168
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Does every Clavien-Dindo complication matter? A national multi-center study in kidney cancer surgery

, , , , , , ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Pages 441-447 | Received 02 Mar 2021, Accepted 20 Jul 2021, Published online: 17 Sep 2021

References

  • Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363(26):2477–2481.
  • Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111(5):518–526.
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213.
  • Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–196.
  • Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Graefen M, European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel, et al. Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol. 2012;61(2):341–349.
  • Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and Meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):431–452.
  • Cheng WM, Lin TP, Lin CC, et al. Standardized report for early complications of radical prostatectomy. J Chin Med Assoc. 2014;77(5):234–241.
  • Ficarra V, Bhayani S, Porter J, et al. Predictors of warm ischemia time and perioperative complications in a multicenter, international series of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;61(2):395–402.
  • Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ, et al. Objective measures of renal mass anatomic complexity predict rates of major complications following partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2011;60(4):724–730.
  • Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Biyani CS, et al. Validation of the Clavien-Dindo grading system in urology by the european association of urology guidelines ad hoc panel. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;4(4):608–613.
  • de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, et al. Categorisation of complications and validation of the clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(2):246–255.
  • Nisen H, Jarvinen P, Fovaeus M, et al. Contemporary treatment of renal tumors: a questionnaire survey in the nordic countries (the NORENCA-I study). Scand J Urol. 2017;51(5):360–366.
  • Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern cooperative oncology group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5(6):649–655.
  • Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, et al. Updating and validating the charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(6):676–682.
  • Dripps RD, Lamont A, Eckenhoff JE. The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. Jama. 1961;178(3):261–266.
  • Henderson JM, Fowler S, Joyce A, BAUS, et al. Perioperative outcomes of 6042 nephrectomies in 2012: surgeon-reported results in the UK from the british association of urological surgeons (BAUS) nephrectomy database. BJU Int. 2015;115(1):121–126.
  • Hadjipavlou M, Khan F, Fowler S, BAUS Sections of Endourology and Oncology, et al. Partial vs radical nephrectomy for T1 renal tumours: an analysis from the british association of urological surgeons nephrectomy audit. BJU Int. 2016;117(1):62–71.
  • Bravi CA, Larcher A, Capitanio U, et al. Perioperative outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic partial nephrectomy: a prospective multicenter observational study (the RECORd 2 project). Eur Urol Focus. 2019;7(2):390–396.
  • Larcher A, Muttin F, Peyronnet B, et al. The learning curve for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Impact of surgical experience on perioperative outcomes. Eur Urol. 2019;75(2):253–256.
  • Thorstenson A, Bergman M, Scherman-Plogell AH, et al. Tumour characteristics and surgical treatment of renal cell carcinoma in Sweden 2005-2010: a population-based study from the national swedish kidney cancer register. Scand J Urol. 2014;48(3):231–238.
  • Gandaglia G, Bravi CA, Dell'Oglio P, et al. The impact of implementation of the european association of urology guidelines panel recommendations on reporting and grading complications on perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2018;74(1):4–7.
  • Healey MA, Shackford SR, Osler TM, et al. Complications in surgical patients. Arch Surg. 2002;137(5):611–617. discussion 617–618.
  • Bauman TM, Potretzke AM, Vetter JM, et al. Cerebrovascular disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease increase risk of complications with robotic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2016;30(3):293–299.
  • Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(9):735–740.
  • Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Amparore D, et al. Nephron-sparing suture of renal parenchyma after partial nephrectomy: Which technique to go for? Some best practices. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5(4):600–603.
  • Hennus PM, Kroeze SG, Bosch JL, et al. Impact of comorbidity on complications after nephrectomy: use of the clavien classification of surgical complications. BJU Int. 2012;110(5):682–687.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.