A paradigm shift for robot ethics: from HRI to human–robot–system interaction (HRSI)

References

• International federation of robotics. Executive Summary World Robotics 2018 Service Robots. World Robotic Report - Executive Summary. Available from: https://ifr.org/downloads/press2018/Executive_Summary_WR_Service_Robots_2018.pdf. Published 2018. Accessed May 20, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Zion market research. Chatbot market by type (support, skills, and assistant), by end-user (healthcare, retail, BFSI, travel & hospitality, E-commerce, media & entertainment, and others): global industry perspective, comprehensive analysis, and forecast 2017–2024. Available from: https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/report/chatbot-market. Published 2018. Accessed December 2, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Veruggio G, Operto F. Roboethics: social and ethical implications roboethics. In: Siciliano B, Khatib O, editors. Springer Handbook of Robotics. Berlin: Springer; 2008:1499–1524.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow R, Sparrow L. In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds Mach. 2006;16(2):141–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey N, Sharkey A. The crying shame of robot nannies: an ethical appraisal. Interact Stud. 2010;11(2):161–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin P, Abney K, Bekey G. Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Vallor S. Carebots and caregivers: sustaining the ethical ideal of care in the twenty-first century. Philos Technol. 2011;24(3):251–268.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Social care. NHS health information available through amazon’s Alexa. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/nhs-health-information-available-through-amazon-s-alexa. Published 2019. Accessed July 18, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Huang J, Zhou M, Yang D. Extracting chatbot knowledge from online discussion forums. In: IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2007; Hyderabad, India:423–428
   Google Scholar
• Hill J, Randolph Ford W, Farreras IG. Real conversations with artificial intelligence: a comparison between human-human online conversations and human-chatbot conversations. Comput Human Behav. 2015;49:245–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick KK, Darcy A, Vierhile M. Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment Heal. 2017;4(2):e19–e19. doi:10.2196/mental.7785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orrell C. Trust and accuracy in diagnostic AI: your. MD’s story so far. Available from: https://medtechengine.com/article/your-md/. Accessed November 1, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Yang G-Z, Bellingham J, Dupont PE, et al. The grand challenges of science robotics. Sci Robot. 2018;3(14):eaar7650. doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aar7650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachouie R, Sedighadeli S, Khosla R, Chu MT. Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a mixed-method systematic literature review. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2014;30(5):369–393. doi:10.1080/10447318.2013.873278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd C. Introducing the Mabu personal healthcare companion. Available from: https://www.cataliahealth.com/introducing-the-mabu-personal-healthcare-companion/. Published 2015. Accessed July 18, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Earnhardt J. Technology ushering in healthcare’s ‘Golden Age’. Accessed October 7, 2009 Available from: https://blogs.cisco.com/news/technology_ushering_in_healthcares_golden_age. Accessed October 29, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sensely. MEET MOLLY, YOUR VIRTUAL ASSISTANT. Available from: http://www.sensely.com/. Accessed October 29, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sheth R. Avatar technology: giving a face to the e-learning interface. eLearning Dev J. August 25;2003:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kazerooni H. Human-Robot Interaction via the Transfer of Power and Information Signals. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1990;20(2):450–463. doi:10.1109/21.52555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held RM, Durlach NI. Telepresence. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1992;1(1):109–112. doi:10.1162/pres.1992.1.1.109
   Google Scholar
• Kazerooni H. Extender: a case study for human-robot interaction via transfer of power and information signals. In: Proceedings of 1993 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication; Tokyo, Japan. 1993:10–20. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.1993.367756
   Google Scholar
• Breazeal C. A motivational system for regulating human–robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence; Madison, USA; 1998:54–61.
   Google Scholar
• Dautenhahn K. Methodology & themes of human-robot interaction: A growing research field. Int J Adv Robot Syst. 2007;4(1):103–108. doi:10.5772/5702
   Google Scholar
• Goodrich MA, Schultz AC. Human-robot interaction: a survey. Found Trends^® Hum Comput Interact. 2007;1(3):203–275. doi:10.1561/1100000005
   Google Scholar
• Yanco HA, Drury JL. A taxonomy for human-robot interaction. In: AAAI Fall Symposium on Human–Robot Interaction; Falmouth, Massachusetts; 2002:111–119.
   Google Scholar
• Yanco HA, Drury J. Classifying human-robot interaction: an updated taxonomy. Conf Proc - IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern. 2004;3(May):2841–2846. doi:10.1109/ICSMC.2004.1400763
   Google Scholar
• Veruggio G. The birth of roboethics. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; Barcelona, Spain: Workshop on Roboethics; 2005:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Veruggio G. EURON Roboethics Roadmap. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots; 2006; Genoa, Italy;612–617.
   Google Scholar
• Denning T, Matuszek C, Koscher K, Smith JR, Kohno T. A spotlight on security and privacy risks with future household robots. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing; Orlando, USA. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Calo MR. Robots and privacy. In: Lin P, Abney K, Bekey GA, editors. Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2011:187–202.
   Google Scholar
• Feil-Seifer D, Matari MJ. Socially assistive robotics ethical issues related to technology. Robot Autom Mag. 2011;18(1):24–31. doi:10.1109/MRA.2010.940150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein J, Pearson Y. Robot caregivers: harbingers of expanded freedom for all? Ethics Inf Technol. 2010;12:277–288. doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9236-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey A. Robots and human dignity: a consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people. Ethics Inf Technol. 2014;16:63–75. doi:10.1007/s10676-014-9338-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey A, Wood N. The paro seal robot: demeaning or enabling? Proceedings of the 50th Annual Convention of the AISB; 2014; London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Sharkey A, Sharkey N. Children, the elderly, and interactive robots: anthropomorphism and deception in robot care and companionship. IEEE Robot Autom Mag. 2011;18(1):32–38. doi:10.1109/MRA.2010.940151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körtner T. Ethical challenges in the use of social service robots for elderly people. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2016;49(4):303–307. doi:10.1007/s00391-016-1066-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks JA. Lifting the burden of women’s care work: should robots replace the “Human Touch”? Hypatia. 2010;25(1):100–120. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01086.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman B, Kahn PH. Human values, ethics, and design. In: The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook; Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.; 2002:1177–1209.
   Google Scholar
• Riek LD, Howard D.. A code of ethics for the human-robot interaction profession. In: Proceedings of We Robot Conference; 2014; Coral Gables, FL:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Belpaeme T, Baxter PE, Read R, et al. Multimodal child-robot interaction: building social bonds. J Human-Robot Interact. 2013;1(2):33–53. doi:10.5898/JHRI.1.2.Belpaeme
   Google Scholar
• Vallès-Peris N, Angulo C, Domènech M. Children’s imaginaries of human-robot interaction in healthcare. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:970. doi:10.3390/ijerph15061188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold T, Scheutz M. The tactile ethics of soft robotics: designing wisely for human-robot interaction. SOFT Robot. 2017;4(2):81–87. doi:10.1089/soro.2017.0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wynsberghe A. A method for integrating ethics into the design of robots. Ind Robot An Int J. 2013;40(5):433–440. doi:10.1108/IR-12-2012-451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallor S. Moral deskilling and upskilling in a new machine age: reflections on the ambiguous future of character. Philos Technol. 2015;28(1):107–124. doi:10.1007/s13347-014-0156-9
   Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh M. Health care, capabilities, and AI assistive technologies. Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 2010;13(2):181–190. doi:10.1007/s10677-009-9186-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wynsberghe A. Designing robots for care: care centered value-sensitive design. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013;19(2):407–433. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wynsberghe A. Healthcare Robots:Ethics, Design and Implementation. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Your.MD. Your personal health guide and symptom checker. Available from: https://www.your.md/. Accessed October 29, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sharkey N, Sharkey A. The eldercare factory. Gerontology. 2012;58(3):282–288. doi:10.1159/000329483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA. Class 2 device recall da Vinci Xi” surgical system. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfres/res.cfm?id=150460. Accessed January 16, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Mobile medical applications guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/mobile-medical-applications.Published 2015. Accessed January 15, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Parviainen J, Turja T, Van Aerschot L.. Robots and human touch in care: desirable and non-desirable robot assistance. In: Ge S. et al., editors. Social Robotics. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Social Robotics; 2018; Qingdao, China:533–540.
   Google Scholar