meniscectomy. Br J Surg. 1975;62(12):977–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehling G, Ruch DS, Chabon SJ. The landscape of meniscal injuries. Clin Sports Med. 1990;9(3):539–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englund M. Meniscal tear-a feature of osteoarthritis. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 2004;75(sup312):1–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mesiha M, Zurakowski D, Soriano J, et al. Pathologic characteristics of the torn human meniscus. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(1):103–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frizziero A, Ferrari R, Giannotti E, et al. The meniscus tear: state of the art of rehabilitation protocols related to surgical procedures. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2012;2(4):295–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaquero J, Forriol F. Meniscus tear surgery and meniscus replacement. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2016;6(1):71–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sgaglione NA, Steadman JR, Shaffer B, et al. Current concepts in meniscus surgery: resection to replacement. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(10):161–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(8):622–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkley A, Griffin S, Whelan D. The development and validation of a quality of life-measurement tool for patients with meniscal pathology: the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET). Clin J Sport Med. 2007;17(5):349–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sihvonen R, Järvelä T, Aho H, et al. Validation of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) for patients with a degenerative meniscal tear: a meniscal pathologyspecific quality-of-life index. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(10):165.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner SM, Dainty KN, Marx RG, et al. Knee-specific quality-of-life instruments: which ones measure symptoms and disabilities most important to patients? Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(9):1450–1458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sgroi M, Däxle M, Kocak S, et al. Translation, validation, and cross-cultural adaption of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) into German. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(8):2332–2337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik D, Demirel M, Kuş G, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(3):816–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong WW, Wang W, Xu W. Development of a Chinese version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11(1):90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guillemin F. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures. Scand J Rheumatol. 1995;24(2):61–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417–1432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennell KL, Bartam S, Crossley KM, et al. Outcome measures in patellofemoral pain syndrome: test retest reliability and inter-relationships. Phys Ther Sport. 2000;1(2):32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Moutzouri M, Tsoumpos P, Billis E, et al. Cross-cultural translation and validation of the Greek version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients with total knee replacement. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(16):1477–1483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, et al. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28(2):88–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos EM, Lohmander LS. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howe TE, Dawson LJ, Syme G, et al. Evaluation of outcome measures for use in clinical practice for adults with musculoskeletal conditions of the knee: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2012;17(2):100–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paxton W, Fithian DC, Stone ML, et al. The reliability and validity of knee-specific and general health instruments in assessing acute patellar dislocation outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(4):487–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton A, Conway J, Holgate S. Reliability: what is it, and how is it measured? Physiotherapy. 2000;86(2):94–99.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin G, Stokes M. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil. 1998;12(3):187–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas JR, Nelson JK. 1996. Research methods in physical therapy. 3rd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley KM, Bennell KL, Cowan SM, et al. Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(5):815–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med. 1998;26(4):217–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson CJ, Propps M, Ratner J, et al. Reliability and responsiveness of the lower extremity functional scale and the anterior knee pain scale in patients with anterior knee pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(3):136–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ebrahimi N, Naghdi S, Ansari NN, et al. Statistical validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) according to COSMIN checklist. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar