641
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Soil & Crop Sciences

An analysis of the adoption of the “system of rice intensification” (SRI): why a homegrown technique has yet to take seed among rice farmers in Madagascar

, , &
Article: 2319932 | Received 28 Jul 2023, Accepted 13 Feb 2024, Published online: 06 Mar 2024

References

  • Achandi, E. L., Mujawamariya, G., Agboh-Noameshie, A. R., Gebremariam, S., Rahalivavololona, N., & Rodenburg, J. (2018). Women’s access to agricultural technologies in rice production and processing hubs: A comparative analysis of Ethiopia, Madagascar and Tanzania. Journal of Rural Studies, 60(February), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.03.011
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs. Prentice Hall.
  • Alam, S. S., Omar, N. A., Ariffin, A. M., & Hashim, N. M. H. N. (2018). Integrating TPB, TAM and DOI theories: An empirical evidence for the adoption of mobile banking among customers in Klang Valley, Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management Science, 8(2), 385–403.
  • Ali, A., Erenstein, O., & Rahut, D. B. (2014). Impact of direct rice-sowing technology on rice producers’ earnings: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Development Studies Research, 1(1), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2014.943777
  • Alwang, J., Larochelle, C., & Barrera, V. (2017). Farm decision making and gender: Results from a randomized experiment in ecuador. World Development, 92, 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.015
  • Andersson, J. A., & D’Souza, S. (2013). From adoption claims to understanding farmers and contexts: A literature review of Conservation Agriculture (CA) adoption among smallholder farmers in southern Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 187, 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.08.008
  • Arsil, P, Sahirman, S, Hidayat, H H, Ardiansyah. (2019). The reasons for farmers not to adopt System of Rice Intensification (SRI) as a sustainable agricultural practice: An explorative study. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 012063(Vol. 250). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/250/1/012063
  • Arsil, P., Tey, Y. S., Brindal, M., Sumarni, E., Ardiansyah, M. (2022). Perceived attributes driving the adoption of system of rice intensification: The Indonesian farmers’ view. Open Agriculture 7(1), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-0080
  • Barrett, C. B., Islam, A., Mohammad Malek, A., Pakrashi, D., & Ruthbah, U. (2022). Experimental evidence on adoption and impact of the system of rice intensification. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 104(1), 4–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12245
  • Barrett, C. B., Moser, C. M., McHugh, O. V., & Barison, J. (2004). Better technology, better plots, or better farmers? Identifying changes in productivity and risk among Malagasy rice farmers. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(4), 869–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00640.x
  • Basu, S., & Leeuwis, C. (2012). Understanding the rapid spread of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) in Andhra Pradesh: Exploring the building of support networks and media representation. Agricultural Systems, 111, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.04.005
  • Berkhout, E., & Glover, D. (2012). The Evolution of the System of Rice Intensification as a Socio-Technical Phenomenon: A Report to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. SSRN Electronic Journal, (February). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1922760
  • Beumer, K., Maat, H., & Glover, D. (2022). It’s not the market, stupid: On the importance of non-market economies in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42(March), 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.02.001
  • Black, E. (2016). Cross Visits In Agricultural Development: A Tool To Increase Program Flexibility And Participant Learning. Cornell University.
  • Brown, L. M. (1998). Swidden agriculture and an intensified rice cultivation program at Ranomafana National Park Madagascar. University of Montana. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/8453%0AThis
  • Carnevale Zampaolo, F., Roxburgh, E., & McCallum, J. (2022). SRI-2030 Summary Report. SRI- 2030. Oxford, UK.
  • Carranza, M., & Niles, M. T. (2019). Smallholder Farmers Spend Credit Primarily on Food: Gender Differences and Food Security Implications in a Changing Climate. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 3, 56. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00056
  • Castellanet, C., & Jordan, C. F. (2002). Participatory action research in natural resource management: a critique of the method based on five year’s experience in the Transamazonica region of Brazil. Taylor & Francis.
  • Cham, H., Reshetnyak, E., Rosenfeld, B., & Breitbart, W. (2017). Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Latent Variable Interactions With Incomplete Indicators. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2016.1245600
  • Chambers, R. (1983). Rural development: putting the last first. Longman Inc.
  • Channa, M., & Syed, S. (2017). Constraints and suggestions of SRI method of paddy growers in Dharwad district, Karnataka, India. Agriculture Update, 12(3), 361–364.
  • Cheng, E. W. L. (2019). Choosing between the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the technology acceptance model (TAM). Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9598-6
  • Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • De Berry, J. (2023). Madagascar and the social impacts of drought. https://blogs.worldbank.org/climatechange/madagascar-and-social-impacts-drought
  • Dearing, J. W. (2009). Intervention Development. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509335569
  • Deb, D. (2020). Is the system of rice intensification (SRI) consonant with agroecology? Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 44(10), 1338–1369. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2020.1779165
  • den Biggelaar, C., & Moore, M. (2016). The Changing Nature of Agricultural Livelihoods along a Peri-urban to Rural Gradient in. Eastern Madagascar, 4(2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajrd-4-2-1
  • Denny, R. C. H., Marquart-Pyatt, S. T., & Houser, M. (2019). Understanding the Past and Present and Predicting the Future: Farmers’ Use of Multiple Nutrient Best Management Practices in the Upper Midwest. Society & Natural Resources, 32(7), 807–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1574045
  • Dong, H., Wang, H., & Han, J. (2022). Understanding ecological agricultural technology adoption in China using an integrated technology acceptance model-theory of planned behavior model. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 927668. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.927668
  • Dröge, S., Poudyal, M., Hockley, N., Mandimbiniaina, R., Rasoamanana, A., Andrianantenaina, N. S., & Llopis, J. C. (2022). Constraints on rice cultivation in eastern Madagascar: Which factors matter to smallholders, and which influence food security? Human Ecology, 50(3), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00336-2
  • Duary, S., Biswas, T., & Biswas, A. (2021). System of rice intensification-a new approach of rice cultivation. Indian Journal of Natural Sciences, 12(69), 37424–37429.
  • Durga, A. R., & Kumar, D. S. (2016). More Crop per Drop of water: Adoption and dis-adoption dynamics of system of rice intensification. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 5(1), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277975215617862
  • FAO CountrySTAT. (2021). Madagascar Key Indicators. http://madagascar.countrystat.org/key-indicators/en/
  • Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985). Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(2), 255–298. https://doi.org/10.1086/451461
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behaviour: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis.
  • Foguesatto, C. R., Borges, J. A. R., & Machado, J. A. D. (2020). A review and some reflections on farmers’ adoption of sustainable agricultural practices worldwide. The Science of the Total Environment, 729, 138831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138831
  • Freudenberger, M. S., & Freudenberger, K. S. (2009). Contradictions in agricultural intensification and improved natural resource management: issues in the Fianarantsoa Forest Corridor of Madagascar. In Natural Resources Management in African Agriculture: Understanding and Improving Current Practices (pp. 181–192). CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995847.0181
  • Global Hunger Index. (2022). Madagascar. https://www.globalhungerindex.org/madagascar.html
  • Global Yield Gap Atlas. (n.d). Madagascar. https://www.yieldgap.org/madagascar
  • Goud, V. V. (2005). Rice does not need water: The system of rice intensification method shows how. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/coverage/rice-does-not-need-water-10108
  • Graf, S. L., & Oya, C. (2021). Is the system of rice intensification (SRI) pro poor? Labour, class and technological change in West Africa. Agricultural Systems, 193, 103229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103229
  • Guielford, J. (1965). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Han, G., & Niles, M. (2023). A Framework and Validation to Acknowledge the Complexity of Farmers’ Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture Practices. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/253uf
  • Hansda, R. (2017). Small-scale farming and gender-friendly agricultural technologies: the interplay between gender, labour, caste, policy and practice. Gender, Technology and Development, 21(3), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2018.1434990
  • Hardenbergh, S. H. B., Green, G., & Peters, D. (1995). The relationship of human resource use, socioeconomic status, health, and nutrition near Madagascar’s protected areas: an assessment of assumption and solutions. In B. D. Patterson, S. M. Goodman, & J. L. Sedlock (Eds.), Environmental Change in Madagascar (pp. 57–58). The Field Museum.
  • Harding, S. S., Mahmood, N., & Toure, A. (2017). Assessing the suitability and profitability of the System Of Rice Intensification (SRI) methodology under farmers ‘ circumstances in Sierra Leone. Agronomie Africaine Sp, 29(1), 41–52.
  • Hawken, P. (2017). Drawdown: the most comprehensive plan ever proposed to reverse global warming. Penguin Books.
  • Ho, M. W. (2005). Rice Wars. Synthesis/Regeneration, 36 (Winter 2005). http://www.greens.org/s-r/36/36-03.html
  • Hume, D. W. (2006). Swidden agriculture and conservation in eastern Madagascar : Stakeholder perspectives and cultural belief systems. Conservation and Society, 4(2), 287–303.
  • Hume, D. W. (2009). Vary Gasy: Folk models of rice and implications for agricultural development in Eastern Madagascar. Études Océan Indien, (42-43), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.4000/oceanindien.812
  • Hume, D. W. (2020). Transmission of swidden farming ritual knowledge among households in eastern Madagascar. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 4(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-019-00041-5
  • IBM Corp. (2021). IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 28.0.
  • IFAD. (n.d). Madagascar. https://www.ifad.org/en/web/operations/w/country/madagascar
  • Jain, M., Barrett, C. B., Solomon, D., & Ghezzi-Kopel, K. (2023). Surveying the evidence on sustainable intensification strategies for smallholder agricultural systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 48(1), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-093911
  • Jones, J. P. G., Andriamarovololona, M. M., & Hockley, N. (2008). The importance of taboos and social norms to conservation in Madagascar. Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 22(4), 976–986. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00970.x
  • Jones, J. P. G., Rakotonarivo, O. S., & Razafimanahaka, J. H. (2021). Forest Conservation in Madagascar: Past, Present, and Future. In S. M. Goodman (Ed.), The New Natural History of Madagascar. Princeton University Press.
  • Jost, C., Kyazze, F., Naab, J., Neelormi, S., Kinyangi, J., Zougmore, R., Aggarwal, P., Bhatta, G., Chaudhury, M., Tapio-Bistrom, M.-L., Nelson, S., & Kristjanson, P. (2016). Understanding gender dimensions of agriculture and climate change in smallholder farming communities. Climate and Development, 8(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2015.1050978
  • Kamara, L. I., Lalani, B., & Dorward, P. (2023). Towards agricultural innovation systems: Actors, roles, linkages and constraints in the system of rice intensification (SRI) in Sierra Leone. Scientific African, 19, e01576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01576
  • Kashem, M. A. (1987). Small Farmers’ constraints to the adoption of modern rice technology. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 15(4), 119–130. http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40795299.pdf
  • Katambara, Z., Kahimba, F. C., Mahoo, H. F., Mbungu, W. B., Mhenga, F., Reuben, P., Maugo, M., & Nyarubamba, A. (2013). Adopting the system of rice intensification (SRI) in Tanzania: A review. Agricultural Sciences, 04(08), 369–375. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2013.48053
  • Keller, E. (2008). The banana plant and the moon: Conservation and the Malagasy ethos of life in Masoala, Madagascar. American Ethnologist, 35(4), 650–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2008.00103.x
  • Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (2007). Participatory action research: origins, approaches and methods. In S. Kindon, R. Pain, & M. Kesby (Eds.), Participatory action research: origins, approaches and methods (pp. 9–18). Routledge.
  • Laksono, Pandu, Mulyo, Jangkung Handoyo, Suryantini, Any, Irham, (2022). Farmers’ willingness to adopt geographical indication practice in Indonesia: A psycho behavioral analysis. Heliyon, 8(8), e10178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10178
  • Lalani, B., Dorward, P., Holloway, G., & Wauters, E. (2016). Smallholder farmers’ motivations for using Conservation Agriculture and the roles of yield, labour and soil fertility in decision making. Agricultural Systems, 146, 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.04.002
  • Laney, R., & Turner, B. L. (2015). The persistence of self-provisioning among smallholder farmers in Northeast Madagascar. Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 43(6), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-015-9791-8
  • Lee, Y. H., & Kobayashi, K. (2018). Assessing the acceptance of the system of rice intensification among farmers in rainfed lowland rice region of Cambodia. Paddy and Water Environment, 16(3), 533–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-018-0646-y
  • Leonardo, W. J., van de Ven, G. W. J., Udo, H., Kanellopoulos, A., Sitoe, A., & Giller, K. E. (2015). Labour not land constrains agricultural production and food self-sufficiency in maize-based smallholder farming systems in Mozambique. Food Security, 7(4), 857–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0480-7
  • Linton, R. (1927). Rice, a Malagasy Tradition. American Anthropologist, 29(4), 654–660. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1927.29.4.02a00060
  • Liu, H., & Brouwer, R. (2022). Incentivizing the future adoption of best management practices on agricultural land to protect water resources: The role of past participation and experiences. Ecological Economics, 196(March), 107389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107389
  • Livingston, G., Schonberger, S., & Delaney, S. (2011). Sub-Saharan Africa : The state of smallholders in agriculture [Paper presentation]. IFAD: International Fund for Agricultural Development: Conference on New Directions for Smallholder Agriculture (pp. 1–36).
  • Loukes, K. (2015). The System of Rice Intensification (SRI): Complicating the global narrative. Queen’s University. http://qspace.library.queensu.ca/jspui/handle/1974/13492
  • Ly, P., Jensen, L. S., Bruun, T. B., Rutz, D., & de Neergaard, A. (2012). The system of rice intensification: Adapted practices, reported outcomes and their relevance in Cambodia. Agricultural Systems, 113, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.07.005
  • Mariano, M. J., Villano, R., & Fleming, E. (2012). Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of modern rice technologies and good management practices in the Philippines. Agricultural Systems, 110, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.03.010
  • Méndez, V. E., Caswell, M., Gliessman, S. R., & Cohen, R. (2017). Integrating Agroecology and Participatory Action Research (PAR): Lessons from Central America. Sustainability, 9(5), 705. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050705
  • Minten, B., & Barrett, C. B. (2008). Agricultural technology, productivity, and poverty in Madagascar. World Development, 36(5), 797–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.05.004
  • Minten, B., Dorosh, P., Jenn-Treyer, O., Magnay, J., & Razafintsalama, Z. (2006). Rice Markets in Madagascar in Disarray : Policy Options for Increased Efficiency and Price Stabilization. World Bank Africa Region Working Paper series. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2007/02/21/000020953_20070221140454/Rendered/PDF/387060PAPER0MG1rkets0wp10101PUBLIC1.pdf
  • Moore, M., Alpaugh, M., Razafindrina, K., Trubek, A. B., & Niles, M. T. (2022). Finding food in the hunger season: A mixed methods approach to understanding wild plant foods in relation to food security and dietary diversity in southeastern Madagascar. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.929308
  • Moser, C. M., & Barrett, C. B. (2003). The disappointing adoption dynamics of a yield-increasing, low external-input technology: The case of SRI in Madagascar. Agricultural Systems, 76(3), 1085–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00041-0
  • Mrunalini, A., & Ganesh, M. (2008). Work load on women using cono weeder in SRI method of paddy cultivation. ORYZA-An International Journal on Rice, 45(1), 58–61. http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:oryza&volume=45&issue=1&article=013
  • Mujawamariya, G., Zenna, N., Leonard, L., Tefy Andrianina, I., & Ramiaramanana, D. (2022). A gendered outlook into the adoption of improved rice varieties in Madagascar. Gender, Technology and Development, 26(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2022.2034095
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2011). Mplus User’s Guide (Sixth). Muthén & Muthén.
  • Mutyasira, V., Hoag, D., & Pendell, D. (2018). The adoption of sustainable agricultural practices by smallholder farmers in Ethiopian highlands: An integrative approach. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 4(1), 1552439. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2018.1552439
  • Muzari, W., Gatsi, W., & Muvhunzi, S. (2012). The Impacts of Technology Adoption on Smallholder Agricultural Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review. Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(8), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v5n8p69
  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403(6772), 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
  • Nguyen, N., & Drakou, E. G. (2021). Farmers intention to adopt sustainable agriculture hinges on climate awareness: the case of Vietnamese coffee. Journal of Cleaner Production, 303, 126828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126828
  • Niles, M. T., Brown, M., & Dynes, R. (2016). Farmer’s intended and actual adoption of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. Climatic Change, 135(2), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1558-0
  • Noltze, M., Schwarze, S., & Qaim, M. (2012). Understanding the adoption of system technologies in smallholder agriculture: The system of rice intensification (SRI) in Timor Leste. Agricultural Systems, 108, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.01.003
  • Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691773384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  • Palanisami, K., Karunakaran, K. R.,  Ranganathan, U., & C., Amarasinghe. (2013). Doing Different Things or Doing It Differently.  ? Economic and Political Weekly, xlviii(8), 51–58.
  • Pannell, D. J., Marshall, G. R., Barr, N., Curtis, A., Vanclay, F., & Wilkinson, R. (2006). Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 46(11), 1407–1424. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05037
  • Pattanayak, S. K., Mercer, D. E., Sills, E., & Yang, J. C. (2003). Taking stock of agroforestry adoption studies. Agroforestry Systems, 57(3), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024809108210
  • Perera, J., Ahamed, A. I., & Simmons, M. (2007). Farmers’ perceptions of the factors that influence the uptake of SRI practices in Sri Lanka. Retrieved from http://sri.ciifad.cornell.edu/countries/srilanka/SLoxfamPercep0207.pdf
  • Perez, R. (2002). Experience in Cuba with the system of rice intensification. In Norman Uphoff, E. Fernandes, Y. Longping, P. Jining, S. Rafaralahy, & J. Rabenandrasana (Eds.), Assessment of the system of rice intensification (pp. 53–55). Cornell International Institute for Food and Agriculture Development.
  • Perret, S. R., & Stevens, J. B. (2006). Socio-economic reasons for the low adoption of water conservation technologies by smallholder farmers in southern Africa: A review of the literature. Development Southern Africa, 23(4), 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/03768350600927193
  • Prabu, M. (2016). Bicycle inspired plougher and weeder gains popularity. The Hindu, November 11. https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/Bicycle-inspired-plougher-and-weeder-gains-popularity/article16299057.ece
  • Prasad, C. S. (2020). Constructing Alternative Socio-technical Worlds: Re-imagining RRI through SRI in India. Science, Technology and Society, 25(2), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721820903002
  • Rabenandrasana, J. L. (2002). SRI Experience of Association Tefy Saina in Madagascar.
  • Rakotomalala, H. W. (1997). Universite d‘Antananarivo. Comparaison entre la Riziculture Traditionnelle et le System de Riziculture Intensive dans la Region de Ranomafana. Thesis.
  • Rakotovao, N. H., Chevallier, T., Chapuis-Lardy, L., Deffontaines, S., Mathé, S., Ramarofidy, M. A., Rakotoniamonjy, T. H., Lepage, A., Masso, C., Albrecht, A., & Razafimbelo, T. M. (2021). Impacts on greenhouse gas balance and rural economy after agroecology development in Itasy Madagascar. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125220
  • Randrianarison, N., Nischalke, S., & Andriamazaoro, H. (2020). The role of biodiversity and natural resource management in food security in south-eastern Madagascar. Acta Horticulturae, 1267(1267), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1267.40
  • Randriamiharisoa, R., & Uphoff, N. (2004). Factorial trials evaluating the separate and combined effects of SRI practices. Online magazine.
  • Razafimahatratra, H. M., Bignebat, C., David-Benz, H., Bélières, J. F., & Penot, E. (2021). Tryout and (Dis)adoption of conservation agriculture. Evidence from Western Madagascar. Land Use Policy, 100(June 2019), 104929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104929
  • Resurreccion, B. P., Sajor, E. E., & Hor, S. (2008). Gender Dimensions of the Adoption of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) in Cambodia. http://sri.ciifad.cornell.edu/countries/cambodia/cambOxfamSRIGenderEval08.pdf
  • Ringler, C. (2010). Climate Change and Hunger: Africa’s Smallholder Farmers Struggle to Adapt. EuroChoices, 9(3), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-692X.2010.00175.x
  • Rodríguez-Cruz, L. A., Moore, M., & Niles, M. T. (2021). Puerto Rican Farmers’ Obstacles Toward Recovery and Adaptation Strategies After Hurricane Maria: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding Adaptive Capacity. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 662918. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.662918
  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (3rd ed.). Free Press.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.). Free Press.
  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  • Rosário, J., Madureira, L., Marques, C., & Silva, R. (2022). Understanding farmers’ adoption of sustainable agriculture innovations: A systematic literature review. Agronomy, 12(11), 2879. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112879
  • Rousseau, S., Steinke, J., Vincent, M., Andriatseheno, H., & Pontarollo, J. (2023). Strong seasonality in diets and alarming levels of food insecurity and child malnutrition in south-eastern Madagascar. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7(June). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1126053
  • Ruzzante, S., Labarta, R., & Bilton, A. (2021). Adoption of agricultural technology in the developing world: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. World Development, 146, 105599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105599
  • Saengavut, V., & Jirasatthumb, N. (2021). Smallholder decision-making process in technology adoption intention: implications for Dipterocarpus alatus in Northeastern Thailand. Heliyon, 7(4), e06633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06633
  • Savage, J. (2000). One voice, different tunes: issues raised by dual analysis of a segment of qualitative data. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(6), 1493–1500. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01432.x
  • Scales, I. R. (2014). A brief history of the state and the politics of natural resource use in Madagascar. In Conservation and Environmental Management in Madagascar (pp. 129–145). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203118313
  • Schaak, H., & Mußhoff, O. (2018). Understanding the adoption of grazing practices in German dairy farming. Agricultural Systems, 165(August 2017), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.06.015
  • Senahoun, J., & Nikoi, C. (2016). Rapport spécial: Mission FAO/PAM d’évaluation des récoltes et de la sécurité alimentaire à Madagascar 27 octobre 2016, 60.
  • Serpantié, G., & Rakotondramanana, M. (2014). From standards to practices: The intensive and improved rice systems (SRI and SRA) in the Madagascar highlands. In Challenges and opportunities for agricultural intensification of the humid highland systems of Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 149–163). Springer International Publishing.
  • Sibiko, K. W., Veettil, P. C., & Qaim, M. (2018). Small farmers’ preferences for weather index insurance: insights from Kenya. Agriculture & Food Security, 7(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-018-0200-6
  • Sinha, S. K., & Talati, J. (2007). Productivity impacts of the system of rice intensification (SRI): A case study in West Bengal, India. Agricultural Water Management, 87(1), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.06.009
  • Sita Devi, K., & Ponnarasi, T. (2009). An Economic Analysis of Modern Rice Production Technology and its Adoption Behaviour in Tamil Nadu. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 22, 341–347.
  • SRI-Rice. (n.d.-a). Madagascar. http://sri.ciifad.cornell.edu/countries/madagascar/
  • SRI-Rice. (n.d.-b). SRI Methodologies. http://sri.ciifad.cornell.edu/aboutsri/methods/index.html
  • Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
  • Stifel D., Minten B., & Dorosh P. (2003). Transaction costs and agricultural productivity: Implications of isolation for rural poverty in Madagascar. Agricultural & Natural Resource Economics.
  • Stokstad, E. (2022). ‘Perennial’ rice saves time and money, but comes with risks. Science, November 7. https://www.science.org/content/article/perennial-rice-saves-time-and-money-comes-risks
  • Stoop, W. A., Uphoff, N., & Kassam, A. (2002). A review of agricultural research issues raised by the system of rice intensification (SRI) from Madagascar: Opportunities for improving farming systems for resource-poor farmers. Agricultural Systems, 71(3), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00070-1
  • Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325896
  • Styger, E., Rakotoarimanana, J. E. M., & Rabevohitra, R. (1999). Indigenous fruit trees of Madagascar : potential components of agroforestry systems to improve human nutrition and restore biological diversity. Agroforestry Systems, 46(3), 289–310.
  • Styger, E., & Traoré, G. (2018). 50,000 Farmers in 13 Countries: Results from Scaling up the System of Rice Intensification in West Africa; Achievements and Regional Perspectives for SRI; SRI- WAAPP Project Summary Report, 2014-2016; West Africa Agriculture Productivity Program (WAAPP) Dakar, Senegal.
  • Suzzi-Simmons, A. (2023). Status of deforestation of Madagascar. Global Ecology and Conservation, 42, e02389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02389
  • Takahashi, K., & Barrett, C. B. (2014). The system of rice intensification and its impacts on household income and child schooling: Evidence from rural Indonesia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96(1), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aat086
  • Taylor, M., & Bhasme, S. (2019). The political ecology of rice intensification in south India: Putting SRI in its places. Journal of Agrarian Change, 19(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12268
  • Tezer, A. (2012). Revisiting the Confounding Adoption Dynamics of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) in Madagascar. Wageningen University.
  • Thakur, A. K., Mandal, K. G., Mohanty, R. K., & Uphoff, N. (2022). How agroecological rice intensification can assist in reaching the Sustainable Development Goals. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 20(2), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2021.1925462
  • Theis, S., Lefore, N., Meinzen-Dick, R., & Bryan, E. (2018). What happens after technology adoption? Gendered aspects of small-scale irrigation technologies in Ethiopia, Ghana, and Tanzania. Agriculture and Human Values, 35(3), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-018-9862-8
  • Troise, C., O’Driscoll, A., Tani, M., & Prisco, A. (2021). Online food delivery services and behavioural intention – a test of an integrated TAM and TPB framework. British Food Journal, 123(2), 664–683. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2020-0418
  • Tsujimoto, Y., Homma, K., Matsuyama, H., & Shiraiwa, T. (2012). Land-use strategies of farmers in responding to rising land-use pressures in the southeastern forest region of madagascar: A comparative study between lowland households and hillside households. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly: JARQ, 46(3), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.46.249
  • Uphoff, N. (2001). Report from Field Visit to Farmers Practicing S.R.I. around Lac Alaotra, Madagascar. http://sri.ciifad.cornell.edu/countries/madagascar/madritrjun01.pdf
  • Uphoff, N. (2023). SRI 2.0 and beyond: Sequencing the protean evolution of the system of rice intensification. Agronomy, 13(5), 1253. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051253
  • Uphoff, N., & Randriamiharisoa, R. (2002). Reducing water use in irrigated rice production with the Madagascar System of Rice Intensification. In Water-wise Rice Production: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Water-Wise Rice Production, 8-11, 2002, Los Baños, Philippines, eds. B. A. M. Bouman, H. Hengsdijk, B. Hardy, P. S.Bindraban, T. P. Tuong, and J. K. Ladha. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines (pp. 71–88).
  • Uphoff, N. (2007). Reducing the vulnerability of rural households through agroecological practice: Considering the System of Rice Intensification (SRI). Mondes en Développement, n° 140(4), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.3917/med.140.0085
  • Uphoff, N., Kassam, A., & Harwood, R. (2011). SRI as a methodology for raising crop and water productivity: Productive adaptations in rice agronomy and irrigation water management. Paddy and Water Environment, 9(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-010-0224-4
  • Uphoff, N., & Thakur, A. K. (2019). An agroecological strategy for adapting to climate change: The System of Rice Intensification (SRI). In A. Sarkar, S. Sensarma, & Eds.), Sustainable Solutions for Food Security (pp. 229–254). Springer.
  • Vallois, P. (2005). MAFF (Mitsitsy Ambioka sy Fomba Fiasa): Intensification de la riziculture répiquée par l’amélioration des façons culturales, PC 15 - Vallée Marianina, Rapport de Campagne 2004–2005.
  • Varma, P. (2019). Adoption and the impact of system of rice intensification on rice yields and household income: an analysis for India. Applied Economics, 51(45), 4956–4972. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1606408
  • von Heland, J., & Folke, C. (2014). A social contract with the ancestors-Culture and ecosystem services in southern Madagascar. Global Environmental Change, 24(1), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.003
  • Voss, R. C., Donovan, J., Rutsaert, P., & Cairns, J. E. (2021). Gender inclusivity through maize breeding in Africa: A review of the issues and options for future engagement. Outlook on Agriculture, 50(4), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270211058208
  • Waldman, K. B., Todd, P. M., Omar, S., Blekking, J. P., Giroux, S. A., Attari, S. Z., Baylis, K., & Evans, T. P. (2020). Agricultural decision making and climate uncertainty in developing countries. Environmental Research Letters, 15(11), 113004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abb909
  • Wang, H., Zhang, J., Luximon, Y., Qin, M., Geng, P., & Tao, D. (2022). The determinants of user acceptance of mobile medical platforms: An investigation integrating the TPB, TAM, and patient-centered factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10758. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710758
  • Waris, A. (2017). Gender dimensions and training needs of farm women in system of rice intensification in selected districts of Bihar state. Agriculture Update, 12(1), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/AU/12.1/109-112
  • Whitman, K., Ratsimbazafy, J., & Stevens, N. (2020). The use of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) near Maromizaha Protected Area, Madagascar. Madagascar Conservation & Development, 15(01), 5–12.
  • Win, E. P., Win, K. K., Bellingrath-Kimura, S. D., & Oo, A. Z. (2020). Greenhouse gas emissions, grain yield and water productivity: A paddy rice field case study based in Myanmar. Greenhouse Gases, 10(5), 884–897. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2011
  • Zeweld, W., Van Huylenbroeck, G., Tesfay, G., & Speelman, S. (2017). Smallholder farmers’ behavioural intentions towards sustainable agricultural practices. Journal of Environmental Management, 187, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.014