References
- Ang, I. 1998. “Can One Say No to Chineseness? Pushing the Limits of the Diasporic Paradigm.” Boundary 2 25 (3): 223–242. doi:10.2307/303595.
- Berry, C., and M. Farquhar. 2006. China on Screen: Cinema and Nation. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Bogue, R. 2003. Deleuze on Cinema. New York: Routledge.
- Brunette, P. 2005. Wong Kar-Wai. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
- Chow, R. 1995. Primitive Passions: Visuality, Sexuality, Ethnography, and Contemporary Chinese Cinema. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Coe, J. G. 2018. “Modernizing Primordialism: Deterritorializing Chineseness and Reterritorializing the Sinophone in Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon.” Asian Cinema 29 (1): 99–116. doi:10.1386/ac.29.1.99_1.
- Colebrook, C. 2002. Gilles Deleuze. London: Routledge.
- Cunliffe, T. 2018. “The Grandmaster: Socio-Political Plurality in Contemporary Hong Kong.” Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media 59 (2): 101–128. doi:10.13110/framework.59.2.0101.
- Deleuze, G. 1986. Cinema One: The Movement–Image. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Deleuze, G. 1989. Cinema Two: The Time–Image. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1983. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Front, S. 2011. “Labyrinth of Time in Wong Kar-Wai’s In the Mood for Love and 2046.” Asian Journal of Literature, Culture and Society 5 (1): 144–155.
- Holland, E. 1999. Deleuze and Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus: Introduction to Schizoanalysis. New York: Routledge.
- Marchetti, G. 2013. “In the Mood for Love (2000).” In Film Analysis: A Norton Reader, edited by J. Geiger and R. L. Rusky, 966–989. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
- Patton, P. 2000. Deleuze and the Political. London: Routledge.
- Pepper, S. 2019. “What Will Be Left of Hong Kong’s Autonomy in 2047?” Hong Kong Free Press, March 26. https://hongkongfp.com/2019/03/24/will-left-hong-kongs-autonomy-2047
- Rushton, R. 2012. Cinema After Deleuze. New York: Continuum.
- Ryans, T. 1995. “Poet of Time.” Sight and Sohund 9 (3): 12–17.
- Shih, S.M. 2011. “The Concept of Sinophone.” PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 126 (3): 709–718. doi:10.1632/pmla.2011.126.3.709.
- Tan, Y.Y. 2010. “Resisting the Lure of the Fetish: Between Abjection and Fetishism in Kar Wai Wong’s In the Mood for Love.” Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies 36 (2): 149–179.
- Tong, J. 2003. “Chungking Express: Time and Its Displacement.” In Chinese Films in Focus II, edited by C. Berry, 64–72. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Wilson, F. 2009. “Viewing Sinophone Cinema Through a French Theoretical Lens: Wong Kar-Wai’s In the Mood for Love and 2046 and Deleuze’s Cinema.” Modern Chinese Literature and Culture 21 (1): 141–173.
- Yue, A. 2003. “In the Mood for Love: Intersections of Hong Kong Modernity.” In Chinese Films in Focus II, edited by C. Berry, 144–152. London: Palgrave Macmillan.