Combining Different Inoculation Types to Increase Student Engagement and Build Resilience Against Science Misinformation

References

• Banas, J. A., & Miller, G. (2013). Inducing resistance to conspiracy theory propaganda: Testing inoculation and metainoculation strategies. Human Communication Research, 39(2), 184–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basol, M., Roozenbeek, J., Berriche, M., Uenal, F., McClanahan, W. P., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Towards psychological herd immunity: Cross-cultural evidence for two prebunking interventions against COVID-19 misinformation. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 20539517211013868. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211013868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, M. S., Jones, C. R., Hall Jamieson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2017). Debunking: A meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of messages countering misinformation. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1531–1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617714579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, J. (2020). Prophylactic versus therapeutic inoculation treatments for resistance to influence. Communication Theory, 30(3), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, J. (2021). Deconstructing climate science denial. In D. Holmes & L. M. Richardson (Eds.), Edward Elgar research handbook in communicating climate change (pp. 62–78). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J., Ecker, U. K. H., Trecek-King, M., Schade, G., Jeffers-Tracy, K., Fessmann, J., Kim, S. C., Kinkead, D., Orr, M., Vraga, E., Roberts, K., & McDowell, J. (2023). The Cranky Uncle game—combining humor and gamification to build student resilience against climate misinformation. Environmental Education Research, 29(4), 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2085671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forer, B. R. (1949). The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(1), 118–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M., McShane, C. J., & Swinbourne, A. (2022). Active versus passive: Evaluating the effectiveness of inoculation techniques in relation to misinformation about climate change. Australian Journal of Psychology, 74(1), 2113340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2022.2113340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. C., Vraga, E. K., & Cook, J. (2021). An eye tracking approach to understanding misinformation and correction strategies on social media: The mediating role of attention and credibility to reduce HPV vaccine misperceptions. Health Communication, 36(13), 1687–1696. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1787933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCuin, J. L., Hayhoe, K., & Hayhoe, D. (2014). Comparing the effects of traditional vs. misconceptions-based instruction on student understanding of the greenhouse effect. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-068.1
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J., & Papageorgis, D. (1961). The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(2), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2018). The fake news game: Actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation. Journal of Risk Research, 22(5), 570–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1443491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, P., & Betsch, C. (2019). Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 931–939. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0632-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thinking Is Power. (n.d.). 11 characteristics of pseudoscience. Thinking Is Power. https://thinkingispower.com/11-characteristics-of-pseudoscience
   Google Scholar
• Trecek-King, M. (2022a). How to sell pseudoscience. Skeptical Inquirer, 46(5), 46–49. https://skepticalinquirer.org/2022/08/how-to-sell-pseudoscience
   Google Scholar
• Trecek-King, M. (2022b). A life preserver for staying afloat in a sea of misinformation. Skeptical Inquirer, 46(2), 44–49. https://skepticalinquirer.org/2022/02/a-life-preserver-for-staying-afloat-in-a-sea-of-misinformation
   Google Scholar
• Trecek-King, M. (2022c). Teach skills, not facts. Skeptical Inquirer, 46(1), 39–42. https://skepticalinquirer.org/2021/12/teach-skills-not-facts
   Google Scholar
• Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar