Stress Analysis on Mesiolingual Cavity of Endodontically Treated Molar Restored Using Bidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Composite (Wallpapering Technique)

References

• Berman LH, Hargreaves KM. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp. 12th ed. Canada: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Baruah S, Nair C, Kanaujia S, Joshi R. Review article the advent of the compression dome concept. World J Pediatr Congenital Heart Surg. 2020;11(2):NP226–NP228. doi:10.1177/2150135118825158
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marvaniya J, Agarwal K, Mehta DN, Parmar N, Shyamal R, Patel J. Minimal invasive endodontics: a comprehensive narrative review. Cureus. 2022;14(6). doi:10.7759/cureus.25984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadaf D. Survival rates of endodontically treated teeth after placement of definitive coronal restoration: 8-year retrospective study. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020;16:125–131. doi:10.2147/TCRM.S223233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chotvorrarak K, Suksaphar W, Banomyong D. Retrospective study of fracture survival in endodontically treated molars: the effect of single-unit crowns versus direct-resin composite restorations. Restor Dent Endod. 2021;46(2):1–11. doi:10.5395/rde.2021.46.e29
   Google Scholar
• Tanner J, Tolvanen M, Garoushi S, Säilynoja E. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite restorations in posterior teeth - results of 2.5 year follow-up. Open Dent J. 2018;12(1):476–485. doi:10.2174/1874210601812010476
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deliperi S, Alleman D, Rudo D. Stress-reduced direct composites for the restoration of structurally compromised teeth: fiber design according to the “wallpapering” technique. Oper Dent. 2017;42(3):233–243. doi:10.2341/15-289-T
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaintantzopoulou MD, Farmakis ET, Eliades GC. Effect of load cycling on the fracture strength/mode of teeth restored with FRC posts or a FRC liner and a resin composite. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1–10. doi:10.1155/2018/9054301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukarcanin J, Sadikoǧlu İS, Yaşa B, Türkün LŞ, Türkün M. Comparison of different restoration techniques for endodontically treated teeth. Int J Biomater. 2022;2022. doi:10.1155/2022/6643825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser HJ, Brandt PD. Fracture behaviour patterns of cusp-replacing fibre strengthened composite restorations. S Afr Dent J. 2015;70(9):390–395.
   Google Scholar
• Shah EH, Shetty P, Aggarwal S, Sawant S, Shinde R, Bhol R. Effect of fibre-reinforced composite as a post-obturation restorative material on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review. Saudi Dent J. 2021;33(7):363–369. doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Sun J, Jiang L, et al. Influence of margin design and restorative material on the stress distribution of endocrowns: a 3D finite element analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/s12903-022-02063-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magne P. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data. Dent Mater. 2007;23(5):539–548. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcelos LM, Bicalho AA, Veríssimo C, Rodrigues MP, Soares CJ. Stress distribution, tooth remaining strain, and fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored without or with one or two fiberglass posts and direct composite resin. Oper Dent. 2017;42(6):646–657. doi:10.2341/16-224-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheron RA, Marshall SJ, Goodis HE, Peters OA. Nanomechanical properties of endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 2011;37(11):1562–1565. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkholy MMA, Nawar NN, Ha WN, Saber SM, Kim HC. Impact of canal taper and access cavity design on the life span of an endodontically treated mandibular molar: a finite element analysis. J Endod. 2021;47(9):1472–1480. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2021.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navimipour EJ, Firouzmandi M, Mirhashemi FS. Finite element analysis of the endodontically-treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin along with glass fiber insertion in various positions. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16(4):284–290. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1677
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asopa S, Mandava J, Chalasani U, Anwarullah A, Ravi R. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with resin composites. Indian J Conserv Endod. 2017;2(3):89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Halaçoglu DM, Yamanel K. The effects of different base materials on the stress distribution of the endodontically treated teeth: 3D FEA. Cumhur Dent J. 2019;22(1):56–65. doi:10.7126/cumudj.453467
   Google Scholar
• Prabhakar A, Shrikant L, Nadig B. Stress analysis in maxillary incisor following fragment reattachment: a finite element analysis. J Dent Allied Sci. 2016;5(1):7. doi:10.4103/2277-4696.185188
   Google Scholar
• Rizzante FAP, Mondelli RFL, Furuse AY, Borges AFS, Mendonça G, Ishikiriama SK. Shrinkage stress and elastic modulus assessment of bulk-fill composites. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;27:1–9. doi:10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadr A, Bakhtiari B, Hayashi J, et al. Effects of fiber reinforcement on adaptation and bond strength of a bulk-fill composite in deep preparations. Dent Mater. 2020;36(4):527–534. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Microtensile bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite with semi-interpenetrating polymer matrix to dentin using various bonding systems. Dent Mater J. 2008;27(6):821–826. doi:10.4012/dmj.27.821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilday N, Seven N. The influence of different fiber-reinforced composites on shear bond strengths when bonded to enamel and dentin structures. J Dent Sci. 2011;6(2):107–115. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2011.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anatavara S, Sitthiseripratip K, Senawongse P. Stress relieving behaviour of flowable composite liners: a finite element analysis. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(3):369–378. doi:10.4012/dmj.2015-204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdigão J. Restoration of root canal-treated teeth; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• GrandioSo, Voco.Scientific compendium. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hasanah, Prihashinta Uswatun, Purwanto Agustiono, Widjijono Widgijono. Comparison of traction strength between fiber and braided fiber on fiber reinforced composite type ultrahigh molecular weight polyethelene (uhmwpe). 2018;3(1):18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Afifa Zahratu Firda D. Impact of fiber braided polyethylene application on composite nanofil resin pressure strength. PhD Thesis. Muhammadiyah University Surakarta. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Rosyida NF, Sunarintyas S, Pudyani PS. The effect of silanated and impregnated fiber on the tensile strength of E-glass fiber reinforced composite retainer. Dent J. 2015;48(1):22. doi:10.20473/j.djmkg.v48.i1.p22-25
   Google Scholar
• Mangoush E, Säilynoja E, Prinssi R, Lassila L, Vallittu PK, Garoushi S. Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: a review of the current literature. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(12):1408–1417.
   Google Scholar
• Zou Z, Hameed M. Combining interface damage and friction in cohesive interface models using an energy based approach. Compos Part a Appl Sci Manuf. 2018;112:290–298. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaladevi M, Balasubramaniam R. Biomechanics in restorative dentistry. Int J Appl Dent. 2020;6(2):251–256.
   Google Scholar
• Soares CJ, Rodrigues M, Faria-E-Silva AL, et al. How biomechanics can affect the endodontic treated teeth and their restorative procedures. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:169–183. doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan B, Shahmoradi M, Zhang Z, et al. Modelling of stress distribution and fracture in dental occlusal fissures. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–10. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-41304-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lia Mondelli RF, Ishikiriama SK, De Oliveira Filho O, Mondelli J. Fracture resistance of weakened teeth restored with condensable resin with and without cusp coverage. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(3):161–165. doi:10.1590/S1678-77572009000300006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serin Kalay T, Yildirim T, Ulker M. Effects of different cusp coverage restorations on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(3):404–410. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneshkazemi A, Mehdi M, Bahabad J, Hosein M, Iranaq A, Karimian E. Stress distribution in four restorative methods in endodontically treated maxillary premolar: a 3D finite element analysis; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Maravić T, Vasiljević D, Kantardžić I, Lainović T, Lužanin O, Blažić L. Influence of restorative procedures on endodontically treated premolars: finite element analysis of a CT-scan based three-dimensional model. Dent Mater J. 2018;37(3):493–500. doi:10.4012/dmj.2017-064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valizadeh S, Ranjbar Omrani L, Deliperi S, Sadeghi Mahounak F. Restoration of a nonvital tooth with fiber reinforce composite (wallpapering technique). Case Rep Dent. 2020;2020. doi:10.1155/2020/9619787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo VC, Faria e Silva AL, Marcondes Martins LR, et al. Effect of cement type, relining procedure, and length of cementation on pull-out bond strength of fiber posts. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1543–1546. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamanel K, Çaǧlar A, Gülşahi K, Özden UA. Effects of different ceramic and composite materials on stress distribution in inlay and onlay cavities: 3-D finite element analysis. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(6):661–670. doi:10.4012/dmj.28.661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haralur SB, Alamri AA, Alshehri SA, Alzahrani DS, Alfarsi M. Influence of occlusal thickness and radicular extension on the fracture resistance of premolar endocrowns from different all-ceramic materials. Appl Sci. 2020;10(8):2696. doi:10.3390/app10082696
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Chen D, Ding H, Chen Q, Meng X. Fatigue behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars with MOD defects under different minimally invasive restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(1):197–206. doi:10.1007/s00784-021-03991-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer SR, Lassila LVJ, Jokinen M, Vallittu PK. Effect of fiber position and orientation on fracture load of fiber-reinforced composite. Dent Mater. 2004;20(10):947–955. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2003.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ensaff H, O’Doherty DM, Jacobsen PH. The influence of the restoration-tooth interface in light cured composite restorations: a finite element analysis. Biomaterials. 2001;22(23):3097–3103. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00058-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiu J, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Thickness influence of veneering composites on fiber-reinforced systems. Dent Mater. 2021;37(3):477–485. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2020.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar