Proposal of an FFE model with a high degree of innovation integrating TRIZ and design thinking methodologies, specific for the personal health equipment sector

References

• Akay, D., Demıray, A., & Kurt, M. (2008). Collaborative tool for solving human factors problems in the manufacturing environment: The Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Technique (TRIZ) method. International Journal of Production Research, 46(11), 2913–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600969774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alencar, E. M. (2003). Criatividade múltiplas perspectivas (3rd ed.). UnB.
   Google Scholar
• Altshuller, G. S. (1984). Creativity as an Exact Science: The Theory of the Solution of Inventive Problems (4th ed.). Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Altshuller, G. S. (2007). The innovation algorithm: TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity. In Shulyak, L., Roadman, S. (Eds.),Technical Innovation Center, Inc (2nd ed.). Technical Innovation Center, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1988). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 57(3), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/4151453
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (2012). Componential Theory of Creativity. In Encyclopedia of Management Theory. SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452276090.n50
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessant, J., Öberg, C., & Trifilova, A. (2014). Framing problems in radical innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(8), 1284–1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blessing, L. T. M., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). DRM, a Design Research Methodology. In DRM, a Design Research Methodology. Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1
   Google Scholar
• BNDES. (2012) . BNDES 60 anos: perspectivas setoriais.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, R., & Collopy, F. (2004). Managing as Designing. Stanford Business Books.
   Google Scholar
• Borgianni, Y., Cascini, G., & Rotini, F. (2018). Investigating the future of the fuzzy front end: Towards a change of paradigm in the very early design phases? Journal of Engineering Design, 29(11), 644–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2018.1520971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brem, A., & Voigt, K. -I. (2009). Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management—Insights from the German software industry. Technovation, 29(5), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brentani, U., & Reid, S. E. (2012). The fuzzy front-end of discontinuous innovation: Insights for research and management. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00879.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 56(12), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2009). How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. Harper Business.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design Thinking for Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 12(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29
   Google Scholar
• Brun, E. C. (2016). Ambidexterity and Ambiguity: The Link between Ambiguity Management and Contextual Ambidexterity in Innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 13(4), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877016500139
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
   Google Scholar
• Cagan, J., & Vogel, C. M. (2002). Creating breakthrough products. Prentice Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Callari, T. C., Moody, L., Saunders, J., Ward, G., Holliday, N., & Woodley, J. (2019). Exploring participation needs and motivational requirements when engaging older adults in an emerging living lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.22215/TIMREVIEW/1223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canuto da Silva, G., Kaminski, P. C., & Pham, D. (2017). Proposal of framework to managing the automotive product development process. Cogent Engineering, 4(1), 1317318. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2017.1317318
   Google Scholar
• Carfagni, M., Fiorineschi, L., Furferi, R., Governi, L., & Rotini, F. (2020). Usefulness of prototypes in conceptual design: Students’ view. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 14(4), 1305–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-020-00697-2
   Google Scholar
• Carlgren, L., Rauth, I., & Elmquist, M. (2016). Framing Design Thinking: The Concept in Idea and Enactment. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, M. A. D. (2017). Inovação em Produtos: IDEATRIZ, uma aplicação da TRIZ/Inovação Sistemática na ideação de produtos. In Inovação em produtos. Blucher. http://openaccess.blucher.com.br/article-list/9788580391794-355/list#articles
   Google Scholar
• Cavallucci, D., Rousselot, F., & Zanni, C. (2011). An ontology for TRIZ. Procedia Engineering, 9, 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.116
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, O., C, G., Leifer, R., Paulson, A. S., & Peters, L. S. (2008). Building a capability for breakthrough innovation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G. (1988). Predevelopment activities determine new product success. Industrial Marketing Management, 17(3), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(88)90007-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corazza, G. E., & Lubart, T. (2020). The Big Bang of Originality and Effectiveness: A Dynamic Creativity Framework and Its Application to Scientific Missions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(September). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575067
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costa, M. A. B., & Toledo, J. C. D. (2016). Análise dos modelos e atividades do pré-desenvolvimento: revisão bibliográfica sistemática. Gestão & Produção, 23(4), 704–717. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x1888-15
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (1999). Design Research: A Disciplined Conversation. Design Issues, 15(2), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, G., Cox, B. F., Walker, J. D., Cochran, S., & Desmulliez, M. P. Y. (2018). Challenges in developing collaborative interdisciplinary research between gastroenterologists and engineers. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 42(6), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2018.1543466
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dantas, D. (2005). Design orientado para o futuro, centrado no indivíduo e na análise de tendencias. Universidade de Sao Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• De Paula, D., Cormican, K., & Dobrigkeit, F. (2022). From Acquaintances to Partners in Innovation: An Analysis of 20 Years of Design Thinking’s Contribution to New Product Development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(4), 1664–1677. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3084884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. (2011). The core of “design thinking” and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, E., & Valle, S. (2018). Tecnología disruptiva: la derrota de las empresas establecidas. Innovar, 28(70), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v28n70.74404
   Google Scholar
• Fleury, A. L., Stabile, H., & Carvalho, M. M. (2016). An overview of the literature on design thinking: Trends and contributions. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(4), 1704–1718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florén, H., Frishammar, J., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2017). Critical success factors in early new product development: A review and a conceptual model. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0458-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration - FDA. (2011). 21 CFR 820 – quality system regulation. FDA. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2011-title21-vol8/pdf/CFR-2011-title21-vol8-part820.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Frishammar, J., Dahlskog, E., Krumlinde, C., & Yazgan, K. (2016). The Front End of Radical Innovation: A Case Study of Idea and Concept Development at Prime Group. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(2), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frishammar, J., Florén, H., & Wincent, J. (2011). Beyond managing uncertainty: Insights from studying equivocality in the fuzzy front end of product and process innovation projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(3), 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2010.2095017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frishammar, J., Lichtenthaler, U., & Richtnér, A. (2013). Managing process development: Key issues and dimensions in the front end. R and D Management, 43(3), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadd, K. (2011). TRIZ for Engineers: Enabling Inventive Problem Solving. TRIZ for Engineers: Enabling Inventive Problem Solving. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470684320
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1920110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassmann, O., & Schweitzer, F. (2014). Management of the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation O. Gassmann & F. Schweitzer, (Eds.). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01056-4
   Google Scholar
• Hassi, L., & Laakso, M. (2011). Conceptions of Design Thinking in the Design and Management discourse: Open questions and possible directions for research. Proceedings of International Association of Societies of Design Research, Delft, Netherlands (pp. 1–10).
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, T., Belt, P., Mottonen, M., Harkonen, J., & Haapasalo, H. (2018). Managing radical innovations in established companies. International Journal of Management Practice, 11(4), 422–447. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMP.2018.095174
   Google Scholar
• Hentschel, C., & Czinki, A. (2013). Design Thinking as a door-opener for TRIZ - Paving the way towards systematic innovation. Proceedings of the TRIZ Future 2013, Paris, France (pp. 1–11).
   Google Scholar
• Heron, D. N. M., Tindale, O. B. E., & B, P. W. (2015). Healthcare technology co-operatives: Innovative about innovation. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 39(7), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2015.1087697
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang, Z., Ahmed, C., & Mickael, G. (2020). A model for supporting the ideas screening during front end of the innovation process based on combination of methods of EcaTRIZ, AHP, and SWOT. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, 28(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X20911165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ideo. (2011). Human Centered Design Toolkit (2nd ed). Ideo.
   Google Scholar
• Ilevbare, I. M., Probert, D., & Phaal, R. (2013). A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice. Technovation, 33(2–3), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Standard. (2016). Medical devices quality management systems requirements for regulatory purposes, ISO 13485 (2nd ed.). ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Joachim, V., & Spieth, P. (2020). What Does Front-End Research Build on? A Cocitation Analysis of the Intellectual Background and Potential Future Research Avenues. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2865496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson-Sköldberg, U., & Woodilla, J. (2009). Towards an epistemological merger of design thinking, strategy, strategy and innovation. Proceedings of the 8th European Academy Of Design Conference, Aberdeen, UK (pp. 1–5).
   Google Scholar
• Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: Past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, U., & Woodilla, J. (2008). Towards a better paradigmatic partnership between design and management. International DMI Education Conference, April, 14–15. https://www.kth.se/polopoly_fs/1.114534!/Menu/general/column-content/attachment/JohanssonWoodillaDMIProceedings.pdf%5Cnhttp://campi.kth.se/polopoly_fs/1.44194!JohanssonWoodillaDMIProceedings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, T. (2001). The art of innovation: Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s leading design firm Tom Kelley. Randos House Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0737-6782(02)00132-7
   Google Scholar
• Khurana, A., & Rosenthal, S. R. (1997). Integrating the fuzzy front end of new product development. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 25(4), 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Khurana, A., & Rosenthal, S. R. (1998). Towards holistic “front ends” in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1510057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L. (2009). Beyond design thinking: Design-as-practice and designs-in-practice. CRESC Conference, May, 1–15. http://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/31119437/beyond_design_thinking.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJ56TQJRTWSMTNPEA&Expires=1461219255&Signature=WEbfax5Hnn+ghbsB4NCjIGYqqWM=&response-content-disposition=inline;filename=Beyond_design_thinking_Design-as
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470811x13071166525216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L. (2012). Rethinking design thinking: Part II. Design and Culture, 4(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470812X13281948975413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koen, P., Ajamian, G., Burkart, R., Clamen, A., Davidson, J., D’Amore, R., Elkins, C., Herald, K., Incorvia, M., Johnson, A., Karol, R., Seibert, R., Slavejkov, A., & Wagner, K. (2001). Providing clarity and a common language to the “fuzzy front end. Research Technology Management, 44(2), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2001.11671418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koen, P. A., Bertels, H. M. J., & Kleinschmidt, E. (2014). Managing the front end of innovation-part I: Results from a three-year study. Research Technology Management, 57(2), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5702145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen, I., Battarbee, K., & Mattelmäki, T. (2003). Empathic design. It Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367435585-14
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (1989). On the Essential Contexts of Artifacts or on the Proposition That “Design is Making Sense (Of Things. Design Issues, 5(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511512
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2000). Propositions of Human-Centeredness; a Philosophy for Design. Doctoral Education in Design: Foundations for the Future, 55–63. http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/210
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn a new foundation for design (1st ed.). Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109–155. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416521003691287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, B. (2005). How designers think. In Design Studies (4th ed.). Architectural Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x(81)90033-8
   Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. (2007). Psicologia da criatividade. Artmed.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marešová, P., Klímová, B., Honegr, J., Kuča, K., Ibrahim, W. N. H., & Selamat, A. (2020). Medical Device Development Process, and Associated Risks and Legislative Aspects-Systematic Review. Frontiers in Public Health, 8(July), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00308
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Markham, S. K. (2013). The impact of front-end innovation activities on product performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2007a). How successful leaders think. Strategic Direction, 23(10). Harvard Business Review, 85(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/sd.2007.05623kad.006
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2007b). How Successful Leaders Think - Harvard Business Review. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 60–68. http://hbr.org/2007/06/how-successful-leaders-think/ar/1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Dunne, D. (2006). Design Thinking and How It Will Change Management Education: An Interview and Discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 512–523. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2006.23473212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, L. A., Kremer, G. E. O., & Wysk, R. A. (2012). Supporting medical device development: A standard product design process model. Journal of Engineering Design, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2012.676635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinel, M., Eismann, T. T., Baccarella, C. V., Fixson, S. K., & Voigt, K. I. (2020). Does applying design thinking result in better new product concepts than a traditional innovation approach? An experimental comparison study. European Management Journal, 38(4), 661–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, G. H. D. S. (2008). O processo de desenvolvimento de produto em empresas de base tecnológica: caracterização da gestão e proposta de modelo de referência. Universidade federal de São Carlos.
   Google Scholar
• Moldoveanu, M. C., & Martin, R. L. (2008). The Future of the MBA, Designing the Thinker of the Future. In The Future of the MBA. Oxford university press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195340143.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Moody, L. (2015). User-centred health design: Reflections on D4D’s experiences and challenges. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 39(7), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2015.1088086
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakata, C. (2020). Design thinking for innovation: Considering distinctions, fit, and use in firms. Business Horizons, 63(6), 763–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional Design. Basic Bookc Inc. https://doi.org/10.1300/J007v13n02_06
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things. Basic Bookc Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/1340961.1340979
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, G. C., & Rice, M. P. (2013). A Comprehensive Model of Uncertainty Associated with Radical Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30, 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, M. G., Mendes, G. H. D. S., & Mendes Serrano, K. (2022). Front-end of innovation: A systematic review and lifecycle analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2022-0047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olszewski, M. (2022). Boosting creativity in co-creation with consumers in the fuzzy front-end of new product development: A literature review and organising framework. E-Mentor, 94(2), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.15219/em94.1563
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28(2083), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Orloff, M. A. (2012). Modern TRIZ. Modern TRIZ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25218-1
   Google Scholar
• Park, D., Han, J., & Childs, P. R. N. (2021). 266 Fuzzy front-end studies: Current state and future directions for new product development. Research in Engineering Design, 32(3), Springer London, 377–409https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-021-00365-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelt, A. V., & Hey, J. (2011). Using TRIZ and human-centered design for consumer product development. Procedia Engineering, 9, 688–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.156
   Google Scholar
• Petrov, V. (2019). Fundamentos De La Teoria Para La Solución De Los Problemas Inventivos: TRIZ.
   Google Scholar
• Pietzsch, J. B., Shluzas, L. A., Paté-Cornell, M., Yock, P. G., & Linehan, J. H. (2009). Stage-Gate Process for the Development of Medical Devices. Journal of Medical Devices, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3148836
   Google Scholar
• Platter, H. (2009). Bootcamp bootleg. Institute of Design Stanford.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, S. E., & Brentani, U. (2004). The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: A theoretical model. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(3), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00068.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, S. E., & Brentani, U. (2010). Market vision and market visioning competence: Impact on early performance for radically new, high-tech products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(4), 500–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00732.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, S. E., Brentani, U., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2014). Divergent thinking and market visioning competence: An early front-end radical innovation success typology. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(8), 1351–1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinertsen, D. G., & Smith, P. G. (1991). The Strategist’s Role in Shortening Product Development. The Journal of Business Strategy, 12(4), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb039425
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riel, A., Neumann, M., & Tichkiewitch, S. (2013). Structuring the early fuzzy front-end to manage ideation for new product development. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 62(1), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, M. (2017). Characterizing design thinking towards integration with product-service system development process Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos. Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos. https://doi.org/10.11606/D.18.2017.tde-08032017-104519
   Google Scholar
• Roth, K., Globocnik, D., Rau, C., & Neyer, A. K. (2020). Living up to the expectations: The effect of design thinking on project success. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(4), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenfeld, H., Forcellini, F. A., Amaral, D. C., Toledo, J. C., Silva, S. L., Alliprandini, D. H., & Scalice, R. K. (2006). Gestão de desenvolvimento de produtos: uma referencia para melhoria do processo. Editira Saraiva. 978-85-02-05446-2.
   Google Scholar
• Salerno, M. S., & Gomes, L. A. D. V. (2018). Gestão da inovação mais radical. Elsevier Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, I. C. T. (2013). Product development methodologies : The case of medical devices. Universidade do Porto.
   Google Scholar
• Santos I CT, Gazelle G Scott, Rocha L A and Tavares J Manuel. (2012). Medical device specificities: opportunities for a dedicated product development methodology. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 9(3), 299–311. 10.1586/erd.12.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savransky, S. D. (2000). Engineering of creativity: Introduction to TRIZ methodology of inventive problem solving. In Savransky, S. (Ed.), Engineering of Creativity: Introduction to TRIZ Methodology of Inventive Problem Solving. CRC Press LLC. 0-8493-2255-3.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K. (2012). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation (2nd ed.). Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoepen, M., Vansteenkiste, E., De Gersem, W., & Detand, J. (2022). Systems thinking and designerly tools for medical device design in engineering curricula. Health Systems, 00(00), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2022.2072778
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. Basic Bookc Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203963371
   Google Scholar
• Seclen-Luna, J. P., & López-Valladares, H. (2020). Influencia del uso de herramientas en la gestión de la fase temprana del proceso de innovación de productos. Innovar, 30(76), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v30n76.85217
   Google Scholar
• Silva, R. H., Kaminski, P. C., & Armellini, F. (2020). Improving new product development innovation effectiveness by using problem solving tools during the conceptual development phase: Integrating Design Thinking and TRIZ. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(4), 685–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial (3rd ed). MIT Press. 9780585360102.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford University. (2012). Bootcamp bootleg.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. (2010). Psicologia Cognitiva (5th ed). Cengage Learning .
   Google Scholar
• Takey, S. M., & Carvalho, M. M. (2016). Fuzzy front end of systemic innovations: A conceptual framework based on a systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111, 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terninko, J., Zusman, A., & Zlotin, B. (1998). Systematic Innovation: An Introduction to TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving). CRC Press LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Tosi, F., & Rinaldi, A. (2017). Design and Usability of the Next Medical Devices for the Home Care. Design Journal, 20(sup1), S2033–2043. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ummar, R., & Saleem, S. (2020). Thematic Ideation: A Superior Supplementary Concept in Creativity and Innovation. SAGE Open, 10(3), 215824402094742. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020947429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger, D., & Eppinger, S. (2011). Improving product development process design: A method for managing information flows, risks, and iterations. Journal of Engineering Design, 22(10), 689–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2010.524886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uribe Ocampo, J., & Kaminski, P. C. (2019). Divergencias y convergencias de las metodologías TRIZ y Design Thinking en el contexto del fuzzy front end, Ingenio, Medellin, Colombia.
   Google Scholar
• Uribe Ocampo, J., & Kaminski, P. C. (2019b). Medical device development, from technical design to integrated product development. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 43(5), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2019.1653393
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uribe Ocampo, J., Vizioli, R., & Kaminski, P. C. (2015). Design centrado no usuário como fundamento do fuzzy front end, Itajubá, Brazil (pp. 1–14).
   Google Scholar
• Vizioli, R. (2019). Integração da Engenharia do Valor e do “Design Thinking” no processo de desenvolvimento de produtos. Universidade de São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Whitney, D. W. (2007). Assemble a Technology Development Toolkit. Research-Technology Management, 50(5), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2007.11657462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyrtki, K., Röglinger, M., & Rosemann, M. (2021). Opportunity-led ideation: How to convert corporate opportunities into innovative ideas. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(3), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaragoza-Sáez, P. D. C., Claver-Cortés, E., Marco Lajara, B., & Úbeda-García, M. (2020). Organizational ambidexterity in subsidiaries of knowledge-intensive sectors. Estudios Gerenciales, 36(157), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2020.157.3906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar