How trustworthy is ChatGPT? The case of bibliometric analyses

References

• Biswas, S. (2023). ChatGPT and the future of medical writing. Radiology, 307(2), 223312. https://doi.org/10.1148/RADIOL.223312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating. Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. EdArxiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/OSF.IO/MRZ8H
   Google Scholar
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, M., & Lucey, B. (2023). ChatGPT for (finance) research: The Bananarama conjecture. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., & Wirtz, J.… Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Else, H. (2023). Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature, 613(7944), 423. https://doi.org/10.1038/D41586-023-00056-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhat, F., Athar, M. T., Ahmad, S., Madsen, D. Ø., & Sohail, S. S. (2023). Antimicrobial resistance and machine learning: Past, present, and future. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 1179312. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1179312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhat, F., Sohail, S. S., Siddiqui, F., Irshad, R. R., & Madsen, D. Ø. (2023). Curcumin in wound healing—A bibliometric analysis. Life, 13(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13010143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2022). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers. bioRxiv [Internet]. ( 2022.12.23.521610). https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.23.521610
   Google Scholar
• Graham, F. (2022). Daily briefing: Will ChatGPT kill the essay assignment? Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/D41586-022-04437-2
   Google Scholar
• Hill-Yardin, E. L., Hutchinson, M. R., Laycock, R., & Spencer, S. J. (2023). A Chat(GPT) about the future of scientific publishing. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 110, 152–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BBI.2023.02.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi, H., Shafie, M. R., Hajiabadi, M., Raihan, A. S., & Ahmed, I. (2023). Chatbots and ChatGPT: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review of publications in Web of Science and Scopus databases. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05436.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. R., & C. (2023). A conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 16(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura, F. C. (2023). ChatGPT is shaping the future of medical writing but still requires human judgment. Radiology, 307(2), 230171. https://doi.org/10.1148/RADIOL.230171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, M. (2023). The importance of proper use of ChatGPT in medical writing. Radiology, 307(3). https://doi.org/10.1148/RADIOL.230312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. Y. (2023). Can an artificial intelligence chatbot be the author of a scholarly article? Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 20, 6. https://doi.org/10.3352/JEEHP.2023.20.6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggio, L. A., Costello, J. A., Norton, C., Driessen, E. W., & Artino, A. R., Jr. (2021). Knowledge syntheses in medical education: A bibliometric analysis. Perspectives on Medical Education, 10(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00626-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurtrie. (2023). Teaching: Will ChatGPT change the way you teach. The Chronicles of Higher Education. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=McMurtrie%2C++B.++2023+Teaching%3A+Will+ChatGPT+change+the+way+you+teach&btnG=
   Google Scholar
• Omar, R., Mangukiya, O., Kalnis, P., Mansour, E., & Arabia, S. (2017). Current status and future directions towards knowledge graph Chatbots.
   Google Scholar
• Perrier, L., Lightfoot, D., Kealey, M. R., Straus, S. E., & Tricco, A. C. (2016). Knowledge synthesis research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 73, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.02.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallam, M. (2023). The utility of ChatGPT as an example of large language models in healthcare education, Research and Practice: Systematic Review on the Future Perspectives and Potential Limitations (pp. 1–34).
   Google Scholar
• Salvagno, M., ChatGpt Taccone, F. S., & Gerli, A. G. (2023). Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Critical Care (London, England), 27(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13054-023-04380-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharples, M. (2022, May 17). New AI tools that can write student essays require educators to rethink teaching and assessment. Blog. London School of Economics. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2022/05/17/new-ai-tools-that-can-write-student-essays-require-educators-to-rethink-teaching-and-assessment/
   Google Scholar
• Sohail, S. S., Farhat, F., Himeur, Y., Nadeem, M., Madsen, D., & Øivind, S. S and Atalla, Y., Mansoor, W. (2023). The Future of GPT: A Taxonomy of Existing ChatGPT Research. Current Challenges, and Possible Future Directions. SSRN Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4413921
   Google Scholar
• Stokel-Walker, C. (2023). ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: Many scientists disapprove. Nature, 613(7945), 620–621. https://doi.org/10.1038/D41586-023-00107-Z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2023). Is ChatGPT a valid author? Nurse Education in Practice, 68, 103600. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEPR.2023.103600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313–313. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.ADG7879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar