71
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research and Teachings

Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences for Laboratory Learning in the Life Sciences

&
Pages 58-66 | Received 29 Jul 2021, Accepted 05 Feb 2022, Published online: 30 Jan 2024

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. AAAS. https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/content_files/VC_report.pdf
  • Auchincloss, L. C., Laursen, S. L., Branchaw, J. L., Eagan, K., Graham, M., Hanauer, D. I., Lawrie, G., McLinn, C. M., Pelaez, N., Rowland, S., Towns, M., Trautmann, N. M., Varma-Nelson, P., Weston, T. J., & Dolan, E. L. (2014). Assessment of course-based undergraduate research experiences: A meeting report. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-01-0004
  • Bangera, G., & Brownell, S. E. (2014). Course-based undergraduate research experiences can make scientific research more inclusive. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(4), 602–606. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-06-0099
  • Brownell, S. E., Hekmat-Scafe, D. S., Singla, V., Chandler Seawell, P., Conklin Imam, J. F., Eddy, S. L., Stearns, T., & Cyert, M. S. (2015). A high-enrollment course-based undergraduate research experience improves student conceptions of scientific thinking and ability to interpret data. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-05-0092
  • Brownell, S. E., Kloser, M. J., Fukami, T., & Shavelson, R. (2012). Undergraduate biology lab courses: Comparing the impact of traditionally based “cookbook” and authentic research-based courses on student lab experiences. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 36–45.
  • Caruso, J. P., Rowland, K., Lovelace, M. J., Saunders, M. J., & Israel, N. (2016). Citizen science: The Small World Initiative improved lecture grades and California Critical Thinking Skills Test scores of nonscience major students at Florida Atlantic University. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 17(1), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v17i1.1011
  • Cooper, K. M., Soneral, P. A., & Brownell, S. E. (2017). Define your goals before you design a CURE: A call to use backward design in planning course-based undergraduate research experiences. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v18i2.1287
  • Corwin, L. A., Runyon, C. R., Ghanem, E., Sandy, M., Clark, G., Palmer, G. C., Reichler, S., Rodenbusch, S. E., & Dolan, E. L. (2018). Effects of discovery, iteration, and collaboration in laboratory courses on undergraduates’ research career intentions fully mediated by student ownership. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-07-0141
  • Davis, E., Sloan, T., Aurelius, K., Barbour, A., Bodey, E., Clark, B., Dennis, C., Drown, R., Fleming, M., Humbert, A., Glasgo, E., Kearns, T., Lingro, K., McMillin, M., Meyer, A., Pope, B., Stalevicz, A., Steffen, B., Steindl, A., … Wildschutte, H. (2017). Antibiotic discovery throughout the Small World Initiative: A molecular strategy to identify biosynthetic gene clusters involved in antagonistic activity. MicrobiologyOpen, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.435
  • Dolan, E. L. (2016). Course-based undergraduate research experiences: Current knowledge and future directions. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Commissioned for the Committee on Strengthening Research Experiences for Undergraduate STEM Students, Board on Science Education. https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_177288.pdf
  • Gardner, G. E., & Jones, M. G. (2011). Pedagogical preparation of the science graduate teaching assistant: Challenges and implications. Science Educator, 20(2), 31–41.
  • Goodwin, E. C., Anokhin, V., Gray, M. K. J., Zajic, D. E., Podrabsky, J. E., & Shortlidge, E. E. (2021). Is this science? Students’ experiences of failure make a research-based course feel authentic. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-07-0149
  • Govindan, B., Pickett, S., & Riggs, B. (2020). Fear of the CURE: A beginner’s guide to overcoming barriers in creating a course-based undergraduate research experience. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v21i2.2109
  • Graham, M. J., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A.-B., & Handelsman, J. (2013). Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science, 341(6153), 1455–1456. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240487
  • Hanauer, D. I., Graham, M. J., Betancur, L., Bobrownicki, A., Cresawn, S. G., Garlena, R. A., Jacobs-Sera, D., Kaufmann, N., Pope, W. H., Russell, D. A., Jacobs Jr., W. R., Sivanathan, V., Asai, D. J., & Hatfull, G. F. (2017). An inclusive Research Education Community (iREC): Impact of the SEA-PHAGES program on research outcomes and student learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(51), 13531–13536. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718188115
  • Hanauer, D. I., & Hatfull, G. (2015). Measuring networking as an outcome variable in undergraduate research experiences. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-03-0061
  • Hurley, A., Chevrette, M. G., Acharya, D. D., Lozano, G. L., Garavito, M., Heinritz, J., Balderrama, L., Beebe, M., DenHartog, M. L., Corinaldi, K., Engels, R., Gutierrez, A., Jona, O., Putnam, J. H. I., Rhodes, B., Tsang, T., Hernandez, S., Bascom-Slack, C., Blum, J. E., … Handelsman, J. (2020). Tiny Earth: A big idea for STEM education and antibiotic discovery. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202011.0250.v1
  • Ing, M., Burnette, J. M., Azzam, T., & Wessler, S. R. (2020). Participation in a course-based undergraduate research experience results in higher grades in the companion lecture course. Educational Researcher, 50(4), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20968097
  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2006). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Interaction Book Company.
  • Knutson, K., Smith, J., Wallert, M. A., & Provost, J. (2010a). Bringing the excitement and motivation of research of students; Using inquiry and research-based learning in a year-long biochemistry laboratory: Part I—guided inquiry-purification and characterization of a fusion protein: Histidine tag, malate dehydrogenase, and green fluorescent protein. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 38(5), 317–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20400
  • Knutson, K., Smith, J., Nichols, P., Wallert, M. A., & Provost, J. J. (2010b). Bringing the excitement and motivation of research to students; Using inquiry and research-based learning in a year-long biochemistry laboratory: Part II—research-based laboratory—a semester-long research approach using malate dehydrogenase as a research model. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 38(5), 324–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20401
  • Laungani, R., Tanner, C., Brooks, T. D., Clement, B., Clouse, M., Doyle, E., Dworak, S., Elder, B., Marley, K., & Schofield, B. (2018). Finding some good in an invasive species: Introduction and assessment of a novel CURE to improve experimental design in undergraduate biology classrooms. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i2.1517
  • Linn, M. C., Palmer, E., Baranger, A., Gerard, E., & Stone, E. (2015). Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities. Science, 347(6222). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261757
  • Lloyd, P. M., & Eckhardt, R. A. (2010). Strategies for improving retention of community college students in the sciences. Science Educator, 19(1), 33–41.
  • Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039
  • Luckie, D. B., Smith, J. J., Cheruvelil K. S., Fata-Hartley, C., Murphy C. A., & Urquhart G. R. (2013). The “anti-cookbook laboratory”: Converting “canned” introductory biology laboratories to multi-week independent investigations. Tested Studies for Laboratory Teaching (Proceedings of the Association for Biology Laboratory Education), 34, 196–213.
  • Maicas, S., Fouz, B., Figàs-Segura, À., Zueco, J., Rico, H., Navarro, A., Carbo, E., Segura-Garcia, J., & Biosca, E. G. (2020). Implementation of antibiotic discovery by student crowdsourcing in the Valencian community through a service learning strategy. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.564030
  • Osborn, J. M., & Karukstis, K. K. (2009). The benefits of undergraduate research, scholarship and creative activity. In M. Boyd & J. Wesemann (Eds.), Broadening participation in undergraduate research: Fostering excellence and enhancing the impact (pp. 41–53). Council on Undergraduate Research.
  • Richards, R., Powell, C., Hammack, J., McMullen, R., Bacnik, L., Lewis, R., & Sams, D. (2014). Mentoring undergraduate research. Georgia College Office of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activity. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271908543_Handbook_of_Mentoring_Undergraduate_Research
  • Rowland, S., Pedwell, R., Lawrie, G., Lovie-Toon, J., & Hung, Y. (2016). Do we need to design course-based undergraduate research experiences for authenticity? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-02-0102
  • Shortlidge, E. E., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). How to assess your CURE: A practical guide for instructors of course-based undergraduate research experiences. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 17(3), 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v17i3.1103
  • U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee. (2012). STEM education: Preparing for the jobs of the future. http://www.jec.senate.gov/public//index.cfm?a=Files.Serve&File_id=6aaa7e1f-9586-47be-82e7-326f47658320
  • Wayment, H. A., & Dickson, K. L. (2008). Increasing student participation in undergraduate research benefits students, faculty, and department. Teaching of Psychology, 35(3), 194–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280802189213
  • Wei, C. A., & Woodin, T. (2011). Undergraduate research experiences in biology: Alternatives to the apprenticeship model. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-03-0028
  • Wheeler, L. B., Clark, C. P., & Grisham, C. M. (2017). Transforming a traditional laboratory to an inquiry-based course: Importance of training TAs when redesigning a curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(8), 1019–1026. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00831
  • Wilson, A. E., Pollock, J. L., Billick, I., Domingo, C., Fernandez-Figueroa, E. G., Nagy, E. S., Steury, T., & Summers, A. (2018). Assessing science training programs: Structured undergraduate research programs make a difference. BioScience, 68(7), 529–534. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy052

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.