A five-phase combinatorial approach for solving a fuzzy linear programming supply chain production planning problem

References

• Akram, M., Shah, S. M. U., Al-Shamiri, M. M. A., & Edalatpanah, S. A. (2023). Extended DEA method for solving multi-objective transportation problem with fermatean fuzzy sets. AIMS Mathematics, 8(1), 924–961. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanassov, K. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanas, S. (1989). Fuzzy programming in multiobjective linear programming—A parametric approach. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 29(3), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(89)90042-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha-ume, K., & Chiadamrong, N. (2012). Simulation of retail supply chain behaviour and financial impact in an uncertain environment. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 13(2), 162–186. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2012.048934
   Google Scholar
• Chutima, P., & Yothaboriban, N. (2017). Multi-objective mixed-model parallel assembly line balancing with a fuzzy adaptive biogeography-based algorithm. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 26(1), 90–132. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2017.083182
   Google Scholar
• De Rocquigny, E., Devictor, N., & Tarantola, S. (2008). Uncertainty setting and natures of uncertainty. In De Rocquigny, E., Devictor, N., & Tarantola, S. (Eds.), Uncertainty in industrial practice. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1978). Operations on fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Systems Science, 9(6), 613–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207727808941724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, D., Foulloy, L., Mauris, G., & Prade, H. (2004). Probability-possibility transformations, triangular fuzzy sets, and probabilistic inequalities. Reliable Computing, 10(4), 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REOM.0000032115.22510.b5
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, C. M., & Fleming, P. J. (1993). Genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization, formulation, discussion and generalization. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (pp. 416–423).
   Google Scholar
• Garg, H., Rani, M., Sharma, S. P., & Vishwakarma, Y. (2014). Intuitionistic fuzzy optimization technique for solving multi-objective reliability optimization problems in interval environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(7), 3157–3167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., Haq, A., Ali, I., & Sarkar, B. (2021). Significance of multi-objective optimization in logistics problem for multi-product supply chain network under the intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7(4), 2119–2139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00326-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guua, S.-M., & Wu, Y.-K. (1999). Two-phase approach for solving the fuzzy linear programming problems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 107(2), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00304-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanczar, P., & Azadehranjbar, Z. (2022). A bi-objective sustainable supply chain redesign: What effect does energy availability have on redesign? Energies, 15(10), 3642. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilpem, S. (1992). The expected value of a fuzzy number. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 47(1), 81–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helton, J. C. (2009). Conceptual and computational basis for the quantification of margins and uncertainty, Sandia National Laboratories, Report SAND 2009–3055.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S., Lin, Y., Zhang, J., & Wang, P. (2023). Chance-constrained approach for decentralized supply chain network under uncertain cost. AIMS Mathematics, 8(5), 12217–12238. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, C. L., & Masud, A. (1979). Multiple objective decision making. Methods and applications: A state of the art survey. In Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (Vol. 164). Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jafaryeganeh, H., Ventura, M., & Guedes, S. C. (2020). Effect of normalization techniques in multi-criteria decision-making methods for the design of ship internal layout from a Pareto optimal set. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 62(4), 1849–1863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02581-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jana, B., & Roy, T. K. (2007). Multi-objective intuitionistic fuzzy linear programming and its application in transportation model. Notes Intuition Fuzzy Sets, 13(1), 34–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, J., & Chiadamrong, N. (2022). Integrating mathematical and simulation approach for optimizing production and distribution planning with lateral transhipment in a supply chain. International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management, 15(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJISSCM.2022010105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, P., & Rachana, K. N. L. (2016). An intuitionistic fuzzy optimization approach to vendor selection problem. Perspectives in Science, 8(1), 348–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pisc.2016.04.071
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S. A. R., Piprani, A. Z., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Digital technology and circular economy practices: Future of supply chains. Operations Management Research, 15(3–4), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00247-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S. A. R., Tabish, M., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Embracement of industry 4.0 and sustainable supply chain practices under the shadow of practice-based view theory: Ensuring environmental sustainability in corporate sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 398, 136609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kousar, S., Batool, M., Kausar, N., Pamucar, D., Ozbilge, E., & Tantay, B. (2022). Multi-objective intuitionistic fuzzy linear programming model for optimization of industrial closed-loop supply chain network. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 17(3), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2022.3.443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., Edalatpanah, S. A., & Mandal, T. (2020). Application of linear fractional programming problem with fuzzy nature in industry sector. Filomat, 34(15), 5073–5084. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL2015073D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration.
   Google Scholar
• Le, T. Q., Rianmora, S., & Kewcharoenwong, P. (2018). Intermodal network design in freight transportation systems [Paper presentation]. 2018 Thirteenth International Conference on Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems (KICSS), Pattaya, Thailand (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/KICSS45055.2018.8950621
   Google Scholar
• Li, X., & Liu, B. (2006). A sufficient and necessary condition for credibility measures. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 14(05), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488506004175
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi, F., & Nasseri, S. H. (2019). A new approach to solve fully fuzzy linear programming problem. Mathematics, Computer Science, 6(2), 139–149.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, R., & Bharati, S. K. (2016). Intuitionistic fuzzy two stage multiobjective transportation problems. Advances in Theoretical and Applied Mathematics, 11(3), 305–316.
   Google Scholar
• Mavrotas, G. (2009). Effective implementation of the ε-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 213(2), 455–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvey, J. M., Vanderbei, R. J., & Zenios, S. A. (1995). Robust optimization of large-scale systems. Operations Research, 43(2), 264–281. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.43.2.264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvathi, R., & Malathi, C. (2012). Intuitionistic fuzzy linear programming problems. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(12), 1787–1791.
   Google Scholar
• Pawar, S. V., Patel, P. L., & Mirajkar, A. (2020). Intuitionistic fuzzy approach in multi-objective optimization for KRBMC irrigation system, India. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 28(sup1), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2020.1781700
   Google Scholar
• Pishvaee, M. S., Razmi, J., & Torabi, S. A. (2012). Robust possibilistic linear programming for socially responsible supply chain network design: A new approach. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 206(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2012.04.010
   Google Scholar
• Roy, S. K., Ebrahimnejad, A., Verdegay, J. L., & Das, S. (2018). New approach for solving intuitionistic fuzzy multi-objective transportation problem. Indian Academy of Science, 43(3), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sapan, K. D. (2021). Optimization of fuzzy linear fractional programming problem with fuzzy numbers. Big Data and Computing Visions, 1(1), 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Sayed, M. A., & Sinna, M. A. (2020). A novel approach for fully intuitionistic fuzzy multi-objective fractional transportation problem. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 60(1), 1447–1463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J., Jin, Y., & Liu, B, Department of Public Basic Courses, Nanjing Vocational University of Industry Technology No.1 Yangshan North Road, Nanjing 210023, China. (2022). Expected value model of an uncertain production inventory problem with deteriorating items. Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, 26(5), 684–690. https://doi.org/10.20965/jaciii.2022.p0684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vluymans, S., Parthaláin, N. M., Cornelis, C., & Saeys, Y. (2019). Weight selection strategies for ordered weighted average based fuzzy rough sets. Information Sciences, 501(1), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.085
   Google Scholar
• Voskoglou, M. (2020). Assessment and linear programming under fuzzy conditions. Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications, 1(3), 198–216.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J.-Q., Nie, R., Zhang, H.-Y., & Chen, X.-H. (2013). New operators on triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their applications in system fault analysis. Information Sciences, 251(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.06.033
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., & Liang, T. (2005). Applying possibilistic linear programming to aggregate production planning. International Journal of Production Economics, 98(3), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Ma, W., & Chen, L. (2014). New similarity of triangular fuzzy number and its application. The Scientific World Journal, 2014(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/215047
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, H. J. (1978). Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(78)90031-3
   Google Scholar