Translation, adaptation, validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the ‘blue flags’ questionnaire

References

• Centraal Bureau Voor de Statistiek (CBS). Labor participation; key figures. 2020 [accessed 9 Mar 2020]. Available from: https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/82309ned/table?fromstatweb
   Google Scholar
• Bond MA, Punnett L, Pyle JL, et al. Gendered work conditions, health, and work outcomes. J Occup Health Psychol. 2004;9(1):28–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ose SO. Working conditions, compensation and absenteeism. J Health Econ. 2005;24(1):161–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransen L. Work and health in interaction. Mijn Gezondheidsgids. 2018. Available from: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:9ee8a817-497a-4b24-820f-276b958ae7ba
   Google Scholar
• Douwes M, Genabeek J, van den Bossche S, et al. Health and safety balance 2016: quality of work, effects and measures in the Netherlands. Leiden: De Nederlandse organisatie voor toegepast-natuurwetenschappelijk onderzoek (TNO). 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz AB, Chen CY, Edington DW. The cost and impact of health conditions on presenteeism to employers: a review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(5):365–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy RD, Kim HJ, Gensmer NP, et al. Linking decent work with physical and mental health: a psychology of working perspective. J Vocation Behav. 2019;112:384–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leijten FR, van den Heuvel SG, van der Beek AJ, et al. Associations of work-related factors and work engagement with mental and physical health: a 1-year follow-up study among older workers. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):86–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehue F, Bolman C, Völlink T, et al. Coping with bullying at work and health related problems. Int J Stress Manag. 2012;19(3):175–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennehed CP, Gard G, Holmberg S, et al. “Blue flags”, development of a short clinical questionnaire on work-related psychosocial risk factors-a validation study in primary care. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swaan J, Preuper HS, Smeets R. Multifactorial analysis in specialist medical rehabilitation. In: Handboek Pijnrevalidatie. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2019. p. 69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, et al. The measurement of effort–reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(8):1483–1499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaratne S, Himle D, Chess WA. Dealing with work stress and strain: Is the perception of support more important than its use? J Appl Behav Sci. 1988;24(2):191–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemyre L, Chair MR, Lalande-Markon MP. Psychological stress measure (PSM-9): Integration of an evidence-based approach to assessment, monitoring, and evaluation of stress in physical therapy practice. Physiother Theory Pract. 2009;25(5–6):453–462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landsman-Dijkstra JJ, van Wijck R, Groothoff JW. Improvement of balance between work stress and recovery after a body awareness program for chronic aspecific psychosomatic symptoms. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60(2):125–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw WS, Van der Windt DA, Main CJ, et al. Early patient screening and intervention to address individual-level occupational factors (“blue flags”) in back disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):64–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, et al. Early identification and management of psychological risk factors (“yellow flags”) in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):737–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulders N, Boersma R, Ijntema R, et al. Professional competence profile Psychosomatic Physiotherapy. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Fysiotherapie volgens de Psychosomatiek. 2009. Available from: https://www.kngf.nl/binaries/content/assets/kngf/onbeveiligd/vakgebied/vakinhoud/beroepsprofielen/beroepsprofiel-psychosomatisch-fysiotherapeut.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Radkiewicz P, Widerszal-Bazyl M, NEXT-Study Group. Psychometric properties of Work Ability Index in the light of comparative survey study. Int Congress Series. 2005;1280:304–309.
   Google Scholar
• De Zwart B, Frings‐Dresen M, Van Duivenbooden J. Test–retest reliability of the Work Ability Index questionnaire. Occup Med. 2002;52(4):177–181.
   Google Scholar
• Meijman T, Broersen J, Fortuin R. Manual VBBA. Amsterdam: SKB Vragenlijst Services; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner D, Amick III BC, Rogers WH, et al. The work limitations questionnaire. Medl Care. 2001;28:72–85.
   Google Scholar
• Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, et al. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998;3(4):322–355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vendrig A. De vragenlijst arbeidsreïntegratie. Diagnostiek-wijzer. 2005;8:27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Heinen S, Bakker R, Brouwer S, et al. Betrouwbaarheid en validiteit van de Groninger Werkbeleving Screeningslijst (GWS). Tbv - Tijdschrift Voor Bedrijfs- en Verzekeringsgeneeskunde. 2014;22(1):15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström K. Review of psychological and social factors at work and suggestions for the General Nordic Questionnaire: Description of the conceptual and theoretical background of topics selected for coverage by the Nordic questionnaire (QPSNordic). Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Council of Ministers. 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Wännström I, Peterson U, Åsberg M, et al. Psychometric properties of scales in the General Nordic Questionnaire for Psychological and Social Factors at Work (QPS): confirmatory factor analysis and prediction of certified long-term sickness absence. Scand J Psychol. 2009;50(3):231–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink L, Prinsen C, Patrick D, et al. COSMIN study design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. 2019. Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, De Vet HC, Prinsen CA, et al. COSMIN risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1171–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Prinsen CA, Chiarotto A, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1159–1170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association WM. World medical association declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bull World Health Organization. 2001;79(4):373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliem JA, Gliem RR. editors. Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community. 2003. Available from: http://pioneer.netserv.chula.ac.th/∼ppongsa/2013605/Cronbach.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adamson KA, Prion S. Reliability: measuring internal consistency using Cronbach's α. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2013;9(5):e179–e180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB. Using multivariate statistics Boston (MA): Pearson; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Mukaka MM. A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24(3):69–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Cambridge (MA): Academic Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heale R, Twycross A. Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evid Based Nurs. 2015;18(3):66–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar