Theorizing communication. The production of theory in communication journals

References

• Abend, G. (2006). Styles of sociological thought: Sociologies, epistemologies, and the Mexican and U.S. quests for truth. Sociological Theory, 24(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2751.2006.00262.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abend, G. (2008). The meaning of ‘theory’. Sociological Theory, 26(2), 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00324.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. C. (1982). Positivism, presuppositions, and current controversies [Theoretical logic in sociology, vol. 1]. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, K. (2003). Neue Medien – neue Theorien? In M. Löffelholz & T. Quandt (Eds), Die neue Kommunikationswissenschaft (pp. 71–87). VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80405-1_6
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. C. (2009). Constructing social theory. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Beniger, J. R. (1990). Who are the most important theorists of communication? Communication Research, 17(5), 698–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365090017005006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R. (1991). Communication theories and other curios. Communication Monographs, 58(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759109376216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2021). Theory construction methodology: A practical framework for building theories in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 756–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620969647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, J., & Miron, D. (2004). Theory and research in mass communication. Journal of Communication, 54(4), 662–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büttner, A. (2021). Theoretisieren in der Soziologie. Bezugskontexte und Modi soziologischer Theoriebildung. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/bj42k
   Google Scholar
• Byron, K., & Thatcher, S. M. (2016). Editors’ comments: “What I know now that I wish I knew then”—Teaching theory and theory building. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, P., Kuo, R., Grubbs, V., & McIlwain, C. (2018). #CommunicationSoWhite. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, R. T. (1993). Why are there so many communication theories? Journal of Communication, 43(3), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01273.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAndrea, D. C., & Holbert, R. L. (2017). Increasing clarity where it is needed most: Articulating and evaluating theoretical contributions. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1304163
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (2007). Explaining social behavior. More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eronen, M. I., & Bringmann, L. F. (2021). The theory crisis in psychology: How to move forward. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, R. (2005). Epistemological duties. In Paul K. Moser (ed.), The Oxford handbook of Epistemology (pp. 362–384). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195301700.003.0013
   Google Scholar
• Fink, E. J., & Gantz, W. (1996). A content analysis of three mass communication research traditions: Social science, interpretive studies, and critical analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(1), 114–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909607300111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. (2010). Personal reflections on theory and psychology. Theory & Psychology, 20(6), 733–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310378184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1986). Making up people. In T. Heller, M. Sosna, & M. Wellbery (Eds.), Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, individuality, and the self in western thought (pp. 222–236). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, S., Frey, F., & Koch, S. (2015). Theoriebildung in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Publizistik, 60(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-015-0229-5
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. A. (2018). Landmark essays on rhetoric of science: Case studies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. A. (2020). Landmark essays on rhetoric of science: Issues and methods. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holbert, R. L, & Park, E. (2020). Conceptualizing, organizing, and positing moderation in communication research. Communication Theory, 30(3), 227–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J., & Jacoby, J. (2019). Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical guide for social scientists. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamhawi, R., & Weaver, D. (2003). Mass communication research trends from 1980 to 1999. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900308000102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (2014). Intuitionist theorizing. In R. Swedberg (Ed.), Theorizing in social science. The context of discovery (pp. 29–60). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, B. (2015). Luhmanns Operationen: Analyse einiger Wendungen der soziologischen Theoriebildung. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-438008.
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, B. (2022). Why are most published research findings under-theorized? Or: Are we in an interpretation crisis?. In B. Krämer & P. Müller (Eds.), Questions of communicative change and continuity (pp. 23–52). Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, M. (2016). The meanings of theorizing. The British Journal of Sociology, 67(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12187_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krey, B. (2022). Diszipliniertes Denken: Lesen und Schreiben an Hochschulen. In D. Meyer, J. Reuter, & O. Berli (Eds.), Ethnografie der Hochschule. Zur Erforschung universitärer Praxis (pp. 211–229). Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In T. S. Kuhn (Ed.), The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change (pp. 320–339). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsov, A. (2019). Changed but undescribed? What STS could say on the research practices of social sciences. EASST Review, 38(1), 4–5. https://easst.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/review_2019_02.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2013). Discipline in crisis? The shifting paradigm of mass communication research. Communication theory, 23(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009). Seeing like a survey. Cultural Sociology, 3(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975509105533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martus, S., & Spoerhase, C. (2022). Geistesarbeit. Eine Praxeologie der Geisteswissenschaften. Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. W., & Schaeffer, N. C. (2000). Toward a sociology of social scientific knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 30(3), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631200030003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1945). Sociological theory. American Journal of Sociology, 50(6), 462–473. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2771390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1968). On sociological theories of middle range. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), Social theory and social structure (pp. 39–72). Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed, W. F. (2022). Dismantling the western canon in media studies. Communication Theory, 32(2), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtac001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J. (2019). A problem in theory. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0522-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, D. W. (2014). Pierre Bourdieu. A critical introduction to media and communication theory. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, W. J. (2014). Patterns in the use of theory in media effects research. In R. S. Fortner, & P. M. Fackler (Eds.), The handbook of media and mass communication theory (pp. 95–114). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, W. J., Cooper, R., & Dupagne, M. (1993). The three paradigms of mass media research in mainstream communication journals. Communication Theory, 3(4), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1993.tb00077.x
   Google Scholar
• Potthoff, M., & Zimmermann, F. (2017). Is there a gender-based fragmentation of communication science? An investigation of the reasons for the apparent gender homophily in citations. Scientometrics, 112(2), 1047–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2392-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosengren, K. E. (1983). Communication research: One paradigm, or four? Journal of Communication, 33(3), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueschemeyer, D. (2009). Usable theory. Analytic tools for social and political research. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, M. (2010). Theorien mittlerer Reichweite. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 20(3), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-010-0136-6
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. J. (1993). Communication in crisis: Theory, curricula, and power. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01315.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. J., Tankard, J. W. Jr., & Lasorsa, D. L. (2004). How to build social science theories. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, D. (2019). Theorizing is a practice, you can teach it. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 56(1), 130–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12236
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Gleason, L. S. (2012). Contributing to theory and knowledge in quantitative communication science. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(4), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.732626
   Google Scholar
• Stanyer, J., & Mihelj, S. (2016). Taking time seriously? Theorizing and researching change in communication and media studies. Journal of Communication, 66(2), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, A. L. (1986). Constructing social theories. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (2012). Theorizing in sociology and social science: Turning to the context of discovery. Theory and Society, 41(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-011-9161-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (2014a). From theory to theorizing. In R. Swedberg (Ed.), Theorizing in social science. The contect of discovery (pp. 1–28). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (2014b). How to teach theorizing: Exercises and more. Perspectives. Newsletter of the ASA Theory Section, 36(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (2014c). The art of social theory. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (2016). Reply to the commentators. The British Journal of Sociology, 67(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12187_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., & Loths, L. (2020). National and gender diversity in communication: A content analysis of six journals between 2006 and 2016. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(4), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1804434
   Google Scholar
• Vogelmann, F. (2017). Measuring, disrupting, emancipating: Three pictures of critique. Constellations (oxford, England), 24(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar