A traditionalist pattern of morality politics in the Italian parliament: the case of same-sex civil partnerships

References

• Atzpodien, D. S. 2023. “Reconciling Intra-Party and Intra-Coalition Dissent in Morality Politics: Parliamentary Debates on Marriage Equality in the German Bundestag.” Swiss Political Science Review 29:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoub, P. M., and K. Stoeckl. 2023. “The Double-Helix Entanglements of Transnational Advocacy: Moral Conservative Resistance to LGBTI Rights.” Review of International Studies 50 (2): 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210523000530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccetti, C. 2007. I Postdemocristiani. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. 1999. Women, Policy and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, T., and M. Driessen. 2016. “Mapping Contemporary Catholic Politics in Italy.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 21 (3): 419–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354571X.2016.1169885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolzonar, F. 2016. “A Christian Democratisation of Politics? The New Influence of Catholicism on Italian Politics Since the Demise of the Democrazia Cristiana.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 21 (3): 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354571X.2016.1169887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandão, A. M., and T. C. Machado. 2012. “How Equal Is Equality? Discussions About Same-Sex Marriage in Portugal.” Sexualities 15 (5–6): 662–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460712446274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, C. 2021. “Principled or Pragmatic? Morality Politics in Direct Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science 51 (2): 584–603. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cravens, R. G. 2019. “Same-Sex Marriage and the Public Policy Process.” Sexuality, Gender & Policy 2 (1): 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/sgp2.12003.
   Google Scholar
• Dombos, T., A. Krizsan, M. Verloo, and V. Zentai 2012, Critical Frame Analysis: A Comparative Methodology for the ‘Quality in Gender+ Equality Policies’ (QUING) Project, CPS Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Donà, A. 2021. “Somewhere Over the Rainbow: Italy and the Regulation of Same-Sex Unions.” Modern Italy 26 (3): 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/mit.2021.28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeli, I., C. Green-Pedersen, and L. T. Larsen. 2012. “How to Study the Two Worlds of Morality Politics.” In Morality Politics in Western Europe: Parties, Agendas and Policy Choices, edited by I. Engeli, C. Green-Pedersen, and L. T. Larsen, 27–34, Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Engeli, I., C. Green-Pedersen, and L. T. Larsen. 2013. “The Puzzle of Permissiveness: Understanding Policy Processes Concerning Morality Issues.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (3): 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.761500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeli, I., and F. Varone. 2011. “Governing Morality Issues Through Procedural Policies.” Swiss Political Science Review 17 (3): 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02025.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euchner, E.-M. 2019. Morality Politics in a Secular Age. Strategic Parties and Divided Governments in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Feo, F. 2022. “Legislative Reforms to Fight Discrimination and Violence Against LGBTQ+: The Failure of the Zan Bill in Italy.” European Journal of Politics and Gender 5 (1): 149–151. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16377638483577.
   Google Scholar
• Garbagnoli, S. 2016. “Against the Heresy of Immanence: Vatican’s ‘Gender’ As a New Rhetorical Device Against the Denaturalisation of the Sexual Order.” Religion and Gender 6 (2): 187–204. https://doi.org/10.18352/rg.10156.
   Google Scholar
• Garbagnoli, S. 2017. “Italy As a Lighthouse: Anti-Gender Protests Between the “Anthropological question” and National Identity.” In Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilising Against Equality, edited by R. Kuhar and D. Paternotte, 151–174. London/New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Giuliani, G. A. 2022. “The Family Policy Positions of Conservative Parties: A Farewell to the Male-Breadwinner Family Model?” European Journal of Political Research 61 (3): 678–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottweis, H. 2006. “Argumentative Policy Analysis.” In Handbook of Public Policy, eds. B. G. Peters and J. Pierre, 461–480. SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S., and M. Prearo. 2022. “Political Parties and Public Opinion Facing Gender, Sexuality, and Family Issues: Insights from the Italian Debate on Same-Sex Civil Unions.” Polis, Ricerche e studi su società e politica 3:393–420. https://doi.org/10.1424/105487.
   Google Scholar
• Gusmeroli, P., and L. Trappolin. 2019. Raccontare l’omofobia in Italia: genesi e sviluppi di una parola chiave. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, A. 2016. “Who’s in Favour? Same-Sex Union Laws in Parliament.” Findings on Stakeholder Engagement 22 (3): 404–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2016.1202649.
   Google Scholar
• Hurka, S., C. Knill, and L. Rivière. 2018. “Four Worlds of Morality Politics: The Impact of Institutional Venues and Party Cleavages.” West European Politics 41 (2): 428–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1380463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantola, J., and E. Lombardo. 2021. “Challenges to Democratic Practices and Discourses in the European Parliament: Feminist Perspectives on the Politics of Political Groups.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society 28 (3): 579–602. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxab022.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C., and C. Preidel. 2015. “Institutional Opportunity Structures and the Catholic Church: Explaining Variation in the Regulation of Same-Sex Partnerships in Ireland and Italy.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (3): 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.951066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreitzer, R., K. Kane, and C. Mooney. 2019. “The Evolution of Morality Policy Debate: Moralization and De-Moralization.” The Forum 17 (1): 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2019-0003.
   Google Scholar
• Lasio, D., N. Congiargiu, S. De Simone, and F. Serri. 2019. “Gender Fundamentalism and Heteronormativity in the Political Discussion About Lesbian and Gay Parenthood.” Sexuality Research & Social Policy 16 (4): 501–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0350-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavizzari, A. 2019. Protesting Gender. 1st ed. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. 1994. The Politics of Sin: Drugs, Alcohol and Public Policy. Armonk: Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, P. 2008. “Critical Frame Analysis of EU Gender Equality Policies: New Perspectives on the Substantive Representation of Women.” Representation 44 (2): 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890802079656.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, C. Z. 2000. “The Decline of Federalism and the Rise of Morality-Policy Conflict in the United States.” Publius 30 (1): 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a030059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, C. Z., and M. H. Lee. 2000. “The Influence of Values on Consensus and Contentious Morality Policy: U.S. Death Penalty Reform, 1956-82.” The Journal of Politics 62 (1): 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, C., J. Ramme, and J. Takács. 2022. Paradoxical Right-Wing Sexual Politics in Europe. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mourão Permoser, J. 2019. “What Are Morality Policies? The Politics of Values in a Post-Secular World.” Political Studies Review 17 (3): 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918816538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucciaroni, G. 2011. “Are Debates About “Morality Policy” Really About Morality? Framing Opposition to Gay and Lesbian Rights: Mucciaroni: Are Debates About “Morality Policy” Really About Morality?” Policy Studies Journal 39 (2): 187–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00404.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucciaroni, G., K. Ferraiolo, and M. E. Rubado. 2019. “Framing Morality Policy Issues: State Legislative Debates on Abortion Restrictions.” Policy Sciences 52 (2): 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9336-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozzano, L. 2015. “The Debate About Same-Sex Marriages/Civil Unions in Italy’s 2006 and 2013 Electoral Campaigns.” Contemporary Italian Politics 7 (2): 144–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2015.1041250.
   Google Scholar
• Ozzano, L. 2016. “Two Forms of Catholicism in Twenty-First-Century Italian Public Debate: An Analysis of Positions on Same-Sex Marriage and Muslim Dress Codes.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 21 (3): 464–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354571X.2016.1169888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozzano, L. 2020a. “Last but Not Least: How Italy Finally Legalised Same-Sex Unions.” Contemporary Italian Politics 12 (1): 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2020.1715594.
   Google Scholar
• Ozzano, L. 2020b. The Masks of the Political God: Religion and Political Parties in Contemporary Democracies. Lanham, Maryland: ECPR Press: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Pansardi, P., and F. Battegazzorre. 2018. “The Discursive Legitimation Strategies of the President of the Commission: A Qualitative Content Analysis of the State of the Union Addresses (SOTEU.” Journal of European Integration 40 (7): 853–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1482286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternotte, D. 2015. “Global Times, Global Debates? Same-Sex Marriage Worldwide.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society 22 (4): 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxv038.
   Google Scholar
• Plumb, A. 2015. “How Do MPs in Westminster Democracies Vote When Unconstrained by Party Discipline? A Comparison of Free Vote Patterns on Marriage Equality Legislation.” Parliamentary Affairs 68 (3): 533–554. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsu006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prearo, M. 2020. L’ipotesi neocattolica. Politologia dei movimenti anti-gender. Milano, Mimesis.
   Google Scholar
• Prearo, M. 2024. Anti-Gender Mobilizations, Religion and Politics: An Italian Case Study. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Proksch, S.-O., and J. B. Slapin. 2015. The Politics of Parliamentary Debates: Parties, Rebels and Representation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rebessi, E., and F. Zucchini. 2018. “The Role of the Italian Constitutional Court in the Policy Agenda: Persistence and Change Between the First and Second Republic.” Italian Political Science Review 48 (3): 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2018.12.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiu, G., and G. Gonano. 2020. “Religious Barriers to the Diffusion of Same-Sex Civil Unions in Italy.” Population Research and Policy Review 39 (6): 1185–1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09613-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvati, E. 2021. “Politicisation and Conflict in the Relationship with the European Union: An Analysis of Italian Prime Ministers’ Parliamentary Speeches.” Italian Political Science Review 51 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2020.1.
   Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S. 2018. In eds. H. Heinelt and S. Münch. The Constructivist Turn in EU Public Policy Approaches. Handbook of European Policies: Edward Elgar Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Schillaci, A. 2016. “Same-Sex Civil Unions: Comparative Law Profiles and the Holding of the Principle of Equality.” DPCE Online 27:3.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, S., E.-M. Euchner, and C. Preidel. 2013. “Regulating Prostitution and Same-Sex Marriage in Italy and Spain: The Interplay of Political and Societal Veto Players in Two Catholic Societies.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (3): 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.761512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, S. N., S. J. Turnbull-Dugarte, and B. A. Olinger. 2022. “Where Is the Party? Explaining Positions on Same-Sex Marriage in Europe Among Would-Be Members of Parliament.” European Journal of Politics and Gender 5 (1): 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16267702086451.
   Google Scholar
• Slapin, J. B., and S.-O. Proksch. 2014. “Words As Data.” In The Oxford Hand-Book of Legislative Studies, edited by S. Martin, T. Saalfeld, and K. W. Strøm. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Studlar, D. T., and G. J. Burns. 2015. “Toward the Permissive Society? Morality Policy Agendas and Policy Directions in Western Democracies.” Policy Sciences 48 (3): 273–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9218-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studlar, D. T., A. Cagossi, and R. D. Duval. 2013. “Is Morality Policy Different? Institutional Explanations for Post-War Western Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (3): 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.761503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verloo, M. 2007. Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality. A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe. Budapest: CEU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verloo, M. 2016. “Mainstreaming Gender Equality in Europe. A Critical Frame Analysis Approach.” Επιθεώρηση Κοινωνικών Ερευνών (117): 11–34. https://doi.org/10.12681/grsr.9555.
   Google Scholar
• Verloo, M., and E. Lombardo. 2007. “Contested Gender Equality and Policy Variety in Europe: Introducing a Critical Frame Analysis Approach.” In Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality. A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe, edited by M. M. T. Verloo, 21–51. Budapest: CEU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vesan, P., and P. Pansardi. 2021. “Speaking Social Europe: A Paradigmatic Shift in the European Commission Presidents’ Social Policy Discourse?” Journal of European Social Policy 31 (4): 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928721999596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, M. M. 2017. “Italy’s Gentle Revolution: The New Law on Same-Sex Partnerships.” Digest: National Italian American Bar Association Law Journal 25:1–31.
   Google Scholar