The valuation of a mine – values, facts and contested notions of sustainability in the prospecting for new mines

References

• Abson, D. J., J. Fischer, J. Leventon, J. Newig, T. Schomerus, U. Vilsmaier, and D. J. Lang. 2017. “Leverage Points for Sustainability Transformation.” AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 46 (1): 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, B. 1998. Timescapes of Modernity: The Environment and Invisible Hazards. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, G. 2017. Parlamentets natur: Utviklingen av norsk miljø-og petroleumspolitikk (1945–2013). Norway: University Publisher, Bergen University.
   Google Scholar
• Anshelm, J., and S. Haikola. 2018a. “Depoliticization, Repoliticization, and Environmental Concerns: Swedish Mining Politics As an Instance of Environmental Politicization.” ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 17 (2): 561–596.
   Google Scholar
• Anshelm, J., S. Haikola, and B. Wallsten. 2018. Svensk gruvpolitik i omvandling: Aktörer, kontroverser, möjliga världar. Halmstad: Gidlunds förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Arboleda, M. 2020. Planetary Mine: Territories of Extraction Under Late Capitalism. New York: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Baber, W. F., and R. V. Bartlett. 2021. Democratic Norms of Earth System Governance: Deliberative Politics in the Anthropocene. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1995. Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, M. 2021. “Value Judgments at the Heart of Green Transformation: The Leverage of Pension Fund Investors.” Global Environmental Politics 21 (3): 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, M., and J. Olsson. 2023. “Managing Public Value Conflicts–Institutional Strategies and the Greening of Public Pension Funds.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 39 (4): 101301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2023.101301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and L. Thévenot. 1999. “The Sociology of Critical Capacity.” European Journal of Social Theory 2 (3): 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/136843199002003010.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and L. Thévenot. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boström, M., E. Andersson, M. Berg, K. Gustafsson, E. Gustavsson, E. Hysing, and J. Öhman. 2018. “Conditions for Transformative Learning for Sustainable Development: A Theoretical Review and Approach.” Sustainability 10 (12): 4479. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. 2009. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9 (2): 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027.
   Google Scholar
• Centemeri, L. 2022. “Green Justification and Environmental Movements.” In Handbook of Economics and Sociology of Conventions, edited by R. Diaz Bone, G. de Larquier, 1–21. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and J. D. Creswell. 2018. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, G., and H. Paanakker. 2022. “Dilemmas and Craftsmanship Practices: Strategies for Empirically Uncovering Values and Value Conflicts.” In Researching Values: Methodological Approaches for Understanding Values Work in Organisations and Leadership, edited by Espedal, 93–113. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Demers, C., and J. P. Gond. 2020. “The Moral Microfoundations of Institutional Complexity: Sustainability Implementation as Compromise-Making at an Oil Sands Company.” Organization Studies 41 (4): 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619867721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1973. On Morality and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. 2009. Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haikola, S., and J. Anshelm. 2020. “Evolutionary Governance in Mining: Boom and Bust in Peripheral Communities in Sweden.” Land Use Policy 93:104056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haikola, S., and J. Anshelm. 2020. “Evolutionary Governance in Mining: Boom and Bust in Peripheral Communities in Sweden.” Land Use Policy 93: 104056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2002. “Discourse Analysis and the Study of Policy Making.” European Political Science 2 (1): 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2002.49.
   Google Scholar
• Isacs, L., J. O. Kenter, H. Wetterstrand, and C. Katzeff. 2022. “What Does Value Pluralism Mean in Practice? An Empirical Demonstration from a Deliberative Valuation.” People and Nature 5 (2): 384–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10324.
   Google Scholar
• Jääskeläinen, T. 2020. “The Sámi Reindeer herders’ Conceptualizations of Sustainability in the Permitting of Mineral Extraction–Contradictions Related to Sustainability Criteria.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 43:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagd, S. 2011. “Pragmatic Sociology and Competing Orders of Worth in Organizations.” European Journal of Social Theory 14 (3): 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011412349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2005. Designs on Nature. Princeton: Princeton University press.
   Google Scholar
• Kojola, E. 2019. “Indigeneity, Gender and Class in Decision-Making About Risks from Resource Extraction.” Environmental Sociology 5 (2): 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2018.1426090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafaye, C., and L. Thévenot. 2017. “An Ecological Justification? Conflicts in the Development of Nature.” In Justification, Evaluation and Critique in the Study of Organizations, edited by C. Charlotte, G. Jean-Pascal, and L. Bernard, 273–300. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R., and R. K. Larsen. 2017. “The Politics of Planning: Assessing the Impacts of Mining on Sami Lands.” Third World Quarterly 38 (5): 1164–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1257909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., G. R. Sundqvist. 2013. “Sociology of Risk.” In Essentials of Risk Theory, edited by Roeser, 75–105. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lindahl, K. B., A. Johansson, A. Zachrisson, and R. Viklund. 2018. “Competing Pathways to Sustainability? Exploring Conflicts Over Mine Establishments in the Swedish Mountain Region.” Journal of environmental management 218:402–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockie, S., and C. M. L. Wong. 2018. “Conflicting Temporalities of Social and Environmental Change?” In Environment and Society: Concepts and Challenges, edited by M. Boström and D. Davidson, 327–350. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Löfmarck, E., and R. Lidskog. 2017. “Bumping Against the Boundary: IPBES and the Knowledge Divide.” Environmental Science & Policy 69:22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malin, S. A., S. Ryder, and M. G. Lyra. 2019. “Environmental Justice and Natural Resource Extraction: Intersections of Power, Equity and Access.” Environmental Sociology 5 (2): 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2019.1608420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachet, L., C. Beckett, and K. S. MacNeil. 2022. “Framing Extractive Violence As Environmental (In) Justice: A Cross-Perspective from Indigenous Lands in Canada and Sweden.” The Extractive Industries and Society 12: 100949.
   Google Scholar
• Nyberg, D., and C. Wright. 2013. “Corporate Corruption of the Environment: Sustainability as a Process of Compromise.” The British Journal of Sociology 64 (3): 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson, T. 2020. Mining Futures: Predictions and Uncertainty in Swedish Mineral Exploration. Doctoral dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Patriotta, G., J. P. Gond, and F. Schultz. 2011. “Maintaining Legitimacy: Controversies, Orders of Worth, and Public Justifications.” Journal of Management Studies 48 (8): 1804–1836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00990.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, J. 2018. “Ecological Reflexivity: Characterising an Elusive Virtue for Governance in the Anthropocene.” Environmental Politics 28 (7): 1145–1166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1487148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poelzer, G. A., and T. Ejdemo. 2018. “Too Good to Be True? The Expectations and Reality of Mine Development in Pajala, Sweden.” Arctic Review on Law and Politics 9:3–24. https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v9.674.
   Google Scholar
• Princen, T. 2005. The Logic of Sufficiency. Cambridge, Mass: Mit Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raitio, K., C. Allard, and R. Lawrence. 2020. “Mineral Extraction in Swedish Sápmi: The Regulatory Gap Between Sami Rights and Sweden’s Mining Permitting Practices.” Land Use Policy 99:105001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinkinen, J., E. Shove, and G. Marsden. 2020. Conceptualising Demand: A Distinctive Approach to Consumption and Practice. Lontoo: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. 2019. Resonance: A Sociology of Our Relationship to the World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P., and D. Yanow. 2013. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., M. Leach, and P. Newell. 2015. The Politics of Green Transformations. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stammler, F., and E. Wilson. 2006. “Dialogue for Development: An Exploration of Relations Between Oil and Gas Companies, Communities, and the State.” Sibirica 5 (2): 1–43. https://doi.org/10.3167/136173606780490739.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. 2021. “Reforming Global Climate Governance in an Age of Bullshit.” Globalizations 18 (1): 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1774315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish public investigations, SOU 2022:33, Om prövning och omprövning – en del av den gröna omställningen. ISBN 978-91-525-0405-5
   Google Scholar
• Swedish public investigations, SOU 2022:56, En tryggad försörjning av metaller och mineral, ISBN 978-91-525-0489-5 (pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L., M. Moody, and C. Lafay. 2000. “Forms of Valuing Nature: Arguments and Modes of Justification in French and American Environmental Disputes.” In Rethinking comparative cultural sociology: Repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States, edited by L. Michèle and T. Laurent, 229–272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Wright, G. H. 1993. “Images of Science and Forms of Rationality.” In The Tree of Knowledge and Other Essays, pp. 172–192. Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E., and F. Stammler. 2016. “Beyond Extractivism and Alternative Cosmologies: Arctic Communities and Extractive Industries in Uncertain Times.” The Extractive Industries and Society 3 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldız, T. D., and O. Kural. 2020. “The Effects of the Mining Operation Activities Permit Process on the Mining Sector in Turkey.” Resources Policy 69:101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar