The difficulties that exist putting ethical theory into practice in critical care

References

• Audit Commission. Critical success. The place of efficient and effective critical care services within the acute hospital. London: Audit Commission; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, et al. Ethicus Study Group. End-of-life practice in European intensive care units: The Ethicus Study. JANIA 2003;290:790–7.
   Google Scholar
• Turner JS, Michell WL, Morgan CJ, et al. Limitation of life support: Frequency and practice in a London and a Cape Town intensive care unit. Intens Care Med 1996;22: 1020–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley TA, Joynt GM, Tan PYH, et al. Limitation of life support: Frequency and practice in a Hong Kong intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2004;32(2):415–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Medical Council. Withholding and withdrawing life-prolonging treatments: Good medical practice in decision-making. London: General Medical Council; 2002. pp 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th. Ed. New York: Oxford University Press. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Miller BL. Autonomy. In Reich WT, editor. Encyclopaedia of bioethics. New York: Simon and Schuster MacMillan; 1995. pp 215–20.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers C. Cruel Choices: autonomy and critical care decision-making. Bioethics 2004;18 (2):104–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook D. Patient autonomy versus parentalism. Crit Care Med 2001;29 (2) (Suppl.):N24–5.
   Google Scholar
• McCullough LB. A transcultural, preventive ethics approach to critical-care medicine: restoring critical care physicians power and authority. J Medical Philosophy 1998;23(6):628–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savulescu J. Rational non-interventional paternalism: Why doctors ought to make judgements of what is best for their patients. J Medical Ethics 1995 1995;21(6):327–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce JM. Ethical principles in critical care. JANIA 1990; 263(5):696–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broomhead LR, Brett SJ. Intensive care follow-up - what has it told us? Crit Care 2002;6:411–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilden VP, Tolle SW, Garland MJ, et al. Decisions about life sustaining treatment. Impact of physicians behaviour on the family. Arch Intern Med 1995;155(6):633–8.
   Google Scholar
• Studdert DM, Mello MM, Burns JP, et al. Conflict in the care of patients with prolonged stay in the ICU: types, sources, and predictors. Intens Care Med 2003;29:1489–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyman DJ, Sprung CL. End-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit. Intens Care Med 2000;26(10):1414–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTurk L. Rational resource allocation: Ethical perspectives. In Pace NA, McClean SAM, editors. Ethics and the law in intensive care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996. Ch. 12.
   Google Scholar
• McNarry AF, Goldhill DR. Intensive care admission deci-sions for a patient with limited survival prospects: a ques-tionnaire and database analysis. Intens Care Med 2004;30(2): 325–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson S, Bihari D, Smithies M, et al. Identification of futility in intensive care. Lancet 1994;344(8931):1203–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keown. J. Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy. The value of human life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. Ch. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Pace NA. Withholding and withdrawing medical treatment. In Pace NA, McClean SAM, editors. Ethics and the law in intensive care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996. Ch. 4.
   Google Scholar
• The Working Group. Consensus statement. Working group on Roman Catholic approaches to determining appropriate critical care. Christ Bioethics 2001;7(2):179–84.
   Google Scholar
• Zweibel NR. Measuring quality of life near the end of life. JANIA 1988;220 (6): 839–40.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers J, Ridley S, Chrispin P, et al. Reliability of the next of kin's estimates of critically ill patients quality of life. Anaes-thesia 1997;52(12):1137–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofhuis J, Hautvast JL, Scrijvers AJ, et al. Quality of life on admission to the intensive care: can we query the relatives. Intens Care Med 2003;29(6):974–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridley S, Biggam M, Stone P. A cost-utility analysis of intensive therapy. II: Quality of life in survivors. Anaesthesia 1994;49 (3):192–6.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard SE, Whittle J, Chelluri L, et al. Quality of life and dialysis decisions in critically ill patients with acute renal failure. Intens Care Med 2003;29(9):1589–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konopad E, Noseworthy TW, Johnston R, et al. Quality of life measures before and one year after admission to an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1995;23(10):1653–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danis M, Patrick DL, Southerland LI, Green ML. Patients' and families' preferences for medical intensive care. JANIA 1988;260(6):797–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angus DC, Carlet J. Brussels Roundtable Participants. Surviving intensive care: a report from the 2002 Brussels Roundtable. Intens Care Med 2003 2002;29(3):368–77.
   Google Scholar
• Montuclard L, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Timsit JF, et al. Out-come, functional autonomy, and quality of life of elderly patients with a long-term intensive care unit stay. Crit Care Med 2000;28(10):3389–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelluri L, Im KH, Belle SH, Schultz R, et al. Long-term mortality and quality of life after prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2004;32 (1):61–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frick S, Uehlinger DE, Zuercher Zenklusen RM. Medical futility: Predicting outcome of intensive care unit patients by nurses and doctors — A prospective comparitive study. Grit Care Med 2003;31(2):456–61.
   Google Scholar
• Catholic Church. Catechism No. 1756. In: Catechism of the Catholic Church. London: Geoffrey Chapman Publisher; 1994. p 393.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher J. Love justifies its means. In Situations Ethics. London: SCM Press, 1966. pp 120–33.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp T, Childress J. Morality and Ethical Theory in The principles of biomedical ethics. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989. Ch. 1.
   Google Scholar
• American Medical Association. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: Ethical considerations in the allocation of organs and other scarce medical resources among patients. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:29–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneiderman LJ, Spragg RG. Sounding Board: Ethical decisions in determining mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 1988;318(15):984–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Re B [2002] 2 All ER 449.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer C. Court to rule on power to decide right to life. The Guardian. London. Monday 16 May 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gormally L. Medicine as a profession and the meaning of health as its goal. In Issues for a Catholic Bioethic. London: Linacre Centre; 1999. Ch. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Smart JJC. Utilitarianism and justice. In Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1973. pp 67–73.
   Google Scholar