329
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
PERSPECTIVES

Integrated Educational Technology in Teaching Anatomy Using the ASIC Framework: A Case Study from VinUniversity

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 669-681 | Received 18 Jan 2023, Accepted 19 May 2023, Published online: 29 Jun 2023

References

  • Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: a critical review. Ann Anat. 2016;208:151–157. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2016.02.010
  • Singh R, Shane Tubbs R, Gupta K, Singh M, Jones DG, Kumar R. Is the decline of human anatomy hazardous to medical education/profession?--A review. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37(10):1257–1265. doi:10.1007/s00276-015-1507-7
  • Murgitroyd E, Madurska M, Gonzalez J, Watson A. 3D digital anatomy modelling - Practical or pretty? Surgeon. 2015;13(3):177–180. doi:10.1016/j.surge.2014.10.007
  • Wickramasinghe N, Thompson BR, Xiao J. The opportunities and challenges of digital anatomy for medical sciences: narrative review. JMIR Med Educ. 2022;8(2):e34687. doi:10.2196/34687
  • Papa V, Vaccarezza M. Teaching anatomy in the XXI century: new aspects and pitfalls. Sci World J. 2013;2013:310348. doi:10.1155/2013/310348
  • Garg AX, Norman GR, Eva KW, Spero L, Sharan S. Is there any real virtue of virtual reality?: the minor role of multiple orientations in learning anatomy from computers. Acad Med. 2002;77(10 Suppl):S97–9. doi:10.1097/00001888-200210001-00030
  • Fairén González M, Farrés M, Moyes Ardiaca J, Insa E. Virtual Reality to teach anatomy. In: Eurographics 2017: Education Papers. European Association for Computer Graphics; 2017. doi10.2312/eged.20171026
  • Guze PA. Using technology to meet the challenges of medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2015;126:260–270.
  • Mansing R, Taru M, S S. Innovative teaching verses traditional teaching in anatomy. Indian J Bas AppMed Res. 2014;4(1):503–505.
  • Patra A, Asghar A, Chaudhary P, Ravi KS. Integration of innovative educational technologies in anatomy teaching: new normal in anatomy education. Surg Radiol Anat. 2022;44(1):25–32. doi:10.1007/s00276-021-02868-6
  • Ministry of Education and Training. Circular 01/2012/TT-BGDDT “Promulgating the set of higher education framework programs for the health sciences sector, undergraduate level”; 2012. Available from: https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/default.aspx?pageid=27160&docid=157514.
  • VietNamNet Global. Barriers exist for people to donate their bodies to science. VietNamNet Global. Available from: https://vietnamnet.vn/en/barriers-exist-for-people-to-donate-their-bodies-to-science-727058.html. Accessed June 2, 2023.
  • Biggs J, Tang C. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 4th ed. The McGraw-Hill Companies; 2011:95–110.
  • Owolabi J. Proposing a framework guide for the integration of educational technologies and innovations into the teaching of anatomy and medical sciences: the ASIC framework. Advan Med Educat Pract. 2021;12:1277–1282. doi:10.2147/amep.s338262
  • Ministry of Health. Decision 1854/QD-BYT on the approval of the document “Basic Standards of Competency of General Practitioners”; 2015. Available from: https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/EN/The-thao-Y-te/Decision-No-1854-QD-BYT-2015-document-about-competence-standards-for-general-practitioners/286613/tieng-anh.aspx.
  • ACGME. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Available from: https://www.acgme.org/. Accessed January 03, 2023.
  • Mennin S. Self-organisation, integration and curriculum in the complex world of medical education. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):20–30. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03548.x
  • Vaitsis C, Spachos D, Karolyi M, et al. Standardization in medical education: review, collection and selection of standards to address technical and educational aspects in outcome-based medical education. MEFANET J. 2017;2017:28–39.
  • Danish J, Sadat A. Innovations in teaching methods of anatomy. Ann Med Health Sci. 2016;3(2):56–58. doi:10.5958/2322-0422.2016.00013.8
  • Othman N, Amiruddin MH. Different perspectives of learning styles from VARK model. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2010;7:652–660. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.088
  • Meyer AJ, Stomski NJ, Innes SI, Armson AJ. VARK learning preferences and mobile anatomy software application use in pre-clinical chiropractic students. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(3):247–254. doi:10.1002/ase.1555
  • Hendriks IF, Bovill JG, van Luijt PA, Hogendoorn PC. Nikolay Ivanovich Pirogov (1810–1881): a pioneering Russian surgeon and medical scientist. J Med Biogr. 2018;26(1):10–22. doi:10.1177/0967772016633399
  • Ackerman M. The visible human project. Access Visib Human Proj. 1995;1:4.
  • Rodrigues-Fernandes CI, Speight PM, Khurram SA, et al. The use of digital microscopy as a teaching method for human pathology: a systematic review. Virchows Arch. 2020;477(4):475–486. doi:10.1007/s00428-020-02908-3
  • von Hagens G, Tiedemann K, Kriz W. The current potential of plastination. Anat Embryol. 1987;175(4):411–421. doi:10.1007/bf00309677
  • Tiruneh C. Acute adverse effects of formaldehyde treated cadaver on new innovative medical students and anatomy staff members in the dissection Hall at Wollo University, Northeast Ethiopia. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021;12:41–47. doi:10.2147/amep.S291755
  • Dalgarno B, Hedberg J, Harper B The contribution of 3-D environments to conceptual understanding; 2002:149–158.
  • Instructure. Canvas by Instructure. Available from: https://www.instructure.com/k12/products/canvas. Accessed January 03, 2023.
  • 3D4Medical. 3D4Medical from Elsevier. Available from: https://3d4medical.com/. Accessed January 15, 2023.