Putting the Place in Flow Restructures: Networks, Assembled Positionalities, and the Special Economic Zone Development

References

• Agnew, J. 2005. Sovereignty regimes: Territoriality and state authority in contemporary world politics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (2):437–61. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00468.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J. 2016. Topologies of power: Beyond territory and networks. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. 2007. Re‐thinking the urban social. City 11 (1):100–14. doi:10.1080/13604810701200961.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C. 2000. The networked polity: Regional development in Western Europe. Governance 13 (2):279–91. doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, D. 2012. Spatial practices and border SEZs in Mekong Southeast Asia. Geography Compass 6 (12):740–51. doi:10.1111/gec3.12012.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, J. 2011. Modernity and the urban imagination in economic zones. Theory, Culture & Society 28 (5):98–122. doi:10.1177/0263276411411495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balibar, E. 2009. Europe as borderland. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27 (2):190–215. doi:10.1068/d13008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beban, A. 2021. Unwritten rules: State making through land reform in Cambodia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bian, L. 2016. Spatial networks in epidemiological studies. In Advancing geographic information science: The past and next twenty years, ed. H. Onsrud and W. Kuhn, 255–57. Needham, MA: GSDI Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. A. 2019. Territorial (in) coherence: Labour and special economic zones in Laos’s border manufacturing. Antipode 51 (2):438–57. doi:10.1111/anti.12462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camba, A. 2020. The Sino‐centric capital export regime: State-backed and flexible capital in the Philippines. Development and Change 51 (4):970–97. doi:10.1111/dech.12604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 1996. The information age: Economy, society and culture. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2000. The rise of the network society. New York: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W. 2021. Harnessing the sending state: Pragmatic improvisations and negotiated memberships of the Chinese diaspora in Laos. Political Geography 89:102425. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X. 2018. Globalisation redux: Can China’s inside-out strategy catalyse economic development and integration across its Asian borderlands and beyond? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (1):35–58. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsy003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science 2 (3):201–15. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830020303.
   Google Scholar
• Diepart, J.-C., and D. Dupuis. 2014. The peasants in turmoil: Khmer Rouge, state formation and the control of land in northwest Cambodia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (4):445–68. doi:10.1080/03066150.2014.919265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diepart, J.-C., and T. Sem. 2018. Fragmented territories: Incomplete enclosures and agrarian change on the agricultural frontier of Samlaut District, North-West Cambodia. Journal of Agrarian Change 18 (1):156–77. doi:10.1111/joac.12155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Er, L. P., and V. Teo, eds. 2011. Southeast Asia between China and Japan. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Glassman, J. 2010. Bounding the Mekong: The Asian Development Bank, China, and Thailand. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, W. N. 2019. From rice fields to financial assets: Valuing land for microfinance in Cambodia. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44 (4):749–62. doi:10.1111/tran.12310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, E. M., M. Kahler, and A. H. Montgomery. 2009. Network analysis for international relations. International Organization 63 (3):559–92. doi:10.1017/S0020818309090195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3):575–99. doi:10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, J.-Y. 2011. State transformation and regional development in Taiwan: From developmentalist strategy to populist subsidy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (3):600–19. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00971.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, C. 2003. The political economy of the Cambodian transition, 1991–2001. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C. 2007. Transnational networks, international organizations and political participation in Cambodia: Human rights, labour rights and common rights. Democratization 14 (5):834–52. doi:10.1080/13510340701635688.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., N. Brenner, and M. Jones. 2008. Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26 (3):389–401. doi:10.1068/d9107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koinova, M. 2021. Diaspora entrepreneurs and contested states. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. K. 2014. The spectre of global China. New Left Review 89:29–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, H., E. Sheppard, and K. M. Sziarto. 2008. The spatialities of contentious politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33 (2):157–72. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00293.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughlin, N., and S. Milne. 2021. After the grab? Land control and regime survival in Cambodia since 2012. Journal of Contemporary Asia 51 (3):375–97. doi:10.1080/00472336.2020.1740295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, J. J., and K. Un. 2020. Cambodia: Hard landing for China’s soft power? ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, J. J., and K. Un. 2021. China’s role in the Cambodian People’s Party’s quest for legitimacy. Contemporary Southeast Asia 43 (2):395–419. doi:10.1355/cs43-2h.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2005. For space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mezzadra, S., and B. Neilson. 2013. Border as method, or, the multiplication of labor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. 2002. Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Natarajan, N., and K. Brickell. 2022. Credit, land and survival work in rural Cambodia: Rethinking rural autonomy through a feminist lens. Journal of Agrarian Change 22 (3):473–88. doi:10.1111/joac.12486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neveling, P. 2020. The political economy of special economic zones: Pasts, presents, futures. In The Oxford handbook of industrial hubs and economic development, ed. A. Oqubay and J. Lin, 190–205. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S. 1975. Transnational and transgovernmental relations. In New dimensions in world politics, ed. G. L. Goodwin and A. Linklater, 35–53. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A. 2007. Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32 (1):3–8. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00234.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, J. 2006. Prosaic geographies of stateness. Political Geography 25 (7):752–74. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, N. D. 1980. The study of international relations in the United States: Perspectives of half a century. International Studies Quarterly 24 (3):343–63. doi:10.2307/2600251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 1997. Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography 21 (3):305–20. doi:10.1191/030913297673302122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E. 2002. The spaces and times of globalization: Place, scale, networks, and positionality. Economic Geography 78 (3):307–30. doi:10.2307/4140812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E. 2010. Geographical political economy. Journal of Economic Geography 11 (2):319–31. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E. 2013. Thinking through the Pilbara. Australian Geographer 44 (3):265–82. doi: 10.1080/00049182.2013.817035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidaway, J. D., T. F. Paasche, C. Y. Woon, and P. Keo. 2014. Transecting security and space in Phnom Penh. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 46 (5):1181–1202. doi:10.1068/a46167.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, S. 2013. Violent accumulation: A postanarchist critique of property, dispossession, and the state of exception in neoliberalizing Cambodia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (3):608–26. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.628259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. 2000. The global situation. Cultural Anthropology 15 (3):327–60. doi:10.1525/can.2000.15.3.327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. L. 2005. Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Un, K., and S. So. 2011. Land rights in Cambodia: How neopatrimonial politics restricts land policy reform. Pacific Affairs 84 (2):289–308. doi:10.5509/2011842289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNIDO. 2016. Marking the 50th anniversary of UNIDO: UNIDO-China Cooperation. https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2016-11/UNIDO_CHINA_EN_SP_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNIDO. 2019. PCP annual report Cambodia (2018). https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/files/2019-07/PCP%20Cambodia_2018%20Annual%20Report_Final_0.pdf?_token=745309448.
   Google Scholar
• Verver, M., and H. Dahles. 2014. The institutionalisation of Oknha: Cambodian entrepreneurship at the interface of business and politics. Journal of Contemporary Asia 45 (1):48–70. doi:10.1080/00472336.2014.891147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. 2021. Understanding scalar politics through the framework of relational archipelagos: The case of Shenzhen fair, China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 45 (4):716–31. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. 2023. Atomised territory and assembled positionalities. Dialogues in Human Geography. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/20438206231217566.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. 2022. Assemblage. In Oxford bibliographies in urban studies, ed. R. Dilworth. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., and S.-M. Li. 2017. State territorialization, neoliberal governmentality: The remaking of Dafen oil painting village, Shenzhen, China. Urban Geography 38 (5):708–28. doi:10.1080/02723638.2016.1139409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, C., and J. Wang. 2024. The deep interface of the effectuated voluminous territories: Gates, smooth and striated spaces, and the royal science in the Air Silk Road. Territory, Politics, Governance 12 (1):153–69. doi:10.1080/21622671.2022.2150286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar