Teaching Philosophy in a Teaching Portfolio: Domain Knowledge and Guidance

References

• Schönwetter DJ, Sokal L, Friesen M, et al. Teaching philosophies reconsidered:A conceptual model for the development and evaluation of teaching philosophy statements. International Journal for Academic Development. 2002;7(1):83–97. doi:10.1080/13601440210156501
   Google Scholar
• Little-Wienert K, Mazziotti M. Twelve tips for creating an academic teaching portfolio. Med Teach. 2018;40(1):26–30. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2017.1364356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babin LA, Shaffer TR, Tomas AM. Teaching Portfolios: uses and Development. J Mark Educ. 2002;24(1):35–42. doi:10.1177/0273475302241005
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly R. Supporting teacher education through a combined model of philosophical, collaborative and experiential learning. J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2009;9(1):35–63.
   Google Scholar
• Browne M. Developing a Teaching Philosophy. J Eff Teach High Ed. 2017;17(3):59–63.
   Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe LJ, Woodard BS. The Teaching Philosophy Framework: learning, Leading, and Growing; 2011. Available from: https://commons.emich.edu/loexconf2009/2/. Accessed June 21, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Saritas E. Relationship between philosophical preferences of classroom teachers and their teaching styles. Educ Res Rev. 2016;11(16):1533–1541. doi:10.5897/ERR2016.2787
   Google Scholar
• Tan C, et al. Philosophical perspectives on education. In: Tan C, Wong B, Chua JSM, editors. Critical Perspectives on Education: An Introduction. Prentice Hall: Singapore; 2006:21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kirch SA, Sadofsky MJ. Medical Education From a Theory-Practice-Philosophy Perspective. Acad Pathol. 2021;8:23742895211010236. doi:10.1177/23742895211010236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeom Y, Miller MA, Delp R. Constructing a teaching philosophy: aligning beliefs, theories, and practice. Teach Learn Nurs. 2018;13(3):131–134. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2018.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Stellenbosch South Africa. What is a teaching philosophy statement? 2013. Available from: https://www0.sun.ac.za/ctlresources/teaching-portfolios/. Accessed February 24, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear GE, Allchin D. Statements of Teaching Philosophy. In: Kaplan M, editor. To Improve the Academy. Stillwater, OK: New Fonnns Press and the Professional and Organizational Deveopment Network in Higher Education; 1998:103–122.
   Google Scholar
• Grundman HG. Writing a Teaching Philosophy Statement Helen; 2006. Available from: https://www.ams.org/notices/200611/comm-grundman.pdf. Accessed May 17, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Laundon M, Cathcart A, Greer DA. Teaching Philosophy Statements. J Manag Educ. 2020;44(5):577–587. doi:10.1177/1052562920942289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayani AH. My Philosophy of Teaching and Learning. Open Access Libr J. 2015;2:e2109. doi:10.4236/oalib.1102109
   Google Scholar
• Thien SJ. A Teaching–Learning Trinity: foundation to My Teaching Philosophy. J Nat Resour Life Sci Educ. 2003;32(1):87–92. doi:10.2134/jnrlse.2003.0087
   Google Scholar
• van der Berg C. Teaching Innovation to Strengthen Knowledge Creation in a Digital World. Electron J Knowl Manag. 2019;17:144–157. doi:10.34190/EJKM.17.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Bansal A, Jain S, Sharma L, et al. Students’ perception regarding pedagogy, andragogy, and heutagogy as teaching-learning methods in undergraduate medical education. J Educ Health Promot. 2020;9(301). doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_221_20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(2):91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paré G, Kitsiou S. Chapter 9 Methods for Literature Reviews. In: Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-Based Approach. Victoria (BC); 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Green BN, Johnson CD, Adams A. Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. J Chiropr Med. 2006;5(3):101–117. doi:10.1016/s0899-3467(07)60142-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, et al. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int. 2011;31(11):1409–1417. doi:10.1007/s00296-011-1999-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramer WM, de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, et al. A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018;106(4):531–541. doi:10.5195/jmla.2018.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus S, Breier M, Lim WM, et al. Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice. Rev Manag Sci. 2022;16:2577–2595. doi:10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8
   Google Scholar
• CQUniversity Australia (Central Queensland University). Database Searching; 2023. Available from: https://libguides.library.cqu.edu.au/c.php?g=760913&p=5456502. Accessed September 9, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen SR, Wilson IK. Humanistic Theory of Learning: maslow. In: Seel NM, editor. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2012:1471–1474.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles M, Holton EF, Swanson RA. The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. Elsevier: USA; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor DCM, Hamdy H. Adult learning theories: implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83. Med Teach. 2013;35(11):e1561–e1572. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.828153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyndt E, Gijbels D, Grosemans I, et al. Teachers’ Everyday Professional Development: mapping Informal Learning Activities, Antecedents, and Learning Outcomes. Rev Educ Res. 2016;86(4):1111–1150. doi:10.3102/0034654315627864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H-Y, Liu T-C, Chou C-Y, et al. A framework of three learning activity levels for enhancing the usability and feasibility of wireless learning environments. J Educational Computing Res. 2004;30(4):331–351.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong KJ, Weidner TG. Formal and Informal Continuing Education Activities and Athletic Training Professional Practice. J Athl Train. 2010;45(3):279–286. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-45.3.279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreasen EM, Slettebø A, Opsal A. Learning activities in bachelor nursing education to learn pre- and postoperative nursing care—A scoping review. Int J Educ Res. 2022;115:102033. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boise State University. Types of Learning Activities: advantages and Disadvantages; 2013. Available from: https://sites.google.com/a/boisestate.edu/si2013/schedule/introduction-to-day-2/types-of-learning-activities-advantages-and-disadvantages. Accessed December 14, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Goh P-S. Medical educator roles of the future. Med Sc Educ. 2020;30(Suppl 1):5–7. doi:10.1007/s40670-020-01086-w
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudson K. Introducing CAL: A Practical Guide to Writing Computer-Assisted Learning Programs. Chapman and Hall London; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Verde A, Valero JM. Teaching and Learning Modalities in Higher Education During the Pandemic: responses to Coronavirus Disease 2019 From Spain. Front Psychol. 2021;12:648592. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongmuanwai B, Simmatun P, Teemueangsa S, et al. Factors and Needs Assessment of Hyflex Learning with Science Activity Base For Strengthen Critical Thinking. J Phys. 2021;1835:012095. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012095
   Google Scholar
• Abuzaid MM, Elshami W, Issa B, et al. Effectiveness of HyFlex Simulation-Based Clinical Learning in Comparison to Traditional Learning in Undergraduate Clinical Education. Al Naimiy HMK, Bettayeb M, Elmehdi HM, et al. editors. Future Trends in Education Post COVID-19: Teaching, Learning and Skills Driven Curriculum. Spinger: Singaporre; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer S, Nistor N, Sceibenzuber C. Online teaching and learning in higher education: lessons learned in crisis situations. Comput Human Behav. 2021;121:106789. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Car LT, Kyaw BM, Dunleavy G, et al. Digital Problem-Based Learning in Health Professions: systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(2):e12945. doi:10.2196/12945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenk J, Chen LC, Chandran L, et al. Challenges and opportunities for educating health professionals after the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2022;10362:1539–1556. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02092-X
   Google Scholar
• Gardner G, Feldman M, Santen SA, et al. Determinants and Outcomes of In-person Lecture Attendance in Medical School. Med Sci Educ. 2022;32(4):1–8. doi:10.1007/s40670-022-01581-2
   Google Scholar
• Mundelsee L, Jurkowski S. Think and pair before share: effects of collaboration on students’ in-class participation. Learn Individ Differ. 2021;88:102015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romli MH, Yunus FW, Cheema MS, et al. A Meta-synthesis on Technology-Based Learning Among Healthcare Students in Southeast Asia. Med Sci Educ. 2022;32:657–677. doi:10.1007/s40670-022-01564-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gross CD. Strengthen Your Teaching Skills to Enhance Student Learning. CSA News. 2019;64(2):26–28. doi:10.2134/csa2019.64.0222
   Google Scholar
• Mourad A, Jurjus A, Hussein IH. The What or the How: a Review of Teaching Tools and Methods in Medical Education. Med Sci Educ. 2016;26:723–728. doi:10.1007/s40670-016-0323-y
   Google Scholar
• National Tertiary Education Union Australia. Preparing and Presenting a Teaching Portfolio: philosophy, Practice and Performance; 2005. Available from: https://issuu.com/nteu/docs/teaching_portfolio. Accessed May 17, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford JD, Pellegrino JW, Berliner D, et al. How People Learn: brain, Mind, Experience, and School. In: Shonkoff JP, Phillips DA, editors. Early Childhood Development and Learning: New Knowledge for Policy. Washington, D C: National Academy of Sciences; 2001:57–86.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly J. Learning Theories; 2012. Available from: https://thepeakperformancecenter.com/educational-learning/learning/theories/. Accessed February 24, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Kay D, Kibble J. Learning theories 101: application to everyday teaching and scholarship. Adv Physiol Educ. 2016;40:17–25. doi:10.1152/advan.00132.2015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales A. Cognitivism; 2012. Available from: https://study.com/learn/lesson/cognitivism-education-learning-theory.html. Accessed February 23, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Williams WA. Instrumental Learning. In: Vonk J, Shackelford T, editors. Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Cham: Springer; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Park SW. Motivation Theories and Instructional Design; 2018. Available from: https://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations. Accessed July 30, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Urhahne D, Wijnia L. Theories of Motivation in Education: an Integrative Framework. Educ Psychol Rev. 2023;35:45. doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alanoglu M, Aslan S, Karabatak S. Do teachers’ educational philosophies affect their digital literacy? The mediating effect of resistance to change. Educ Inf Technol. 2022;27(3):3447–3466. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10753-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fries CH. Teaching Style Preferences and Educational Philosophy of Teacher Education Faculty at a State University. Doctor of Education Thesis. Oklahoma, USA: Oklahoma State University; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Siraj KK, Hamdan BK, Pandurengan V, et al. A Study on Dominant Education Philosophy in Classrooms: the Case of Colleges of Technology (CoT) in the Sultanate of Oman. Univ J Educ Res. 2020;8(12A):8771. doi:10.13189/ujer.2020.082577
   Google Scholar
• Sadideen H, Kneebone R. Practical skills teaching in contemporary surgical education: how can educational theory be applied to promote effective learning? Am J Surg. 2012;204(396–401):396. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.12.020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Juste MP, López BR. Learning Strategies in Higher Education. Int J Learning Ann Rev. 2010;17(1):259–274. doi:10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v17i01/46813
   Google Scholar
• Kreber C. Developing the Scholarship of Teaching Through Transformative Learning. J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2006;6(1):88–109.
   Google Scholar
• Coakley LA, Sousa KJ. The effect of contemporary learning approaches on student perceptions in an introductory business course. J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2013;13(3):1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Leinster S. AMEE Guide no. 34: teaching in the clinical environment. Med Teach. 2008;30(4):347–364. doi:10.1080/01421590802061613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer J. Learning and teaching in the clinical environment. BMJ. 2003;326(591). doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7389.591
   Google Scholar
• Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, et al. Key tips for teaching in the clinical setting. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(Suppl 2):463. doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02283-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedlander MJ, Andrews L, Armstrong EG, et al. What can medical education learn from the neurobiology of learning? Acad Med. 2011;86(4):415–420. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820dc197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Academy of Medical Educators. Professional Standards for medical, dental and veterinary educators. 2021. Available from: https://www.medicaleducators.org/write/MediaManager/Documents/AoME_Professional_Standards_4th_edition_1.0_(web_full_single_page_spreads).pdf. Accessed March 3, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Gaddy VT, Medlock AE. Just-in-Time Teaching (JiTT): an Active Learning Pedagogy to Study Concepts in Cell Biology. Med Sci Educ. 2013;23(4S):664–665. doi:10.1007/BF03341698
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino JW. Assessment as a positive influence on 21st century teaching and learning: a systems approach to progress. Psicol Educ. 2014;20(2):65–77. doi:10.1016/j.pse.2014.11.002
   Google Scholar
• University of Rochester Medical centre. Tips for Planning and Writing Your Educator Portfolio 1; 2017. Available from: https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/MediaLibraries/URMCMedia/smd/academic-affairs/documents/educator-portfolio-instructions.pdf. Accessed May 17, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher MR. Student Assessment in Teaching and Learning; 2023. Available from: https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/student-assessment-in-teaching-and-learning/. Accessed February 23, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• North Island College’s Centre for Teaching and Learning Innovation. Ungrading; 2022. Available from: https://teachanywhere.opened.ca/practices/ungrading/. Accessed August 31, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Bellaera L, Weinstein-Jones Y, Ilie S, et al. Critical thinking in practice: the priorities and practices of instructors teaching in higher education. Thinking Skills Creat. 2021;41(4):100856. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100856
   Google Scholar
• Columbia University in the city of New York. Ungrading: reimagining Assessment of Student Learning; 2023. Available from: https://ctl.columbia.edu/faculty/sapp/ungrading/. Accessed September 1, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• von Renesse C, Wenger SA. Two Examples of Ungrading in Higher Education in the United States and Germany. PRIMUS. 2023;33(9):1035–1054. doi:10.1080/10511970.2023.2229819
   Google Scholar
• Guberman D. Student Perceptions of an Online Ungraded Course. TLI. 2021;9(1):86–97. doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.8
   Google Scholar
• Kohn A. Foreward. In: Blum SD, editor. In: Ungrading Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do Instead). USA: West Virginia University Press; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• McArthur J. Rethinking authentic assessment: work, well‑being, and society. High Educ. 2023;85(1):85–101. doi:10.1007/s10734-022-00822-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nel D, Burch V, Adam S, et al. The introduction of competency-based medical education for postgraduate training in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2022;112(9):742–743. doi:10.7196/SAMJ.2022.v112i9.16717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry L, Docherty M. Implementing competency-based education. Collected Essays Learning Teaching. 2017;10:61–74. doi:10.22329/celt.v10i0.4716
   Google Scholar
• Prakash J, Chatterjee K, Srivastava K, et al. Workplace based assessment: a review of available tools and their relevance. Ind Psychiatry J. 2020;29(2):200–204. doi:10.4103/ipj.ipj_225_20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norcini JJ. ABC Of Learning And Teaching In Medicine: work Based Assessment. BMJ. 2003;326(7392):753–755.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino J. CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework.; 2015. Available from: https://canmeds.royalcollege.ca/uploads/en/framework/CanMEDS%202015%20Framework_EN_Reduced.pdf. Accessed February 23, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Valding B, Monti M, Perron NJ, et al. Entrustable professional activities for residency in general internal medicine: a systematic review. Swiss Med Wkly. 2022;152:40002. doi:10.57187/smw.2022.40002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cate OT, Taylor DR. The recommended description of an entrustable professional activity. Med Teach. 2021;43(10). doi:10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripartite Alliance (RACP; RACS; RCPSC). Work-based assessment: a practical guide. Building an assessment system around work; 2014. Available from: https://www.surgeons.org/-/media/Project/RACS/surgeons-org/files/becoming-A-surgeon-trainees/work-based-assessment-A-practical-guide.pdf?rev=64c62242e777411eb43be8ac781dfa4a&hash=DCEE633AC11B7EE63975DF1A6948C99A. Accessed August 30, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee D, Corral J. How to write well-defined learning objectives. J Educ Perioper Med. 2017;19(4):E610.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tabish SA. Assessment Methods in Medical Education. Int J Health Sci. 2008;2(2):3–7.
   Google Scholar
• TeachThought Staff. 22 Simple assessment strategies you can use every day; 2023. Available from: https://www.teachthought.com/pedagogy/simple-assessment-strategies/. Assessed August 31, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Stellenbosch U. Assessment in Higher Education; 2023. Available from: https://www0.sun.ac.za/ctlresources/assessment/. Accessed September 11, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Shahzad A, Saeed MHB, Paiker S. Dental students’ concerns regarding OSPE and OSCE: a qualitative feedback for process improvement. BDJ Open. 2017;3(17009). doi:10.1038/bdjopen.2017.9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Omonigho AJ Continuous assessment: scope and relevance. Available from: https://chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.globalacademicgroup.com/journals/teacher%20perspective/CONTINUOUS%20ASSESSMENT%20SCOPE%20AND%20RELEVANCE.pdf. Assessed August 23, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Obi JSC, Obineli SU. Continuous Assessment in Counselling. Enugu, Nigeria: Hugotez Publications; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• University of South Africa. Assessment policy; 2005. Available from: https://www.unisa.ac.za/static/myunisa/Content/Student%20affairs%20&%20SRC/Documents/SRC%20Important%20Policy%20Documents/Assessment%20Policy%20-%20rev%20appr%20Council%20-%2019.06.2019.pdf. Accessed September 11, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• den Boer AW, Verkoeijen PP, Heijltjes AE. Comparing Formative and Summative Cumulative Assessment: two Field Experiments in an Applied University Engineering Course. Psychol Learn Teach. 2021;20:128–143. doi:10.1177/1475725720971946
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton NW, Bilionis LD. Ten principles to Inform curriculum development. In: Hamilton NW, Bilionis LD, editors. Law Students Professional Development and Formation: Bridging Law School, Student, and Employer Goals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Future Classroom Lab. Tool 5.2 – rubrics for 21st Century Learning Activity Design; 2018. Available from: https://fcl.eun.org/tool5p2. Accessed February 24, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Innovative Teaching and Learning Research. 21CLD learning activity rubrics; s2012. Available from: https://fcl.eun.org/documents/10180/14691/5.3x++21cld+learning+activity+rubrics+2012.pdf/e240da11-07c2-4633-a86e-06c12f00d8ad?version=1.0. Accessed March 3, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Smith MA, Nigro S. Applying design-thinking principles to practice-based pharmacy research. Ann Pharmacother. 2023. doi:10.1177/10600280221147014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durski KN, Singaravelu S, Naidoo D, et al. Design thinking during a health emergency: building a national data collection and reporting system. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1896. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-10006-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interaction Design Foundation. Design Thinking; 2023. Available from: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/design-thinking. Accessed February 25, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Parse RR. Interdisciplinary and interprofessional: what are the differences? Nurs Sci Q. 2015;28(1):5–6. doi:10.1177/0894318414558624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo Parse R. Interdisciplinary and interprofessional: what are the differences? Nurs Sci Q. 2015;28(1):5–6. doi:10.1177/0894318414558624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen SS. Interprofessional and interdisciplinary collaboration: moving forward. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2013;14(3–4):115–116. doi:10.1177/1527154414533616
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olenick M, Allen LR, Smego RA. Interprofessional education: a concept analysis. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2010;1:75–84. doi:10.2147/amep.S13207
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kereluik K, Mishra P, Fahnoe C, et al. What Knowledge Is of Most Worth: teacher Knowledge for 21st Century Learning. J Digit Learn Teach Educ. 2013;29(4):127–140. doi:10.1080/21532974.2013.10784716
   Google Scholar
• Archambault L, Wetzel K, Foulger TS, et al. Professional Development 2.0: transforming Teacher Education Pedagogy with 21st Century Tools. J Digit Learn Teach Educ. 2014;27(1):4–11. doi:10.1080/21532974.2010.10784651
   Google Scholar
• Bansal S, Mahendiratta S, Kumar S, et al. Collaborative research in modern era: need and challenges. Indian J Pharmacol. 2019;51(3):137–139. doi:10.4103/ijp.IJP_394_19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajer D Ecological Education: what if Schools Were Ecosystems? 2023. Available from: https://www.dustinbajer.com/ecological-education/. Accessed February 25, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Shariffuddin SA, Razli JR. Transformation of higher education institutions in Malaysia: a review. J Global Business Social Entrepreneurship. 2017;1(2):126–136.
   Google Scholar
• Akhtar VL, Kotter JP Charting the Course – the Path to Transformation in Education; s2019. Available from: https://www.kotterinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Transformation-in-Education-web-version.pdf. Accessed February 24, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Seepe S. Higher education transformation in South Africa. In: Cross M, Ndofirepi A, editors. Knowledge and Change in African Universities: Volume 1 - Current Debates. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• C21 Canada. Shifting Minds 3.0. Redefining the Learning Landscape in Canada; 2015. Available from: https://www.c21canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/C21-ShiftingMinds-3.pdf. Accessed February 26, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• C21 Canada. Shifting minds 4.0: 7Cs Competencies for learning and leading; 2017. Available from: https://c21canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/CMEC-C21-Canada-7Cs-Shifting-Minds-and-Systems-Drivers-Inventory.pdf. Accessed February 26, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon T, Thakore H. Achieving constructive alignment: putting outcomes first. Quality Higher Educ. 2006;3:10–19.
   Google Scholar
• University of Toronto Centre for Teaching Support & Innovation. Developing Learning Outcomes: a Guide for University of Toronto Faculty; 2008. Available from: https://teaching.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Developing-Learning-Outcomes-Guide-Aug-2014.pdf. Accessed March 2, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Iowa State University. Revised Bloom’s taxonomy; 2022. Available from: https://www.celt.iastate.edu/instructional-strategies/effective-teaching-practices/revised-blooms-taxonomy/. Accessed April 17, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Hoque ME. Three Domains of Learning: cognitive, Affective and Psychomotor. J EFL Edu Res. 2017;2(2):56.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang A, Feng X. The concept analysis of smart teaching. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;112:105329. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner R. Mentoring in Higher Education. Direction Spring. 2001;30(1):45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Dallaghan GLB, Coe CL, Wright ST, et al. Mentoring Medical Education Research: guidelines from a Narrative Review. Med Sci Educ. 2022;32(3):723–731. doi:10.1007/s40670-022-01565-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamer DH, Hansoti B, Prabhakaran D, et al. Global Health Research Mentoring Competencies for Individuals and Institutions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019;100(1 Suppl):15–19. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.18-0558
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carmel RG, Paul MW. Mentoring and coaching in academia: reflections on a mentoring/coaching relationship. Policy Futures Educ. 2015;13(4):479–491. doi:10.1177/1478210315578562
   Google Scholar
• Hansoti B, Kalbarczyk A, Hosseinipour MC, et al. Global Health Mentoring Toolkits: a Scoping Review Relevant for Low- and Middle-Income Country Institutions. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019;100(1 Suppl):48–53. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.18-0563
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orsini JM, Benge MP, Carter HS. Developing a Mentorship Program in Higher Education Institutions. UF/IFAS Ext Univ Florida. 2019;2019(2):wc328. doi:10.32473/edis-wc328-2019
   Google Scholar
• Kehoe A, Crampton P, Buchanan J, et al. Tips to Support the Recruitment, Retention, and Progression of Clinical Academics. Med Sci Educ. 2022;32(2):503–509. doi:10.1007/s40670-022-01512-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Netshitangani T, Machaisa PR. Supervision experiences of postgraduate students at an ODL institution in South Africa. Cogent Social Sci. 2001;7:1970442. doi:10.1080/23311886.2021.1970442
   Google Scholar
• James R, Baldwin G. Eleven Practices of Effective Postgraduate Supervisors. Australia: Centre for the Study of Higher Education and the school of Graduate Studies, University of Melbourne; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Beck Dallaghan GL, Coe CL, Wright ST, et al. Mentoring Medical Education Research: guidelines from a Narrative Review. Med Sci Educ. 2022;32(3):723–731. doi:10.1007/s40670-022-01565-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• University of Phoenix. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning; 2022. Available from: https://research.phoenix.edu/content/scholarship-teaching-and-learning. Accessed March 7, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Register SJ, King KM. Promotion and Tenure: application of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, and Scholarship of Engagement Criteria to Health Professions Educ. Health Professions Educ. 2018;4:39–47. doi:10.1016/j.hpe.2017.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Boyer EL. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priority of the Professoriate. New York: Jossey-Bass, John Wiley & Sons; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Streveler R, Moskal B, Miller R. Using Boyer’s Four Forms of Scholarship to Advance Engineering Education. J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2012;3(2):41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Fincher RM, Simpson DE, Mennin SP, et al. Scholarship in teaching: an imperative for the 21st century. Acad Med. 2000;75(9):887–894. doi:10.1097/00001888-200009000-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassick CE. Boyer’s expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards for assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Acad Med. 2000;75(9):877–880. doi:10.1097/00001888-200009000-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcketti SB, Freeman S. SoTL Evidence on Promotion and Tenure Vitas at a Research University. J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2016;16(5):19–31. doi:10.14434/josotl.v16i5.21152
   Google Scholar
• Milner RJ, Flotte TR, Thorndyke LE. Defining Scholarship for Today and Tomorrow. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2023;43(2):133–138. doi:10.1097/ceh.0000000000000473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canning J, Masika R. The scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL): the thorn in the flesh of educational research. Studies Higher Educ. 2020;47(6):1084–1096. doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1836485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secret M, Leisey M, Lanning S, et al. Faculty perceptions of the scholarship of teaching and learning: definition, activity level and merit considerations at one university. J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2011;11(3):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Chen CY. A Study Showing Research has been Valued over Teaching in Higher Education. J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2015;15(3):15–32.
   Google Scholar
• South African Department of Higher Education and Training. University Research Support and Policy Development; 2022. Available from: https://www.dhet.gov.za/SitePages/University%20Research%20Support%20and%20Policy%20Development.aspx. Accessed February 26, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Tscharntke T, Hochberg ME, Rand TA, et al. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biol. 2007;5(1):e18. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundling P. Author contributions and allocation of authorship credit: testing the validity of different counting methods in the field of chemical biology. Scientometrics. 2023;128:2737–2762. doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04680-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• National Information Standards Organization. Contributor Roles Taxonomy; 2023. Available from: https://credit.niso.org/. Accessed August 26, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Alpi KM, Akers KG. CRediT for authors of articles published in the Journal of the Medical Library Association. J Med Libr Assoc. 2021;109(3):362–364. doi:10.5195/jmla.2021.1294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. Authorship: giving credit where it’s due; 2023. Available from: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/resources/publishing-tips/giving-credit. Accessed August 26, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Harvard Medical School. 7.2.1. Promotion to Professor; 2023. Available from: https://facultyhandbook.hms.harvard.edu/7prof-titles/prof/promo-2/. Accessed August 26, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• University of Cape Town. Academic staff promotion; 2023. Available from: https://hr.uct.ac.za/performance-promotion-promotion/academic-staff-promotion. Acessed August 26, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Mbuagbaw L, Anderson LN, Lokker C, et al. Advice for Junior Faculty Regarding Academic Promotion: what Not to Worry About, and What to Worry About. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020;13:117–122. doi:10.2147/jmdh.S240056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of San Diego. What Is a Teaching Philosophy? Examples and Prompts; 2023. Available from: https://pce.sandiego.edu/teaching-philosophy-examples/. Accessed March 3, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Ruge G, Schӧnwetter DJ, McCormack C, et al. Teaching philosophies revalued: beyond personal development to academic and institutional capacity building. Int J Acad Dev. 2021. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2021.1963735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payant C. Teaching philosophy statements: in-service ESL teachers’ practices and beliefs. TESOL J. 2017;8(3):636–656. doi:10.1002/tesj.290
   Google Scholar
• Hayden S Developing a Teaching Philosophy Statement. UNLV Best Teaching Practices Expo 2018. University of Nevada, Las Vegas; 2018. Available from: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=btp_expo. Accessed February 23, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan M, Meizlish DS, O’Neal C, et al. 16: a Research-Based Rubric for Developing Statements of Teaching Philosophy. Improve Acad. 2008;26(1):242–656. doi:10.1002/j.2334-4822.2008.tb00512.x
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Patient engagement; 2016. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/252269/9789241511629-eng.pdf;sequence=1. Accessed February 19, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• University of Free State. Teaching portfolio template; 2022. Available from: https://www.ufs.ac.za/ctl/home-page/divisions/academic-staff-and-leadership-development/teaching-portfolios. Accessed March 7, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Abuzaid MM, Elshami E, David L, et al. Perceptions of E-portfolio Use in Lifelong Learning and Professional Development Among Radiology Professionals. Curr Med Imaging. 2017;13(4):495–501. doi:10.2174/1573405613666170105153425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Calgary. Sample Philosophy Statements and Dossiers; 2023. Available from: https://taylorinstitute.ucalgary.ca/resources/sample-teaching-philosophy-statements. Accessed June 14, 2023.
   Google Scholar