Teaching Statistics: Can Supplemental Instruction Facilitate Student Success?

References

• Arendale, D. R. 1994. “Understanding the Supplemental Instruction Model.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 1994 (60):11–21. doi: 10.1002/tl.37219946004.
   Google Scholar
• Arendale, D. R. 1997. “Supplemental Instruction (SI): Review of Research concerning the Effectiveness of SI from the University of Missouri-Kansas City and Other Institutions from across the United States.” In Proceedings of the 17th and 18th Annual Institutes for Learning Assistance Professionals: 1996 and 1997, edited by S. Mioduski and G. Enright. Tucson: University Learning Center, University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Arendale, D. R. 2002. “History of Supplemental Instruction (SI): Mainstreaming of Developmental Education.”. In Histories of Developmental Education, edited by D. B. Lundell and J. Higbee, 15–27. Minneapolis: Center for Research on Developmental Education and Urban Literacy, General College, University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Arendale, D. R. 2004. “Mainstreamed Academic Assistance and Enrichment for All Students: The Historical Origins of Learning Assistance Centers.” Research for Education Reform 9 (4):3–21. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/200364.
   Google Scholar
• Blanc, R. A., L. E. DeBuhr, and D. C. Martin. 1983. “The Effects of Supplemental Instruction on Undergraduate Performance and Attrition.” The Journal of Higher Education 54 (1):80–90. doi: 10.2307/1981646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, T. J., A. C. McCoy, and S. C. Bates. 2008. “The Effect of Supplemental Instruction on Timely Graduation.” College Student Journal 42 (30):853–9.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, L. T., S. E. Brown, R. B. Gardner, and R. L. Davidson. 2009. “D.RA.MA.: An Extended Conceptualization of Student Anxiety in Criminal Justice Research Methods Courses.” Journal of Criminal Justice Education 20 (3):217–26. doi: 10.1080/10511250903109348.
   Google Scholar
• Bronstein, S. B. 2008. “Supplemental Instruction: Supporting Persistence in Barrier Courses.” The Learning Assistance Review 13 (1):31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, E. M., K. D. Valentine, and M. L. Frizell. 2019. “Supplemental Instruction: Understanding Academic Assistance in Underrepresented Groups.” The Journal of Experimental Education 87 (2):288–98. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2017.1421517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushway, S. D., and S. M. Flower. 2002. “Helping Criminal Justice Students Learn Statistics: A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of Learning Assistance.” Journal of Criminal Justice Education 13 (1):35–56. doi: 10.1080/10511250200085321.
   Google Scholar
• Carnevale, A. P., and N. Smith. 2018. Balancing work and learning: Implications for low-income students. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. https://1gyhoq479ufd3yna29x7ubjn-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/Low-Income-Working-Learners-FR.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Condron, D. J., J. H. Becker, and L. Bzhetaj. 2018. “Sources of Students’ Anxiety in a Multidisciplinary Social Statistics Course.” Teaching Sociology 46 (4):346–55. doi: 10.1177/0092055X18780501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congos, D. 2001. “How Supplemental Instruction (SI) Generates Revenue for Colleges and Universities.” Journal of College Student Retention 3 (3):301–9. doi: 10.2190/KUTE-ERFN-XTG4-TE7W.
   Google Scholar
• Conner, T. W., and T. M. Rabovsky. 2011. “Accountability, Affordability, Access: A Review of the Recent Trends in Higher Education Policy Research.” Policy Studies Journal 39 (1):93–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00389_7.x.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, J. W., and M. Kisielewski. 2016. How Does Your Department Compare?. Structure of Sociology Departments in 2016. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dancer, D., K. Morrison, and G. Tarr. 2015. “Measuring the Effects of Peer Learning on Students’ Academic Achievement in First-Year Business Statistics.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (10):1808–28. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.916671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, P., J. van der Meer, J. Skalicky, and K. Cowley. 2014. “On the Effectiveness of Supplemental Instruction: A Systematic Review of Supplemental Instruction and Peer-Assisted Study Sessions Literature between 2001 and 2010.” Review of Educational Research 84 (4) :609–39. doi: 10.3102/0034654314540007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCesare, M. 2007. “‘Statistics Anxiety’ among Sociology Majors: A First Diagnosis and Some Treatment Options.” Teaching Sociology 35 (4):360–7. doi: 10.1177/0092055X0703500405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierker, L., J. Alexander, J. L. Cooper, A. Selya, J. Rose, and N. Dasgupta. 2016. “Engaging Diverse Students in Statistical Inquiry: A Comparison of Learning Experiences and Outcomes of under-Represented and Non-Underrepresented Students Enrolled in a Multidisciplinary Project-Based Statistics Course.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 10 (1):1–9. doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2016.100102.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, R. G. 2011. “Why Should Faculty Be Involved with Supplemental Instruction?” College Teaching 59 (4):135–41. doi: 10.1080/87567555.2011.586656.
   Google Scholar
• Fayowski, V., and P. D. MacMillan. 2008. “An Evaluation of the Supplemental Instruction Programme in a First Year Calculus Course.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 39 (7):843–55. doi: 10.1080/00207390802054433.
   Google Scholar
• Grillo, M. C., and C. W. Leist. 2013. “Academic Support as a Predictor of Retention to Graduation: New Insights on the Role of Tutoring, Learning Assistance, and Supplemental Instruction.” Journal of College Student Retention 15 (3):387–408. doi: 10.2190/CS.15.3.e.
   Google Scholar
• Hensen, K. A., and M. C. Shelley. 2003. “The Impact of Supplemental Instruction: Results from a Large, Public, Midwestern University.” Journal of College Student Development 44 (2):250–9. doi: 10.1353/csd.2003.0015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, R., C. W. Dochen, and D. Joy. 2001. “Increasing Students’ Success: When Supplemental Instruction Becomes Mandatory.” Journal of College Reading and Learning 31 (2):143–56. doi: 10.1080/10790195.2001.10850111.
   Google Scholar
• International Center for Supplemental Instruction at UMKC. 2017 & 2018. Supplemental Instruction supervisor training. Conducted at: University of Missouri - Kansas City. Training description available: https://info.umkc.edu/si/training-in-kansas-city/.
   Google Scholar
• International Center for Supplemental Instruction at UMKC. 2020. Supplemental Instruction purpose. Accepted June 21, 2020. https://info.umkc.edu/si/.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. P., and K. T. Fields. 2001. “The Role of Supplemental Instruction in the First Accounting Course.” Issues in Accounting Education 16 (4):531–47. doi: 10.2308/iace.2001.16.4.531.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, J., L. Bryngfors, and L. Mörner. 2011. “Improving Student Success in Difficult Engineering Education Courses through Supplemental Instruction (SI) –What is the Impact of the Degree of SI Attendance?” Journal of Peer Learning 4 (1):16–23. https://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol4/iss1/4.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, J., L. Bryngfors, and L. Mörner. 2012. “Supplemental Instruction for Improving First-Year Engineering Studies.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (6):655–66. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.535610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D. C., and D. Arendale. 1994. Review of research concerning the effectiveness of SI from the University of Missouri-Kansas City and other institutions from across the United States. Annual conference of the freshman year experience, ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO ED 370 502, SC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED370502.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Meling, V. B., M.-A. Mundy, L. Kupczynski, and M. E. Green. 2013. “Supplemental Instruction and Academic Success and Retention in Science Courses at a Hispanic-Serving Institution.” World Journal of Education 3 (3):11–23. doi: 10.5430/wje.v3n3p11.
   Google Scholar
• Okun, M. A., A. Berlin, J. Hanrahan, J. Lewis, and K. Johnson. 2015. “Reducing the Grade Disparities between American Indians and Euro-American Students in Introduction to Psychology through Small-Group, Peer-Mentored, Supplemental Instruction.” Educational Psychology 35 (2):176–91. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2013.849324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterfreund, A. R., K. A. Rath, S. P. Xenos, and F. Bayliss. 2008. “The Impact of Supplemental Instruction on Students in Stem Courses: Results from San Francisco State University.” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice 9 (4):487–503. doi: 10.2190/CS.9.4.e.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. 2008. The costs of failure factories in American higher education. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/32cc/c23bc90adf9c1a6662bdfdcd09172347c52a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Summers, E. J., T. W. Acee, and G. Ryser. 2015. “Differential Benefits of Attending Supplemental Instruction for Introductory, Large-Section, University U.S. History Courses.” Journal of Peer Learning 11 (6):76–88. doi: 10.1080/10790195.2015.1030516.
   Google Scholar
• van der Meer, J., and S. Scott. 2013. “Including Everyone: A Peer Learning Program That Works for under-Represented Minorities?” The International Journal of First Year in Higher Education 4 (4):84–95. doi: 10.5204/intjfyhe.v4i1.147.
   Google Scholar
• Zaritsky, J. S., and A. Toce. 2006. “Supplemental Instruction at a Community College: The Four Pillars.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2006 (106):23–31. doi: 10.1002/tl.230.
   Google Scholar