Additional Flaws in the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised

References

• American Psychological Association . 1985 . Standards for educational and psychological testing , Washington, DC : Author .
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association . 1992 . Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct . American Psychologist , 47 : 1597 – 1611 .
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association . 1999 . Standards for educational and psychological testing , Washington, DC : Author .
   Google Scholar
• Anastasi , A. 1988 . Psychological testing , New York : Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Barbaree , H. E. , Seto , M. , Langton , C. and Peacock , E. 2001 . Evaluating the accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders . Criminal Justice and Behavior , 28 : 490 – 521 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartosh , D. L. , Garby , T. , Lewis , D. and Gray , S. Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type . International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology , in press
   Google Scholar
• Bruning , J. L. and Kintz , B. 1977 . Computational handbook of statistics , Glenview, IL : Scott, Foresman and Company .
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach , L. J. 1970 . Essentials of psychological testing , New York : Harper & Row .
   Google Scholar
• Doren , D. 2000 . Evidentiary issues, actuarial scales, and sex offender civil commitments . Sex Offender Law Report , 1 ( 5 ) August/September : 65 – 66 . 78 – 79 .
   Google Scholar
• Doren , D. M. and Dow , E. 2003 . What “shrinkage” of the MnSOST-R? A response to Wollert 2002b . Journal of Threat Assessment , 2 ( 4 ) : 49 – 64 .
   Google Scholar
• Epperson , D. 2000 . Description of the MnSOST-R cross-validation sample Available: http://psych-server.iastate.edu/faculty/epperson/crossvalidationupdate
   Google Scholar
• Epperson , D. , Kaul , J. and Hesselton , D. 1999 . Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R): Development, performance, and recommended risk level cut scores Unpublished manuscript
   Google Scholar
• Epperson , D. L. , Kaul , J. and Huot , S. Predicting risk of recidivism for incarcerated sex offenders . Paper presented at the annual ATSA conference . New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Epperson , D. , Kaul , J. , Huot , S. , Hesselton , D. , Alexander , W. and Gilman , M. Cross-validation of the MnSOST-R . Paper presented at the annual ATSA conference . San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Janus , E. S. and Meehl , P. 1997 . Assessing the legal standard for predictions of dangerousness in sex offender commitment proceedings . Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 3 : 33 – 64 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langton , C. M. 2003 . Contrasting risk approaches to risk assessment with adult male sexual offenders , Doctoral dissertation University of Toronto .
   Google Scholar
• McCall , R. B. 1975 . Fundamental statistics for psychology , New York : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich .
   Google Scholar
• Meehl , P. E. and Rosen , A. 1955 . Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, and cutting scores . Psychological Bulletin , 52 : 194 – 216 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagano , R. R. 1986 . Understanding statistics in the behavioral sciences , St. Paul, MN : West Publishing Company .
   Google Scholar
• Simon , F. H. 1971 . Prediction methods in criminology , London : Her Majesty's Stationery Office .
   Google Scholar
• Stott , D. H. 1960 . The prediction of delinquency from non-delinquent behavior . British Journal of Delinquency , 10 : 195 – 210 .
   Google Scholar
• Turner , S. M. , DeMers , S. , Fox , H. and Reed , G. 2001 . APA's guidelines for test user qualifications . American Psychologist , 56 : 1099 – 1113 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters , A. A. 1955–56 . A note on statistical methods of predicting delinquency . British Journal of Delinquency , 6 : 297 – 301 .
   Google Scholar
• Wollert , R. 2000 . The value of archiving actuarial data from commitment cases for analyzing test validity, expert judgment, and average sexual recidivism risk Unpublished manuscript
   Google Scholar
• Wollert , R. W. 2002 . The importance of cross-validation in actuarial test construction: Shrinkage in the risk estimates for the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised . Journal of Threat Assessment , 2 ( 1 ) : 87 – 102 .
   Google Scholar