Accelerating materials discovery: combinatorial synthesis, high-throughput characterization, and computational advances

References

• Moskowitz SL. The advanced materials revolution: technology and economic growth in the age of globalization. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Jain A, Ong SP, Hautier G, et al. Commentary: the materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 2013;1(1):1–41. doi: 10.1063/1.4812323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potyrailo RA, Amis EJ. High-throughput analysis: a tool for combinatorial materials science. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Tabor DP, Roch LM, Saikin SK, et al. Accelerating the discovery of materials for clean energy in the era of smart automation. Nat Rev Mater. 2018;3:5–20. doi: 10.1038/s41578-018-0005-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier WF, Stöwe K, Sieg S. Combinatorial and high-throughput materials science. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46(32):6016–6067. doi: 10.1002/anie.200603675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terakura K, Takeuchi I. Focus on materials genome and informatics. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2017;18(1):1–2. doi: 10.1080/14686996.2016.1246226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhang W, Chen L, et al. Quantitative description on structure–property relationships of Li-ion battery materials for high-throughput computations. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2017;18(1):134–146. doi: 10.1080/14686996.2016.1277503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasset F, Pic L. Focus on overview of innovative materials for energy. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2017;18(1):704. doi: 10.1080/14686996.2017.1379729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam Pham T, Kino H, Terakura K, et al. Machine learning reveals orbital interaction in materials. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2017;18(1):756–765. doi: 10.1080/14686996.2017.1378060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig A. Discovery of new materials using combinatorial synthesis and high-throughput characterization of thin-film materials libraries combined with computational methods. Npj Comput Mater. 2019;5(1):70. doi: 10.1038/s41524-019-0205-0
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Chen C, Zheng C, et al. Database of ab initio L-edge X-ray absorption near edge structure. Sci Data. 2021;8(1):153. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00936-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton MK, Dwaraknath S, Persson KA. Promises and perils of computational materials databases. Nat Comput Sci. 2021;1(1):3–5. doi: 10.1038/s43588-020-00016-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gregoire JM, Zhou L, Haber JA. Combinatorial synthesis for AI-driven materials discovery. Nat Synth. 2023;2(6):493–504. doi: 10.1038/s44160-023-00251-4
   Google Scholar
• Ogale SB. Thin films and heterostructures for oxide electronics. New York: Springer; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Cabo MJ, NP M, Song JI. Synthesis of non-phosphorylated epoxidised corn oil as a novel green flame retardant thermoset resin. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):24140. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03274-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Materials research Society. Fall Meeting. Mineralization in natural and synthetic biomaterials: symposium held November 29-December 1 1999, Boston, MA. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Fasolka MJ, Materials Research Society. Fall Meeting. Combinatorial methods and informatics in materials science : symposium held November 28-December 1, 2005, Boston, MA, Warrendale, PA: Materials Research Society; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Park JC, Heo GS, Lee JH, et al. Synthesis of TaZnO thin films using combinatorial magnetron sputtering and its electrical, structural and optical properties. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2012;12(7):5303–5306. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2012.6303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinn PJ. Thin-film processing routes for combinatorial materials investigations—a review. ACS Comb Sci. 2019;21(7):501–515. doi: 10.1021/acscombsci.9b00032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potyrailo RA, Materials Research Society. Fall Meeting. Combinatorial and artificial intelligence methods in materials science II : symposium held December 1–4 2003, Boston, MA, Warrendale, PA: Materials Research Society; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Al Hasan NM, Hou H, Sarkar S, et al. Combinatorial synthesis and high-throughput characterization of microstructure and phase transformation in ni–ti–cu–V quaternary thin-film library. Eng. 2020;6(6):637–643. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Green ML, Takeuchi I, Hattrick-Simpers JR. Applications of high throughput (combinatorial) methodologies to electronic, magnetic, optical, and energy-related materials. J Appl Phys. 2013;113(23):231101. doi: 10.1063/1.4803530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potyrailo RA, Amis EJ. Battery materials for ultrafast charging and discharging. Nature. 2009;458(7235):190–193. doi: 10.1038/nature07853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Zunger A. Identification of potential photovoltaic absorbers based on first-principles spectroscopic screening of materials. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;108(6):68701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.068701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Setyawan W, Wang S, et al. A search model for topological insulators with high-throughput robustness descriptors. Nat Mater. 2012;11(7):614–619. doi: 10.1038/nmat3332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hack J, Maeda N, Meier DM. Review on CO2 capture using Amine-functionalized materials. ACS Omega. 2022;7(44):39520–39530. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armiento R, Kozinsky B, Fornari M, et al. Screening for high-performance piezoelectrics using high-throughput density functional theory. Phys Rev B. 2011;84(1):14103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.014103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Hautier G, Ceder CG. Synthesis, computed stability, and crystal structure of a new family of inorganic compounds: carbonophosphates. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(48):19619–19627. doi: 10.1021/ja3040834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alapati SV, Johnson JK, Sholl DS. Identification of destabilized metal hydrides for hydrogen storage using first principles calculations. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110(17):8769–8776. doi: 10.1021/jp060482m
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J, Fang ZZ, Choi YJ, et al. Potential of binary lithium magnesium nitride for hydrogen storage applications. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111(32):12129–12134. doi: 10.1021/jp0733724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Sudik A, Wolverton C, et al. High capacity hydrogen storage materials: attributes for automotive applications and techniques for materials discovery. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39(2):656–675. doi: 10.1039/B802882F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain A, Hautier G, Moore C, et al. A computational investigation of Li9M3(P2O7)3(PO4)2 (M = V, Mo) as cathodes for li ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc. 2012;159(5):A622. doi: 10.1149/2.080205jes
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathew K, Montoya JH, Faghaninia A, et al. Atomate: a high-level interface to generate, execute, and analyze computational materials science workflows. Comput Mater Sci. 2017;139:140–152. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.07.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain A, Hautier G, Moore CJ, et al. A high-throughput infrastructure for density functional theory calculations. Comput Mater Sci. 2011;50(8):2295–2310. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain A, Shin Y, Persson KA. Computational predictions of energy materials using density functional theory. Nat Rev Mater. 2016;1(1):1–13. doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2015.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelli IE, Olsen T, Datta S, et al. Computational screening of perovskite metal oxides for optimal solar light capture. Energy Environ Sci. 2012;5(2):5814–5819. doi: 10.1039/C1EE02717D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JC, Moore CJ, Kang B, et al. Synthesis and electrochemical properties of monoclinic LiMnBO[sub 3] as a li intercalation material. J Electrochem Soc. 2011;158(3):A309. doi: 10.1149/1.3536532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou T, Fong KD, Wang J, et al. Correction: the solvation structure, transport properties and reduction behavior of carbonate-based electrolytes of lithium-ion batteries. Chem Sci. 2022;13(27):8205. doi: 10.1039/D2SC90129C
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutt A, Shen J-X, Horton M, et al. Expanding the material search space for multivalent cathodes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14(39):44367–44376. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c11733
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siron M, Andriuc O, Persson KA. Data-driven investigation of tellurium-containing semiconductors for CO2 reduction: trends in adsorption and scaling relations. J Phys Chem C. 2022;126(31):13224–13236. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c04810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ionut A, Ludwig A, Savan A, et al. Scanning droplet cell microscopy on a wide range Hafnium – Niobium thin film combinatorial library. Electrochim Acta. 2013;110:539–549. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandrakis V, Wallisch W, Hamann S, et al. Combinatorial development of Fe–Co–Nb thin film magnetic nanocomposites. ACS Comb Sci. 2015;17(11):698–703. doi: 10.1021/acscombsci.5b00116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fackler SW, Alexandrakis V, König D, et al. Combinatorial study of Fe-Co-V hard magnetic thin films. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2017;18(1):231–238. doi: 10.1080/14686996.2017.1287520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawashima K, Okamoto Y, Annayev O, et al. Combinatorial screening of halide perovskite thin films and solar cells by mask-defined IR laser molecular beam epitaxy. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2017;18(1):307–315. doi: 10.1080/14686996.2017.1314172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardare AI, Savan A, Ludwig A, et al. A combinatorial passivation study of Ta–Ti alloys. Corros Sci. 2009;51(7):1519–1527. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtarolo S, Hart GLW, Nardelli MB, et al. The high-throughput highway to computational materials design. Nat Mater. 2013;12(3):191–201. doi: 10.1038/nmat3568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao SS, Burrows PE. Combinatorial screening of thin film materials: an overview. J Mater. 2015;1(2):85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmat.2015.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Potyrailo R, Rajan K, Stoewe K, et al. Combinatorial and high-throughput screening of materials libraries: review of state of the art. ACS Comb Sci. 2011;13(6):579–633. doi: 10.1021/co200007w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zrinski I, Minenkov A, Cancellieri C, et al. Mixed anodic oxides for forming-free memristors revealed by combinatorial screening of hafnium-tantalum system. Appl Mater Today. 2022;26:101270. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siket CM, Tillner N, Mardare AI, et al. Direct writing of anodic oxides for plastic electronics. Npj Flex Electron. 2018;2(1):23. doi: 10.1038/s41528-018-0036-y
   Google Scholar
• Mardare AI, Kaltenbrunner M, Sariciftci NS. Ultra-thin anodic alumina capacitor films for plastic electronics. Phys Status Solidi Appl Mater Sci. 2012;209(5):813–818. doi: 10.1002/pssa.201100785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong SP, Richards WD, Jain A, et al. Python materials Genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput Mater Sci. 2013;68:314–319. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzad K, Mardare CC, Mardare AI, et al. Growth of mixed anodic films on combinatorial Al-Gd alloys and their superimposed potential-pH diagrams. J Electroanal Chem. 2022;911:116227. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang XD, Sun X, Briceño G, et al. A combinatorial approach to materials discovery. Science. 1995;268(5218):1738–1740. ited: in: PMID: 17834993. doi: 10.1126/science.268.5218.1738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koinuma H, Takeuchi I. Combinatorial solid-state chemistry of inorganic materials. Nat Mater. 2004;3(7):429–438. doi: 10.1038/nmat1157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dover RB, Schneemeyer LF, Fleming RM. Discovery of a useful thin-film dielectric using a composition-spread approach. Nature. 1998;392(6672):162–164. doi: 10.1038/32381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Schultz AM, Li L, et al. Combinatorial substrate epitaxy: a high-throughput method for determining phase and orientation relationships and its application to BiFeO3/TiO2 heterostructures. Acta Mater. 2012;60(19):6486–6493. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyeon T. Chemical synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles. Chem Commun. 2003;8:927–934. doi: 10.1039/b207789b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldan I, Semenyuk Y, Marchuk I, et al. Chemical synthesis and application of palladium nanoparticles. J Mater Sci. 2015;50(6):2337–2354. doi: 10.1007/s10853-014-8802-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talapin DV, Chevchanko EV. Introduction: nanoparticle chemistry. Chem Rev. 2016;116(18):10343–10345. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani HR. A review of methods for synthesis of Al nanoparticles. Orient J Chem. 2014;30(4):1941–1949. doi: 10.13005/ojc/300456
   Google Scholar
• Hu X, Takai O, Saito N. Simple synthesis of platinum nanoparticles by plasma sputtering in water. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2013;52(1S):01AN05. doi: 10.7567/JJAP.52.01AN05
   Google Scholar
• Orozco-Montes V, Caillard A, Brault P, et al. Synthesis of platinum nanoparticles by plasma sputtering onto glycerol: effect of argon pressure on their physicochemical properties. J Phys Chem C. 2021;125(5):3169–3179. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c09746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang J, Liu Q, Li T, et al. Magnetron sputtering enabled sustainable synthesis of nanomaterials for energy electrocatalysis. Green Chem. 2021;23(8):2834–2867. doi: 10.1039/D0GC03994B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri PK, Bhattacharyya S, Singh DK, et al. Correlation between microstructure and optical properties of ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by ball milling. J Appl Phys. 2007;102(9):93515. doi: 10.1063/1.2804012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Pu S, Liu Y, et al. High-purity disperse α-Al2O3 nanoparticles synthesized by high-energy ball milling. Adv Powder Technol. 2018;29(9):2194–2203. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2018.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abid N, Khan AM, Shujait S, et al. Synthesis of nanomaterials using various top-down and bottom-up approaches, influencing factors, advantages, and disadvantages: a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;300:102597. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2021.102597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ristoscu C, Mihailescu IN. Thin films and nanoparticles by pulsed laser deposition: wetting, adherence, and nanostructuring. Pulsed laser ablation. New York: Jenny Stanford Publishing; 2018. p. 245–276.
   Google Scholar
• Serbezov V. Pulsed laser deposition: the road to hybrid nanocomposites coatings and novel pulsed laser adaptive technique. Recent Pat Nanotechnol. 2013;7(1):26–40. doi: 10.2174/187221013804484863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanan KB, Sakthivel N. Biological synthesis of metal nanoparticles by microbes. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2010;156(1–2):1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2010.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegwart DJ, Whitehead KA, Nuhn L, et al. Combinatorial synthesis of chemically diverse core-shell nanoparticles for intracellular delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(32):12996–13001. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106379108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König D, Richter K, Siegel A, et al. High-throughput fabrication of Au–Cu nanoparticle libraries by combinatorial sputtering in ionic liquids. Adv Funct Mater. 2014;24(14):2049–2056. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201303140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter K, Campbell PS, Baecker T, et al. Ionic liquids for the synthesis of metal nanoparticles. Phys Status Solidi. 2013;250(6):1152–1164. doi: 10.1002/pssb.201248547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Yen C-W, Lin H-C, et al. Automated high-throughput preparation and characterization of oligonucleotide-loaded lipid nanoparticles. Int J Pharm. 2021;599:120392. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damoiseaux R, George S, Li M, et al. No time to lose—high throughput screening to assess nanomaterial safety. Nanoscale. 2011;3(4):1345–1360. doi: 10.1039/c0nr00618a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramishetti S, Hazan-Halevy I, Palakuri R, et al. A combinatorial library of lipid nanoparticles for RNA delivery to leukocytes. Adv Mater. 2020;32(12):1906128. doi: 10.1002/adma.201906128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Yang B, Rack PD, et al. High-throughput synthesis and corrosion behavior of sputter-deposited nanocrystalline Alx(CoCrFeNi)100-x combinatorial high-entropy alloys. Mater Des. 2020;195:109018. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock N. High-throughput investigations employing solvothermal syntheses. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2010;129(3):287–295. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenstein-Dresler LCW, Kama A, Frisch J, et al. Prospect of making XPS a high-throughput analytical method illustrated for a CuxNi1−xOy combinatorial material library. RSC Adv. 2022;12(13):7996–8002. doi: 10.1039/D1RA09208A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stremy M, Horvath D, Vana D, et al. RBS channeling MATLAB application for automated measurement control and evaluation for 6MV tandetron accelerator. Appl Sci. 2021;11(9):11. doi: 10.3390/app11093817
   Google Scholar
• Möller S, Höschen D, Kurth S, et al. A new high-throughput focused MeV ion-beam analysis setup. Instruments. 2021;5(1):10. doi: 10.3390/instruments5010010
   Google Scholar
• Möller S, Ding R, Xie H, et al. 13C tracer deposition in EAST D and He plasmas investigated by high-throughput deuteron nuclear reaction analysis mapping. Nucl Mater Energy. 2020;25:100805. doi: 10.1016/j.nme.2020.100805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Światowska-Mrowiecka J, de Diesbach S, Maurice V, et al. Li-ion intercalation in thermal oxide thin films of MoO3 as studied by XPS, RBS, and NRA. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112(29):11050–11058. doi: 10.1021/jp800147f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barfoot KM. Ion beam analysis. Phys Bull. 1984;35(12):511. doi: 10.1088/0031-9112/35/12/022
   Google Scholar
• Wendelbo R, Akporiaye DE, Karlsson A, et al. Combinatorial hydrothermal synthesis and characterisation of perovskites. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2006;26(6):849–859. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.12.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusne AG, Gao T, Mehta A, et al. On-the-fly machine-learning for high-throughput experiments: search for rare-earth-free permanent magnets. Sci Rep. 2014;4(1):6367. doi: 10.1038/srep06367
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Long CJ, Hattrick-Simpers J, Murakami M, et al. Rapid structural mapping of ternary metallic alloy systems using the combinatorial approach and cluster analysis. Rev Sci Instrum. 2007;78(7):72217. doi: 10.1063/1.2755487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EAG Laboratories. The global leader in materials testing services [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 14]. Available from: https://www.eag.com/
   Google Scholar
• Zarnetta R, Kneip S, Somsen C, et al. High-throughput characterization of mechanical properties of Ti–Ni–Cu shape memory thin films at elevated temperature. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011;528(21):6552–6557. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naujoks D, Eggeler YM, Hallensleben P, et al. Identification of a ternary μ-phase in the Co–Ti–W system – an advanced correlative thin-film and bulk combinatorial materials investigation. Acta Mater. 2017;138:100–110. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.07.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtarolo S, Setyawan W, Wang S, et al. AFLOWLIB.ORG: a distributed materials properties repository from high-throughput ab initio calculations. Comput Mater Sci. 2012;58:227–235. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinde PA, Lokhande AC, Chodankar NR, et al. Temperature dependent surface morphological modifications of hexagonal WO3 thin films for high performance supercapacitor application. Electrochim Acta. 2017;224:397–404. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunn JK, Fang RL, Albing MR. A high-throughput investigation of Fe–Cr–Al as a novel high-temperature coating for nuclear cladding materials. Nanotechnology. 2015;26(27):274003. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/27/274003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattrick-Simpers JR, Jun C, Murakami M, et al. High-throughput screening of magnetic properties of quenched metallic-alloy thin-film composition spreads. Appl Surf Sci. 2007;254(3):734–737. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.07.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi I, Famodu OO, Read JC, et al. Identification of novel compositions of ferromagnetic shape-memory alloys using composition spreads. Nat Mater. 2003;2(3):180–184. doi: 10.1038/nmat829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker P, Naujoks D, Langenkämper D, et al. High-throughput structural and functional characterization of the thin film materials system Ni–Co–Al. ACS Comb Sci. [Internet] 2017;19:618–624. doi: 10.1021/acscombsci.6b00176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia R, Brabec CJ, Yip H-L, et al. High-throughput optical screening for efficient semitransparent organic solar cells. Joule. 2019;3(9):2241–2254. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashiwagi T, Sue K, Takebayashi Y, et al. High-throughput synthesis of silver nanoplates and optimization of optical properties by machine learning. Chem Eng Sci. 2022;262:118009. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2022.118009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen C, Wang C, Huang M, et al. A generic high-throughput microstructure classification and quantification method for regular SEM images of complex steel microstructures combining EBSD labeling and deep learning. J Mater Sci Technol. 2021;93:191–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yablon D, Chakraborty I, Passino H, et al. Deep learning to establish structure property relationships of impact copolymers from AFM phase images. MRS Commun. 2021;11(6):962–968. doi: 10.1557/s43579-021-00103-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sormana J-L, Meredith JC. High-throughput discovery of structure−mechanical property relationships for segmented poly(urethane−urea)s. Macromolecules. 2004;37(6):2186–2195. doi: 10.1021/ma035385v
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Hu X, Liu H, et al. High-throughput assessment of local mechanical properties of a selective-laser-melted non-weldable Ni-based superalloy by spherical nanoindentation. Mater Sci Eng A. 2022;844:143207. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2022.143207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y, Zhang H, Huang H, et al. Strengthening mechanism of CoCrNiMox high entropy alloys by high-throughput nanoindentation mapping technique. Intermetallics. 2021;135:107209. doi: 10.1016/j.intermet.2021.107209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregoire JM, Van Campen DG, Miller CE, et al. A. High-throughput synchrotron X-ray diffraction for combinatorial phase mapping. J Synchrotron Radiat. 2014;21(6):1262–1268. doi: 10.1107/S1600577514016488
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanaka M, Katsuya Y, Yamamoto A. A new large radius imaging plate camera for high-resolution and high-throughput synchrotron x-ray powder diffraction by multiexposure method. Rev Sci Instrum. 2008;79(7):75106. doi: 10.1063/1.2956972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caskey CM, Richards RM, Ginley DS, et al. Thin film synthesis and properties of copper nitride, a metastable semiconductor. Mater Horizons. 2014;1(4):424–430. doi: 10.1039/C4MH00049H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham BJ, Hildebrand DGC, Kuan AT, et al. High-throughput transmission electron microscopy with automated serial sectioning. bioRxiv. 2019;657346. doi:10.1101/657346
   Google Scholar
• Sáfrán G. “One-sample concept” micro-combinatory for high throughput TEM of binary films. Ultramicroscopy. 2018;187:50–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young R, Carleson PD, Da X, et al. High-yield and high-throughput TEM sample preparation using focused ion beam automation. Istfa’98 Proc 24th Int Symp Test Fail Anal. ASM International. 1998;332.
   Google Scholar
• Ornelas IM, Unwin PR, Bentley CL. High-throughput correlative electrochemistry–microscopy at a transmission electron microscopy grid electrode. Anal Chem. 2019;91(23):14854–14859. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li YJ, Savan A, Kostka A, et al. Accelerated atomic-scale exploration of phase evolution in compositionally complex materials. Mater Horizons. 2018;5(1):86–92. doi: 10.1039/C7MH00486A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugnaioli E, Gorelik T, Kolb U. “Ab initio” structure solution from electron diffraction data obtained by a combination of automated diffraction tomography and precession technique. Ultramicroscopy. 2009;109(6):758–765. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2009.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li YJ, Kostka A, Savan A, et al. Atomic-scale investigation of fast oxidation kinetics of nanocrystalline CrMnFeCoNi thin films. J Alloys Compd. 2018;766:1080–1085. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolle KM, Tansley DSW, Hey AJ. The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery. 2011;99(8):1334–1337.
   Google Scholar
• Bell G, Hey T, Szalay A. Beyond the data deluge. Science. 2009;323(5919):1297–1298. doi: 10.1126/science.1170411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin R. Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data Soc. 2014;1(1):1–12. doi: 10.1177/2053951714528481
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Choudhary A. Perspective: materials informatics and big data: realization of the “fourth paradigm” of science in materials science. APL Mater. 2016;4(5):053208–10. doi: 10.1063/1.4946894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain A, Persson KA, Ceder G. Research update: the materials genome initiative: data sharing and the impact of collaborative ab initio databases. APL Mater. 2016;4(5):53102. doi: 10.1063/1.4944683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szalay A. Extreme data-intensive scientific computing. Comput Sci Eng. 2011;13(6):34–41. doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2011.74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faris J, Kolker E, Szalay A, et al. Communication and data-intensive science in the beginning of the 21st century. Omi A J Integr Biol. 2011;15(4):213–215. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabo C, Sheng QZ, Kroeger T, et al. Science in the cloud: allocation and execution of data-intensive scientific workflows. J Grid Comput. 2014;12(2):245–264. doi: 10.1007/s10723-013-9282-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns R, Vogelstein JT, Szalay AS. From cosmos to connectomes: the evolution of data-intensive science. Neuron. 2014;83(6):1249–1252. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nukarapu D, Tang B, Wang L, et al. Data replication in data intensive scientific applications with performance guarantee. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst. 2010;22(8):1299–1306. doi: 10.1109/TPDS.2010.207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira SF, Fürlinger K, Kranzlmüller D Trends in computation, communication and storage and the consequences for data-intensive science. 2012 IEEE 14th Int Conf High Perform Comput Commun 2012 IEEE 9th International Conference on Embed Softw Syst. Liverpool (UK): IEEE; 2012. p. 572–579.
   Google Scholar
• Tian Y, Yuan R, Xue D, et al. Role of uncertainty estimation in accelerating materials development via active learning. J Appl Phys. 2020;128(1):14103. doi: 10.1063/5.0012405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen C, Wang C, Wei X, et al. Physical metallurgy-guided machine learning and artificial intelligent design of ultrahigh-strength stainless steel. Acta Mater. 2019;179:201–214. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.08.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JG. Computational materials science: an introduction. Boca Raton: CRC press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Raabe D. Computational materials science: the simulation of materials microstructures and properties. Germany: Wiley-Vch; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• LeSar R. Introduction to computational materials science: fundamentals to applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Schrödinger E. An undulatory theory of the mechanics of atoms and molecules. Phys Rev. 1926;28(6):1049–1070. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.28.1049
   Google Scholar
• Dirac PAM, Fowler RH. Quantum mechanics of many-electron systems. Proc R Soc London Ser A, Contain Pap a Math Phys Character. 1997;123:714–733.
   Google Scholar
• Hartree DR. The wave mechanics of an atom with a non-Coulomb central field. Part I. Theory and methods. Proc Camb Philol Soc. 1928;24:89. doi: 10.1017/S0305004100011919
   Google Scholar
• Thomas LH. The calculation of atomic fields. Math Proc Cambridge philos Soc. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1927.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn W, Sham LJ. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys Rev. 1965;140(4A):A1133–A1138. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleder GR, Padilha ACM, Acosta CM, et al. From DFT to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science – a review. J Phys Mater. 2019;2(3):032001. doi: 10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b
   Google Scholar
• Persson KA, Waldwick B, Lazic P, et al. Prediction of solid-aqueous equilibria: Scheme to combine first-principles calculations of solids with experimental aqueous states. Phys Rev B – Condens Matter Mater Phys. 2012;85:1–12. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.235438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen AJ, Mori-Sánchez P, Yang W. Challenges for density functional theory. Chem Rev. 2012;112(1):289–320. doi: 10.1021/cr200107z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doe RE, Persson KA, Meng YS, et al. First-principles investigation of the Li−Fe−F phase diagram and equilibrium and nonequilibrium conversion reactions of Iron fluorides with lithium. Chem Mater. 2008;20(16):5274–5283. doi: 10.1021/cm801105p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ping S, Davidson W, Jain A, et al. Python materials genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput Mater Sci. 2013;68:314–319. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, et al. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J Chem Phys. 2010;132(15):154104. doi: 10.1063/1.3382344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai T, Han H, Yu Y, et al. Study on the ground state of NiO: the LSDA (GGA)+ U method. Phys B Condens Matter. 2009;404(1):89–94. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2008.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kresse G, Hafner J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys Rev B. 1993;47(1):558–561. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedecker S, Teter M, Hutter J. Separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials. Phys Rev B. 1996;54(3):1703–1710. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannozzi P, Baroni S, Bonini N, et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J Phys Condens Matter. 2009;21(39):395502. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segall MD, Lindan PJD, Probert MJ, et al. First-principles simulation: ideas, illustrations and the CASTEP code. J Phys Condens Matter. 2002;14(11):2717. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iftimie R, Minary P, Tuckerman ME. Ab initio molecular dynamics: concepts, recent developments, and future trends. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005;102(19):6654–6659. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500193102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skylaris C-K, Haynes PD, Mostofi AA, et al. Introducing ONETEP: linear-scaling density functional simulations on parallel computers. J Chem Phys. 2005;122(8):84119. doi: 10.1063/1.1839852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz K, Blaha P. Solid state calculations using WIEN2k. Comput Mater Sci. 2003;28(2):259–273. doi: 10.1016/S0927-0256(03)00112-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulans A, Kontur S, Meisenbichler C, et al. Exciting: a full-potential all-electron package implementing density-functional theory and many-body perturbation theory. J Phys Condens Matter. 2014;26(36):363202. PMID: 25135665. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/26/36/363202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade X, Strubbe D, De Giovannini U, et al. Real-space grids and the octopus code as tools for the development of new simulation approaches for electronic systems. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17(47):31371–31396. doi: 10.1039/C5CP00351B
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen JJ, Hansen LB, Jacobsen KW. Real-space grid implementation of the projector augmented wave method. Phys Rev B. 2005;71(3):35109. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.035109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neese F. The ORCA program system. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci. 2012;2(1):73–78. doi: 10.1002/wcms.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlrichs R, Bär M, Häser M, et al. Electronic structure calculations on workstation computers: the program system turbomole. Chem Phys Lett. 1989;162(3):165–169. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(89)85118-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner H-J, Knowles PJ, Knizia G, et al. Molpro: a general-purpose quantum chemistry program package. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci. 2012;2(2):242–253. doi: 10.1002/wcms.82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García A, Papior N, Akhtar A, et al. Siesta: recent developments and applications. J Chem Phys. 2020;152(20):204108. doi: 10.1063/5.0005077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum V, Gehrke R, Hanke F. Ab initio molecular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals. Comput Phys Commun. 2009;180(11):2175–2196. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.06.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setyawan W, Curtarolo S. High-throughput electronic band structure calculations: challenges and tools. Comput Mater Sci. 2010;49(2):299–312. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aflow - Automatic FLOW for materials discovery [Internet]. Available from: http://aflowlib.org/
   Google Scholar
• Gražulis S, Chateigner D, Downs RT, et al. Crystallography open database – an open-access collection of crystal structures. J Appl Crystallogr. 2009;42(4):726–729. Cited: in: PMID: 22477773. doi: 10.1107/S0021889809016690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shishkin M, Sato H. Self-consistent parametrization of DFT + U framework using linear response approach: application to evaluation of redox potentials of battery cathodes. Phys Rev B. 2016;93(8). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.085135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AFLOWπ [Internet]. Available from: http://aflowlib.org/src/aflowpi/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Materials Project [Internet]. Available from: https://materialsproject.org/
   Google Scholar
• Automated interactive infrastructure and database for computational science — AiiDA documentation [Internet]. Available from: http://aiida.net/
   Google Scholar
• Pizzi G, Cepellotti A, Sabatini R, et al. AiiDA: automated interactive infrastructure and database for computational science. Comput Mater Sci. 2016;111:218–230. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crystallography Open Database [Internet]. Available from: http://crystallography.net/cod/
   Google Scholar
• Mathew K, Singh AK, Gabriel JJ, et al. Mpinterfaces: A materials project based python tool for high-throughput computational screening of interfacial systems. Comput Mater Sci. 2016;122:183–190. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.05.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OQMD [Internet]. Available from: https://oqmd.org/
   Google Scholar
• Jain A, Ong SP, Chen W, et al. FireWorks: a dynamic workflow system designed for high-throughput applications. Concurr Comput Pract Exp. 2015;27(17):5037–5059. doi: 10.1002/cpe.3505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICSD [Internet]. Available from: https://icsd.fiz-karlsruhe.de/
   Google Scholar
• Lambert H, Fekete A, Kermode JR, et al. Imeall: a computational framework for the calculation of the atomistic properties of grain boundaries. Comput Phys Commun. 2018;232:256–263. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.04.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haastrup S, Strange M, Pandey M, et al. The computational 2D materials database: high-throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals. 2D Mater. 2018;5(4):042002. doi: 10.1088/2053-1583/aacfc1
   Google Scholar
• Pylada documentation [Internet]. Available from: http://pylada.github.io/pylada/
   Google Scholar
• Ashton M, Paul J, Sinnott SB, et al. Topology-scaling identification of layered solids and stable exfoliated 2D materials. Phys Rev Lett. 2017;118(10):106101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.106101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorth Larsen A, Mortensen J J, Blomqvist J, et al. The atomic simulation environment—a python library for working with atoms. J Phys Condens Matter. 2017;29(27):273002. Cited: in: PMID: 28323250. doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atomic Simulation Environment [Internet]. Available from: https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/ase/
   Google Scholar
• NOMAD [Internet]. Available from: https://nomad-lab.eu/nomad-lab/
   Google Scholar
• Mathew K, Montoya JH, Faghaninia A, et al. Atomate: A high-level interface to generate, execute, and analyze computational materials science workflows. Comput Mater Sci. 2017;139:140–152. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.07.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atomate (materials science workflows) — atomate 1.0.3 documentation [Internet]. Available from: https://atomate.org/
   Google Scholar
• Talirz L, Kumbhar S, Passaro E, et al. Materials Cloud, a platform for open computational science. Sci Data. [Internet] 2020;7:299. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-00637-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhary K, Cheon G, Reed E, et al. Elastic properties of bulk and low-dimensional materials using van der Waals density functional. Phys Rev B. 2018;98(1):14107. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.014107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhary K, Cheon G, Reed E, et al. Computational materials chemistry [Internet]. Available from: https://cmr.fysik.dtu.dk/
   Google Scholar
• Agapito LA, Curtarolo S, Nardelli MB. Reformulation of DFT + U as a pseudohybrid hubbard density functional for accelerated materials discovery. Phys Rev X. 2015;5(1). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.011006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain A, Hautier G, Ong SP, et al. Formation enthalpies by mixing GGA and GGA + U calculations. Phys Rev B - Condens Matter Mater Phys. 2011;84:1–10. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.045115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderon CE, Plata JJ, Toher C, et al. The AFLOW standard for high-throughput materials science calculations. Comput Mater Sci. 2015;108:233–238. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Z-H. Machine learning. Singapore Pte Ltd; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• El Naqa I, Murphy MJ. What is machine learning? Berlin: Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• What is machine learning course| its importance and types-FORE [Internet]. Available from: https://www.fsm.ac.in/blog/an-introduction-to-machine-learning-its-importance-types-and-applications/
   Google Scholar
• Phoenics: phoenics: bayesian optimization for efficient experiment planning [Internet]. Available from: https://github.com/aspuru-guzik-group/phoenics
   Google Scholar
• Häse F, Roch LM, Kreisbeck C, et al. Phoenics: a Bayesian optimizer for chemistry. ACS Cent Sci. 2018;4(9):1134–1145. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schütt KT, Kessel P, Gastegger M, et al. SchNetPack: A deep learning toolbox for atomistic systems. J Chem Theory Comput. 2019;15(1):448–455. Cited: in: PMID: 30481453. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atomistic-machine-learning/schnetpack: SchNetPack - deep neural networks for atomistic systems.
   Google Scholar
• Bartók AP, Payne MC, Kondor R, et al. Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;104(13):136403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.136403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TensorFlow [Internet]. Available from: https://www.tensorflow.org/
   Google Scholar
• Smith JS, Isayev O, Roitberg AE. ANI-1: an extensible neural network potential with DFT accuracy at force field computational cost. Chem Sci. 2017;8(4):3192–3203. doi: 10.1039/C6SC05720A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASE_ANI: ANI-1 neural net potential with python interface (ASE) [Internet]. Available from: https://github.com/isayev/ASE_ANI
   Google Scholar
• amp [Internet]. Available from: https://bitbucket.org/andrewpeterson/amp/src/master/
   Google Scholar
• Scikit-learn: machine learning in python — scikit-learn 1.2.2 documentation [Internet]. Available from: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/
   Google Scholar
• Weka 3 - data mining with open source machine learning software in java [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/
   Google Scholar
• SISSO: a data-driven method combining symbolic regression and compressed sensing for accurate & interpretable models. [Internet]. Available from: https://github.com/rouyang2017/SISSO
   Google Scholar
• AFLOW ML [Internet]. Available from: http://aflowlib.org/aflow-ml/
   Google Scholar
• Matminer (materials data mining) — matminer 0.8.0 documentation [Internet]. Available from: https://hackingmaterials.lbl.gov/matminer/
   Google Scholar
• PROPhet [Internet]. Available from: https://biklooost.github.io/PROPhet/
   Google Scholar
• Wolverton/Magpie — bitbucket. [Internet] Available from: https://bitbucket.org/wolverton/magpie/src/master/
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Zhang L, Han J, et al. DeePMD-kit: A deep learning package for many-body potential energy representation and molecular dynamics. Comput Phys Commun. 2018;228:178–184. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deepmodeling/deepmd-kit: a deep learning package for many-body potential energy representation and molecular dynamics [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 19]. Available from: https://github.com/deepmodeling/deepmd-kit
   Google Scholar
• Combo: COMmon Bayesian optimization [Internet]. Available from: https://github.com/tsudalab/combo
   Google Scholar
• Geilhufe RM, Olsthoorn B, Balatsky AV. Shifting computational boundaries for complex organic materials. Nat Phys. 2021;17(2):152–154. doi: 10.1038/s41567-020-01135-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpaydin E. Machine learning. Cambridge (USA): Mit Press; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Awad M, Khanna R. Machine learning BT - efficient learning machines: theories, concepts, and applications for engineers and system designers. Berkeley, CA: Apress; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Machine learning a probabilistic perspective by Kevin P. Murphy – Bridget market [Internet]. Available from: https://bridgetmarket.us/product/machine-learning-a-probabilistic-perspective-by-kevin-p-murphy/?gclid=Cj0KCQjwwtWgBhDhARIsAEMcxeDbvFRioGBCRTKU5no7ClDW8En05BHyw9v_I_wCKLOTE6wXewVvvaAaAjndEALw_wcB
   Google Scholar
• Pilania G, Wang C, Jiang X, et al. Accelerating materials property predictions using machine learning. Sci Rep. 2013;3(1):2810. doi: 10.1038/srep02810
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mannodi-Kanakkithodi A, Pilania G, Huan TD, et al. Machine learning strategy for accelerated design of polymer dielectrics. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):20952. doi: 10.1038/srep20952
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang A-T, Murdock RJ, Kauwe SK, et al. Machine learning for materials scientists: an Introductory guide toward best practices. Chem Mater. 2020;32(12):4954–4965. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohavi R, Quinlan R. Decision-tree discovery handbook of data mining and knowledge discovery. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Xue D, Balachandran PV, Hogden J, et al. Accelerated search for materials with targeted properties by adaptive design. Nat Commun. 2016;7: doi: 10.1038/ncomms11241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell TM. Machine learning. New York: McGraw-Hill Science; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Hill J, Mulholland G, Persson K, et al. Materials science with large-scale data and informatics: unlocking new opportunities. MRS Bull. 2016;41(5):399–409. doi: 10.1557/mrs.2016.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Choudhary A. Perspective: materials informatics and big data: realization of the “fourth paradigm” of science in materials science. APL Mater. 2016;4(5):053208. doi: 10.1063/1.4946894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward L, Wolverton C. Atomistic calculations and materials informatics: a review. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2017;21(3):167–176. doi: 10.1016/j.cossms.2016.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Choudhary A. Deep materials informatics: applications of deep learning in materials science. MRS Commun. 2019;9(3):779–792. doi: 10.1557/mrc.2019.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hey T. The fourth paradigm, data-intensive scientific discovery, microsoft research. Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer-Verlag; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hey T, Tansley S, Tolle KM. Jim Gray on eScience: a transformed scientific method. In: The fourth paradigm; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hey T, Trefethen A. The fourth paradigm 10 years on. Inform Spektrum. 2020;42(6):441–447. doi: 10.1007/s00287-019-01215-9
   Google Scholar
• Dimiduk DM, Holm EA, Niezgoda SR. Perspectives on the impact of machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence on materials, processes, and structures engineering. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. 2018;7:157–172. Internet. doi: 10.1007/s40192-018-0117-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isayev O, Tropsha A, Curtarolo S. Materials informatics: methods, tools, and applications. New York (USA): John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ramprasad R, Batra R, Pilania G, et al. Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects. Npj Comput Mater. 2017;3(1):54. doi: 10.1038/s41524-017-0056-5
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi K, Tanaka Y. Materials informatics: a journey towards material design and synthesis. Dalton Trans. 2016;45:10497–10499. Internet. doi: 10.1039/C6DT01501H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frydrych K, Karimi K, Pecelerowicz M, et al. Materials informatics for mechanical deformation: a review of applications and challenges. Materials. 2021;14(19):5764.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alberi K, Nardelli MB, Zakutayev A, et al. The 2019 materials by design roadmap. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2019;52(1):013001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aad926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allam O, Cho BW, Kim KC, et al. Application of DFT-based machine learning for developing molecular electrode materials in li-ion batteries. RSC Adv. 2018;8(69):39414–39420. doi: 10.1039/C8RA07112H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai J, Chu X, Xu K, et al. Machine learning-driven new material discovery. Nanoscale Adv. 2020;2(8):3115–3130. doi: 10.1039/D0NA00388C
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner J, Wolverton C, Ceder G, et al. Toward computational materials design: The impact of density functional theory on materials research. MRS Bull. 2006;31(9):659–668. doi: 10.1557/mrs2006.174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler KT, Frost JM, Skelton JM, et al. Computational materials design of crystalline solids. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45(22):6138–6146. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00841G
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer B, Nørskov JK. Theoretical surface science and catalysis—calculations and concepts. Adv Catal. 2000;45:71–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdew JP, Chevary JA, Vosko SH, et al. Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. Phys Rev B. 1992;46(11):6671–6687. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn W, Becke AD, Parr RG. Density functional theory of electronic structure. J Phys Chem. 1996;100(31):12974–12980. doi: 10.1021/jp960669l
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazurek AH, Ł S, Pisklak DM. Periodic DFT calculations—review of applications in the pharmaceutical sciences. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(5):415. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12050415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul A, Birol T. Applications of DFT + DMFT in materials science. Ann Rev Mater Res. 2019;49(1):31–52. doi: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-121825
   Google Scholar
• Smith SW. Digital Signal Processing. San Diego (CA): California Technical Publishing; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Tolba SA, Gameel KM, Ali BA, et al. The DFT+U: Approaches, accuracy, and applications. In: Density functional calculations: recent progresses of theory and application; 2018. p. 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lederer Y, Toher C, Vecchio KS, et al. The search for high entropy alloys: a high-throughput ab-initio approach. Acta Mater. 2018;159:364–383. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomczak JM. Thermoelectricity in correlated narrow-gap semiconductors. J Phys Condens Matter. 2018;30(18):183001. doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/aab284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin L. Materials databases infrastructure constructed by first principles calculations: a review. Mater Perform Charact. 2015;4. doi: 10.1520/MPC20150014
   Google Scholar
• Montoya JH, Persson KA. A high-throughput framework for determining adsorption energies on solid surfaces. Npj Comput Mater. 2017;3(1):1–3. doi: 10.1038/s41524-017-0017-z
   Google Scholar
• Armitage NP, Mele EJ, Vishwanath A. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids. Rev Mod Phys. 2018;90(1):15001. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ando Y, Fu L. Topological crystalline insulators and topological superconductors: from concepts to materials. Annu Rev Condens Matter Phys. 2015;6(1):361–381. doi: 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014501
   Google Scholar
• Cano J, Bradlyn B, Wang Z, et al. Building blocks of topological quantum chemistry: elementary band representations. Phys Rev B. 2018;97(3):35139. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.035139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradlyn B, Elcoro L, Vergniory MG, et al. Band connectivity for topological quantum chemistry: band structures as a graph theory problem. Phys Rev B. 2018;97(3):35138. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.035138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Gao M, Yeh J, et al. High-entropy alloys: fundamentals and applications. Switzerland: Springer; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kuisma M, Ojanen J, Enkovaara J, et al. Kohn-Sham potential with discontinuity for band gap materials. Phys Rev B. 2010;82(11):115106. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.115106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan MZ, Kane CL. Colloquium: topological insulators. Rev Mod Phys. 2010;82(4):3045–3067. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K. High-throughput design of functional materials using materials genome approach. Chinese Phys B. 2018;27(12):128103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/27/12/128103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt J, Marques MRG, Botti S, et al. Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. Npj Comput Mater. 2019;5(1):83. doi: 10.1038/s41524-019-0221-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain A, Ong SP, Hautier G, et al. Commentary: the materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 2013;1(1):11002. doi: 10.1063/1.4812323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaiszik B, Chard K, Pruyne J, et al. The materials data facility: data services to advance materials science research. JOM. Internet 2016;68:2045–2052. doi: 10.1007/s11837-016-2001-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen C, Zhang Y, Wang C, et al. Machine learning assisted design of high entropy alloys with desired property. Acta Mater. 2019;170:109–117. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtarolo S, Morgan D, Persson K, et al. Predicting crystal structures with data mining of quantum calculations. Phys Rev Lett. 2003;91(13):1–4. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.135503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer CC, Tibbetts KJ, Morgan D, et al. Predicting crystal structure by merging data mining with quantum mechanics. Nat Mater. 2006;5(8):641–646. Cited: in: PMID: 16845417. doi: 10.1038/nmat1691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coey JM. Magnetism and magnetic materials. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Andreoni W, Yip S. Handbook of materials modeling: applications: current and emerging materials. Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Lee J, Seko A, Shitara K, et al. Prediction model of band gap for inorganic compounds by combination of density functional theory calculations and machine learning techniques. Phys Rev B. 2016;93(11):115104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.115104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamawaki M, Ohnishi M, Ju S, et al. Multifunctional structural design of graphene thermoelectrics by Bayesian optimization. Sci Adv. 2023;4(6):eaar4192. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aar4192
   Google Scholar
• Faber FA, Lindmaa A, von Lilienfeld OA, et al. Machine learning energies of 2 million elpasolite (ABCD6) crystals. Phys Rev Lett. 2016;117(13):135502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.135502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V BP, Young J, Lookman T, et al. Learning from data to design functional materials without inversion symmetry. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):14282. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14282
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jain A, Bligaard T. Atomic-position independent descriptor for machine learning of material properties. Phys Rev B. 2018;98(21):214112. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.214112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies DW, Butler KT, Walsh A. Data-driven discovery of photoactive quaternary oxides using first-principles machine learning. Chem Mater. 2019;31(18):7221–7230. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad Y, Gao D, Ngo T, et al. Data mining for materials: computational experiments with AB compounds. Phys Rev B. 2012;85(10):104104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.104104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houhou R, Bocklitz T. Trends in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and chemometrics applied to chemical data. Anal Sci Adv. 2021;2(3–4):128–141. doi: 10.1002/ansa.202000162
   Google Scholar
• Martin TB, Audus DJ. Emerging trends in machine learning: a polymer perspective. ACS Polym Au. 2023;3(3):239–258. doi: 10.1021/acspolymersau.2c00053
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao J-C. Combinatorial approaches as effective tools in the study of phase diagrams and composition–structure–property relationships. Prog Mater Sci. 2006;51(5):557–631. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Introduction — pymatgen 2023.3.23 documentation [Internet]. Available from: https://pymatgen.org/
   Google Scholar
• Hassel AW, Lohrengel MM. The scanning droplet cell and its application to structured nanometer oxide films on aluminium. Electrochim Acta. 1997;42(20–22):3327–3333. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(97)00184-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, et al. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:4–17. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirklin S, Saal JE, Hegde VI, et al. High-throughput computational search for strengthening precipitates in alloys. Acta Mater. Internet 2016;102:125–135. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studt F, Sharafutdinov I, Abild-Pedersen F, et al. Discovery of a Ni-Ga catalyst for carbon dioxide reduction to methanol. Nat Chem. 2014;6(4):320–324. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suram SK, Xue Y, Bai J, et al. Automated phase mapping with AgileFD and its application to light absorber discovery in the V–Mn–Nb oxide system. ACS Comb Sci. 2017;19(1):37–46. doi: 10.1021/acscombsci.6b00153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber L, Hadian R, Grabowski B, et al. A machine learning approach to model solute grain boundary segregation. Npj Comput Mater. 2018;4(1):64. doi: 10.1038/s41524-018-0122-7
   Google Scholar
• Aykol M, Dwaraknath SS, Sun W, et al. Thermodynamic limit for synthesis of metastable inorganic materials. Sci Adv. 2018;4:1–8. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaq0148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J-C. A combinatorial approach for efficient mapping of phase diagrams and properties. J Mater Res. 2001;16(6):1565–1578. doi: 10.1557/JMR.2001.0218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi R, Kubota H, Murakami M, et al. Design of combinatorial shadow masks for complete ternary-phase diagramming of solid state materials. J Comb Chem. 2004;6(1):50–53. doi: 10.1021/cc030038i
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasegawa Y, Iwata J-I, Tsuji M, et al. First-principles calculations of electron states of a silicon nanowire with 100,000 atoms on the K computer. Proc 2011 Int Conf High Perform Comput Networking, Storage Anal. 2011. p. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Jinnouchi R, Karsai F, Kresse G. Making free-energy calculations routine: combining first principles with machine learning. Phys Rev B. 2020;101(6):60201. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.060201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan C, Janet JP, Liu F, et al. Learning from failure: predicting electronic structure calculation outcomes with machine learning models. J Chem Theory Comput. 2019;15(4):2331–2345. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAndrew CC, Victory JJ. Accuracy of approximations in MOSFET charge models. IEEE Trans Electron Devices. 2002;49(1):72–81. doi: 10.1109/16.974752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gunsteren WF, Berendsen HJC. Computer simulation of molecular dynamics: methodology, applications, and perspectives in chemistry. Angew Chemie Int Ed English. 1990;29(9):992–1023. doi: 10.1002/anie.199009921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argaman N, Makov G. Density functional theory: an introduction. Am J Phys. 2000;68(1):69–79. doi: 10.1119/1.19375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarascon J-M, Armand M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature. 2001;414(6861):359–367 [Internet]. doi: 10.1038/35104644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thackeray MM, Kang S-H, Johnson CS, et al. Li2MnO3-stabilized LiMO2 (M = Mn, Ni, Co) electrodes for lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem. 2007;17(30):3112–3125. Internet. doi: 10.1039/b702425h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Huang X, Chen L, et al. A high capacity nano ­ Si composite anode material for lithium rechargeable batteries. Electrochem Solid-State Lett. 1999;2(11):547. Internet. doi: 10.1149/1.1390899
   Google Scholar
• Xiao R, Li H, Chen L. High-throughput design and optimization of fast lithium ion conductors by the combination of bond-valence method and density functional theory. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):14227. Internet. doi: 10.1038/srep14227
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hautier G, Jain A, Chen H, et al. Novel mixed polyanions lithium-ion battery cathode materials predicted by high-throughput ab initio computations. J Mater Chem. 2011;21(43):17147–17153. Internet. doi: 10.1039/c1jm12216a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knauth P. Inorganic solid li ion conductors: an overview. Solid State Ion. 2009;180(14–16):911–916. Internet. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2009.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Xiao R, Li H, et al. Quantitative structure-property relationship study of cathode volume changes in lithium ion batteries using ab-initio and partial least squares analysis. J Mater [Internet]. 2017;3(3):178–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jmat.2017.02.002
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod BP, Parlane FGL, Morrissey TD, et al. Self-driving laboratory for accelerated discovery of thin-film materials. Sci Adv. 2020;6(20):eaaz8867. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz8867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar