Nested affordance-based intuitive design tool: Affordance interaction matrix

References

• Albrechtsen, H., Andersen, H. H., Bødker, S., & Pejtersen, A. M. (2001). Affordances in activity theory and cognitive systems engineering. Rapport technique riso. Risø National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. K., Christoff, K., Stappen, I., Panitz, D., Ghahremani, D. G., Glover, G., Gabrieli, J. D., & Sobel, N. (2003). Dissociated neural representations of intensity and valence in human olfaction. Nature Neuroscience, 6(2), 196–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baerentsen, K. B., & Trettvik, J. (2002, October). An activity theory approach to affordance. In Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction (pp. 51–60). https://doi.org/10.1145/572020.572028
   Google Scholar
• Bartoshuk, L. M., Duffy, V. B., & Miller, I. J. (1994). PTC/PROP tasting: Anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects. Physiology & Behavior, 56(6), 1165–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-93849490361-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bregman, A. S. (1994). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., Fadel, G., & Mata, I. (2022). Applications of affordance and cognitive ergonomics in virtual design: A digital camera as an illustrative case. Concurrent Engineering, 30(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X211054132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djajadiningrat, J. P. (1998). Cubby: What you see is where you act: Interlacing the display and manipulation spaces [ Doctoral dissertation]. Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Galvao, A. B., & Sato, K. (2005, January). Affordances in product architecture: Linking technical functions and users’ tasks. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (Vol. 4742, pp.143–153). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2005-84525
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. W. (1992, December). The affordances of media spaces for collaboration. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 17–24). https://doi.org/10.1145/143457.371596
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, T., & Lee, S. (2021). A heterophenomenological framework for analyzing user experiences with affordances. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(20), 1883–1898. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1917841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartson, R. (2003). Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(5), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290310001592587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, H. H., Hsiao, S. W., & Liang, S. M. (2016). Improving product based on affordance with fuzzy theory for product development strategy. International Journal of Production Research, 54(18), 5522–5533. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1164350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, S. W., Hsu, C. F., & Lee, Y. T. (2012). An online affordance evaluation model for product design. Design Studies, 33(2), 126–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2012, May). Affordances in HCI: Toward a mediated action perspective. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 967–976). https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208541
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (1987). Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 342–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-02858790008-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, S. Z., Hsu, M. H., & Chen, W. H. (2022). Psychological factors behind innovation adoption: Affordance actualisation model. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2022.2148141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M. C., Wang, C. C., Chen, M. S., & Chang, C. A. (2008). Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process. Computers in Industry, 59(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2007.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, J. R., Ezhilan, T., & Fadel, G. M. (2007, January). The affordance structure matrix: A concept exploration and attention directing tool for affordance based design. In International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference (Vol. 48043, pp. 277–287). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2007-34526
   Google Scholar
• Maier, J. R., & Fadel, G. M. (2009). Affordance-based design methods for innovative design, redesign and reverse engineering. Research in Engineering Design, 20(4), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-009-0064-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantel, B., Hoppenot, P., & Colle, E. (2012). Perceiving for acting with teleoperated robots: Ecological principles to human–robot interaction design. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 42(6), 1460–1475. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2012.2190400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, L. S., Ye, L., & Smart, L. J. (2015). Perceiving the nesting of affordances for complex goal-directed actions. Ecological Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407410903058229
   Google Scholar
• McGrenere, J., & Ho, W. (2000, May). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. Graphics Interface, 2000, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.20380/GI2000.24
   Google Scholar
• Naoto, F., Takeshi, G., & Masato, S. (2004). The ecological approach to design. Tokyo Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Neisser, U., & Becklen, R. (1975). Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 480–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-02857590019-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/301153.301168
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2008). Signifiers, not affordances. Interactions, 15(6), 18–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/1409040.1409044
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things (Revised and Expanded ed.). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2014.958035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo, A. (2006, June). The origin and design of intentional affordances. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems (pp. 239–240). https://doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142407
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2004). Decision making—the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-0151-5
   Google Scholar
• Soegaard, M., & Dam, R. F. (2012). The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Stoffregen, T. A. (2003). Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffregen, T. A., & Mantel, B. (2015). Exploratory movement and affordances in design. Ai Edam, 29(3), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060415000190
   Google Scholar
• Torenvliet, G. (2003). We can’t afford it! The devaluation of a usability term. Interactions, 10(4), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/838830.838857
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-02858090005-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, P. (2005). Affordance as context. Interacting with Computers, 17(6), 787–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2005.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turvey, M. T. (1992). Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology, 4(3), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0403_3
   Google Scholar
• Van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G., & Turvey, M. T. (2003). Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(3), 331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente, K. J., & Rasmussen, J. (1992). Ecological interface design: Theoretical foundations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22(4), 589–606. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.156574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagman, J. B., & Miller, D. B. (2003). Nested reciprocities: The organism–environment system in perception–action and development. Developmental Psychobiology: The Journal of the International Society for Developmental Psychobiology, 42(4), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.10114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagman, J. B., & Stoffregen, T. A. (2020). It doesn’t add up: Nested affordances for reaching are perceived as a complex particular. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(8), 3832–3841. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02108-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, W. H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 683. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicker, A. W. (1984). An introduction to ecological psychology. CUP Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Zipoli Caiani, S. (2014). Extending the notion of affordance. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 275–293. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s11097-013-9295-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar