What Feedback Content Do Clinical Teachers Address During OSTEs?

References

• Liu L, Jiang Z, Qi X, et al. An update on current EPAs in graduate medical education: a scoping review. Med Educ Online. 2021;26(1):1981198. doi:10.1080/10872981.2021.1981198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teherani A, Chen HC. The next steps in competency-based medical education: milestones, entrustable professional activities and observable practice activities. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(8):1090–1092. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-2850-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shorey S, Lau TC, Lau ST, Ang E. Entrustable professional activities in health care education: a scoping review. Med Educ. 2019;53(8):766–777. doi:10.1111/medu.13879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Cate O, Chen HC, Hoff RG, et al. Curriculum development for the workplace using Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs): AMEE guide no. 99. Med Teach. 2015;37(11):983–1002. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1060308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute VJ. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2008;78(1):153–189. doi:10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crommelinck M, Anseel F. Understanding and encouraging feedback-seeking behaviour: a literature review. Med Educ. 2013;47(3):232–241. doi:10.1111/medu.12075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Konings KD, Ginsburg S, van der Vleuten CPM. Meaningful feedback through a sociocultural lens. Med Teach. 2019;41(12):1342–1352. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2019.1656804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell C, Kehoe A, Farook SF, Illing J. Enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace: a rapid evidence review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(9):e052929. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté L, Bordage G. Content and conceptual frameworks of preceptor feedback related to residents’ educational needs. Acad Med. 2012;87(9):1274–1281. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182623073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menachery EP, Wright SM, Howell EE, Knight AM. Physician-teacher characteristics associated with learner-centered teaching skills. Med Teach. 2008;30(5):e137–e144. doi:10.1080/01421590801942094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté L, Gromaire P, Bordage G. Content and rationale of junior and senior preceptors responding to residents’ educational needs revisited. Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(3):299–306. doi:10.1080/10401334.2015.1044659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté L, Rocque R, Audétat M-C. Content and conceptual frameworks of psychology and social work preceptor feedback related to the educational requests of family medicine residents. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(6):1194–1202. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalo JD, Heist BS, Duffy BL, et al. Content and timing of feedback and reflection: a multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14(1):212. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-212
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lafleur A, Cote L, Witteman HO. Analysis of supervisors’ feedback to residents on communicator, collaborator, and professional roles during case discussions. J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(2):246–256. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-20-00842.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Renting N, Dornan T, Gans ROB, et al. What supervisors say in their feedback: construction of CanMEDS roles in workplace settings. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2016;21(2):375–387. doi:10.1007/s10459-015-9634-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renting N, Gans ROB, Borleffs JCC, et al. A feedback system in residency to evaluate CanMEDS roles and provide high-quality feedback: exploring its application. Med Teach. 2016;38(7):738–745. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1075649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert Y, Mann K, Anderson B, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: a 10-year update: BEME guide no. 40. Med Teach. 2016;38(8):769–786. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottolini M, Wohlberg R, Lewis K, Greenberg L. Using observed structured teaching exercises (OSTE) to enhance hospitalist teaching during family centered rounds. J Hosp Med. 2011;6(7):423–427. doi:10.1002/jhm.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert Y. Faculty development: from rubies to oak. Med Teach. 2020;42(4):429–435. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2019.1688769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone S, Mazor K, Devaney-O’Neil S, et al. Development and implementation of an objective structured teaching exercise (OSTE) to evaluate improvement in feedback skills following a faculty development workshop. Teach Learn Med. 2003;15(1):7–13. doi:10.1207/S15328015TLM1501_03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajwa NM, De Grasset J, Audétat M-C, et al. Training junior faculty to become clinical teachers: the value of personalized coaching. Med Teach. 2020;42(6):663–672. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2020.1732316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junod Perron N, Louis-Simonet M, Cerutti B, et al. The quality of feedback during formative OSCEs depends on the tutors’ profile. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):1–8. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0815-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodges B, McIlroy JH. Analytic global OSCE ratings are sensitive to level of training. Med Educ. 2003;37(11):1012–1016. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01674.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP. SPIKES—a Six-Step Protocol for Delivering Bad News: Application to the Patient with Cancer. Oxford University Press; 2000:302–311.
   Google Scholar
• Barton JR, Corbett S, van der Vleuten CP, et al. The validity and reliability of a direct observation of procedural skills assessment tool: assessing colonoscopic skills of senior endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(3):591–597. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddons N, Potter TM. Improving interdisciplinary relationships in primary care with the implementation of TeamSTEPPS. Interdiscip J Partnersh Stud. 2016;3(1). doi:10.24926/ijps.v3i1.122
   Google Scholar
• Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep. 1966;19(1):3–11. doi:10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Duin TS, de Carvalho Filho MA, Pype PF, et al. Junior doctors’ experiences with interprofessional collaboration: wandering the landscape. Med Educ. 2022;56(4):418–431. doi:10.1111/medu.14711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan JR, Conforti LN, Bernabeo EC, et al. Faculty staff perceptions of feedback to residents after direct observation of clinical skills. Med Educ. 2012;46(2):201–215. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04137.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilminster SM, Jolly BC. Effective supervision in clinical practice settings: a literature review. Med Educ. 2000;34(10):827–840. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00758.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junod Perron N, Nendaz M, Louis-Simonet M, et al. Impact of postgraduate training on communication skills teaching: a controlled study. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14(1):80. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salmon P, Young B. Creativity in clinical communication: from communication skills to skilled communication. Med Educ. 2011;45(3):217–226. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03801.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmboe ES, Ward DS, Reznick RK, et al. Faculty development in assessment: the missing link in competency-based medical education. Acad Med. 2011;86(4):460–467. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820cb2a7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irby DM. Excellence in clinical teaching: knowledge transformation and development required. Med Educ. 2014;48(8):776–784. doi:10.1111/medu.12507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irby DM, Wilkerson L. Teaching rounds - teaching when time is limited. Br Med J. 2008;336(7640):384–387. doi:10.1136/bmj.39456.727199.AD
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pierce C, Corral J, Aagaard E, et al. A BEME realist synthesis review of the effectiveness of teaching strategies used in the clinical setting on the development of clinical skills among health professionals: BEME guide no. 61. Med Teach. 2020;42(6):604–615. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2019.1708294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingerich A, Kogan J, Yeates P, et al. Seeing the ‘black box’ differently: assessor cognition from three research perspectives. Med Educ. 2014;48(11):1055–1068. doi:10.1111/medu.12546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingerich A, Ramlo SE, van der Vleuten CP, Eva KW, Regehr G. Inter-rater variability as mutual disagreement: identifying raters’ divergent points of view. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2017;22(4):819–838. doi:10.1007/s10459-016-9711-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weallans J, Roberts C, Hamilton S, Parker S. Guidance for providing effective feedback in clinical supervision in postgraduate medical education: a systematic review. Postgrad Med J. 2022;98(1156):138–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiese A, Kilty C, Bennett D. Supervised workplace learning in postgraduate training: a realist synthesis. Med Educ. 2018;52(9):951–969. doi:10.1111/medu.13655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar