Designing for Communities with Communities: A Public Library Codesign Project

References

• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athuraliya, A. (2023, September 21). 10 effective ideation techniques for all teams. Creately. https://creately.com/guides/ideation-techniques-with-templates/#2-brainwriting.
   Google Scholar
• Bignoli, C., & Stara, L. (2020). Responding to rapid change in libraries: a user experience approach. American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Biskjaer, M. M., Dalsgaard, P., & Halskov, K. (2017). Understanding creativity methods in design. In M. Smyth & P. Dalsgaard (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2017 conference on designing interactive systems (DIS ‘17) (pp. 839–851). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Bjögvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P.-A. (2012). Design things and design thinking: Contemporary participatory design challenges. Design Issues, 28(3), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, J. (2023). Why every library needs design. Public Services Quarterly, 19(1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2022.2157925
   Google Scholar
• Botero, A., Hyysalo, S., Kohtala, C., & Whalen, J. (2020). Getting participatory design done: From methods and choices to translation work across constituent domains. International Journal of Design, 14(2), 17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, E., Binder, T., & Sanders, E. B. (2012). Ways to engage telling, making and enacting. In J. Simonsen & T. Robertson (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of participatory design (pp. 145–181). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bratteteig, T., & Wagner, I. (2014). Disentangling participation: Power and decision-making in participatory design (pp. 1–12). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06163-4_1
   Google Scholar
• Caixeta, M. C. B. F., Tzortzopoulos, P., & Fabricio, M. M. (2019). User involvement in building design – a state-of-the-art review. Pós. Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo da FAUUSP, 26(48), e151752–e151752. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-2762.posfau.2019.151752
   Google Scholar
• Celikoglu, O. M., Ogut, S. M., & Krippendorff, K. (2017). How do user stories inspire design? A study of cultural probes. Design Issues, 33(2), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, M.-L. (2002). An organizational view of design communication in design collaboration. Design Studies, 23(2), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00019-9
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. I. (2020). Design thinking. ALA Neal-Schuman.
   Google Scholar
• Dalsgaard, P. (2012). Participatory design in large-scale public projects: Challenges and opportunities. Design Issues, 28(3), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewe, M. (2016). Planning public library buildings: concepts and issues for the librarian. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Digital Society School. (n.d.). Sensorial. Design Method Toolkit. https://toolkits.dss.cloud/design/method-card/sensorial-2/.
   Google Scholar
• Dogunke, S. (2020). Co-design in libraries. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 26(2-4), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1810081
   Google Scholar
• Drain, A., & Sanders, E. B.-N. (2019). A collaboration system model for planning and evaluating participatory design projects. International Journal of Design, 13(3), 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudeck, A. (1980). (2) Branch library renovation and citizen participation. International Library Review, 12(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7837(80)90013-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efeoğlu, A., & Møller, C. (2023). Redesigning design thinking for codesign with nondesigners: a method efficiency perspective. Design Science, 9, e14. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2023.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fekete, G. (2019, December 2). Designing a co-design workshop: The why, the what and the how. Medium. https://medium.com/@gyngyifekete/designing-a-co-design-workshop-7686eaf4bf0f.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. (2017). Public participation: Processes and outcomes in the planning and design of public libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Flib and rip. (n.d.). Session Lab. https://www.sessionlab.com/methods/flip-and-rip.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, S. (2019, July 14). Cognitive maps, mind maps, and concept maps: Definitions. NN/g Nielsen Normal Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/cognitive-mind-concept/.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, D. (2010a, June 19). The pitch. Game Storming. https://gamestorming.com/the-pitch/.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, D. (2010b, October 15). Post-up. Game Storming. https://gamestorming.com/post-up/.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, D. (2010c, October 15). Storyboard. Game Storming. https://gamestorming.com/storyboard/.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, D. (2010d, October 27). Cover story. Game Storming. https://gamestorming.com/cover-story/.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, D. (2011a, April 5). 20/20 vision. Game Storming. https://gamestorming.com/2020-vision/.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, D. (2011b, April 5). Heart, hand, mind. Game Storming. https://gamestorming.com/heart-hand-mind/.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, D. (2011c, January 5). How-now-wow matrix. Game Storming. https://gamestorming.com/how-now-wow-matrix/
   Google Scholar
• Guelton, B. (2023). “Mental maps”: Between memorial transcription and symbolic projection. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1142238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1142238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, E. S. (2018). Dotmocracy and planning poker for uncertainty management in collaborative research. In F. J. García-Peñalvo (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, 833–839. https://doi.org/10.1145/3284179.3284325
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Z., & Somerville, M. M. (2014). A comparative study of two design Charrettes: implications for codesign and participatory action research. CoDesign, 10(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.881883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, H. (2021). Practice guide to running a school library design Charrette. https://hilaryemh.wordpress.com/resources/charrette/.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, T., & Fellow, R. (2012). Participatory design toolkit: Using community engagement to improve the design and performance of affordable housing. Enterpirse. https://www.greencommunitiesonline.org/sites/default/files/participatory-design-toolkit.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IDEO. (2015). Design thinking in a day: An at-a-glance guide for advancing your library. Retrieved 8 January from https://drive.google.com/open?id = 18FN76ofJLHvRMpwqZQ1nMuV-AeGPvsZK.
   Google Scholar
• International Association for Public Participation. (2018). IAP2 Public Participation Spectrum. IAP2 https://iap2.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2018_IAP2_Spectrum.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., Huvila, I., Jochumsen, H., Khosrowjerdi, M., Mierzecka, A., & Pálsdóttir, Á. (2023). LAM professionals’ roles and attitudes to user participation in Norway and Sweden. Library & Information Science Research, 45(3), 101249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2023.101249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlen, M., & Fleming, R. (2016). Space planning basics. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, A. (2009). Better by design: An introduction to planning and designing a new library building. Facet Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lesneski, T. E., & Bray, H. (2023). Redefining library as culture house: The missoula public library partnership. ABI Technik, 43(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/abitech-2023-0003
   Google Scholar
• Luck, R. (2018). Participatory design in architectural practice: Changing practices in future making in uncertain times. Design Studies, 59, 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattern, S. (2003). Just How public is the Seattle public library? Journal of Architectural Education, 57(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1162/104648803322336548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkelä, T., & Helfenstein, S. (2016). Developing a conceptual framework for participatory design of psychosocial and physical learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 19(3), 411–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9214-9
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, R. C. (2007). Managing your library construction project: A step-by-step guide. American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, J. J., & Miller, R. K. (2016). Turning the revolution into an evolution: The case for design thinking and rapid prototyping in libraries. College & Research Libraries News, 77(6), 283–286. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.77.6.9506
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, V. (2018). Redefining the library: Co-designing for our future selves and cities. Public Library Quarterly, 37(1), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2017.1379348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutt, P. C., & Backoff, R. W. (1993). Transforming public organizations with strategic management and strategic leadership. Journal of Management, 19(2), 299–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639301900206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdorfer, J. (1988). Community participation in the design of the Boulder Creek branch library. Design Studies, 9(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(88)90022-1
   Google Scholar
• Panchenko, M. (n.d.). Design thinking ideation techniques you haven’t tried. Eleken. https://www.eleken.co/blog-posts/design-thinking-ideation-techniques#toc-5.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, D., Loke, L., & Ahmadpour, N. (2021). Toolkits, cards and games – a review of analogue tools for collaborative ideation. CoDesign, 17(4), 410–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1715444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowicz, L. M., & Osgood, S. (2010). Building science 101: A primer for librarians. American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, C. (n.d.). The idea vault. Session Lab. https://www.sessionlab.com/methods/07ygnc.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, L. (2019). Generative design method cards. Design research methods. https://designresearchmethods.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Sanders_MethodCards.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schlipf, F. (2020). Constructing library buildings that work. American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, J., & Robertson, T. (2012). Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• State Library of New South Wales. (2023). People places: A guide for planning public library buildings. https://www.sl.nsw.gov.au/public-library-services/people-places.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. (2019, July 22). How to run a Crazy eights workshop. Prototypr. https://blog.prototypr.io/how-to-run-a-crazy-eights-workshop-60d0a67b29a.
   Google Scholar
• Thinking wrong exercise. (n.d.). Social up. https://toolkit.designthinking-socialup.eu/en/thinking-wrong-exercise.
   Google Scholar
• Vold, T., & Evjen, S. (2016). How children find their way: Access, adaptability and aesthetics in the organisation and design of a new children's library. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301030
   Google Scholar
• Wakeling, S., Shephard, M., Hider, P., Jamali Mahmuei, H. R., Garner, J., & Coe, M. (2022). Public library building and development: Understanding community consultation and the design process. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association 71(4), 308–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warpole, K. (2013). Contemporary library architecture. A planning and designing guide. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Washington-Blair, A. (1992). The scope and methods of citizen participation in planning and designing public library facilities. University of North Texas.
   Google Scholar