577
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Mechanical Engineering

Determining optimal lighting in 3D scanner for hand foot static anthropometric measurements

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Article: 2233248 | Received 04 May 2023, Accepted 30 Jun 2023, Published online: 10 Jul 2023

References

  • Arakida, T., Kanazawa, M., Iwaki, M., Suzuki, T., & Minakuchi, S. (2018). Evaluating the influence of ambient light on scanning trueness, precision, and time of intraoral scanner. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 62(3), 324–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.005
  • Blanco, D., Fernandez, P., Cuesta, E., & Suarez, C. M. (2008). Influence of ambient light on the quality of laser digitized surfaces. World Congress on Engineering 2008, Vols I-Ii, I. http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgiGWVersion=2&SrcAuth=ORCID&SrcApp=OrcidOrg&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=WOS:000259580600006&KeyUID=WOS:000259580600006
  • Dharma, I. B., & Nathania, N. A. (2017). David laser scanner for foot anthropometric measurements. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Industrial Engineering and the National Seminar on Integrated Scientific Industrial Engineering, October 4-6, 2017, Malang (pp. 239–243). Industrial Engineering, Brawijaya University.
  • Fourie, Z., Damstra, J., Gerrits, P. O., & Ren, Y. (2011). Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems. Forensic Science International, 207(1–3), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.09.018
  • Gerbino, S., Del Giudice, D. M., Staiano, G., Lanzotti, A., & Martorelli, M. (2016). On the influence of scanning factors on the laser scanner-based 3D inspection process. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 84(9–12), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7830-7
  • Greiner, T. M. (1991). Hand anthropometry of U.S. ARMY personnel final report (Issue December 1990).
  • Griffin, L., Sokolowski, S., Lee, H., Seifert, E., Kim, N., & Carufel, R. (2019). Methods and tools for 3D measurement of hands and feet. Advances in Intelligent Systems & Computing, 790, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94601-6_7
  • Imrhan, S. N., Sarder, M. D., & Mandahawi, N. (2009). Hand anthropometry in Bangladeshis living in America and comparisons with other populations. Ergonomics, 52(8), 987–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130902792478
  • Kwon, O., Jung, K., You, H., & Kim, H. E. (2009). Determination of key dimensions for a glove sizing system by analyzing the relationships between hand dimensions. Applied Ergonomics, 40(4), 762–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.07.003
  • Lemeš, S., & Zaimović-Uzunović, N. (2009). Study of ambient light influence on laser 3D scanning. 7th International Conference on Industrial Tools and Material Processing Technologies ICIT & MPT, 327–330. http://www.am.unze.ba/papers/327-330.pdf
  • Mindarti, R. D., & Dharma, I. B. (2015). Parameter optimization of feet antropoometry measurement system based on 3D scanning using kinect. Gadjah Mada University.
  • Pheasant, S., & Haslegrave, C. M. (2005). Bodyspace: Anthropometry, ergonomics and the design of work (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=nwfvSbuyBdMC
  • Price, C., & Nester, C. (2016). Foot dimensions and morphology in healthy weight, overweight and obese males. Clinical Biomechanics, 37, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.07.003
  • Revilla-León, M., Jiang, P., Sadeghpour, M., Piedra-Cascón, W., Zandinejad, A., Özcan, M., & Krishnamurthy, V. R. (2020). Intraoral digital scans—Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 124(3), 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.003
  • Revilla-León, M., Subramanian, S. G., Özcan, M., & Krishnamurthy, V. R. (2020). Clinical study of the influence of ambient light scanning conditions on the accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an intraoral scanner. Journal of Prosthodontics, 29(2), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13135
  • Robinette, K., Blackwell, S., Daanen, H., Boehmer, M., Fleming, S., Brill, T., Hoeferlin, D., & Burnsides, D. (1991). Civilian American and European surface anthropometry resource (Ceasar). SAE International, 5(December), 14–30.
  • Spahiu, T., Shehi, E., Galantucci, L., Kaçani, J., & Piperi, E. (2015). 3D low-cost scanning systems for extracting foot dimensions. The 1st SCARDUS International Conference on Education, Science, Technology, Innovation, Health & Environment June 12-13, 2015, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4987.0801
  • Weinberg, S. M., Scott, N. M., Neiswanger, K., Brandon, C. A., & Marazita, M. L. (2004). Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: Evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 41(5), 507–518. https://doi.org/10.1597/03-066.1
  • Wibowo, R. K. K., & Soni, P. (2014). Anthropometry and agricultural hand tool design for Javanese and Madurese farmers in East Java, Indonesia. APCBEE procedia, 8(Caas 2013), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.03.012
  • Witana, C. P., Xiong, S., Zhao, J., & Goonetilleke, R. S. (2006). Foot measurements from three-dimensional scans: A comparison and evaluation of different methods. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36(9), 789–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2006.06.004
  • Yu, A., Yick, K. L., Ng, S. P., & Yip, J. (2013). 2D and 3D anatomical analyses of hand dimensions for custom-made gloves. Applied Ergonomics, 44(3), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.10.001