The power of names: The neoliberal imaginary in education policyspeak

Bibliography

• Asen, R. School Choice and the Betrayal of Democracy: How Market-Based Education Reform Fails Our Communities. University Park, PA: Penn State Press, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. Global Education Inc: New Policy Networks and the Neoliberal Imaginary. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2013. doi:10.4324/9780203803301.
   Google Scholar
• Bavel, V., J. Jay, and D. J. Packer. The Power of Us: Harnessing Our Shared Identities to Improve Performance, Increase Cooperation, and Promote Social Harmony. New York: Little, Brown Spark, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C. The Manufactured Crisis: Myths, Fraud, and the Attack on America’s Public Schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. Discourse: Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris-Black, J. Analysing Political Speeches. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. “The State, Power, and Agency: Missing in Action in Institutional Theory?” Journal of Management Inquiry 19, no. 1 (2010): 4–13. doi:10.1177/1056492609347562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. Philanthropy, Hidden Strategy, and Collective Resistance. Gorham, ME: Myers Education Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• DeVos, B. Prepared Remarks by Secretary DeVos to Students and Faculty at Woods Learning Center. Casper, WY: Rethink Schools Tour, September 12, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• DeVos, B. Prepared Remarks by US Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos to the 2017 ASU GSV Summit. Salt Lake City, UT: Arizona State University/Global Silicon Valley Summit, May 9, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• DeVos, B. “US Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos’Addressed the National Association of State Boards of Education in Washington, DC.”Washington, DC: National Association of State Boards of Education meeting, March 20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• DeVos, B. “Prepared Remarks from US Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos to Foundation for Excellence in Education National Summit on Education Reform.” Foundation for Excellence in Education National Summit on Education Reform. Nashville, TN. November 30, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• DeVos, B. Prepared Remarks by US Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos on FY19 Budget to Labour-HHS-Education and Related Agencies House Appropriations Subcommittee. Washington, DC, March 20, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• DeVos, B. “Prepared Remarks by U.S. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos to the American Enterprise Institute.” American Enterprise Institute Conference, Washington, DC, January 16, 2018. https://www.ed.gov/news/speech-archive.
   Google Scholar
• DeVos, B. “Prepared Remarks by US Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos to South by Southwest-Education Conference.” South by Southwest-EDU, Austin, TX, March 6, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• DeVos, B. Prepared Remarks by Secretary DeVos at the Manhattan Institute’s 19th Annual Alexander Hamilton Award Dinner. New York: Alexander Hamilton Award Dinner, May 1, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• DeVos, B. Prepared Remarks by Secretary DeVos on 2019 National Assessment of Educational Progress Results. Washington, DC, October 30, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• DeVos, B. Prepared Remarks by Secretary DeVos to Students and Faculty at St. Marcus School. Milwaukee, WI, September 16, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• DeVos, B. Prepared Remarks by Secretary DeVos at Hillsdale College. Hillsdale, MI, October 19, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• DeVos, B. Prepared Remarks to the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies. Washington, DC, March 5, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. L. “Critical and Descriptive Goals in Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 9, no. 6 (1985): 739–763. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(85)90002-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, C. “Cognitive Linguistic Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Researching Discourse, edited by C. Hart, 97 and 104. Abingdon: Routledge, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hlavacik, M. Assigning Blame: The Rhetoric of Education Reform. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: ERIC, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hursh, D. W., and J. Henderson. “Contesting Global Neoliberalism and Creating Alternative Futures.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 32, no. 2 (2011): 171–185. doi:10.1080/01596306.2011.562665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, K. “Localized Ideographs in Education Rhetoric: Polly Williams and a Justice-Driven Ideology of Choice.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 107, no. 3 (2021): 305–327. doi:10.1080/00335630.2021.1945133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kathleen deMarrais, T. Jameson Brewer, Brigette Herron, Jamie C. Atkinson, Jamie B. Lewis, Philanthropy, Hidden Strategy, and Collective Resistance. (Gorham, ME: Myers Education Press, 2019), 17.
   Google Scholar
• Kathleen deMarrais, T. Jameson Brewer, Brigette Herron, Jamie C. Atkinson, Jamie B. Lewis, Philanthropy, Hidden Strategy, and Collective Resistance. (Gorham, ME: Myers Education Press, 2019), 94.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. H., and L. McGoey. “Facts, Power and Global Evidence: A New Empire of Truth.” Economy and Society 47, no. 1 (2018): 1–26. doi:10.1080/03085147.2018.1457261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramsch, C. Language as Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. “Mapping the Brain’s Metaphor Circuitry: Metaphorical Thought in Everyday Reason.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8 (2014): 958–958. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C., T. J. Brewer, and P. Londe. “Orchestrating Policy Ideas: Philanthropies and Think Tanks in US Education Policy Advocacy Networks.” Australian Educational Researcher 43, no. 1 (2016): 55–73. doi:10.1007/s13384-015-0187-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, T. Our Own Worst Enemy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, H. The Power to Name: Locating the Limits of Subject Representation in Libraries. Secaucus, NJ: Springer, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Parry-Giles, T., and M. J. Steudeman. “Crafting Character, Moving History: John McCain’s Political Identity in the 2008 Presidential Campaign.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 103, no. 1–2 (2017): 66–89. doi:10.1080/00335630.2016.1234062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patricia “Democracy, Demagoguery, and Critical Rhetoric.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 8, no. 3 (2005): 459–476. doi:10.1353/rap.2005.0069.
   Google Scholar
• Patricia Roberts-Miller, “Democracy, Demagoguery, and Critical Rhetoric,” Rhetoric and Public Affairs 8, no. 3 (Fall 2005): 459#476, 459.
   Google Scholar
• Povinelli, E. “What Do White People Want? Interest, Desire, and Affect in Late Liberalism.” In Presented at the State of Emergency: Politics. Aesthetics, Trumpism: A Public Forum, New York University. December 10, 2016. https://conversations.e-flux.com/t/elizabeth-a-povinelli-what-do-white-people-want-interest-desire-and-affect-in-late-liberalism/5845
   Google Scholar
• Saltman, K. J. The Swindle of Innovative Educational Finance. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Steudeman, M. J. “Rethinking Rhetorical Education in Times of Demagoguery.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 49, no. 3 (2019): 297–314. doi:10.1080/02773945.2019.1610642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teun A. van Dijk. Discourse and Knowledge: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Teun A. van Dijk. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE Publications, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Teun A. van Dijk. “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society 4, no. 2 (1993): 249–283. doi:10.1177/0957926593004002006.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. “What’s in a Name? Stance Markers in Oral Argument About Marriage Laws.” Discourse & Communication 5, no. 1 (2011): 65–88. doi:10.1177/1750481310390167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar