“Signs, Signs, Everywhere the Signs”: Interpretive Trail Signage for Biodiversity Education

References

• Adedokun, O. A., & Burgess, W. D. (2012). Analysis of paired dichotomous data: A gentle introduction to the McNemar test in SPSS. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 8(17), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v8i17.336
   Google Scholar
• Alves, R. N., Silva, V. N., Trovao, D., Oliveria, J. V., Mourao, J. S., Dias, T., Alves, A., Lucena, R., Barboza, R., Montenegro, P., Vieira, W., & Souto, W. (2014). Students’ attitudes toward and knowledge about snakes in the semiarid region of northeastern Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 10, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-10-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/content_files/VC_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ayotte-Beaudet, J., & Potvin, P. (2020). Factors related to students’ perception of learning during outdoor science lessons in schools’ immediate surroundings. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(2), Article e2212. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/7815
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., & Hughes, K. (2003). Measure twice, cut once: Developing a research-based interpretive signs checklist. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 19, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0814062600001439
   Google Scholar
• Barker, S., Slingsby, D., & Tilling, S. (2002). Teaching biology outside the classroom: Is it heading for extinction? Field Studies Council and British Ecological Society. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=21a060340b171a8e3de483e234c0b94fd42023a2
   Google Scholar
• Boews, K. E. (2013). Campus eco tours: An integrative and interactive field project for undergraduate biology students. American Biology Teacher, 75(5), 330–334. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2013.75.5.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowser, G., Gretzel, U., Davis, E. B., & Brown, M. A. (2014). Educating the future of sustainability. Sustainability, 6(2), 692–701. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6020692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke da Silva, K. (2014). Biological field work in higher education: Is the cost worth the effort? International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(2), 64–74.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, G. (1994). The role of outdoor education in education for the 21st century. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership, 11(2), 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Daempfle, P. A. (2003). An analysis of the high attrition rates among first-year college science, math, and engineering majors. Journal of College Student Retention, 5(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.2190/DWQT-TYA4-T20W-RCWH
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, K. (2016). Natural history: Restore our sense of species. Nature, 533, 172–174. https://doi.org/10.1038/533172a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerstam, E. (2013). High school teachers’ experience of the educational potential of outdoor teaching and learning. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 14(1), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2013.769887
   Google Scholar
• Fleischner, T. L., Espinoza, R. E., Gerrish, G. A., Greene, H. W., Kimmerer, R. W., Lacey, E. A., Pace, S., Parrish, J. K., Swain, H. M., Trombulak, S. C., Weisberg, S., Winkler, D. W., & Zander, L. (2017). Teaching biology in the field: Importance, challenges, and solutions. Bioscience, 67(6), 558–567. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glackin, M. (2016). ‘Risky fun’ or ‘authentic science’? How teachers’ beliefs influence their practice during a professional development programme on outdoor learning. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1145368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. W., Brewster, L., Buxcey, J., & Robinson, S. (2015). Interpretive by design: Engaging a community to create interpretive park signage. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 33(3), 48–61.
   Google Scholar
• Hirshi, D. G., & Screven, C. G. (1988). Effects of questions on visitor reading behavior. ILVS Review: A Journal of Visitor Behavior, 1(1), 50–61.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, M., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2002). Impact of trail-side interpretive signs on visitor knowledge. Journal of Ecotourism, 1(2), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724040208668119
   Google Scholar
• Jolley, A., Kennedy, B., Brogt, E., Hampton, S., & Fraser, L. (2018). Are we there yet? Sense of place and the student expedience on roadside and situated geology trips. Geosphere, 14(2), 651–667. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01484.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamen, E., & Leri, A. (2019). Promoting STEM persistence through an innovative field trip–based first-year experience course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(2), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst19_049_02_24
   Google Scholar
• Kuchel, L., Wilson, R. S., & Ellis, W. H. (2015). Cameras, competition and creativity: Assessing 1st-year ecology in the field. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 23(2), 34–45.
   Google Scholar
• Kunz, T., Braun de Torrex, E., Bauer, D., Lobova, T., & Fleming, T. H. (2011). Ecosystem services provided by bats. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06004.x
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. C., & Grace, M. (2010). Students’ reasoning processes in making decisions about an authentic, local socio-scientific issue: Bat conservation. Journal of Biological Education, 44(4), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2010.9656216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnis, P. (2014). Get your students outside with technology. Science Scope, 37, 58–64. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/ss14_037_07_58
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, M. B., & Brown, J. R. (2005). Visual learning for science and engineering. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 25(5), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2005.117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, N., O’Connell, K. B., McNulty, S., Berkowitz, A., Bowser, G., Giamellaro, M., & Miriti, M. N. (2020). Promoting inclusion in ecological field studies. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 101(4), e01742. https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1742
   Google Scholar
• Mutiara, M. M., Rachmawati, E., & Sunkar, A. (2021). Effectivity assessment of interpretive signs for biodiversity conservation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 739, 012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/739/1/012066
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, I., Herzog, S., Bath, C., & Fleisner, C. (2020). Contextualization of factual knowledge in genetics: A pre- and post- survey of undergraduates’ understanding of the nature of science. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(2), e2215. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/7816
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, L. T., Rodrigues, J. F. M., & Borges-Nojosa, D. M. (2016). Formal education, previous interaction and perception influence the attitudes of people towards the conservation of snakes in a large urban center of northeastern Brazil. Journal of Ethnobotany and Ethnomedicine, 12, Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0096-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler, C. (2008). Teaching species identification: A prerequisite for learning biodiversity and understanding ecology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 4(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75344
   Google Scholar
• Ratnayaka, H. H. (2017). An on-campus botanical tour to promote student satisfaction and learning in a university-level biodiversity or general biology course. Education Science, 7(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010018
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y, & Sanders, D. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. National Foundation for Educational Research and King’s College, London.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, G. W., & Goulder, R. (2016). Conflicting perceptions of the status of field biology and identification skills in the UK education. Journal of Biological Education, 50(3), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1202489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrell, B. (1996). Exhibit labels: An interpretive approach. Alta Mira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sponarski, C. C., Vaske, J. J., Bath, A. J., & Loeffler, T. A. (2016). Changing attitudes and emotions towards coyotes with experiential education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 47(4), 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2016.1158142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, D. A., McClure, C. J. W., Sutton, W. B., Rudolph, D. C., Pierce, J. B., Lee, J. R., Smith, L. L, Gregory, B. B., Baxley, D. L., Stevenson, D. J., & Guyer, C. (2014). Copperheads are common when kingsnakes are not: Relationships between the abundances of a predator and one of their prey. Herpetologica, 70(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1655/HERPETOLOGICA-D-13-00064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, W. B., Bolus, M. G., & Wang, Y. (2009). Lampropeltis getula nigra (Eastern Black Kingsnake). Ophiophagy. Herpetological Review, 40(2), 231.
   Google Scholar
• Svajda, J., & Cincera, J. (2017). Evaluation of the attention capture and holding power of interpretive signs among visitors to a nature trail in the High Tatras National Park (Slovakia). Envigogika, 12(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.549
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. S., & Butler, D. R. (2007). Geography student knowledge of bats and Austin bat colonies. Southwestern Geographer, 11, 231–243.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D., & Bitgood, S. (1988). The effects of sign length, letter size, and proximity on reading. In S. Bitgood, J. Roper Jr., & A. Benefield (Eds.), Visitor studies—1988: Theory, research and practice (pp. 101–112). Center for Social Design.
   Google Scholar
• Tripp, B., & Shortlidge, E. E. (2019). A framework to guide undergraduate education in interdisciplinary science. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-11-0226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, G. G., Reeder, D. M., & Coleman, J. T. H. (2011). A five-year assessment of mortality and geographic spread of white-nose syndrome in North American bats and a look to the future. Bat Research News, 52, 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Wandersee, J. H., & Clary, R. M. (2007). Learning on the trail: A content analysis of a university arboretum’s exemplary interpretive science signage system. American Biology Teacher, 69(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/4452076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigl, P. D. (2009). The natural history conundrum revisited: Mammalogy begins at home. Journal of Mammalogy, 90(2), 265–269. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30224474 https://doi.org/10.1644/08-MAMM-S-232.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zettler, J. A., Collier, A., Leidersdorf, B., & Sanou, M. P. (2010). Plants in your ants: Using ant mounds to test basic ecological principles. American Biology Teacher, 72(3), 173–176. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2010.72.3.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, H. T., & McClain, L. R. (2014). Exploring the outdoors together: Assessing family learning in environmental education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar