Radical reflexivity, experimental ontology and RRI

References

• Agamben, Giorgio. 2014. “What is a Destituent Power?” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32 (1): 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1068/d3201tra.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agamben, Giorgio. 2017. The Omnibus Homo Sacer. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Åsberg, C., and N. Lykke. 2010. “Feminist Technoscience Studies.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 17 (4): 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506810377692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2012. “Matter Feels, Converses, Suffers, Desires, Yearns and Remembers.” In New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies, edited by R. Dolphijn and I. van der Tui. Michigan: Open Humanities Press. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/o/ohp/11515701.0001.001/1:4.3/--new-materialism-interviews-cartographies?rgn=div2;view=fulltext.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2010. “Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/Continuities, SpaceTime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come.” Derrida Today 3 (2): 240–268. https://doi.org/10.3366/drt.2010.0206.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2014. “Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart.” Parallax 20 (3): 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2017. “Troubling Time/s and Ecologies of Nothingness: Re-Turning, Re-membering, and Facing the Incalculable.” New Formations: A Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics 92: 56–86. https://doi.org/10.3898/NEWF:92.05.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2018. “Troubling Time/s and Ecologies of Nothingness: Re-turning, Re-membering, and Facing the Incalculable.” In Eco-Deconstruction: Derrida and Environmental Philosophy, edited by Matthias Fritsch, Philippe Lynes, and David Wood, 206–248. New York, USA: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, M. 2017. “Towards a More-Than-Human Participatory Research.” In Participatory Research in More-Than-Human Worlds, edited by M. Bastian, O. Jones, N. Moore, and E. Roe, 19–37. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bauchspies, Wenda K., J. Croissant, and Sal P. Restiv. 2006. Science Technology and Society: A Sociological Approach. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birtchnell, Th., S. Savitzky, and J. Urry. 2015. Cargomobilities. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blaser, Mario. 2013. “Ontological Conflicts and the Stories of Peoples in Spite of Europe: Toward a Conversation on Political Ontology.” Current Anthropology 54 (5): 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1086/672270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, Vincent, and Pieter Lemmens. 2015. “The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications, edited by Bert-Jaap Koops, Ilse Oosterlaken, Henny Romijn, Tsjalling Swierstra, and Jeroen van den Hoven, 19–35. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, Vincent. 2020. “Towards An Ontology of Innovation: On the New, the Political-Economic Dimension and the Intrinsic Risks Involved in Innovation Processes.” In The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Engineering, edited by D. P. Michelfelder and N. Doorn, 1st ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Böhm, Steffen, and Stefano Pascucci. 2020. “It’s Not Just About the Mafia! Conceptualizing Business–Society Relations of Organized Violence.” Academy of Management Perspectives 34 (4): 546–565. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2019.0029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohr, N. 1928. “The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory1.” Nature 121 (3050): 580–590. https://doi.org/10.1038/121580a0.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, R. 2019. Corporate Stakeholder Democracy. New York: CEU University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, R., A. Loeber, M. Vinther Christensen, J. Cohen, E. Frankus, E. Griessler, H. Hönigmayer, and J. Starkbaum. 2023. “Social Labs as Temporary Intermediary Learning Organizations to Help Implement Complex Normative Policies. The Case of Responsible Research and Innovation in European Science Governance.” The Learning Organization 30 (6): 713–739. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-09-2021-0118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, R., and E. Griessler. 2018. “More Democratic Research and Innovation.” Journal of Science Communication 17 (3), C04. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17030304.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, R., and R. Randell. 2023. “The Political Ontology of Automobility.” Mobility Humanities 2 (1): 24–42. https://doi.org/10.23090/MH.2023.01.2.1.022.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Robert, and Richard Randell. 2020. “Futuramas of the Present: The “Driver Problem” in the Autonomous Vehicle Sociotechnical Imaginary.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7 (1): 163. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00655-z.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Robert, and Richard Randell. 2022. Post-automobility Futures: Technology, Power, and Imaginaries. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Robert, and Richard Randell. 2023. “Towards post-automobility: Destituting Automobility.” Applied Mobilities, 8 (3): 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2022.2071664.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender Trouble. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Sean M. 2019. Something Deeply Hidden: Quantum Worlds and the Emergence of Spacetime. Boston, MA: Dutton an imprint of Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Cavoukian, Ann. 2009. “Privacy by Design: The 7 Foundational Principles.” Information and privacy commissioner of Ontario, Canada 5.
   Google Scholar
• Cetina, K. K. 1993. “Strong Constructivism — From a Sociologist’s Point of View: A Personal Addendum to Sismondo’s Paper.” Social Studies of Science 23 (3): 555–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312793023003005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. 2018. Ontopolitics in the Anthropocene: An Introduction to Mapping, Sensing and Hacking. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, M. B. E. 1995. “A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance.” The Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 92–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/258888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Craig, Clancy Wilmott, Emma Fraser, and Jim Thatcher. 2020. ““Smart” Discourses, the Limits of Representation, and New Regimes of Spatial Data.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (2): 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1665493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Castro, Eduardo Viveiros. 1998. “Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4 (3): 469–488. https://doi.org/10.2307/3034157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debord, Guy. (1967) 2014. The Society of the Spectacle. Translated by Ken Knabb. Berkeley, CA: Bureau of Public Secrets.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, David. 2010. “Apart from Universes.” In Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, and Reality, edited by Simon Saunders and others, 542–552. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewandre, N. 2018. “Political Agents as Relational Selves: Rethinking EU Politics and Policy-Making with Hannah Arendt.” Philosophy Today 62 (2): 493–519. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday2018612222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrnström-Fuentes, M., and S. Böhm. 2023. “The Political Ontology of Corporate Social Responsibility: Obscuring the Pluriverse in Place.” Journal of Business Ethics 185 (2): 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05175-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, Arturo. 2007. “The ‘Ontological Turn’ in Social Theory. A Commentary on ‘Human Geography Without Scale’, by Sallie Marston, John Paul Jones II and Keith Woodward.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32 (1): 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00243.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, Arturo. 2019. “Thinking-Feeling with the Earth: Territorial Struggles and the Ontological Dimension of the Epistemologies of the South.” In Knowledges Born in the Struggle: Constructing the Epistemologies of the Global South, edited by Boaventura de Sousa Santos and Maria Meneses, 41–57. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, Arturo. 2020. Pluriversal Politics: The Real and the Possible. New York: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2001. Fearless Speech. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 2006. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Theory.” Journal of Management Studies 39 (1): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Gad, Christopher, Casper Bruun Jensen, and Brit Ross Winthereik. 2019. “Practical Ontology: Worlds in STS and Anthropology.” Last Modified August 7, 2019, Accessed January 25, 2023. https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/practical-ontology-worlds-sts-and-anthropology.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. 2022. Harold Garfinkel: Studies of Work in the Sciences Edited by M. Lynch. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H., M. Lynch, and E. Livingston. 1981. “The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11 (2): 131–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839318101100202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, Harold. 1991. Studies in Ethnomethodology. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glasius, Marlies, and Marcus Michaelsen. 2018. “Authoritarian Practices in the Digital Age| Illiberal and Authoritarian Practices in the Digital Sphere — Prologue.” International Journal of Communication 12:3795–3813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griessler, E. 2012. “One Size Fits All? On the Institutionalization of Participatory Technology Assessment and Its Interconnection with National Ways of Policy-Making: The Cases of Switzerland and Austria.” Poiesis & Praxis 9:61–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-012-0120-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griessler, E., R. Braun, M. Wicher, and M. Yorulmaz. 2022. “The Drama of Responsible Research and Innovation: The Ups and Downs of a Policy Concept.” In Responsible Research and Innovation: An Evidence-Based Reconceptualization, edited by V. Blok, 11–34. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. 2016. “Sex, Work, Meat: The Feminist Politics of Veganism.” Feminist Review 114 (1): 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-016-0011-1.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, Graham. 2009. Prince of Networks. Melbourne: Re.press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, M. 2022. “Climate Emergency: How the Inequality Crisis is Dynamically Linked to the Sociogenesis of Climate Change.” Global Social Challenges Journal 1 (1): 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1332/MEPZ5639.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, Martin. 1971. Poetry, Language, Thought. Translated by Albert Hofstadter. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, Martin. 2002. Off the Beaten Track. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, Martin Hofstadter Albert. 2013. Poetry, Language, Thought. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Thought, 657–673. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., and T. Stivers. 2012. “Conversation Analysis and Sociology.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Sidnell and T. Stivers.
   Google Scholar
• Heur, Bas van, Loet Leydesdorff, and Sally Wyatt. 2012. “Turning to Ontology in STS? Turning to STS Through ‘Ontology’.” Social Studies of Science 43 (3): 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712458144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbert, Richard A. 1990. “Ethnomethodology and the Micro-Macro Order.” American Sociological Review 55 (6): 794–808. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbraad, Martin, and Morten Axel Pedersen. 2018. The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holbraad, Martin, Morten Axel Pedersen, and Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. 2014. “The Politics of Ontology: Anthropological Positions.” Theorizing the Contemporary, Fieldsights. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/the-politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, Emily L., Christopher D. Wirz, Dominique Brossard, Dietram A. Scheufele, and Michael A. Xenos. 2019. “Seeing Through Risk-Colored Glasses: Risk and Benefit Perceptions, Knowledge, and the Politics of Fracking in the United States.” Energy Research & Social Science 55:168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.05.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Translated by D. Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, Don. 2009. Postphenomenology and Technoscience: The Peking University Lectures. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2004. States of Knowledge: The co-Production of Science and the Social Order. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2009. “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea.” Minerva 47:119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., and Paul A. Sabatier. 1994. “Evaluating the Advocacy Coalition Framework.” Journal of Public Policy 14 (2): 175–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00007431.
   Google Scholar
• Joerges, Bernward. 1999. “Do Politics Have Artefacts?” Social Studies of Science 29 (3): 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631299029003004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juelskjaer, M., and N. Schwennesen. 2012. “Intra-active Entanglements – An Interview with Karen Barad.” KVINDER, KØN & FORSKNING, 1-2: 10–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, Eduardo. 2013. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 2013. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2000. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (Winter): 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. 1986. “On the Methods of Long Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation, and the Portuguese Route to India.” In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? edited by J. Law, 234–263. London: Routledge, Henley.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. 2009. “Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics.” In The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, edited by B. S. Turner, 141–158. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John. 2015. “What's Wrong with a One-World World?” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 16 (1): 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2015.1020066.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John, and Marianne Elisabeth Lien. 2018. “Denaturalizing Nature.” In A World of Many Worlds, edited by Marisol de la Cadena and Mario Blaser, 131–171. New York, USA: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John, and John Urry. 2004. “Enacting the Social.” Economy and Society 33 (3): 390–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514042000225716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Peter J. 2016. Quantum Ontology: A Guide to the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Oxford Academic.
   Google Scholar
• López-Cotarelo, J. 2021. “Ethnomethodology and Routine Dynamics.” In Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics, edited by M. Feldman, B. Pentland, L. D'Adderio, K. Dittrich, C. Rerup, and D. Seidl, 49–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. 1993. Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, Michael. 2012. “Philosophy on the Ground: An Appreciation of a ‘Spirit Master’.” The American Sociologist 43 (1): 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-012-9150-9.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, Michael. 2013. “Ontography: Investigating the Production of Things, Deflating Ontology.” Social Studies of Science 43 (3): 444–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713475925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, Michael. 2019. Ontography as the Study of Locally Organized Ontologies 10 (1): 147–160.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2013. “Why Political Ontology Must be Experimentalized: On Eco-show Homes as Devices of Participation.” Social Studies of Science 43 (3): 417–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712475255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, Noortje. 2015. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, John E., Helle Abelvik-Lawson, and Damien Short. 2020. “A Paradox of ‘Sustainable Development’: A Critique of the Ecological Order of Capitalism.” In The Emerald Handbook of Crime, Justice and Sustainable Development, edited by Jarrett Blaustein, Kate Fitz-Gibbon, Nathan W. Pino, and Rob White, 439–463. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Meillassoux, Quentin Brassier Ray. 2008. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Mejlgaard, Niels, Carter Bloch, Emil B. Madsen, Erich Griessler, Milena Wutekich, Ingeborg Meijer, Richard Woolley, et al. 2018a. Monitoring the Evolution and Benefits of Responsible Research and Innovation in Europe, edited by Viola Peter and Frederic Maier. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Mejlgaard, Niels, Richard Woolley, Carter Bloch, Susanne Bührer, Erich Griessler, Angela Jäger, Ralf Lindner, et al. 2018b. “Europe’s Plans for Responsible Science.” Science 361 (6403): 1.
   Google Scholar
• Merz, M., and K. K. Cetina. 1997. “Deconstruction in a ‘Thinking’ Science: Theoretical Physicists at Work.” Social Studies of Science 27 (1): 73–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631297027001004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitcham, Carl. 2014. “The True Grand Challenge for Engineering: Self-Knowledge.” Issues in Science and Technology 31 (1). https://issues.org/perspectives-the-true-grand-challenge-for-engineering-self-knowledge/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Ronald K., Bradley R. Agle, and Donna J. Wood. 1997. “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts.” Academy of Management Review 22 (4): 853–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 1999. “Ontological Politics: A Word and Some Questions.” The Sociological Review 47:74–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie. 2014. “Other Words: Stories from the Social Studies of Science, Technology, and Medicine.” Theorizing the Contemporary, Fieldsights, January 13.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie. 2021. Eating in Theory. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie, Barbara Herrnstein Smith, and E. Roy Weintraub. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. New York, USA: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, Evgeny. 2013. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, Timothy. 2012. “Ecology Without the Present.” Oxford Literary Review 34 (2): 229–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, Timothy. 2016. Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murris, Karin. 2021. Navigating the Postqualitative New Materialist and Critical Posthumanist Terrain Across Disciplines: An Introductory Guide. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, S., and R. Cretney. 2022. “Retrofitting an Emergency Approach to the Climate Crisis: A Study of two Climate Emergency Declarations in Aotearoa New Zealand.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 40 (1): 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544211028901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon, Rob. 2011. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novitzky, Peter, Michael J. Bernstein, Vincent Blok, Robert Braun, Tung Tung Chan, Wout Lamers, Anne Loeber, Ingeborg Meijer, Ralf Lindner, and Erich Griessler. 2020. “Improve Alignment of Research Policy and Societal Values.” Science 369 (6499): 39–41. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksala, Johanna. 2010. “Foucault’s Politicization of Ontology.” Continental Philosophy Review 43 (4): 445–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz. 2013. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, and Mario Pansera. 2019. “Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Handbook on Science and Public Policy, edited by Dagmar Simon, Stefan Kuhlmann, Julia Stamm, and Weert Canzler, 26–48. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Mario Pansera, Phil Macnaghten, and Sally Randles. 2021. “Organisational Institutionalisation of Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 50 (1): 104132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, René von Schomberg, and Phil Macnaghten. 2021. “An Unfinished Journey? Reflections on a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1948789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, Andrew. 2017. “The Ontological Turn: Taking Different Worlds Seriously.” Social Analysis 61 (2): 134–150. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2017.610209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollner, M. 1991. “Left of Ethnomethodology: The Rise and Decline of Radical Reflexivity.” American Sociological Review 56 (3): 370–380. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollner, M. 2012. “The End(s) of Ethnomethodology.” The American Sociologist 43:7–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-011-9144-z.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, Robert N., and Londa Schiebinger. 2008. Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, Bernard. 2018. “RRI as the Inheritor of Deliberative Democracy and the Precautionary Principle.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (1): 38–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A. 2014. “The Past and Future of RRI.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10 (17): 1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rip, Arie. 2016. “The Clothes of the Emperor. An Essay on RRI in and Around Brussels.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (3): 290–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, Kjetil, and Niels van Dijk. 2022. “Privacy Engineering and the Techno-Regulatory Imaginary.” Social Studies of Science 52 (6): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221119424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, Kjetil, Roger Strand, Ragnar Fjelland, and Silvio Funtowicz. 2013. What Can History Teach us About the Prospects of a European Research Area? edited by A. Saltelli: Joint Research Centre, Institute for the Protection and the Security of the Citizen. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, Bruce Kuttner Fred. 2012. Quantum Enigma: Physics Encounters Consciousness, 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rovelli, Carlo. 2006. “The Disappearance of Space and Time.” In The Ontology of Spacetime, edited by Dennis Geert Bernardus, and Johan Dieks, 25–36. London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. 1988. “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein.” Policy Sciences 21 (2/3): 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadowski, Jathan, and Roy Bendor. 2019. “Selling Smartness: Corporate Narratives and the Smart City as a Sociotechnical Imaginary.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 44 (3): 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918806061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutz, Alfred. 1967. Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Judith, and John-Andrew McNeish, eds. 2021. Our Extractive Age: Expressions of Violence and Resistance. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldrake, Merlin. 2021. Entangled Life: How Fungi Make our Worlds, Change our Minds & Shape our Futures. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Sismondo, S. 1993a. “Response to Knorr Cetina.” Social Studies of Science 23 (3): 563–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312793023003006.
   Google Scholar
• Sismondo, Sergio. 1993b. “Some Social Constructions.” Social Studies of Science 23 (3): 515–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312793023003004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sismondo, Sergio. 2004. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, N., and J. Lewis. 2017. “Doing Laboratory Ethnography: Reflections on Method in Scientific Workplaces.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 17 (2): 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116678040.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabarés, Raúl, Anne Loeber, Mika Nieminen, Michael J. Bernstein, Erich Griessler, Vincent Blok, Joshua Cohen, Helmut Hönigmayer, Ulrike Wunderle, and Elisabeth Frankus. 2022. “Challenges in the Implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation Across Horizon 2020.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (3): 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2101211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, Stephen Edelston. 2013. Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, John. 2000. Sociology Beyond Societies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, John. 2004. “The ‘System’ of Automobility.” Theory, Culture & Society 21 (4-5): 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404046059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaneigem, Raoul. (1967) 1983. The Revolution of Everyday Life. London: Left Bank Books and Rebel Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, Rene. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 51–74. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Warfield, Katie. 2016. “Making the Cut: An Agential Realist Examination of Selfies and Touch.” Social Media + Society 2 (2): 2056305116641706. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnke, P., and G. Heimeriks. 2008. “Technology Foresight as Innovation Policy Instrument: Learning from Science and Technology Studies.” In Future-Oriented Technology Analysis, edited by C. Cagnin, M. Keenan, R. Johnston, F. Scapolo, and R. Barré, 71–87. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, Stephen A. 2020. “Why Agential Realism Matters to Social Work.” The British Journal of Social Work 51 (8): 2964–2981. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentland, Alexander. 2016. “Imagining and Enacting the Future of the German Energy Transition: Electric Vehicles as Grid Infrastructure.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 29 (3): 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2016.1159946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, Alfred North. (1929) 1979. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, L. 1986. “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” In The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, edited by L. Winner, 19–39. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, Pak-Hang. 2016. “Responsible Innovation for Decent Nonliberal Peoples: A Dilemma?” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (2): 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1216709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolgar, Steve, and Javier Lezaun. 2013. “The Wrong Bin Bag: A Turn to Ontology in Science and Technology Studies?” Social Studies of Science 43 (3): 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713488820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, Brian. 1995. “Public Understanding of Science.” In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen, and Trevor Pinch, 361–388. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar