Determining which of the classic seven quality tools are in the quality practitioner’s RCA tool kit

References

• Alexa, V., & Kiss, I. (2016). Complaint analysis using 8D method within the companies in the field of automotive. Analecta, 10(1), 16–14. https://doi.org/10.14232/analecta.2016.1.16-21
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2007). Business Process Improvement Toolbox (2nd ed.). Quality Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. C., & Jamison, V. K. (2014). Reducing welding defects in turnaround projects: A lean six sigma case study. Quality Engineering, 26(2), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2013.801492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antony, J., McDermott, O., Sony, M., Fernandes, M. M., & Ribeiro, R. V. C. (2021). A study on the Ishikawa’s original basic tools of quality control in South American Companies: Results from a pilot survey and directions for further research. The TQM Journal, 33(8), 1770–1786. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-01-2021-0004
   Google Scholar
• Araman, H., & Saleh, Y. (2023). A case study on implementing Lean Six Sigma: DMAIC methodology in aluminum profiles extrusion process. The TQM Journal, 35(2), 337–365. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-05-2021-0154
   Google Scholar
• Arp, D., Jr. (2020). Nuts and Bolts: The Fishbone Evolves. Lean and Six Sigma Review, 19(4), 24–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bamford, D. R., & Greatbanks, R. W. (2005). The use of quality management tools and techniques: A study of application in everyday situations. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(4), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710510591219
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, M. (2017). Statistics spotlight: Revisiting the old seven. Quality Progress, 50(4), 42–45.
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, M. (2023). Back to Basics: 8D or A3? Quality Progress, 56(1), 56.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, R. (2014). Warranty Claims reduction: A Modern Approach with Continuous Improvement Techniques. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borror, C. M. (Ed.). (2009). The Certified Quality Engineer Handbook (3rd ed.). ASQ, Quality Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borrows, M. (2005). Use distribution analysis to understand your data source. Quality Progress, 38(12), 50–56.
   Google Scholar
• Bothe, D. R. (2001). Back to basics: Use check sheets to identify the causes of downtime. Quality Progress, 34(4), 136.
   Google Scholar
• Carita, R. A. (2014). At Your Fingertips. Quality Progress, 47(3), 24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravorty, S. S. (2016). Station to Station. Quality Progress, 40(8), 40–48.
   Google Scholar
• Cournoyer, M. E., Trujillo, S., Schreiber, S., Saba, M. T., & Peabody, M. C. (2013). Causal analysis of a glovebox glove breach. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety, 20(2), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchas.2012.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Darekar, S., Pendum, D. V., Shukla, P., & Joshi, P. (2013). Systematic fact finding and problem solving for leakage in high pressure line in diesel engine. MR International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5(1), 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Desai, K. J., & Johnson, R. (2013). Using a fishbone diagram to develop change management strategies to achieve first-year student persistence. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 4(1), 51–63.
   Google Scholar
• George, A., Ranjha, S., & Kulkarni, A. (2021). Enhanced problem solving through redefined 8d step completion criteria. Quality Engineering, 33(4), 695–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2021.1969665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gryna, F. M. (2001). Quality Planning and Analysis (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Harjac, S. J., Atrens, A., & Moss, C. J. (2008). Six sigma review of root causes of corrosion incidents in hot potassium carbonate acid gas removal plant. Engineering Failure Analysis, 15(5), 480–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2007.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, K. (1985). What is Total Quality Control?: The Japanese Way. Translated by D. J. Lu. Engelwood. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, K. (1991). Guide to Quality Control (2nd ed.). Translated by Asian Productivity Organization. Asian Productivity Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. A., Widener, S., Gitlow, H., & Popovich, E. (2006). A ‘Six sigma’ © Black Belt Case Study: G.E.P. box’s paper helicopter experiment part a. Quality Engineering, 18(4), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982110600875894
   Google Scholar
• Jukka Rantamäki, E. -L.T., Kässi, T., & Kässi, T. (2013). A Case of Implementing SPC in a Pulp Mill. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 4(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-05-2013-0029
   Google Scholar
• Juran, J. (1975). “The Non-Pareto Principle-Mea Culpa. Quality Progress, 8(5), 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Juran, J. (2005). The QC Circle Phenomenon. In K. Stephens (Ed.), Juran, Quality, and a Century of Improvement (pp. 121–149). Quality Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, G., Warrack, B., & Bartel, H. (1994). Statistics for Management and Economics. Duxbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kume, H. (1997). Statistical Methods for Quality Improvement. AOTS.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. G., Chechurin, L., & Lenyashin, V. (2018). Introduction to cause-effect chain analysis plus with an application in solving manufacturing problems. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 99(9–12), 2159–2169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2217-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legentil, J. -M., Legentil, M. -O., & Schwarz, T. (2018). The Toyota Kata Memory Jogger. GOL/QPC.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, P. A. D. A., & Matthé, R. (2017). Six Sigma DMAIC Project to improve the performance of an aluminum die casting operation in Portugal. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(2), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-05-2015-0086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur, S., Antony, J., Olivia, M., Fabiane Letícia, L., Shreeranga, B., Raja, B. J., & Ayon, C. (2022). An empirical study into the use of 7 quality control tools in higher education institutions (HEIs). The TQM Journal, Retrieved from No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-07-2022-0222
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, O., Antony, J., Sony, M., Rosa, A., Hickey, M., & Grant, T. A. (2022). A study on ishikawa’s original basic tools of quality control in healthcare. The TQM Journal, Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2022-0187
   Google Scholar
• Metha, W. (2014). Weighting for success, applying prioritization technique takes cause-and-effect diagrams up a notch. Industrial Engineering, 4(1), 45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Minzuno, S. (1989). Company-Wide Quality Control. Asian Productivity Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Murugaiah, U., Benjamin, S. J., Marathamuthu, M. S., & Muthaiyah, S. (2010). Scrap loss reduction using the 5‐whys Analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 27(5), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656711011043517
   Google Scholar
• Neyestani, B. (2017). Seven basic tools of quality control: the appropriate quality techniques for solving quality problems in the organizations. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.400832
   Google Scholar
• Okes, D. (2002). Organize your quality tool belt. Quality Progress, 35(7), 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Santos Filho, G. M., & Simão, <.N.<.N.E. (2022). A3 Methodology: Going Beyond Process Improvement. Revista de Gestão ahead-of-print, Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-03-2021-0047
   Google Scholar
• Sá, J. C., Vaz, S., Carvalho, O., Lima, V., Morgado, L., Fonseca, L., Doiro, M., & Santos, G. (2022). A Model of Integration ISO 9001 with lean six sigma and main benefits achieved. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 33(1–2), 218–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2020.1829969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P. S., Malik, C., Gupta, A., & Jha, P. C. (2018). A DMAIC six sigma approach to quality improvement in the anodising stage of the amplifier production process. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35(9), 1868–1880. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-08-2017-0155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleeper, A. D. (2006). Design for Six Sigma: 59 Tools for Diagnosing and Solving problems in DFSS Initiatives. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2017). Random thoughts: looking out for outliers. Six Sigma Forum Magazine, 16(4), 31–33.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. D. (2019). One check to rule them all. Quality Progress, 52(8), 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Snee, R. D. (2008). Statistics roundtable: Make data matter. Quality Progress, 41(12), 60–63.
   Google Scholar
• Soković, M., Jovanović, J., Krivokapić, Z., & Vujović, A. (2009). Basic quality tools in continuous improvement. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 55(5), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreedharan, S. R., Raja, V., Rajasekar, A., Kannan, S., Arunprasad, P., & Trehan, R. (2018). Defect reduction in an electrical parts manufacturer: A Case Study. The TQM Journal, 30(6), 650–678. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-03-2018-0031
   Google Scholar
• Stamatis, D. H. (2002). Six Sigma and Beyond: Problem Solving and Basic Mathematics. St. Lucie Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez-Barraza, M. F., Miguel-Dávila, J. A., & Morales-Contreras, M. F. (2021). Application of Kaizen-Kata methodology to improve operational problem processes: A case study in a service organization. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 13(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-07-2020-0113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez-Barraza, M. F., & Rodríguez-González, F. G. (2019). Cornerstone root causes through the analysis of the Ishikawa Diagram, is it possible to find them? a first research approach. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 11(2), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-12-2017-0113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tague, N. (2005). The Quality Toolbox. Quality Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, H. (2023). Synthesize and Unify. Quality Progress, 56(2), 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Villarreal, M., & Kleiner, B. H. (1997). Analytical tools for facilitating task group performance. Journal of Workplace Learning, 9(3), 94–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665629710164896
   Google Scholar