Achieving Desired Student Outcomes in Virtual Field Experiences Through Attention to Design Considerations: A Delphi Study

References

• Bang, M., Marin, A., & Medin, D. (2018). If Indigenous peoples stand with the sciences, will scientists stand with us? Daedalus, 147(2), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. R., Heimlich, J. E., Ardoin, N. M., & Braus, J. (2020). Using a Delphi study to clarify the landscape and core outcomes in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 26(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1727859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliffe, A. D. (2017). A review of the benefits and drawbacks to virtual field guides in today’s geoscience higher education environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0066-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, W. W. (1990). Applied nonparametric statistics (2nd ed.). PWS-Kent.
   Google Scholar
• Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Scott Foresman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dolphin, G., Dutchak, A., Karchewski, B., & Cooper, J. (2019). Virtual field experiences in introductory geology: Addressing a capacity problem, but finding a pedagogical one. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(2), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2018.1547034
   Google Scholar
• Duggan-Haas, D., White, L. D., & Ross, R. M. (2018, December 10–14). Virtual explorations of the Pacific Coast of the Cenozoic [Paper presentation]. American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, Washington, DC, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, L. C., & Gallo, M. A. (2005). Field trips and their effect on student achievement and attitudes: A comparison of physical versus virtual field trips to the Indian River Lagoon. Journal of College Science Teaching, 34(5), 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. D., & Simon, T. N. (2020). Student perceptions of open educational resources video-based active learning in university-level biology classes: A multi-class evaluation. Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(6), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/0047231X.2020.12290663
   Google Scholar
• Heimlich, J. E., Carlson, S. P., & Storksdieck, M. (2011). Building face, construct, and content validity through use of a modified Delphi: Adapting grounded theory to build an environmental field days observation tool. Environmental Education Research, 17(3), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.538669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. J., Bombaci, S. P., Gigliotti, L. C., Harris, S. N., Marneweck, C. J., Muthersbaugh, M. S., Newman, B. A., Rodriguez, S. L., Saldo, E. A., Shute, K. E., Titus, K. L., Williams, A. L., Yu, S. W., & Jachowski, D. S. (2021). Attracting diverse students to field experiences requires adequate pay, flexibility, and inclusion. BioScience, 71(7), 757–770. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, N., O’Connell, K. B., McNulty, S., Berkowitz, A., Bowser, G., Giamellaro, M., & Miriti, M. N. (2020). Promoting inclusion in ecological field experiences: Examining and overcoming barriers to a professional rite of passage. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 101(4), e01742. https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1742
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, K., Hoke, K. L., Giamellaro, M., Berkowitz, A. R., & Branchaw, J. (2022). A tool for designing and studying student-centered undergraduate field experiences: The UFERN model. BioScience, 72(2), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, G. W., Humphries, S., & Henri, D. C. (2019). Expectation, motivation, engagement and ownership: Using student reflections in the conative and affective domains to enhance residential field courses. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(3), 280–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1608516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, A., Feig, A. D., Atchison, C. L., & Gilley, B. (2019). Making geoscience fieldwork inclusive and accessible for students with disabilities. Geosphere, 15(6), 1809–1825. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02006.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavaleta, E. S., Beltran, R. S., & Borker, A. L. (2020). How field courses propel inclusion and collective excellence. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 35(11), 953–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar