Measuring offending: self-reports, official records, systematic observation and experimentation

References

• Ahonen, L., Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Hipwell, A. E., & Stepp, S. D. (2017). What is the hidden figure of delinquency in girls? Scaling up from police charges to self-reports. Victims and Offenders, 12, 761–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Farrington, D. P. (1988). Criminal career research: Its value for criminology. Criminology, 26(1), 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J. A., & Visher, C. A. (Eds.). (1986). Criminal careers and “career criminals”. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogen, D. (1944). Juvenile delinquency and economic trend. American Sociological Review, 9(2), 178–184. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2086310.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bosick, S. J. (2009). Operationalizing crime over the life course. Crime and Delinquency, 55, 472–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckle, A., & Farrington, D. P. (1984). An observational study of shoplifting. British Journal of Criminology, 24, 63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckle, A., & Farrington, D. P. (1994). Measuring shoplifting by systematic observation: A replication study. Psychology, Crime and Law, 1, 133–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckle, A., Farrington, D. P., Burrows, J., Speed, M., & Burns-Howell, T. (1992). Measuring shoplifting by repeated systematic counting. Security Journal, 3(3), 137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Cops, D., Boeck, A. D., & Pleysier, S. (2016). School vs. mail surveys: Disentangling selection and measurement effects in self-reported juvenile delinquency. European Journal of Criminology, 13, 92–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denniston, M. M., Brener, N. D., Kann, L., Eaton, D. K., McManus, T., Kyle, T. M., … Ross, J. G. (2010). Comparison of paper-and-pencil versus Web administration of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS): Participation, data quality, and perceived privacy and anonymity. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1054–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durea, M. A. (1935). Mental and social maturity in relation to certain indicators of the degree of juvenile delinquency. Child Development, 6, 154–160.
   Google Scholar
• Enzmann, D. (2013). The impact of questionnaire design on prevalence and incidence rates of self-reported delinquency: Results of an experiment modifying the ISRD-2 questionnaire. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 29, 147–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P. (1973). Self-reports of deviant behavior: Predictive and stable? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 64, 99–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P. (1977). The effects of public labelling. British Journal of Criminology, 17, 112–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., Bowen, S., Buckle, A., Burns-Howell, T., Burrows, J., & Speed, M. (1993). An experiment on the prevention of shoplifting. In R. V. Clarke (Ed.), Crime prevention studies (Vol. 1, pp. 93–119). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P. (2008). Criminology as an experimental science. In C. Horne & M. J. Lovaglia (Eds.), Experiments in criminology and law: A research revolution (pp. 175–179). New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., & Jolliffe, D. (2004). England and Wales. In D. P. Farrington, P. A. Langan, & M. Tonry (Eds.), Cross-national studies in crime and justice (pp. 1–38). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., Jolliffe, D., Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Hill, K. G., & Kosterman, R. (2003). Comparing delinquency careers in court records and self-reports. Criminology, 41, 933–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., Jolliffe, D., Loeber, R., & Homish, D. L. (2007). How many offenses are really committed per juvenile court offender? Victims and Offenders, 2, 227–249.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., & Kidd, R. F. (1977). Is financial dishonesty a rational decision? British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 139–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., Knapp, W. S., Erickson, B. E., & Knight, B. J. (1980). Words and deeds in the study of stealing. Journal of Adolescence, 3, 35–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., & Knight, B. J. (1979). Two non-reactive field experiments on stealing from a ‘lost’ letter. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 277–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., & Knight, B. J. (1980). Stealing from a “lost” letter: Effects of victim characteristics. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 7, 423–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., Langan, P. A., & Tonry, M. (Eds.). (2004). Cross-national studies in crime and justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., Langan, P. A., Tonry, M., & Jolliffe, D. (2004). Introduction. In D. P. Farrington, P. A. Langan, & M. Tonry (Eds.), Cross-national studies in crime and justice (pp. v–xvi). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., Piquero, A. R., & Jennings, W. G. (2013). Offending from childhood to late middle age: Recent results from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P. (2003). Key results from the first 40 years of the Cambridge study in delinquent development. In T. P. Thornberry & M. D. Krohn (Eds.), Taking stock of delinquency: An overview of findings from contemporary longitudinal studies (pp. 137–183). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., Ttofi, M. M., Crago, R. V., & Coid, J. W. (2014). Prevalence, frequency, onset, desistance and criminal career duration in self-reports compared with official records. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 24, 241–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, M. (1966). Undetected delinquent behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 3, 27–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, G. (2009). Drug decriminalization in Portugal: Lessons for creating fair and successful drug policies. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1979). Correlates of delinquency: The illusion of discrepancy between self-report and official measures. American Sociological Review, 44(6), 995–1014. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2094722.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISRD3 Working Group. (2013). Questionnaire ISRD3: Standard student questionnaire (ISRD3 Technical Report Series #2). Retrieved from https://web.northeastern.edu/isrd/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/ISRD3_TechRep_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, W. G, Loeber, R, Ahonen, L, Piquero, A. R, & Farrington, D. P. (2018). An examination of developmental patterns of chronic offending from self-report records and official data: evidence from the pittsburgh girls study (pgs). Journal Of Criminal Justice, 55, 71-79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2014). Self-reported offending: Reliability and validity. In G. J. N. Bruinsma & D. L. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 4716–4723). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemian, L., & Farrington, D. P. (2005). Comparing the validity of prospective, retrospective, and official onset for different offending categories. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 127–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konecni, V. J., Ebbesen, E. B., & Konecni, D. K. (1976). Decision processes and risk taking in traffic: Driver response to the onset of yellow light. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 359–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krohn, M. D., Thornberry, T. P., Bell, K., Lizotte, A., & Phillips, M. (2012). Self-report surveys within longitudinal panel designs. In D. Gadd, S. Karstedt, & S. Messner (Eds.), The Sage handbook of criminological research methods (pp. 23–35). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krohn, M. D., Thornberry, T. P., Gibson, C. L., & Baldwin, J. M. (2010). The development and impact of self-report measures of crime and delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 509–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauritsen, J. L. (1998). The age-crime debate: Assessing the limits of longitudinal self-report data. Social Forces, 77, 127–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Blanc, M., & Fréchette, M. (1989). Male criminal activity from childhood through youth: Multilevel and developmental perspectives. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Hipwell, A. E., Stepp, S. D., Pardini, D., & Ahonen, L. (2015). Constancy and change in the prevalence and frequency of offending when based on longitudinal self-reports or official records: Comparisons by gender, race, and crime type. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1, 150–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., & Petechuk, D. (2003). Child delinquency: Early intervention and prevention. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (NCJ 186182).
   Google Scholar
• Lucia, S., Herrmann, L., & Killias, M. (2007). How important are interview methods and questionnaire designs in research on self-reported juvenile delinquency? An experimental comparison of Internet vs paper-and-pencil questionnaires and different definitions of the reference period. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 39–64.
   Google Scholar
• Maxfield, M. G., & Babbie, E. R. (2009). Basics of research methods for criminal justice and criminology (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, E., & Muncie, J. (2001). The sage dictionary of criminology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, F. J., Shirley, M. M., & Witmer, H. L. (1946). The incidence of hidden delinquency. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 16, 686–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, F. I., Short, J. F., & Olson, V. J. (1958). Socioeconomic status and delinquent behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 381–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood, D. W., McMorris, B. J., & Potenza, M. T. (2002). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance I: Item response theory scaling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 267–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A. R., Schubert, C. A., & Brame, R. (2014). Comparing official and self-report records of offending across gender and race/ethnicity in a longitudinal study of serious youthful offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51, 526–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porterfield, A. L. (1943). Delinquency and its outcome in court and college. American Journal of Sociology, 49(3), 199–208. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2771246.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, S. M., Billinger, S., & Stieglitz, N. (2014). Let’s be honest: A review of experimental evidence of honesty and truth-telling. Journal of Economic Psychology, 45, 181–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanches, C., Gouveia-Pereira, M., Marôco, J., Gomes, H. S., & Roncon, F. (2016). Deviant behavior variety scale: Development and validation with a sample of portuguese adolescents. Psicologia: Reflexão E Crítica, 29(31), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Hippler, H. J., & Bishop, G. (1991). The impact of administration mode on response effects in survey measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 193–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellin, T. (1931). The basis of a crime index. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 22, 335–356.
   Google Scholar
• Sellin, T. (1938). Culture conflict and crime: A report of the subcommittee on delinquency of the committee on personality and culture. New York, NY: Social Science Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Theobald, D., Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., Pardini, D. A., & Piquero, A. R. (2014). Scaling up from convictions to self-reported offending. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 24, 265–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In D. Duffee (Ed.), Criminal Justice (pp. 33–84). Washington, DC: U.S. National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Thornberry, T. P. (1989). Panel effects and the use of self-reported measures of delinquency in longitudinal studies. In M. W. Klein (Ed.), Cross-national research in self-reported crime and delinquency (pp. 347–369). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., & Smith, T. W. (1996). Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 275–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, D. J., & Farrington, D. P. (1977). The delinquent way of life. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1985). Crime and human nature. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, D. L., Aquilino, W. S., & Supple, A. J. (1998). A comparison of computer-assisted and paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaires in a survey on smoking, alcohol, and drug use. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 331–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar