Contouring the mobile risk society

References

• Adey, P., T. Cresswell, J. Y. Lee, A. Nikolaeva, A. Nóvoa, and C. Temenos. 2022. Moving Towards Transition: Commoning Mobility for a Low-Carbon Future. Just Sustainabilities Ser. London: Zed. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=6725109.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, R. 2020. “It’s Getting Harder and Harder to Limit Ourselves to 2°C.” https://folk.universitetetioslo.no/roberan/t/global_mitigation_curves.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, D., and S. Rahmstorf. 2011. The Climate Crisis: An Introductory Guide to Climate Change. Reprinted with corr ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, A. 2023. The Climate Crisis: Science, Impacts, Policy, Psychology, Justice, Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann, U. 2020. “Zerbricht das eherne Gehäuse funktionaler Differenzierung? Entdifferenzierung als Teilprozess reflexiver Modernisierung.” In Cambridge Soziale Welt 24 1. edited by O. Römer, C. Boehncke, and M. Holzinger, 70–93. Special issue ed.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 1991. Modernity and Ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.).
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2005. Liquid Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U.1986. Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt a.M.: suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1988. Gegengifte. Die organisierte Unverantwortlichkeit. Frankfurt a. M: suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1991. “Die Soziologie und die ökologische Frage.” Berliner Journal für Soziologie Heft 3: 331–341.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Repr. Theory, Culture and Society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1993. Die Erfindung des Politischen: Zu einer Theorie reflexiver Modernisierung. Frankfurt a.M: suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1998. “Politics of Risk Society.” In The Politics of Risk Society, edited by J. Franklin, 9–22. Malden: Mass. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 2006. “Reflexive Governance: Politics in the Global Risk Society.” In Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, edited by J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, and R. Kemp, 31–56. Cheltenham: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 2009. “Critical Theory of World Risk Society: A Cosmopolitan Vision.” PRAXIS International 16 (1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2009.00534.x.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 2016. The Metamorphosis of the World: How Climate Change Is Transforming Our Concept of the World. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 2018. “Mobility and the Cosmopolitan Perspective”, In Exploring Networked Urban Mobilities: Theories, Concepts, Ideas. edited by M. Freudendal-Pedersen and S. Kesselring, 140–152. 1st ed. Networked urban mobilities series volume 1. New York, NY:Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., W. Bonß, and C. Lau. 2003. “The Theory of Reflexive Modernization: Problematic, Hypotheses and Research Programme.” Theory, Culture & Society 20 (2): 1–34. doi:10.1177/0263276403020002001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, U. 2016. Grundwissen Verkehrsökologie: Grundlagen, Handlungsfelder und Maßnahmen für die Verkehrswende. Berlin: Oekom verlag. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=6388950.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., A. Giddens, and S. Lash. 1994. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Traditions and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. 1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books Inc. Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. 2012. Post-Ecologist Politics: Social Theory and the Abdication of the Ecologist Paradigm. Routledge Innovations in Political Theory. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=169013.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 1994. Nomadic Subjects. Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brundtland, G. H. 1987. Our Common Future. Reprint ed. Oxford paperbacks. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. 2005. “2004 Presidential Address: For Public Sociology.” American Sociological Review 70 (1): 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkart, G. 1994. “Individuelle Mobilität und soziale Integration: Zur Soziologie des Automobilismus.” Soziale Welt 2: 216–241.
   Google Scholar
• Cabalquinto, E. C. B. 2022. (Im)mobile Homes: Family Life at a Distance in the Age of Mobile Media. Oxford Scholarship Online. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canzler, W., and A. Knie. 2016. “Mobility in the Age of Digital Modernity: Why the Private Car Is Losing Its Significance, Intermodal Transport Is Winning and Why Digitalisation Is the Key.” Applied Mobilities 1 (1): 56–67. doi:10.1080/23800127.2016.1147781.
   Google Scholar
• Canzler, W., A. Knie, L. Ruhrort, and C. Scherf. 2018. Erloschene Liebe? Das Auto in der Verkehrswende: Soziologische Deutungen. X-Texte zu Kultur und Gesellschaft. Bielefeld: Transcript. https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/507761.
   Google Scholar
• Caradonna, J. L. 2014. Sustainability: A History. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cattan, N., and L. Faret, eds. 2021. Hybrid Mobilities: Transgressive Spatialities. Changing Mobilities. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=6691022.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, K. J., and F. Moura. 2017. “Conceptual Framework for Understanding Latent Demand: Accounting for Unrealized Activities and Travel.” Transportation Research Record 2668 (1): 78–83. https://doi.org/10.3141/2668-08.
   Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P. J. 2002. “Geology of Mankind.” Nature 415 (6867): 23. doi:10.1038/415023a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, K. L. 2013. “Mobility Futures: Moving on and Breaking through on an Empty Tank.” In New Mobilities Regimes: The Analytical Power of the Social Sciences and Arts, edited by S. Witzgall, G. Vogl, and S. Kesselring, 331–354. Burlington VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Derudder, B., N. van Nuffel, and F. Witlox. 2009. “Connecting the World: Analyzing Global City Networks through Airline Flows.” In Aeromobilities, edited by S. Cwerner, S. Kesselring, and J. Urry, 76–95. International library of sociology. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstadt, S. N. 2002. Multiple Modernities. New Brunswick and N.J: [u.a.]: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M. 2009. Mobility in Daily Life: Between Freedom and Unfreedom. Transport and Society. Burlington VT: Ashgate Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M. 2022. Making Mobilities Matter. Changing Mobilities Ser. Milton: Taylor & Francis Group. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=6886853.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, B. 2021. How to Avoid a Climate Disaster: The Solutions We Have and the Breakthroughs We Need. London: Allen Lane an imprint of Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goethe, J. W. V. 1960. Italienische Reise: 1786-1788. München: Hirmer.
   Google Scholar
• Gössling, S., M. Balàš, M. Mayer, and Y.-Y. Sun. 2023. “A Review of Tourism and Climate Change Mitigation: The Scales, Scopes, Stakeholders and Strategies of Carbon Management.” Tourism Management 95: 104681. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., ed. 2010. Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., and S. Kesselring. 1999. “Democracy in the Risk Society? Learning from the New Politics of Mobility in Munich.” Environmental Politics 8 (3): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019908414477.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., and W. Versteeg. 2019. “Imagining the Post-Fossil City: Why Is it so Difficult to Think of New Possible Worlds?” Territory, Politics, Governance 7 (2): 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1510339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2000. Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hentschel, K.-M. 2020. Handbuch Klimaschutz: Wie Deutschland das 1,5-Grad-Ziel einhalten kann. München: oekom.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. J. 2021. The Engaged Scholar: Expanding the Impact of Academic Research in Today’s World. Redwood City: Stanford briefs an imprint of Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, E., D. Banister, S. Gössling, G. Gilpin, and K. Linnerud. 2020. “Grand Narratives for Sustainable Mobility: A Conceptual Review.” Energy Research & Social Science 65:101454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2023. “Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change.” Accessed June 05, 2023. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/. Working Group III contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. 2021. Post Growth: Life After Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, R. 1981. Global 2000: Der Bericht an den Präsidenten. 27. Zweitausendeins. Aufl. Frankfurt a.M.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, V., A. Audikana, and G. Drevon. 2022. Europe beyond Mobility: Mobilities, Social Cohesion and Political Integration. Networked Urban Mobilities. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kesselring, S. 2008. The Mobile Risk Society.” Tracing mobilities: Towards a cosmopolitan perspective, edited by W. Canzler, V. Kaufmann, and S. Kesselring, 77–102. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Kesselring, S. 2019. “Reflexive Mobilitäten.” In Das Risiko ‐ Gedanken übers und ins Ungewisse: Interdisziplinäre Aushandlungen des Risikophänomens im Lichte der Reflexiven Moderne. Eine Festschrift für Wolfgang Bonß: Eine Festschrift für Wolfgang Bonß, edited by H. Pelizäus and L. Nieder, 155–193. 1st ed. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Kesselring, S., W. Canzler, and V. Kaufmann. 2021. “Sustainable Automobilities in the Mobile Risk Society.” Sustainability 13 (10): 1–5. doi:10.3390/su13105648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesselring, S., M. Freudendal-Pedersen, and D. Zuev. 2020. “Sharing Mobilities and the Mobile Risk Society: An Introduction.” In Sharing Mobilities: New Perspectives for the Mobile Risk Society, edited by S. Kesselring, M. Freudendal-Pedersen, and D. Zuev, 1–16. Networked urban mobilities. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lash, S. 1999. Another Modernity, a Different Rationality. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2018. Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. English ed. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Leed, E. J. 1992. The Mind of the Traveler: From Gilgamesh to Global Tourism. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Leed, E. J. 1993. Die Erfahrung der Ferne: Reisen von Gilgamesch bis zum Tourismus unserer Tage. Frankfurt am Main: Campus-Verl.
   Google Scholar
• Lenton, T. M., J. Rockström, O. Gaffney, S. Rahmstorf, K. Richardson, W. Steffen, and H. J. Schellnhuber. 2019. “Climate Tipping Points ‐- Too Risky to Bet Against: The Growing Threat of Abrupt and Irreversible Climate Changes Must Compel Political and Economic Action on Emissions.” Nature Communications 575 (7784): 592–595. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-03595-0.
   Google Scholar
• Lübbe, H. 1995. “Mobilität und Kommunikation in der zivilisatorischen Evolution.” Spektrum der Wissenschaft. Dossier 2: 112–119.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1991. Soziologie des Risikos. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, A. 2018. The Progress of This Storm: Nature and Society in a Warming World. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Marinetti, F. T. 1909. “The Futurist Manifesto.” https://www.societyforasianart.org/sites/default/files/manifesto_futurista.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H., D. L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. W. Behrens. 1972. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome´s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. A Potomac Associates Book. New York: A Signet Book from New American Library.
   Google Scholar
• Mense-Petermann, U., T. Welskopp, and A. Zaharieva, eds. 2022. “In Search of the Global Labor Market.” In Studies in Critical Social Sciences. vol. 219. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Mögele, M. 2021. “Regionale Automobilkulturen zwischen (Re)Produktion und Wandel: Eine kultursensitive Perspektive auf Süddeutschland.” Dissertation., Geographie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in a Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Paech, N. 2012. Liberation from Excess: The Road to a Post-Growth Economy. Berlin: oekom verlag. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=6389113.
   Google Scholar
• Pemble, J. 1987. The Mediterranean Passion: Victorians and Edwardians in the South. Oxford: Clarendon Pr.
   Google Scholar
• Perrow, C. 1984. Normal Accidents: Living with high-risk Technologies. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1944. The Great Transformation. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.
   Google Scholar
• Rammler, S. 2008. ”The Wahlverwandtschaft of Modernity and Mobility.” Tracing mobilities: Towards a cosmopolitan perspective, edited by W. Canzler, V. Kaufmann, and S. Kesselring, 57–77. Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate
   Google Scholar
• Rasborg, K. 2022. Ulrich Beck: Theorising World Risk Society and Cosmopolitanism. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=6825109.
   Google Scholar
• Raworth, K. 2018. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think like a 21st-Century Economist. Paperback ed. London: Random House Business Books.
   Google Scholar
• Reheis, F. 1996. Die Kreativität der Langsamkeit. Neuer Wohlstand durch Entschleunigung. Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchges.
   Google Scholar
• Reichow, H. B. 1959. Die autogerechte Stadt. Ein Weg aus dem Verkehrschaos. Ravensburg: Maier.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, I., and T. Haas. 2020. “Greening the Car? Conflict Dynamics within the German Platform for Electric Mobility.” Sustainability 12 (19): 8043. doi:10.3390/su12198043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. 2013. Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. Online-Ausg. New Directions in Critical Theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. http://swb.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1103424.
   Google Scholar
• Ruhrort, L. 2020. “Reassessing the Role of Shared Mobility Services in a Transport Transition: Can They Contribute the Rise of an Alternative Socio-Technical Regime of Mobility?.” Sustainability 12 (19): 8253. doi:10.3390/su12198253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalz-Bruns, R. 1995. Reflexive Demokratie. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verl.-Ges.
   Google Scholar
• Schneidewind, U. 2018. “Die große Transformation: Eine Einführung in die Kunst gesellschaftlichen Wandels. Originalausgabe.” In Forum für Verantwortung. vol. 70259. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch.
   Google Scholar
• Schroer, M. 2022. Geosoziologie: Die Erde als Raum des Lebens. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag. https://www.onleihe.de/goethe-institut/frontend/mediaInfo,51-0-1802062970-100-0-0-0-0-0-0-0.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1998. The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York [u.a.]: Norton. http://bvba2.bib-bvb.de:80/V/2YJ1RNDCG9HEQ4NLHQA38KJ7IM55GEHRNYCU5P4V84NGHT6XE1-48412?func=find-0i<document.getElementsByTagName(’div’).length;i++).
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. 2018. Mobility Justice: The Politics of Movement in the Age of Extremes. London and Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2016. “Mobilizing the New Mobilities Paradigm.” Applied Mobilities 1 (1): 10–25. doi:10.1080/23800127.2016.1151216.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. 1923. “Der Raum und die räumlichen Ordnungen der Gesellschaft”. Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung, edited by G. Simmel, 460–526. München und Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Sodero, S. 2022. “Under the Weather: Reimagining Mobility in the Climate Crisis.” In McGill-Queen’s/Brian Mulroney Institute of Government Studies in Leadership, Public Policy, and Governance Ser. 1st ed. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=30159059.
   Google Scholar
• Staab, P. 2022. Anpassung: Leitmotiv der nächsten Gesellschaft. Originalausgabe. Berlin, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. http://www.content-select.com/index.php?id=bib_view&ean=9783518774793.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., J. Grinevald, P. Crutzen, and J. McNeill. 2011. “The Anthropocene: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives.” Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences 369 (1938): 842–867. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szerszynski, B. 2016. “Planetary Mobilities: Movement, Memory and Emergence in the Body of the Earth.” Mobilities 11 (4): 614–628. doi:10.1080/17450101.2016.1211828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. 2023. “International Climate Targets are Achievable, but Only in Models, Not in the Real World.” The Anthropocene Review 205301962311776. doi:10.1177/20530196231177686.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. 1995. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/bios/simon053/95038428.html.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2000. Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities of the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2002. “Mobility and Proximity.” Sociology 36 (2): 255–274. doi:10.1177/0038038502036002002.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2003. Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2004. “The ’System’ of Automobility.” Theory, Culture & Society 21 (4–5): 25–39. doi:10.1177/0263276404046059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2011. Climate Change and Society. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2016. What Is the Future? 1. Aufl. Cambridge UK and Malden, MA: Polity. http://gbv.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=4678286.
   Google Scholar
• Virilio, P. 1992. Rasender Stillstand. Wien: Hauser.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., D. Bauknecht, and R. Kemp, eds. 2006. Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development. Cheltenham: Elgar. http://www.gbv.de/dms/goettingen/493394168.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, I., R. Collins, and M. Mann. 2014. Does Capitalism Have a Future? New York: Oxford University Press USA. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=656574.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1988. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., and J. Winckelmann. 1988. Gesammelte politische Schriften. Mit e. Geleitw. von Theodor Heuss. Hrsg. von Johannes Friedrich Winckelmann. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
   Google Scholar
• Wessels, B. 2018. “Virtual exchange-based Mobilities: Platform Economy, Exchange and Culture.” Applied Mobilities 3 (1): 51–65. doi:10.1080/23800127.2018.1435438.
   Google Scholar
• Whitelegg, J. 2016. Mobility: A New Urban Design and Transport Planning Philosophy for A Sustainable Future. North Charleston, SC: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
   Google Scholar