Bi-objective pareto optimization of centric crank-rocker mechanisms

References

• Ahmadi, B., & Ahmadi, B. (2022). Optimal synthesis of crank-rocker mechanisms with optimum transmission angle for desired stroke and time-ratio using genetic programming. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 14(10), 168781322211312. https://doi.org/10.1177/16878132221131291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Dwairi, A., Al-Lubani, S., & Al-Nawafleh, M. (2009). Analytical synthesis of crank-rocker and double-crank mechanisms with minimax link-length ratios. Proc. of the 37th Conference "Advanced Problems in Mechanics," Russian Academy of Science, June 30 – July 5 ( pp. 192–203 ) . Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
   Google Scholar
• Balli, S. S., & Chand, S. (2002). Transmission angle in mechanisms (Triangle in mech). Mechanism and Machine Theory, 37(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-114X(01)00067-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Shakery, S., Ramadan, R., & Khader, K. (2020). Analytical and graphical optimal synthesis of crank-rocker four bar mechanisms for achieving targeted transmission angle deviations. Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 14(3), 303–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogarasy, A. A., & Smith, M. R. (1998). The influence of manufacturing tolerances on the kinematic performance of mechanisms. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 212(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1243/0954406981521024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funabashi, H., & Freudenstein, F. (1979). Performance criteria for high-speed crank-and-rocker linkages—Part I: Plane crank-and-rocker linkages. Journal of Mechanical Design, 101(1), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3454019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunantara, N. (2018). A review of multi-objective optimization: Methods and its applications. Cogent Engineering, 5(1), 1502242. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1502242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, T., Jiao, L., Lee, J. H., & Yin, J. (2023). A utopia point method-based robust vector polynomial optimization scheme. Journal of Global Optimization, 88 (2), 461–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-023-01321-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahan, A., Edwards, K., & Bahraminasab, M. (2013). Multi-criteria decision analysis (2nd ed., pp. 63–65). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W.-T., & Russell, K. (2017). Developments in quantitative dimensional synthesis (1970–present): four-bar path and function generation. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 26(9), 1280–1304. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2017.1396328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, L., Anderson-Cook, C. M., & Robinson, T. J. (2011). Optimization of designed experiments based on multiple criteria utilizing a Pareto frontier. Technometrics, 53(4), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1198/TECH.2011.10087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lun, M., & Leu, Y. (1996). Design of crank-rocker mechanisms with optimum transmission angle over working stroke. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 31(4), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-114x(95)00088-g
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutlu, H. (2021). Design of the crank–rocker mechanism for various design cases based on the closed-form solution. Sādhanā, 46(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-01529-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nariman-Zadeh, N., Felezi, M., Jamali, A., & Ganji, M. (2009). Pareto optimal synthesis of four-bar mechanisms for path generation. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 44(1), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2008.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, R. L. (2013). Kinematics and dynamics of machinery. Mcgraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, V., Komal, & Dincer, H. (2023). A review on TOPSIS method and its extensions for different applications with recent development. Soft Computing, 27 (23), 18011–18039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09011-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothenhofer, G., Walsh, C., & Slocum, A. (2010). Transmission ratio based analysis and robust design of mechanisms. Precision Engineering, 34(4), 790–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2010.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro, E. (1992). Global methods in multi-objective optimization and their application to a mechanical design problem. Computers in Industry, 18(2), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-3615(92)90111-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, R., Chaudhary, H., & Singh, A. K. (2017). Defect-free optimal synthesis of crank-rocker linkage using nature-inspired optimization algorithms. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 116, 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencia-Segura, L. E., Villarreal-Cervantes, M. G., Corona-Ramirez, L. G., Cuenca-Jimenez, F., & Castro-Medina, R. (2021). Optimum synthesis of four-bar mechanism by using relative angle method: A comparative performance study. IEEE Access. 9, 132990–133010. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3115444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, K. J., Kinzel, G. L., & Kumar Agrawal, S. (2016). Kinematics, dynamics, and design of machinery. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Tian, Y., & Jin, Y. (2015). A knee point-driven evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 19(6), 761–776. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2014.2378512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar