Bibliography
- Allison, N. “Even Some RNC Members Are Fed Up with ‘Embarrassing,’ Trump-Less Debates.” Politico, October 5, 2023. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/05/trump-presidential-debates-rnc-future-00120012
- Auer, J. J. “The Counterfeit Debates.” In The Great Debates: Background, Perspective, Effects, edited by S. Kraus, 142–150. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1962.
- Auer, J. J. “Great Myths About the Great Debates.” Speaker and Gavel 18, no. 2 (1981): 14–21.
- Ayers, A. “Voting as Exclusion.” Fordham Law Review no. 90 (2021): 373.
- Benoit, W. L. Political Election Debates: Informing Voters About Policy and Character. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2013.
- Benoit, W. L., L. Brazeal, and D. Airne. “A Functional Analysis of Televised U.S. Senate and Gubernatorial Campaign Debates.” Argumentation & Advocacy 44, no. 2 (2007): 75–89. doi:10.1080/00028533.2007.11821679.
- Benoit, W. L., and G. J. Hansen. “Presidential Debate Watching, Issue Knowledge, Character Evaluation and Vote Choice.” Human Communication Research 30, no. 1 (2004): 124–144. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00727.x.
- Benoit, W. L., G. J. Hansen, and R. M. Verser. “A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Viewing U.S. Presidential Debates.” Communication Monographs 70, no. 4 (2003): 335–350. doi:10.1080/0363775032000179133.
- Bond, B. E., and R. Neville-Shepard. “The Rise of Presidential Eschatology: Conspiracy Theories, Religion, and the January 6th Insurrection.” American Behavioral Scientist 67, no. 5 (2021): 1–16. doi:10.1177/00027642211046557.
- Bramlett, J. C. “Battles for Branding: A Political Marketing Approach to Studying Televised Candidate Debates.” Communication Quarterly 69, no. 3 (2021): 280–300. doi:10.1080/01463373.2021.1944889.
- Bramlett, J. C. “Examining the Normative and Persuasive Effects of Televised US Senate Debates.” Argumentation & Advocacy 57, no. 1 (2021): 37–56. doi:10.1080/10511431.2021.1894393.
- Brennan Center for Justice. “Voting Laws Roundup: February 2023.” March 25, 2023. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-february-2023
- Brubaker, P. J. “New Media’s Contribution to Presidential Debates.” In Techno Politics in Presidential Campaigning, edited by J. A. Hendricks and L. L. Kaid, 152–170. New York: Routledge, 2011.
- Carlin, D. P. “Presidential Debates as Focal Points for Campaign Arguments.” Political Communication 9, no. 4 (1992): 251–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1992.9962949.
- Coker, C. R., and J. L. Reed. “ ‘This is a Patriotism Check’: Political Economy, Corruption, and Duty to America in the 2020 Primary Debates.” Argumentation & Advocacy 57, no. 3–4 (2021): 200–217. doi:10.1080/10511431.2021.1949544.
- C-SPAN. “Alaska U.S. Senate Debate.” October 27, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?522907-1/alaska-us-senate-debate
- C-SPAN. “Arizona U.S. Senate Debate.” October 6, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?522999-1/arizona-us-senate-debate
- C-SPAN. “Florida U.S. Senate Debate.” October 18, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?522606-1/florida-us-senate-debate
- C-SPAN. “Idaho U.S. Senate Debate.” October 4, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?523305-1/idaho-us-senate-debate
- C-SPAN. “Illinois U.S. Senate Debate.” October 27, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?523759-1/illinois-us-senate-debate
- C-SPAN. “Indiana U.S. Senate Debate.” October 16, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?522701-1/indiana-us-senate-debate
- C-SPAN. “Iowa U.S. Senate Debate.” October 6, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?522661-1/iowa-us-senate-debate
- C-SPAN. “New Hampshire U.S. Senate Debate.” November 2, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?524013-1/hampshire-us-senate-debate
- C-SPAN. “New Hampshire U.S. Senate Debate.” October 27, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?523737-1/hampshire-us-senate-debate
- C-SPAN. “North Carolina U.S. Senate Debate.” October 7, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?522921-1/north-carolina-us-senate-debate
- C-SPAN. “Ohio U.S. Senate Debate.” October 17, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?523437-1/ohio-us-senate-debate
- C-SPAN. “South Dakota U.S. Senate Debate.” November 4, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?523114-1/south-dakota-us-senate-debate
- C-SPAN. “Utah U.S. Senate Debate.” October 17, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?522666-1/utah-us-senate-debate
- C-SPAN. “Vermont U.S. Senate Debate.” October 13, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?522901-1/vermont-us-senate-debate
- C-SPAN. “Washington State Senate Forum.” October 30, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?523825-1/washington-state-senate-forum
- C-SPAN. “Washington State Senate Forum.” October 23, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?523542-1/washington-us-senate-debate
- C-SPAN. “Wisconsin U.S. Senate Debate.” October 13, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?523117-1/wisconsin-us-senate-debate
- C-SPAN. “Wisconsin U.S. Senate Debate.” October 7, 2022. https://www.c-span.org/video/?523242-1/wisconsin-us-senate-debate
- C-SPAN. “Campaign 2022.” Retrieved December 15, 2023. https://www.c-span.org/campaign/?2022
- Diamond, L. “Defining and Developing Democracy.” In The Democracy Sourcebook, edited by R. Dahl, I. Shapiro and José A. Cheibub, 29–40. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2003.
- Dimock, A. “Disturbing Argument Through Strategic Question Avoidance in Presidential Debate.” In Disturbing Argument, edited by C. Palczewski, 161–168. New York: Routledge, 2015.
- Edbauer, J. “Unframing Models of Public Distribution: From Rhetorical Situation to Rhetorical Ecologies.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 35, no. 4 (2005): 5–24. doi:10.1080/02773940509391320.
- Fenno, R. F. Senators on the Campaign Trail. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1996.
- Goldzwig, S. R. “LBJ, the Rhetoric of Transcendence, and the Civil Rights Act of 1968.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 6, no. 1 (2003): 25–53. doi:10.1353/rap.2003.0029.
- Grossmann, M., and D. A. Hopkins. Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
- Henson, J. R. , and W. L. Benoit. “Functional Federalism in Political Campaign Debates.” Publius the Journal of Federalism 39, no. 4 (2009): 696–706. doi:10.1093/publius/pjp018.
- Hinck, R. S., E. A. Hinck, S. S. Hinck, W. O. Dailey, and B. Melton. “The 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Debates: Exploring Politeness Strategies for Facing an Aggressive Incumbent.” Argumentation & Advocacy 57, no. 3–4 (2021): 181–199. doi:10.1080/10511431.2021.1949554.
- Hoffman, M. F., and D. J. Ford. Organizational Rhetoric: Situations and Strategies. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2010.
- Jackson-Beeck, M., and R. Meadow. “The Triple Agenda of Presidential Debates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 43 (1979): 173–180.
- Jamieson, K. H., and D. S. Birdsell. Presidential Debates: The Challenge of Creating an Informed Electorate. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
- Jarratt, S. C. Rereading the Sophists: Classical Rhetoric Refigured, 98–100. Carbondale, Illinois: SIU Press, 1998.
- Jennings, F. J., J. C. Bramlett, M. S. McKinney, and M. M. Hardy. “Tweeting Along Partisan Lines: Identity-Motivated Elaboration and Presidential Debates.” Social Media + Society 6, no. 4 (2020): 1–12. doi:10.1177/2056305120965518.
- Jones, J. M., and R. C. Rowland. “Redefining the Proper Role of Government: Ultimate Definition in Reagan’s First Inaugural.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 18, no. 4 (2015): 691–718. doi:10.14321/rhetpublaffa.18.4.0691.
- Kahn, K. F., and P. J. Kenney. The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.
- Kraus, S. The Great Debates: Kennedy Vs Nixon, 1960. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1962.
- Lee, M. J. “Considering Political Identity: Conservatives, Republicans, and Donald Trump.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 20, no. 4 (2017): 719–730. doi:10.14321/rhetpublaffa.20.4.0719.
- McKinney, M. S. “Let the People Speak: The Public’s Agenda and Presidential Town Hall Debates.” The American Behavioral Scientist 49, no. 2 (2005): 198–212. doi:10.1177/0002764205279428.
- McKinney, M. S. “Presidential Campaign Debates in the 2020 Elections: Debate Scholarship and the Future of Presidential Debates.” Argumentation & Advocacy 57, no. 3–4 (2021): 149–156. doi:10.1080/10511431.2021.1963526.
- McKinney, M. S., and D. B. Carlin. “Political Campaign Debates.” In Handbook of Political Communication Research, edited by L. L. Kaid, 221–252. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Mercieca, J. Demagogue for President: The Rhetorical Genius of Donald Trump. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, 2020.
- Mixon, H. “The Rhetoric of States’ Rights and White Supremacy.” In A New Diversity in Contemporary Southern Rhetoric, edited by C. M. Logue and H. Dorgan, 166–187. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1987.
- Murphy, J. M. ““Presidential Debates and Campaign Rhetoric: Text within Context.” Southern Journal of Communication 57, no. 3 (1992): 219–228. doi:10.1080/10417949209372867.
- Neville-Shepard, R. “Post-Presumption Argumentation and the Post-Truth World: On the Conspiracy Rhetoric of Donald Trump.” Argumentation & Advocacy 55, no. 3 (2019): 175–193. doi:10.1080/10511431.2019.1603027.
- Pauley, G. E. “Rhetoric and Timeliness: An Analysis of Lyndon B. Johnson’s Voting Rights Address.” Western Journal of Communication 62, no. 1 (1998): 26–53.
- Pauley, G. E. “Harry Truman and the NAACP: A Case Study in Presidential Persuasion on Civil Rights.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 2, no. 2 (1999): 211–241. doi:10.1080/10570319809374596.
- Paul, W. B., J. L. Reed, and J. C. Bramlett. “Mr. Flake Gets Out of Washington: The Jeremiadic Martyrdom of Jeff Flake.” Western Journal of Communication 88, no. 1 (2023): 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2023.2174383.
- Reagan, R., Presidential Library and Museum. “Inaugural Address 1981” January 20, 1981. https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/speech/inaugural-address-1981.
- Reed, J. L. “Religion and Politics in the Anglican Rhetorical Tradition: The Rhetoric of John Danforth and the Challenge of a Political via Media.” Journal of Communication and Religion 42, no. 1 (2019): 46–62.
- Reed, J. L., and M. S. McKinney. “Constitutive Rhetoric and Partisan Polarization in the 2016 Presidential Primary Debates.” Speaker and Gavel 59, no. 1 (2023): 5.
- Rowland, R. C. “The 2020 Presidential Debates: Reasoned Argument or Political Theater.” Argumentation & Advocacy 57, no. 3–4 (2021): 218–235. doi:10.1080/10511431.2021.1949535.
- Ruiz Casado, J. A. “Who Owns ‘Democracy’? The Role of Populism in the Discursive Struggle Over the Signifier ‘Democracy’ in Catalonia and Spain.” Critical Discourse Studies 20, no. 6 (2023): 1–17. doi:10.1080/17405904.2022.2088584.
- Sabato, L. J. “A Return to Normalcy? Taking Stock at the End of the Trump Presidency.” In A Return to Normalcy? The 2020 Election That (Almost) Broke America, edited by L. J. Sabato, K. Kondik, and J. M. Coleman, 1–26. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2021.
- Schumpeter, J. A. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. 3rd ed. Harper Collins. 2008, New York.
- Smith, M. “Upfront Recap: Sen. Ron Johnson on the Campaign Trail.” WISN-TV, August 1, 2022. https://www.wisn.com/article/upfront-recap-sen-ron-johnson-on-the-campaign-trail/40945066#.
- Stein, K. “Points of Stasis in the 1960 and 2000 Presidential Debates.” Speaker and Gavel 41, no. 1 (2004). Available at https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/speaker-gavel/vol41/iss1/5.
- Stewart, P. A. The Audience Decides: Applause-Cheering, Laughter, and Booing During Debates in the Trump Era. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
- Waisbord, S. “Why Populism is Troubling for Democratic Communication.” Communication, Culture and Critique 11, no. 1 (2018): 21–34. doi:10.1093/ccc/tcx005.
- Waldman, M. “Mike Johnson Is Now the Most Powerful Election Denier in Washington.” Brennan Center, October 31, 2023. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/mike-johnson-now-most-powerful-election-denier-washington
- Ward, M. “Republicans Straddle Line on Rnc’s Jan. 6 Rhetoric.” Político, February 6, 2022. https://www.politico.com/news/2022/02/06/republicans-cheney-kinzinger-rubio-00006039
- Warner, B. R., and M. S. McKinney. “To Unite and Divide: The Polarizing Effect of Presidential Debates.” Communication Studies 64, no. 5 (2013): 508–527. doi:10.1080/10510974.2013.832341.
- Waxman, O. B. “As Trump Plans to Skip Biden’s Swearing In, Here Are 3 Other U.S. Presidents Who Dodged Their Successors’ Inauguration.” Time, January 19, 2021. https://time.com/5928537/trump-biden-not-attend-inauguration-history/
- Waymer, D., and R. Heath. “Explicating the Public Memory Dialectic in Public Relations: The Case of Donald Trump, the Oath Keepers, and January 6, 2021.” Public Relations Review 49 (2023). doi:10.106/j.pubrev.2022.102281.
- Winerman, A. “Electoral Fraud or Fraudulent Rhetoric: An Analysis of Jurisprudential and Political Arguments Over Voter Photo Identification Laws”. (2011). doi:10.2139/ssrn.1792131.
- Woods, C. S. “Barbara Jordan and the Ongoing Struggle for Voting Rights.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 106, no. 3 (2020): 291–298. doi:10.1080/00335630.2020.1785640.
- Wu, N., and K. Cheney. “Ron Johnson Tried to Hand Fake Elector Info to Mike Pence on Jan. 6, Panel Reveals.” Politico, June 21, 2021. https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/21/jan-6-panel-trump-overturn-2020-election-00040816
- Yourish, K., L. Buchanan, and Lu Denise. “The 147 Republicans Who Voted to Overturn Election Results.” The New York Times, January 7, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/01/07/us/elections/electoral-college-biden-objectors.html.