405
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

The Influence of Active Learning on the Development of Learner Capabilities in the College of Applied Medical Sciences: Mixed-Methods Study

Pages 87-99 | Received 17 Oct 2022, Accepted 31 Dec 2022, Published online: 05 Feb 2023

References

  • Kember D, Leung DYP. The influence of active learning experiences on the development of graduate capabilities. Stud High Educ. 2005;30(2):155–170. doi:10.1080/03075070500043127
  • Gargallo B, Suárez-Rodríguez JM, Almerich G, Verde I. The dimensional validation of the Student Engagement Questionnaire (SEQ) with a Spanish university population. Students’ capabilities and the teaching-learning environment. Ann Psychol. 2018;34(3):519–530. doi:10.6018/analesps.34.3.299041
  • Ertmer PA, Newby TJ. Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructiv-ism: comparing critical features from an instructional design perspec-tive. Intern Improv Q. 2013;6(4):43–71. doi:10.1002/piq.21143
  • Monereo C, Domínguez C. La identidad docente de los profeso-res universitarios competentes. Educ XXI. 2014;17(2):83–104.
  • Torra I, Márquez MD, Pagès T, et al. Retos institucionales de la formación del profesorado universita-rio. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria. 2013;11(1):285–309. doi:10.4995/redu.2013.5601
  • García LA, Díaz CE, Ramírez JM, Castro JJ. Las competencias para el empleo en los titulados universitarios. Tenerife: Universidad de La La-guna. OPSIL (Observatorio Permanente para el Seguimiento de la In-serción Laboral); 2008.
  • Tuning. Una introducción a Tuning Educational Structures in Euro-pe; la contribución de las universidades al proceso de Bolonia; 2009. Available from: http://www.unideusto.org/tuningeu/images/stories/documents/General_Brochure_Sp.anish_version.pdf. Accessed January 19, 2023.
  • Kember D, Leung D. Disciplinary differences in student ratings of teaching quality. Resear High Educ. 2011;52:278–299. doi:10.1007/s11162-010-9194-z
  • Wetzel EM, Farrow CB. Active learning in construction management education: faculty perceptions of engagement and learning. Inter J Construc Educ Resear. 2021. doi:10.1080/15623599.2021.1974684
  • Lizzio A, Wilson K, Simons R. University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Stud High Educ. 2002;27(1):27–52. doi:10.1080/03075070120099359
  • Farrow CB, Wetzel E. An Active Learning classroom in construction management education: student perceptions of engagement and learning. Inter J Construc Educ Resear. 2021;17(4):299–317. doi:10.1080/15578771.2020.1757536
  • Kassab SE, Al-Shafei AI, Salem AH, Otoom S. Relationships between the quality of blended learning experience, self-regulated learning, and academic achievement of medical students: a path analysis. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015;6:27–34. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S75830
  • Armstrong JS. Natural Learning in Higher Education. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Hedelberg: Springer; 2011:1–11.
  • Smith KA, Sheppard SD, Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Pedagogies of engagement: classroom-based practices. J Eng Educ. 2005;94(1):87–101. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x
  • Leech NL, Onwuegbuzie AJ. A typology of mixed methods research designs. Qual Quant. 2009;43(2):265–275. doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
  • Kember D, Leung D. Development of a questionnaire for assessing students’ perceptions of the teaching and learning environment and its use in quality assurance. Learn Environ Resear. 2009;1:15–29. doi:10.1007/s10984-008-9050-7
  • Guba EG. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. ECTJ. 1981;29(2):75–91. doi:10.1007/BF02766777
  • Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Introduction: entering the field of qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage; 1994:1–17.
  • Fitzsimons M. Engaging students’ learning through active learning. International council for small business. World Conference Proceedings. 2014;3(1):1. doi:10.21427/D7842T
  • Killian M, Bastas H. The effects of team-based learning on students’ attitudes and students’ performances in introductory sociology classes. J Scholarsh Teac Learn. 2015;15(3):53–67. doi:10.14434/josotl.v15i3.12960
  • Sasikumar N. Impact of active learning strategies to enhance student performance. Innovare J Educ. 2014;2(1):2–4.
  • Wessel A. Peer Learning Strategies in the Classroom. J Best Teach Practices. 2015;2(1):14.
  • Paul N, Chimezie A, Immaculata C, Uchechukwu OA. Peer learning strategy and students’ academic achievement in economics in Imo State. Asian J Bus Account. 2018;6(2):1–7. doi:10.9734/ajeba/2018/39490
  • Schindler LA, Burkholder GJ, Morad AO, Marsh C. Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2017;14:25. doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
  • Pascarella ET, Edison M, Nora A, Hagedorn LS, Terenzini PT. Influences on students’ openness to diversity and challenge in the first year of college. J High Educ. 2016;174–195. doi:10.1080/00221546.1996.11780255
  • Munna AS, Kalam MA. Impact of Active Learning Strategy on the Student Engagement. Interdiscip J Human Prax. 2021;4(2):2714.