‘We have opened a can of worms’: using collaborative ethnography to advance responsible artificial intelligence innovation

References

• AIES. 2023. “Call for Papers.” https://www.aies-conference.com/2023/call-for-papers/.
   Google Scholar
• Alvargonzález, D. 2011. “Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, and the Sciences.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (4): 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2011.623366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmer, A. S., J. Calvert, C. Marris, S. Molyneux-Hodgson, E. Frow, M. Kearnes, K. Bulpin, P. Schyfter, A. MacKenzie, and P. Martin. 2015. “Taking Roles in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: Reflections on Working in Post-ELSI Spaces in the UK Synthetic Biology Community.” Science & Technology Studies 28 (3): 3–25. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.55340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmer, A. S., J. Calvert, C. Marris, S. Molyneux-Hodgson, E. Frow, M. Kearnes, K. Bulpin, P. Schyfter, A. Mackenzie, and P. Martin. 2016. “Five Rules of Thumb for Post-ELSI Interdisciplinary Collaborations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (1): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1177867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, A. 2010. “From Co-Location to Co-Presence: Shifts in the Use of Ethnography for the Study of Knowledge.” Social Studies of Science 40 (3): 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709359219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieler, P., M. D. Bister, J. Hauer, M. Klausner, J. Niewöhner, C. Schmid, and S. von Peter. 2021. “Distributing Reflexivity Through Co-Laborative Ethnography.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 50 (1): 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241620968271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bietti, E. 2021. “From Ethics Washing to Ethics Bashing: A Moral Philosophy View on Tech Ethics.” Journal of Social Computing 2 (3): 266–283. https://doi.org/10.23919/JSC.2021.0031.
   Google Scholar
• Binns, R., M. Veale, M. Van Kleek, and N. Shadbolt. 2017. “Like Trainer, Like Bot? Inheritance of Bias in Algorithmic Content Moderation.” In Social Informatics, edited by G. L. Ciampaglia, A. Mashhadi, and T. Yasseri, 405–415. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67256-4_32
   Google Scholar
• Birhane, A. 2021. “Algorithmic Injustice: A Relational Ethics Approach.” Patterns 2 (2): 100205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• boyd, danah, and K. Crawford. 2012. “Critical Questions for Big Data.” Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brayne, S. 2017. “Big Data Surveillance: The Case of Policing.” American Sociological Review 82 (5): 977–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417725865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromham, L., R. Dinnage, and X. Hua. 2016. “Interdisciplinary Research Has Consistently Lower Funding Success.” Nature 534 (7609): 684–687. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDEI. 2021. “The Role of AI in Addressing Misinformationon Social Media Platforms.” Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1008700/Misinformation_forum_write_up__August_2021__-_web_accessible.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, S. N., B. Tabas, and E. York. 2022. “Futures Labs: A Space for Pedagogies of Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 10 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2129179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza-Chock, S. 2020. Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/43542.
   Google Scholar
• Crooks, R., and M. Currie. 2021. “Numbers Will Not Save Us: Agonistic Data Practices.” The Information Society 37 (4): 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2021.1920081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, A., and H. Åm. 2018. “Experiments in Interdisciplinarity: Responsible Research and Innovation and the Public Good.” PLoS Biology 16 (3): e2003921. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez Hernández, A., and V. Galanos. 2022. “A Toolkit of Dilemmas: Beyond Debiasing and Fairness Formulas for Responsible AI/ML.” IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society 2022 (ISTAS22). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS55053.2022.10227133.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez Hernández, A., R. Owen, D. S. Nielsen, and R. McConville. 2023. “Ethical, Political and Epistemic Implications of Machine Learning (Mis)Information Classification: Insights from an Interdisciplinary Collaboration Between Social and Data Scientists.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 10 (1): 2222514. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2222514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, G. L., and T. Zuiderent-Jerak. 2016. “8  Making and Doing: Engagement and Reflexive Learning in STS.” In C. A. (30).
   Google Scholar
• Downey, G. L., and T. Zuiderent-Jerak, eds. 2021. Making & Doing: Activating STS Through Knowledge Expression and Travel. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11310.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• EPSRC. 2018. “Framework for Responsible Innovation.” https://www.ukri.org/about-us/epsrc/our-policies-and-standards/framework-for-responsible-innovation/.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, V. 2017. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. 1st ed. New York, NY: StMartin's Press
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S. W., M. Leese, and D. Rychnovská. 2021. “Science, Technology, Security: Towards Critical Collaboration.” Social Studies of Science 51 (2): 189–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720953515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M., S. A. Friedler, J. Moeller, C. Scheidegger, and S. Venkatasubramanian. 2015. “Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact.” In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1145/2783258.2783311.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U., J. Igelsböck, A. Schikowitz, and T. Völker. 2016. “Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice: Between Imaginaries of Collective Experimentation and Entrenched Academic Value Orders.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41 (4): 732–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915626989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, E., R. L. Mahajan, and C. Mitcham. 2006. “Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance from Within.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 26 (6): 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467606295402.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E., M. O’Rourke, R. Evans, E. B. Kennedy, M. E. Gorman, and T. P. Seager. 2015. “Mapping the Integrative Field: Taking Stock of Socio-Technical Collaborations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (1): 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.1001671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floridi, L., J. Cowls, M. Beltrametti, R. Chatila, P. Chazerand, V. Dignum, C. Luetge, et al. 2018. “AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations.” Minds and Machines 28 (4): 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisslinger, M., F. Poszler, J. Betz, C. Lütge, and M. Lienkamp. 2021. “Autonomous Driving Ethics: From Trolley Problem to Ethics of Risk.” Philosophy & Technology 34 (4): 1033–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00449-4.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. 2014. “The Relevance of Algorithms.” In Media Technologies, edited by T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, and K. A. Foot, 167–194. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009.
   Google Scholar
• Gorwa, R., R. Binns, and C. Katzenbach. 2020. “Algorithmic Content Moderation: Technical and Political Challenges in the Automation of Platform Governance.” Big Data & Society 7 (1): 205395171989794. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiffenhagen, C., M. Mair, and W. Sharrock. 2015. “Methodological Troubles as Problems and Phenomena: Ethnomethodology and the Question of ‘Method’ in the Social Sciences.” The British Journal of Sociology 66 (3): 460–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, G., K. Hamberg, and B. Lundgren. 2013. The Social Politics of Research Collaboration. London, UK: Taylor & Francis. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1211739.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H., and D. Sarewitz. 2002. “Real-Time Technology Assessment.” Technology in Society 24 (1-2): 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2013. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203873106-18.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 1995. “‘Strong Objectivity’: A Response to the New Objectivity Question.” Synthese 104 (3): 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillersdal, L., A. P. Jespersen, B. Oxlund, and B. Bruun. 2020. “Affect and Effect in Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration.” Science & Technology Studies 33 (2): 66–82. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.63305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. 2021. “Tech Ethics: Speaking Ethics to Power, or Power Speaking Ethics?” Journal of Social Computing 2 (3): 238–248. https://doi.org/10.23919/JSC.2021.0033.
   Google Scholar
• Irani, L., J. Vertesi, P. Dourish, K. Philip, and R. E. Grinter. 2010. “Postcolonial Computing: A Lens on Design and Development.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1311–1320. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753522.
   Google Scholar
• Jaton, F. 2021. “Assessing Biases, Relaxing Moralism: On Ground-Truthing Practices in Machine Learning Design and Application.” Big Data & Society 8 (1): 205395172110135. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211013569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, T. E. 2012. “Intervention by Invitation: New Concerns and New Versions of the User in STS.” Science & Technology Studies 25 (1): 13–36. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.55279.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, M., and A. Rådström. 2013. “Experiences of Research Collaboration in ‘Soloist’ Disciplines: On the Importance of Not Knowing and Learning from Affects of Shame, Ambivalence and Insecurity.” In The Emotional Politics of Research Collaboration, edited by G. Griffin and A. Bränström-Öhman, 130–143. New York: Routledge. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-66761.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltenbrunner, W., K. Birch, T. van Leeuwen, and M. Amuchastegui. 2022. “Changing Publication Practices and the Typification of the Journal Article in Science and Technology Studies.” Social Studies of Science 52 (5): 758–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221110623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katell, M., M. Young, D. Dailey, B. Herman, V. Guetler, A. Tam, C. Bintz, D. Raz, and P. M. Krafft. 2020. “Toward Situated Interventions for Algorithmic Equity: Lessons from the Field.” In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372874.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2014. “Big Data, New Epistemologies and Paradigm Shifts.” Big Data & Society 1 (1): 205395171452848. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinberg, J., J. Ludwig, S. Mullainathan, and A. Rambachan. 2018. “Algorithmic Fairness.” AEA Papers and Proceedings 108: 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20181018.
   Google Scholar
• Lassiter, L. E. 2005. The Chicago Guide to Collaborative Ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage Library of Social Research; Vol. 80. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., S. Jain, A. F. Cooper, J. Kleinberg, and H. Heidari. 2022. “Four Years of FAccT: A Reflexive, Mixed-Methods Analysis of Research Contributions, Shortcomings, and Future Prospects.” In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533107.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. 2016. “STS as Method.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by U. Felt, S. Beck, R. Fouché, C. A. Miller, L. Smith-Doerr, M. Alac, S. Amir, M. Arribas-Ayllon, B. Balmer, and J. Barandiarán, 31–57. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ed/detail.action?docID=5052910
   Google Scholar
• Leonelli, S. 2015. “What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework.” Philosophy of Science 82 (5): 810–821. https://doi.org/10.1086/684083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezaun, J., N. Marres, and M. Tironi. 2017. “7  Experiments in Participation.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies 4th ed., 195–221.
   Google Scholar
• Lindvig, K., and L. Hillersdal. 2019. “Strategically Unclear? Organising Interdisciplinarity in an Excellence Programme of Interdisciplinary Research in Denmark.” Minerva 57 (1): 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-018-9361-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippert, I. 2020. “In, with and of STS.” In Locating Media/Situierte Medien, edited by A. Wiedmann, K. Wagenknecht, P. Goll, and A. Wagenknecht, 1st ed., Vol. 19, 301–318. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839443798-011.
   Google Scholar
• Lippert, I., and J. S. Mewes. 2021. “Data, Methods and Writing: Methodographies of STS Ethnographic Collaboration in Practice.” Science & Technology Studies 34 (3): 2–16. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.110597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyall, C., A. Bruce, W. Marsden, and L. Meagher. 2013. “The Role of Funding Agencies in Creating Interdisciplinary Knowledge.” Science and Public Policy 40 (1): 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle, K. 2021. “Interventional STS: A Framework for Developing Workable Technologies.” Sociological Research Online 26 (2): 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780420915723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. 2000. “Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge.” Theory, Culture & Society 17 (3): 26–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760022051202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. 2020. “We Have Never Been Anti-Science: Reflections on Science Wars and Post-Truth.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 6 (1): 49–57. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2020.309.
   Google Scholar
• Manokha, I. 2018. “Surveillance, Panopticism, and Self-Discipline in the Digital Age.” Surveillance & Society 16 (2): 219–237. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v16i2.8346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, K. E. 2015. “Ethical Issues in the Big Data Industry.” MIS Quarterly Executive 14 (2): 67–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeish, T., and V. Strang. 2016. “Evaluating Interdisciplinary Research: The Elephant in the Peer-Reviewers’ Room.” Palgrave Communications 2 (1): Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.55.
   Google Scholar
• Miceli, M., and J. Posada. 2022. “The Data-Production Dispositif.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6 (CSCW2): 460:1–460:37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555561.
   Google Scholar
• Moats, D. 2021. “Rethinking the ‘Great Divide’: Approaching Interdisciplinary Collaborations Around Digital Data with Humour and Irony.” Science & Technology Studies 34 (1): 19–42. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.97321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moats, D., and N. Seaver. 2019. ““You Social Scientists Love Mind Games”: Experimenting in the ‘Divide’ Between Data Science and Critical Algorithm Studies.” Big Data & Society 6 (1): 205395171983340. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719833404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nästesjö, J. 2021. “Navigating Uncertainty: Early Career Academics and Practices of Appraisal Devices.” Minerva 59 (2): 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-020-09425-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neff, G., A. Tanweer, B. Fiore-Gartland, and L. Osburn. 2017. “Critique and Contribute: A Practice-Based Framework for Improving Critical Data Studies and Data Science.” Big Data 5 (2): 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2016.0050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, D. S., and R. McConville. 2022. “MuMiN: A Large-Scale Multilingual Multimodal Fact-Checked Misinformation Social Network Dataset.” In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 3141–3153. https://doi.org/10.1145/3477495.3531744
   Google Scholar
• Noble, S. U. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ed/detail.action?docID=4834260.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R. 2014. “The UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council’s Commitment to a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.882065.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., J. R. Bessant, and M. Heintz 2013. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., and M. Pansera. 2019. “Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Handbook on Science and Public Policy, edited by D. Simon, S. Kuhlmann, J. Stamm, and W. Canzler, 26–48. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/edcoll/9781784715939/9781784715939.00010.xml.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., M. Pansera, P. Macnaghten, and S. Randles. 2021. “Organisational Institutionalisation of Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 50 (1): 104132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, J., C. Pocock, and L. Burton. 2018. “Waiting, Power and Time in Ethnographic and Community-Based Research.” Qualitative Research 18 (4): 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117728413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansera, M., R. Owen, D. Meacham, and V. Kuh. 2020. “Embedding Responsible Innovation Within Synthetic Biology Research and Innovation: Insights from a UK Multi-Disciplinary Research Centre.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 384–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1785678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratto, M. 2011. “Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life.” The Information Society 27 (4): 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2011.583819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinsborough, M. 2020. “Art-Science Collaboration in an EPSRC/BBSRC-Funded Synthetic Biology UK Research Centre.” NanoEthics 14 (1): 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-020-00367-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rességuier, A., and R. Rodrigues. 2020. “AI Ethics Should Not Remain Toothless! A Call to Bring Back the Teeth of Ethics.” Big Data & Society 7 (2): 205395172094254. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720942541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A., T. J. Misa, and J. Schot. 1995. Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblat, A., and L. Stark. 2016. “Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers.” International Journal of Communication, 3758–3785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., J. Antoniou, L. Brooks, T. Jiya, K. Macnish, and B. Stahl. 2021. “Research and Practice of AI Ethics: A Case Study Approach Juxtaposing Academic Discourse with Organisational Reality.” Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (2): 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00293-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and A. Rip. 1997. “The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 (2-3): 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuijff, M., and A. M. Dijkstra. 2020. “Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (2): 533–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00167-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selbst, A. D., D. boyd, S. A. Friedler, S. Venkatasubramanian, and J. Vertesi. 2019. “Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems.” In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287598
   Google Scholar
• Sloane, M., and E. Moss. 2019. “AI’s Social Sciences Deficit.” Nature Machine Intelligence 1 (8): 330–331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0084-6.
   Google Scholar
• Smolka, M., E. Fisher, and A. Hausstein. 2021. “From Affect to Action: Choices in Attending to Disconcertment in Interdisciplinary Collaborations.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 46 (5): 1076–1103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920974088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, L., D. Greene, and A. L. Hoffmann. 2021. “Critical Perspectives on Governance Mechanisms for AI/ML Systems.” In The Cultural Life of Machine Learning, edited by J. Roberge and M. Castelle, 257–280. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56286-1_9.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund, M. 2013. “At the Interstices of Disciplines: Early Career Researchers and Research Collaborations Across Boundaries.” In The Social Politics of Research Collaboration. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., M. Miceli, and T. Gebru. 2022. “The Exploited Labor Behind Artificial Intelligence.” Noema, October 13. https://www.noemamag.com/the-exploited-labor-behind-artificial-intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S. S. 2020. “Autonomous Vehicles, Trolley Problems, and the Law.” Ethics and Information Technology 22 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-019-09506-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York, E. 2018. “Doing STS in STEM Spaces: Experiments in Critical Participation.” Engineering Studies 10 (1): 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2018.1447576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar