Visual Field Asymmetry in Facial Affect Perception: Moderating Effects of Hypnosis, Hypnotic Susceptibility Level, Absorption, and Sustained Attentional Abilities

References

• Annett M. Classification of hand preference by association analysis. British Journal of Psychology 1970; 61: 303–321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson R. P. Individual differences in afterimage persistence during waking and hypnosis: Effects of hypnotizability and visuospatial skills. Paper presented at the scientific meeting of the Society for Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, New Orleans, LA, October, 1991
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson R. P., Crawford H. J. Individual differences in afterimage persistence: Relationships to hypnotic responsiveness and visuospatial skills. American Journal of Psychology 1992; 105: 527–539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings L. S., Harrison D. W., Alden J. D. Age differences among women in the functional asymmetry for bias in facial affect perception. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1993; 31: 317–320
   Google Scholar
• Borod J. C., Koff E. Lateralization for facial emotional behavior: A methodological perspective. Special Issue: Facial asymmetry: Expression and paralysis. International Journal of Psychology 1990; 25: 157–177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson S. E., McLaren J., Wadden N. P., MacLean M. Differential asymmetries for positive and negative emotion: Hemisphere or stimulus effects. Cortex 1991; 27: 359–365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen R. A. The neuropsychology of attention. Plenum, New York 1993
   Google Scholar
• Crawford H. J. Hypnotic susceptibility as related to gestalt closure tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981; 40: 376–383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford H. J. Hypnotizability, daydreaming styles, imagery vividness, and absorption: A multidimensional study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982; 42: 915–926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford H. J. Imagery processing during hypnosis: Relationships to hypnotizability and cognitive strategies. Imagery: Recent Practice and Theory, M. Wolpin, J. E. Shor, L. Krueger. Plenum Press, New York 1986; 13–32
   Google Scholar
• Crawford H. J. Cognitive and physiological flexibility: Multiple pathways to hypnotic responsiveness. Suggestion and suggestibility; Theory and research, V. Ghorghui, P. Netter, H. Eysenck, R. Rosenthal. Plenum Press, New York 1989; 155–168
   Google Scholar
• Crawford H. J. Cognitive and psychophysiological correlates of hypnotic responsiveness and hypnosis. Creative mastery in hypnosis and hypnoanalysis: A festscrift for Erika Fromm, M. L. Fass, D. P. Brown. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey 1990; 47–54
   Google Scholar
• Crawford H. J. Brain dynamics and hypnosis: Attentional and disattentional processes. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1994; 42: 204–232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford H. J. Cerebral brain dynamics of mental imagery: Evidence and issues for hypnosis. Imagination and Hypnosis, R. G. Kunzendorf, N. Spanos, B. Wallace. Baywood Press, NY, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Crawford H. J., Allen S. N. Group Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Unpublished manual. University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 1982
   Google Scholar
• Crawford H. J., Allen S. N. Enhanced visual memory during hypnosis as mediated by hypnotic responsiveness and cognitive strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1983; 112: 662–685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford H. J., Brown A. M., Moon C. E. Sustained attentional and disattentional abilities: Differences between low and highly hypnotizable persons. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1993; 102: 534–543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford H. J., Gruzelier J. H. A midstream view of the neuropsychophysiology of hypnosis: Recent research and future directions. Contemporary hypnosis research, E. Fromm, M. R. Nash. Guilford Press, NY 1992; 227–266
   Google Scholar
• Crawford H. J., Gur R. C., Skolnick B., Gur R. E., Benson D. Effects of hypnosis on regional cerebral blood flow during ischemic pain with and without suggested hypnotic angelsia. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1993; 15: 181–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford H. J., Knebel T., Coplin J., Fulkerson B., Scanlon J., Sawyer J., Houzouris N., Kaplan L. EEG topographic map differences in high and low sustained-attention adults: Tracking tasks. Paper presented at the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Atlanta, Georgia, October, 1994
   Google Scholar
• Crawford H. J., Knebel T., Lyons L. A., Sturgis E. T. Dissociative-like experiences: Relationships to hypnotic responsiveness. Paper presented at the meeting of the society for Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, Washington, D.C., October, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Crawford H. J., MacLeod-Morgan C. Hypnotic investigations of imagery: A critical review of relationships. International Review of Mental Imagery Volume 2, A. A. Sheikh. Human Sciences Press, Inc, New York 1986; 32–56
   Google Scholar
• Crawford H. J., Nomura K., Slater H. Spatial memory processing: Enhancement during hypnosis. Imagery: Theoretical aspects and applications, J. C. Shorr, J. Conella, G. Sobel, T. Robin. Plenum Press, New York 1983; 209–216
   Google Scholar
• Crawford H. J., Wallace B., Nomura K., Slater H. Eidetic-like imagery in hypnosis: Rare but there. American Journal of Psychology 1986; 99: 527–546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson R. J. Parsing affective space: Perspectives from neuropsychology and psychophysiology. Special Section: Neuropsychological perspectives on components of emotional processing. Neuropsychology 1993; 7: 464–475
   Google Scholar
• Detteman D. K. What does reaction time tell us about intelligence. Speed of information processing and intelligence, P. A. Vernon. Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey 1987; 177–200
   Google Scholar
• Dimond S. J., Farrington L., Johnson P. Differing emotional responses from right and left hemispheres. Nature 1976; 261: 690–692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dywan J., Bowers K. The use of hypnosis to enhance recall. Science 1983; 222: 184–185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman P., Friesen W. Pictures of facial affect. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, California 1978
   Google Scholar
• Gainotti G. Emotional behavior and hemispheric side of lesion. Cortex 1972; 8: 41–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• George M. S., Ketter T A., Gill D. S., Haxby J. V., Ungerleider L. G., Herscovitch P., Post R. M. Brain regions involved in recognizing facial emotion or identity: An oxygen-15 PET study. Journal of Neuropsychiatry 1993; 5: 384–394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheorghiu V. Experimentelle unter suchurgen zur hypnotischen hypermnesie [Experimental investigation of hypnotic hypermnesia]. Hypnose under psychosomatische medizin, D. Langen. Hippokrates Verlag, Stuttgart 1972; 42–46
   Google Scholar
• Godefroy O., Cabaret M., Rousseaux M. Vigilance and effects of fatigability, practice and motivation on simple reaction time tests in patients with lesion of the frontal lobe. Neuropsychologia 1994; 32: 983–990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godefroy O., Rousseaux M. Patients with frontal lobe lesion promote rapidity regardless of accuracy in dual-task. Neurology 1993; 43: A 157
   Google Scholar
• Grumbles D., Carwford H. J. Differential attentional skills and hypnotizability. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Clinical and Expeirmental Hypnosis, Portland, Oregon, October, 1981
   Google Scholar
• Gruzelier J. H. The neuropsychology of hypnosis. Hypnosis: Current clinical. experimental and forensic practices, M. Heap. Croom Helm, London 1988; 68–76
   Google Scholar
• Gur R. C., Hilgard E. R. Visual imagery and the discrimination of differences between altered pictures simultaneously and successively presented. British Journal of Psychology 1975; 66: 341–345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison D. W., Gorelczenko P. M. Functional asymmetry for facial affect perception in high and low hostile men and women. International Journal of Neuroscience 1990; 55: 89–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison D. W., Gorelczenko P. M., Cook J. Sex differences in the functional asymmetry and facial affect perception. International Journal of Neuroscience 1990; 52: 11–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgard E. R. Divided consciousness: Multiple controls in human thought and action (expanded ed.). Wiley, New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Larsen R. J. Theory and measurement of affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic. Dissertation Abstracts International 1985; 5: 2297B, (University Microfilms No. 84-221 12)
   Google Scholar
• Larsen R. J., Diener E., Emmons R. A. Affect intensity and reactions to daily life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986; 51: 803–814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley R. G., Bryden M. P. Hemispheric differences in processing emotions and faces. Brain and Language 1979; 7: 127–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons L. C., Crawford H. J. Attentional processing, arousal, and hypnotizability. Paper prsented at the meeting of the Society for Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, New Orleans, October, 1991
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod-Morgan C., Lack L. Hemispheric specificity: A physiological concomitant of hypnotizability. Psychophysiology 1982; 19: 687–690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks D. F. Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology 1973; 64: 17–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeever W. F. Tachistoscopic methods in neuropsychology. Experimental techniques in human neuropsychology, H. J. Hannay. Oxford University Press, New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• McKeever W. F., Dixon M. S. Right hemisphere superiority for discriminating memorized from non-memorized faces: Affective imagery, sex, and perceived emotionality effects. Brain and Language 1981; 12: 246–260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meszaros I., Carwford H. J., Szaho C., Nagy-Kovacs A., Revesz M. A. Hypnotic susceptibility and cerebral hemisphere preponderance: Verbal-imaginal discrimination task. Suggestion and suggestibility: Theory and research, V. Ghorghui, P. Netter, H. Eysenck, R. Rosenthal. Springer-Verlag, New York 1989; 191–204
   Google Scholar
• Miller R. J. Response to the Ponzo illusion as reflection of hypnotic susceptibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1975; 23: 148–157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccione C., Hilgard E. R., Zimbardo P. G. On the degree of stability of measured hypnotizability over a 25-year period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989; 56: 289–295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pribram K. H. Brain and perception: Holonomy and structure in figural processing. Erlbaum, Hillsddale, NJ 1991
   Google Scholar
• Priebe F. A., Wallace B. Hypnotic susceptibility, imaging ability and the detection of embedded objects. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1986; 34: 320–329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter-Lorenz P., Davidson R. J. Differential contributions of the two cerebral hemispheres to the perception of happy and sad faces. Neuropsychologia 1981; 19: 609–414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter-Lorenz P., Givis R. P., Moscovitch M. Hemispheric specialization and the perception of emotion: Evidence from right-handers and from inverted and non-inverted left-handers. Neuropsychologia 1983; 21: 687–492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabourin M. E., Cutcomb S. D., Crawford H. J., Pribram K. EEG correlates of hypnotic susceptibility and hypnotic trance: Spectral analysis and coherence. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1990; 10: 125–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz G. E., Davidson R. J., Maer F. Right hemisphere lateralization for emotion in the human brain: Interactions with cognition. Science 1975; 190: 286–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergent J. Theoretical methodological consequences of variations in exposure duration in visual laterality studies. Perception & Psychophysics 1982; 31: 451–461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice T. From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeEngland 1988
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan P. W. Imagery and hypnosis: Forging a link, at least in part. Research Communications in Psychology, Psychiatry, and Behavior 1982; 7: 257–272
   Google Scholar
• Shor R. E., Ome M. T. Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA 1962
   Google Scholar
• Spielberger C. D. Self-evaluation questionnaire. STAI Form X2 1968
   Google Scholar
• Stuss D. T., Benson D. F. The frontal lobes. Raven Press, New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Tellegen A. Brief manual for the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, St. Paul 1982, Unpublished manuscript
   Google Scholar
• Tellegen A., Atkinson C. Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1974; 83: 268–277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker D. M. Lateral brain function, emotion, and conceptualization. Psychological Bulletin 1981; 89: 19–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker N. S., Garrett J. B., Wallace B. Restoration of eidetic imagery via hypnotic age regression: A preliminary import. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1976; 85: 335–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace B. Restoration of eidetic imagery via hypnotic age regression: More evidence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1978; 87: 673–675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace B. Latency and frequency reports to the Necker Cube illusion: Effects of hypnotic susceptibility and mental arithmetic. Journal of General Psychology 1986; 113: 187–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace B. Imaging ability, visual search strategies, and the unvividness paradox. Journal of Mental Imagery 1988; 12: 173–184
   Google Scholar
• Wallace B. Imagery vividness, hypnotic susceptibility, and the perception of fragmented stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990; 58: 354–359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace B., Allen P. A., Weber T. A. Hypnotic susceptibility, imaging ability, and the detection of embedded words within letters. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1994; 57: 20–38
   Google Scholar
• Wallace B., Garrett J. B., Anstadt S. P. Hypnotic susceptibility, suggestion, and reports of autokinetic movement. American Journal of Psychology 1974; 87: 117–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace B., Knight T. A., Garrett J. F. Hypnotic susceptibility and frequency reports to illusory stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1976; 85: 558–563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler A. F. The effect of organic brain disease on recall of emotionally vs. neutral narrative texts. Neurology 1973; 23: 130–135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer A. M., Hilgard E. R. Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA 1962
   Google Scholar