Unpacking the mechanisms of entrepreneurial bricolage for new venture growth: the mediating roles of new venture adaptiveness and innovative ambidexterity

References

• Aguirre-Urreta, M. I., & Hu, J. (2019). Detecting common method bias: Performance of the Harman’s single-factor test. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 50(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3330472.3330477
   Google Scholar
• Akpan, I. J., Udoh, E. A. P., & Adebisi, B. (2022). Small business awareness and adoption of state-of- the-art technologies in emerging and developing markets, and lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 34(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1820185
   Google Scholar
• Allred, S. B., & Ross-Davis, A. (2011). The drop-off and pick-up method: an approach to reduce nonresponse bias in natural resource surveys. Small-Scale Forestry, 10(3), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-010-9150-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alva, E., Vivas, V., & Urcia, M. (2021). Entrepreneurial bricolage: crowdfunding for female entrepreneurs during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 15(4), 677–697. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-12-2020-0464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, W., Zhao, X., Cao, Z., Zhang, J., & Liu, H. (2018). How bricolage drives corporate entrepreneurship: The roles of opportunity identification and learning orientation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arslan, A., Al Kharusi, S., Hussain, S. M., & Alo, O. (2023). Sustainable entrepreneurship development in Oman: a multi-stakeholder qualitative study. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(8), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-11-2022-3497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryadita, H., Sukoco, B. M., & Lyver, M. (2023). Founders and the success of start-ups: An integrative review. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3), 2284451. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2284451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, J. T., Ohlies, I., & Flatten, T. (2021). Effects of entrepreneurial marketing on new ventures’ exploitative and exploratory innovation: The moderating role of competitive intensity and firm size. Industrial Marketing Management, 99, 87–100.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing : resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balboni, B., Bortoluzzi, G., Pugliese, R., & Tracogna, A. (2019). Business model evolution, contextual ambidexterity and the growth performance of high-tech start-ups. Journal of Business Research, 99(August 2018), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.029
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage : A ten- year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, J. M., Cheah, J. H., Gholamzade, R., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2023). PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(1), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2022-0474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj, R., Bindra, S., Singh, T., & Sahay, A. (2023). Toward a typology of entrepreneurial bricolage and its capabilities. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies. Ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-07-2022-0205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., Zimmermann, A., & Raisch, S. (2016). How do firms adapt to discontinuous change? Bridging the dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity perspectives. California Management Review, 58(4), 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budin, D., Kamisah, A., & Wafa, S. A. (2013). The relationship between gender and ethnicity upon hofstede’s cultural dimensions among sabah ethnicities. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 10(6), 55–58.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, Q., Ying, Y., Liu, Y., & Wu, W. (2019). Innovating with limited resources: The antecedents and consequences of frugal innovation. Sustainability, 11(20), 5789. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceptureanu, S. I., Ceptureanu, E. G., & Cerqueti, R. (2022). Innovation ambidexterity and impact on the performance in IT companies: the moderating role of business experience. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(7), 746–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1918337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y. Y., & Hughes, M. (2012). Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small- to medium-sized firms. European Management Journal, 30(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, W. Y. (2012). Critical success factors for small and medium enterprises: perceptions of entrepreneurs in urban Malaysia. Journal of Business and Policy Research, 7(4), 204–215.
   Google Scholar
• Ciambotti, G., Sgrò, F., Bontis, N., & Zaccone, M. C. (2021). Local relationships matter! The impact of intellectual capital on entrepreneurial bricolage in African social entrepreneurs. Knowledge and Process Management, 28(4), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidsson, P., Baker, T., & Senyard, J. M. (2017). A measure of entrepreneurial bricolage behavior. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(1), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2015-0256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00097-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duymedjian, R., & Rüling, C. C. (2010). Towards a foundation of bricolage in organization and management theory. Organization Studies, 31(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609347051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziuban, C. D., & Shirkey, E. C. (1974). When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychological Bulletin, 81(6), 358–361. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Nemar, S., El-Chaarani, H., Dandachi, I., & Castellano, S. (2022). Resource-based view and sustainable advantage: a framework for SMEs. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2022.2160486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese, M., & Gielnik, M. M. (2023). The psychology of entrepreneurship: action and process. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055646
   Google Scholar
• Fu, H., Chen, W., Huang, X., Li, M., & Köseoglu, M. A. (2020). Entrepreneurial bricolage, ambidexterity structure, and new venture growth: Evidence from the hospitality and tourism sector. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 85(July), 102355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102355
   Google Scholar
• Greco, M., Cricelli, L., & Grimaldi, M. (2013). A strategic management framework of tangible and intangible assets. European Management Journal, 31(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2012.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, R., Cai, L., & Zhang, W. (2016). Effectuation and causation in new internet venture growth: the mediating effect of resource bundling strategy. Internet Research, 26(2), 460–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-01-2015-0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider, S. A., Zubair, M., Tehseen, S., Iqbal, S., & Sohail, M. (2023). How does ambidextrous leadership promote innovation in project-based construction companies? Through mediating role of knowledge-sharing and moderating role of innovativeness. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2021-0083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook (p. 197). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Y., & Xie, L. (2023). Platform network ties and enterprise innovation performance: The role of network bricolage and platform empowerment. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(4), 100416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp, C., & Sonderegger, R. (2015). Understanding the dynamics of nascent entrepreneurship-prestart-up experience, intentions, and entrepreneurial success. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 1076–1096. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, M. I., Tabash, M. I., Siow, M. L., Ong, T. S., & Anagreh, S. (2023). Entrepreneurial intentions of Gen Z university students and entrepreneurial constraints in Bangladesh. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00279-y
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, S. M., Akbar, A., Tehseen, S., Poulova, P., Haider, S. A., Sheraz, F., & Yasmin, F. (2021). Evaluation of entrepreneurs success: a special reference to women entrepreneurs in Bangladesh. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 27, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal, Q., Ahmad, N. H., & Halim, H. A. (2021). Insights on entrepreneurial bricolage and frugal innovation for sustainable performance. Business Strategy & Development, 4(3), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.147
   Google Scholar
• Islam, T., & Halim, A. (2022). Impact of ready-made garments (RMG) industries and sustainability : Perspective of the pandemic period in developing country. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 11(May 2021), 100567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100567
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. J., Tempelaar, M. P., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khairuddin, S. M. H. S., Haider, S. A., Tehseen, S., & Iqbal, S. (2021). Creativity in construction project through entrepreneurial leadership, innovative ambidexterity and collaborative culture. Advances in Mathematics: Scientific Journal, 10(3), 1529–1546. https://doi.org/10.37418/amsj.10.3.38
   Google Scholar
• Khan, A., Chen, L. R., & Hung, C. Y. (2021). The role of corporate social responsibility in supporting second-order social capital and sustainable innovation ambidexterity. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(13), 6994. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13136994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak, M. S., & Ullah, R. (2021). The role of entrepreneurial orientation in tangible and intangible resource acquisition and new venture growth. Managerial and Decision Economics, 42(6), 1619–1637. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortmann, S. (2015). The mediating role of strategic orientations on the relationship between ambidexterity-oriented decisions and innovative ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 666–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurniawan, P., Hartati, W., Qodriah, S. L., & Badawi, B. (2020). From knowledge sharing to quality performance: The role of absorptive capacity, ambidexterity and innovation capability in creative industry. Management Science Letters, 10(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.8.027
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., & Kreiser, P. M. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation and ambidexterity: Literature review, challenges, and agenda for future research. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth, 28, 37–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1048-473620180000028002
   Google Scholar
• Li, C. R., Lin, C. J., & Tien, Y. H. (2015). CEO transformational leadership and top manager ambidexterity: An empirical study in Taiwan SMEs. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(8), 927–954. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2014-0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. E., McDonough, E. F., Lin, S. J., & Lin, C. Y. Y. (2013). Managing the exploitation/exploration paradox: The role of a learning capability and innovation ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(2), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00998.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, T., & Yang, S. (2022). Impact of entrepreneurial orientation on the performance of new ventures in China: the roles of entrepreneurial bricolage and opportunity recognition. Chinese Management Studies, 16(4), 924–941. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-11-2020-0478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maganga, D. P., & Taifa, I. W. (2023). Quality 4.0 transition framework for Tanzanian manufacturing industries. The TQM Journal, 35(6), 1417–1448. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-01-2022-0036
   Google Scholar
• Makkonen, H., Pohjola, M., Olkkonen, R., & Koponen, A. (2014). Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in a financial crisis. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2707–2719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, C., & Raynard, M. (2015). Institutional strategies in emerging markets. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 291–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2015.1014661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. L., Javalgi, R., Ciravegna, L., & Raj, G. (2018). Service advantage built on service capabilities: An empirical inquiry of international new ventures. Journal of Business Research, 88(June 2017), 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.024
   Google Scholar
• Modina, M., Capalbo, F., Sorrentino, M., Ianiro, G., & Khan, M. F. (2023). Innovation ecosystems: a comparison between university spin-off firms and innovative start-ups. Evidence from Italy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00857-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muneeb, D., Ahmad, S. Z., Abu Bakar, A. R., & Tehseen, S. (2023). Empowering resources recombination through dynamic capabilities of an enterprise. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 36(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-01-2021-0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, P. C., Feng, C., & Guedes, M. J. (2021). Marketing capability and new venture survival: The role of marketing myopia. Industrial Marketing Management, 93(February), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.01.020
   Google Scholar
• Peltoniemi, M., & Vuori, E. (2014). Business ecosystem as the new approach to complex adaptive business environments adaptive business environments. In Proceedings of eBusiness Research Forum, 2(22), 267–281.
   Google Scholar
• Prabhu, J., & Jain, S. (2015). Innovation and entrepreneurship in India: Understanding jugaad. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4), 843–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9445-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purnamawati, I. G. A., Yuniarta, G. A., & Puah, C.-H. (2022). Entrepreneurial bricolage and improving the capability of women weaving entrepreneurs. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 20(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2022.020.01.05
   Google Scholar
• Roemer, E., Schuberth, F., & Henseler, J. (2021). HTMT2–An improved criterion for assessing discriminant validity in structural equation modeling. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(12), 2637–2650. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-02-2021-0082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roundy, P. T., Bradshaw, M., & Brockman, B. K. (2018). The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach. Journal of Business Research, 86(January 2018), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.032
   Google Scholar
• Santos, L. L. D., Borini, F. M., & Pereira, R. M. (2021). Bricolage as a path towards organizational innovativeness in times of market and technological turbulence. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(2), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-02-2020-0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scuotto, A., Cicellin, M., & Consiglio, S. (2023). Social bricolage and business model innovation: a framework for social entrepreneurship organizations. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 30(2), 234–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-02-2022-0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senyard, J., Baker, T., & Steffens, P. (2010). Entrepreneurial bricolage and firm performance: Moderating effects of firm change and innovativeness [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (No. 50237, pp. 1–25). Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijabat, E. A. S., Nimran, U., Utami, H. N., & Prasetya, A. (2020). Ambidextrous innovation in mediating entrepreneurial creativity on firm performance and competitive advantage. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), 737–746. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, M., Dhir, S., & Mishra, H. (2022). Synthesizing research in entrepreneurial bootstrapping and bricolage: a bibliometric mapping and TCCM analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 74(1), 487–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00308-2
   Google Scholar
• Steffens, P. R., Baker, T., Davidsson, P., & Senyard, J. M. (2022). When is less more? Boundary conditions of effective entrepreneurial bricolage. Journal of Management, 49(4), 1277–1311. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221077210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabas, A. M., Komulainen, H., & Arslan, A. (2020). Internationalisation in entrepreneurial ecosystem and innovation system literatures: a systematic review. International Journal of Export Marketing, 3(4), 314–334. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEXPORTM.2020.109527
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, R., & Hale, D. (2022). Strategic crisis response: managerial implications and direction for recovery and survival. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 37(10), 1959–1973. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2021-0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsilika, T., Kakouris, A., Apostolopoulos, N., & Dermatis, Z. (2020). Entrepreneurial bricolage in the aftermath of a shock. Insights from Greek SMEs. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 32(6), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1764733
   Google Scholar
• Tu, Y., & Wu, W. (2021). How does green innovation improve enterprises’ competitive advantage? The role of organizational learning. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Yu, X., & Meng, X. (2021). Entrepreneurial bricolage and new product development performance in new ventures: the contingent effects of founding team involvement. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 13(4), 813–839. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2020-0485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waqar, A., Jamil, M., & Fadzil, A. F. M. (2020). Comprehensive review of social entrepreneurship: Developing the conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of social new venture creation. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(4), 1987–1995.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L., Kanbach, D. K., Kraus, S., & Dabić, M. (2023). Strategic corporate venturing in interlinked ambidextrous units: An exploratory model. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2023.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiratmadja, I. I., Profityo, W. B., & Rumanti, A. A. (2021). Drivers of innovation ambidexterity on small medium enterprises (SMEs) performance. IEEE Access, 9, 4423–4434. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3048139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Q., Yan, D., & Umair, M. (2023). Assessing the role of competitive intelligence and practices of dynamic capabilities in business accommodation of SMEs. Economic Analysis and Policy, 77, 1103–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yodchai, N., Ly, P. T. M., & Tran, L. T. T. (2022). How the creative mindset affects entrepreneurial success in the tourism sector: the mediating role of innovation capability. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(1), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2021-0695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, X., Li, Y., Su, Z., Tao, Y., Nguyen, B., & Xia, F. (2020). Entrepreneurial bricolage and its effects on new venture growth and adaptiveness in an emerging economy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(4), 1141–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09657-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, X., & Wang, X. (2021). The effects of entrepreneurial bricolage and alternative resources on new venture capabilities: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 137(September), 527–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.063
   Google Scholar
• Zapata-Cantu, L., Sanguino, R., Barroso, A., & Nicola-Gavrilă, L. (2022). Family business adapting a new digital-based economy: Opportunities and challenges for future research. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(1), 408–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00871-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Chu, Z., Ren, L., & Xing, J. (2023). Open innovation and sustainable competitive advantage: The role of organizational learning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q., Edafioghor, T. E., Wu, C. H., & Doherty, B. (2022). Building organisational resilience capability in small and medium‐sized enterprises: The role of high‐performance work systems. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(4), 806–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zickar, M. J., & Keith, M. G. (2023). Innovations in sampling: improving the appropriateness and quality of samples in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-052946
   Google Scholar