Predicting locus-specific DNA methylation levels in cancer and paracancer tissues

References

• Li E. Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3(9), 662–673 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berdasco M, Esteller M. Aberrant epigenetic landscape in cancer: how cellular identity goes awry. Dev. Cell 19(5), 698–711 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch A, Joosten SC, Feng Z et al. Analysis of DNA methylation in cancer: location revisited. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 15(7), 459–466 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das PM, Singal R. DNA methylation and cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 22(22), 4632–4642 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley E, Di Nicolantonio F, Loupakis F, Bardelli A. Liquid biopsy: monitoring cancer-genetics in the blood. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 10(8), 472–484 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li ADR, Liu Y, Plott J, Chen L, Montgomery JS, Shih A. Multi-bevel needle design enabling accurate insertion in biopsy for cancer diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 68(5), 1477–1486 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashiwagi S, Asano Y, Goto W et al. Optical see-through head-mounted display (OST-HMD)-assisted needle biopsy for breast tumor: a technical innovation. In Vivo 36(2), 848–852 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago L, Candelaria RP, Huang ML. MR imaging-guided breast interventions: indications, key principles, and imaging-pathology correlation. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am. 26(2), 235–246 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu W, Liu X, Leng F, Li W. Blood-based multi-tissue gene expression inference with Bayesian ridge regression. Bioinformatics 36(12), 3788–3794 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada H, Uza N, Matsumori T et al. A novel technique for mapping biopsy of bile duct cancer. Endoscopy 53(6), 647–651 (2021).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stępniak P, Maycock M, Wojdan K et al. Microarray Inspector: tissue cross contamination detection tool for microarray data. Acta Biochim. Pol. 60(4), 647–655 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guibert N, Tsukada H, Hwang DH et al. Liquid biopsy of fine-needle aspiration supernatant for lung cancer genotyping. Lung Cancer 122, 72–75 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masse R, Duvernay J, Korbi S, Majoufre C, Schlund M. Oral carcinoma cuniculatum, a rare variant of squamous cell carcinoma. J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 125(4), 101729 (2023).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halin S, Hammarsten P, Adamo H, Wikström P, Bergh A. Tumor indicating normal tissue could be a new source of diagnostic and prognostic markers for prostate cancer. Expert Opin. Med. Diagn. 5(1), 37–47 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ogawa T, Ito K, Koshita S et al. Usefulness of cholangioscopic-guided mapping biopsy using SpyGlass DS for preoperative evaluation of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a pilot study. Endosc. Int. Open 6(2), e199–e204 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deftereos G, Sandoval A, Furtado LV, Bronner M, Matynia AP. Successful lung cancer EGFR sequencing from DNA extracted from TTF-1 immunohistochemistry slides: a new means to extend insufficient tissue. Hum. Pathol. 97, 52–59 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teschendorff A, Gao Y, Jones A et al. DNA methylation outliers in normal breast tissue identify field defects that are enriched in cancer. Nat. Commun. 7, 10478 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller M, Strand SH, Mundbjerg K et al. Heterogeneous patterns of DNA methylation-based field effects in histologically normal prostate tissue from cancer patients. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1–14 (2017).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsu C-H, Hsiao C-W, Sun C-A et al. Multiple gene promoter methylation and clinical stage in adjacent normal tissues: effect on prognosis of colorectal cancer in Taiwan. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1–11 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson KC, Houseman EA, King JE, Christensen BC. Normal breast tissue DNA methylation differences at regulatory elements are associated with the cancer risk factor age. Breast Cancer Res. 19(1), 81 (2017).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun JX, He Y, Sanford E et al. A computational approach to distinguish somatic vs. germline origin of genomic alterations from deep sequencing of cancer specimens without a matched normal. PLoS Comp. Biol. 14(2), e1005965 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utsunomiya T, Ishikawa D, Asanoma M et al. Specific miRNA expression profiles of non-tumor liver tissue predict a risk for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol. Res. 44(6), 631–638 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomimaru Y, Sasaki Y, Yamada T et al. Fibrosis in non-cancerous tissue is the unique prognostic factor for primary hepatocellular carcinoma without hepatitis B or C viral infection. World J. Surg. 30(9), 1729–1735 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao K, Zhang F, Chen K et al. Expression patterns and prognostic value of RUNX genes in kidney cancer. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 14934 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan R, Zhou C, Dai J et al. Endothelial PAS domain protein 1 gene hypomethylation is associated with colorectal cancer in Han Chinese. Exp. Ther. Med. 16(6), 4983–4990 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia Z, Wang Y, Xue J et al. DNA methylation patterns at and beyond the histological margin of early-stage invasive lung adenocarcinoma radiologically manifested as pure ground-glass opacity. Clin. Epigenetics 13(1), 153 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun HM, Siegmund KD, Pan F, Weisenberger DJ, Yang AS. Epigenetic profiling of somatic tissues from human autopsy specimens identifies tissue- and individual-specific DNA methylation patterns. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18(24), 4808–4817 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar RD, Jones MJ, Meaney MJ, Turecki G, Kobor MS. BECon: a tool for interpreting DNA methylation findings from blood in the context of brain. Transl. Psychiatry 7(8), e1187 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AK, Kilaru V, Klengel T et al. DNA extracted from saliva for methylation studies of psychiatric traits: evidence tissue specificity and relatedness to brain. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 168(1), 36–44 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y-S, Zhang H, Jiang Y et al. Epigenome-scale comparison of DNA methylation between blood leukocytes and bronchial epithelial cells. Epigenomics 13(7), 485–498 (2021).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abraham JE, Maranian MJ, Spiteri I et al. Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping. BMC Med. Genomics 5(1), 1–6 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Carli MM, Baccarelli AA, Trevisi L et al. Epigenome-wide cross-tissue predictive modeling and comparison of cord blood and placental methylation in a birth cohort. Epigenomics 9(3), 231–240 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma B, Allard C, Bouchard L et al. Locus-specific DNA methylation prediction in cord blood and placenta. Epigenetics 14(4), 405–420 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma B, Wilker EH, Willis-Owen SA et al. Predicting DNA methylation level across human tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 42(6), 3515–3528 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T, Guestrin C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Association for Computing Machinery, NY, USA, 785–794 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Li W, Yin Y, Quan X, Zhang H. Gene expression value prediction based on XGBoost algorithm. Front. Genet. 10, 1077 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma B, Chai B, Dong H et al. Diagnostic classification of cancers using DNA methylation of paracancerous tissues. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 10646 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou W, Triche TJ Jr, Laird PW, Shen H. SeSAMe: reducing artifactual detection of DNA methylation by Infinium BeadChips in genomic deletions. Nucleic Acids Res. 46(20), e123 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou W, Laird PW, Shen H. Comprehensive characterization, annotation and innovative use of Infinium DNA methylation BeadChip probes. Nucleic Acids Res. 45(4), e22 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YA, Lemire M, Choufani S et al. Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics 8(2), 203–209 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vapnik VN. An overview of statistical learning theory. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 10(5), 988–999 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell JT, Pai AA, Pickrell JK et al. DNA methylation patterns associate with genetic and gene expression variation in HapMap cell lines. Genome Biol. 12(1), R10 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecilia L, Dodd IB, Kim S, Haerter JO. DNA methylation in human epigenomes depends on local topology of CpG sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 44(11), 5123–5132 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckhardt F, Lewin J, Cortese R et al. DNA methylation profiling of human chromosomes 6, 20 and 22. Nat. Genet. 38(12), 1378–1385 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris TJ, Butcher LM, Feber A et al. ChAMP: 450k chip analysis methylation pipeline. Bioinformatics 30(3), 428–430 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phipson B, Maksimovic J, Oshlack A. missMethyl: an R package for analyzing data from Illumina's HumanMethylation450 platform. Bioinformatics 32(2), 286–288 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato T, Arai E, Kohno T et al. Epigenetic clustering of lung adenocarcinomas based on DNA methylation profiles in adjacent lung tissue: its correlation with smoking history and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int. J. Cancer 135(2), 319–334 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 12(1), 1–8 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalışkan M, Cusanovich DA, Ober C, Gilad Y. The effects of EBV transformation on gene expression levels and methylation profiles. Hum. Mol. Genet. 20(8), 1643–1652 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval J, Heyn H, Moran S et al. Validation of a DNA methylation microarray for 450,000 CpG sites in the human genome. Epigenetics 6(6), 692–702 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachiya T, Furukawa R, Shiwa Y et al. Genome-wide identification of inter-individually variable DNA methylation sites improves the efficacy of epigenetic association studies. NPJ Genom. Med. 2(1), 1–14 (2017).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Du L, Pertsemlidis A. Cancer and neurodegenerative disorders: pathogenic convergence through microRNA regulation. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 3(3), 176–180 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Siddiqui O, Zhang H, Guan Y. Joint learning improves protein abundance prediction in cancers. BMC Biol. 17(1), 107 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cokus SJ, Feng S, Zhang X et al. Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning. Nature 452(7184), 215–219 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang F, Fan S, Zhang X, Zhang MQ. Predicting methylation status of CpG islands in the human brain. Bioinformatics 22(18), 2204–2209 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Peter A. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13(7), 484–492 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irizarry RA, Laddacosta C, Wen B et al. Genome-wide methylation analysis of human colon cancer reveals similar hypo- and hypermethylation at conserved tissue-specific CpG island shores. Nat. Genet. 41(2), 178–186 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng J, Gao L, Zhang M, Gao S, Fan S, Liang C. Systematic investigation of the prognostic value of cell division cycle-associated proteins for clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients. Biomark. Med. 14(3), 223–238 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angermueller C, Lee HJ, Reik W, Stegle O. DeepCpG: accurate prediction of single-cell DNA methylation states using deep learning. Genome Biol. 18(1), 67 (2017).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ni P, Huang N, Zhang Z et al. DeepSignal: detecting DNA methylation state from Nanopore sequencing reads using deep-learning. Bioinformatics 35(22), 4586–4595 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Yao S, Li X, Chen C, Hu X. Genome-wide prediction of DNA methylation using DNA composition and sequence complexity in human. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18(2), 420 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo X, Wang F, Wang G, Zhao Y. Identification of methylation states of DNA regions for Illumina methylation BeadChip. BMC Genomics 21(1), 1–10 (2020).
   Google Scholar
• Tian Q, Zou J, Tang J, Fang Y, Yu Z, Fan S. MRCNN: a deep learning model for regression of genome-wide DNA methylation. BMC Genomics 20(2), 1–10 (2019).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rao JS, Zhang H, Kobetz E, Aldrich MC, Conway D. Predicting DNA methylation from genetic data lacking racial diversity using shared classified random effects. Genomics 113(1 Pt 2), 1018–1028 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu L, Peng Q, Chai L. Predicting DNA methylation states with hybrid information based deep-learning model. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 17(5), 1721–1728 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Spector TD, Deloukas P, Bell JT, Engelhardt BE. Predicting genome-wide DNA methylation using methylation marks, genomic position, and DNA regulatory elements. Genome Bio. 16(1), 14 (2015).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang J, Zou J, Zhang X et al. PretiMeth: precise prediction models for DNA methylation based on single methylation mark. BMC Genomics 21(1), 1–15 (2020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock C, Walter J, Paulsen M, Lengauer T. CpG island mapping by epigenome prediction. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3(6), e110 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock C, Paulsen M, Tierling S, Mikeska T, Lengauer T, Walter J. CpG island methylation in human lymphocytes is highly correlated with DNA sequence, repeats, and predicted DNA structure. PLoS Genet. 2(3), e26 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Wu H, Li J, Jiang S-W. CpGIMethPred: computational model for predicting methylation status of CpG islands in human genome. BMC Med. Genomics 6(1), 1–12 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fan S, Zhang MQ, Zhang X. Histone methylation marks play important roles in predicting the methylation status of CpG islands. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 374(3), 559–564 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltus FA, Lee EK, Costello JF, Plass C, Vertino PM. Predicting aberrant CpG island methylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100(21), 12253–12258 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das R, Dimitrova N, Xuan Z et al. Computational prediction of methylation status in human genomic sequences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103(28), 10713–10716 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazra A, Gogtay N. Biostatistics series module 6: correlation and linear regression. Indian J. Dermatol. 61(6), 593–601 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen KD, Timp W, Bravo HC et al. Increased methylation variation in epigenetic domains across cancer types. Nat. Genet. 43(8), 768–775 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar